[sw-issues] [Issue 76796] Illogical behaviour of Con ditional Text Fields which are not being evalu ated

2007-06-06 Thread os
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76796


User os changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Ever confirmed|  |1

  Status|UNCONFIRMED   |NEW

Target milestone|---   |OOo Later





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun  6 11:39:07 + 
2007 ---
Set target to OOo Later

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[sw-issues] [Issue 76796] Illogical behaviour of Con ditional Text Fields which are not being evalu ated

2007-04-30 Thread helgekraak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76796





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 09:55:42 + 
2007 ---
Maybe I was wrong saying it should be the ELSE value. Probably the fields not
evaluating a dataset should be left empty generally.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[sw-issues] [Issue 76796] Illogical behaviour of Con ditional Text Fields which are not being evalu ated

2007-04-29 Thread helgekraak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76796
 Issue #|76796
 Summary|Illogical behaviour of Conditional Text Fields which a
|re not being evaluated
   Component|Word processor
 Version|680m210
Platform|All
 URL|
  OS/Version|All
  Status|UNCONFIRMED
   Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
  Resolution|
  Issue type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
 Assigned to|os
 Reported by|helgekraak





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 03:01:39 + 
2007 ---
Please have a look on the attached files.

In the Writer document you see a table with several conditional text fields in
rows which are divided by next dataset fields, so that the conditional
textfields of every row are assigned to a different dataset in the database.

The table has 10 rows for 10 datasets but the mailmerge only gets 7 datasets
from the database, so the conditional text fields in the lower 3 rows are not
being evaluated. 

In the rows I use these two conditions rotationally:
First:
IF
conditional_text_evaluation.abfrage_testtabelle.varchar_ignorecase NEQ 
THEN
filled
ELSE

Second:
IF
conditional_text_evaluation.abfrage_testtabelle.varchar_ignorecase EQ 
THEN

ELSE
filled

As you will see in the lower 3 rows of the resulting mailmerge document after
the execution of the mailmerge it always shows filled though one of the
conditions has the filled term as the THEN condition and the other has it as
ELSE condition.

I think that in case some of the conditional text fields don't retrieve a
dataset to evaluate from the database due an insufficient number of datasets,
always the ELSE condition should be used.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[sw-issues] [Issue 76796] Illogical behaviour of Con ditional Text Fields which are not being evalu ated

2007-04-29 Thread helgekraak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76796


User helgekraak changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

 Attachment data|  |Created an attachment (id=
|  |44767)
Please register wit
|  |h name conditional_text_e
|  |valuation






--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 03:03:13 + 
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44767)
Please register with name conditional_text_evaluation


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[sw-issues] [Issue 76796] Illogical behaviour of Con ditional Text Fields which are not being evalu ated

2007-04-29 Thread helgekraak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76796


User helgekraak changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

 Attachment data|  |Created an attachment (id=
|  |44768)
Mailmerge document






--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 03:03:44 + 
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44768)
Mailmerge document


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]