[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-04-07 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr  7 07:13:22 + 
2008 ---
*** Issue 84965 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-04-05 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|VERIFIED  |CLOSED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr  5 12:53:06 + 
2008 ---
closed

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-04-05 Thread jcb62281
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User jcb62281 changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  CC|'kendy,kz,rene'   |'jcb62281,kendy,kz,rene'





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr  5 18:34:30 + 
2008 ---
I think the given patch is suboptimal--it disables the visibilty feature
completely when the problem is certain to exist only with
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden; is there no way to use -fvisibility=hidden but not
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden?

I've made longer comments explaining what I think the cause of this is on Issue
84965.  In a nutshell: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden causes GCC to emit
relocations that shared objects on amd64 are not allowed to use.  This appears
to be an unavoidable consequence of what -fvisibility-inlines-hidden is intended
to do, and the only bug in GCC here is that it doesn't detect that
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden and -fPIC conflict on amd64 and give a more useful
error.  (In other words, trying to hide all evidence of inlines prevents truly
making position-independent code, which x86-64 shared objects are required to 
be.)

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-03-07 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

 Assigned to|cmc   |kendy





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar  7 11:18:43 + 
2008 ---
cmc-kendy: happy to verify this change on config_office in s390port01 ?

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-03-07 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User kendy changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|RESOLVED  |VERIFIED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar  7 14:32:20 + 
2008 ---
Works here, thanks! = VERIFIED

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-03-06 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

 Attachment is patch|  |Created an attachment (id=
|  |51933)
patch to fallback t
|  |o no visibility if it is b
|  |usted






--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar  6 12:35:35 + 
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51933)
patch to fallback to no visibility if it is busted


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-03-06 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|NEW   |STARTED

Target milestone|---   |OOo 3.0





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar  6 12:32:59 + 
2008 ---
Lets leave things as they are for 2.4 and turn off visibility if it fails some
tests in configure. 

Some experimentation on some other broken systems (e.g. s390) shows that their
linker can fail but exit with 0! requiring a more cunning test for brokenness.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-03-06 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|STARTED   |RESOLVED

  Resolution|  |FIXED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar  6 12:38:06 + 
2008 ---
done in s390port01

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-30 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 17:27:33 + 
2008 ---
I'd go with something like this:

http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/patches/src680/buildfix-x86-64-visibility-workaround.diff

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-24 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 24 12:22:37 + 
2008 ---
pjanik: Additionally, when using --without-system-stdlibs it will pack 
libgcc_s and libstdc++ in your install sets as well.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-23 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 23 08:30:23 + 
2008 ---
As against that I think --without-stlport should be the default on all platforms
except for ones where we are already locked into stlport with an established set
of binary extensions linked against the ure libs. 

--without-stlport has the advantage that for new ports that porters don't get
stuck on fixing stlport to build on their platform and making that even more of
an unmaintainable tree of confusion. It also makes the install set smaller, and
enables sharing at run-time of the standard c++ libraries that other apps e.g.
firefox on the desktop are using.

The reason for doing it as early as possible for x86_64 is to avoid the
prorogation of x86_64 binary add-ons locked to the stlport abi making it
difficult to change in the future. Builds linked against libstdc++ *should*
install and work anywhere, and actually we already are, e.g.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpms]$ ldd program/libuno_cppu.so.3 |grep stdc++
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x06936000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpms]$ ldd program/libuno_cppu.so.3 |grep stlport
libstlport_gcc.so = /usr/lib/openoffice.org/program/libstlport_gcc.so
(0x024a4000)

so we're already linked to the system libstdc++ even in the stlport case.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-22 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 22 23:12:10 + 
2008 ---
I think that on x86_64 as well as elsewhere (almost everywhere), --with-stlport 
should be turned on by 
default so builds produced by source build run everywhere...



-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-21 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 21 10:02:37 + 
2008 ---
[BTW, we are using 
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/patches/src680/buildfix-x86-64-visibility-workaround.diff
 
as the workaround; probably too hacky for up-streaming - it disables 
visibility for the broken headers on case-by-case basis.]

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-21 Thread kendy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 21 09:59:46 + 
2008 ---
cmc: For me, the broken compiler was 'g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20070115 (prerelease) 
(SUSE Linux)' on SLED10, but apparently Pavel has something similarly broken 
when the configure check bails out for him as well.

pjanik: The configure check was a consequence of issue 82715.  The compiler 
was OK so far exactly because --with-stlport used to be the default 
everywhere.  But we should really use system stl wherever possible, the less 
installations using stlport around the better [at least from my point of 
view ;-)].

Maybe we could change the configure so that it does not stop for the broken 
compilers, and instead it would not define -fvisibility-inlines-hidden in 
solenv/inc/unxlngx6.mk for those?

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-21 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User rene changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  CC|'kendy,kz'|'kendy,kz,rene'





-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-21 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 22 06:47:32 + 
2008 ---
JFYI: I build on these systems:

paveljanik:~ pavel$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /etc/SuSE-release; gcc -v
SUSE LINUX 10.0 (X86-64)
VERSION = 10.0
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr 
--with-local-prefix=/usr/local 
--infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 
--libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --
enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f95,java,ada --disable-checking --with-gxx-include-
dir=/usr/include/c++/4.0.2 --enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-libjava-multilib 
--with-slibdir=/lib64 
--with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit 
--without-system-libunwind --
host=x86_64-suse-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
paveljanik:~ pavel$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /etc/SuSE-release; gcc -v
openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64)
VERSION = 10.2
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr 
--with-local-prefix=/usr/local 
--infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 
--libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --
enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada --enable-checking=release 
--with-gxx-
include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.1.2 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp 
--disable-libgcj --with-
slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit 
--enable-libstdcxx-
allocator=new --program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs 
--without-system-
libunwind --with-cpu=generic --host=x86_64-suse-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
paveljanik:~ pavel$ 



-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-20 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User pjanik changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

Priority|P1|P2





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 20 19:43:39 + 
2008 ---
OK, but so late in the release cycle and when the compiler was OK so far?



-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-20 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  CC|'kz'  |'kendy,kz'





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 20 19:25:25 + 
2008 ---
Quite probably. The configure test was boiled out of a test-case failure that
kendy provided on some particular open suse version. Perhaps he can tell us what
opensuse gcc compiler versions are known bad, and which known good on x86_64.

FWIW I don't see this as a blocker, as it only affects x86_64 and I believe some
particular slightly broken compiler version.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-19 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398
 Issue #|85398
 Summary|mws_ooh680: Your gcc is not -fvisibility-inlines-hidde
|n safe. Try with --with-stlport
   Component|tools
 Version|680m242
Platform|All
 URL|
  OS/Version|All
  Status|NEW
   Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
  Resolution|
  Issue type|DEFECT
Priority|P1
Subcomponent|configure
 Assigned to|cmc
 Reported by|pjanik





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 19 20:26:10 + 
2008 ---
Hi,

my current build of mws_ooh680 (to-be-m4):

checking for STL providing headers... using system STL
checking if hash_map will be in __gnu_cxx namespace... yes
checking if STL headers are visibility safe... yes
checking if gcc is -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe with STL headers... no
configure: error: Your gcc is not -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with 
--with-stlport

Does this mean that we have to change the configure line so late in the 2.4 
release cycle?

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[tools-issues] [Issue 85398] mws_ooh680: Your gcc is no t -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe. Try with - -with-stlport

2008-01-19 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 19 20:31:01 + 
2008 ---
In addition to this, module cppuhelper warns on other unxlngx6 machine:

Making: ../unxlngx6.pro/slo/component_context.obj
ccache /usr//bin/g++  -Wreturn-type -fmessage-length=0 -c -O2 
-fno-strict-aliasing -
Wuninitialized   -I.  -I../unxlngx6.pro/inc/cppuhelper 
-I../unxlngx6.pro/inc/cppuhelper -
I../unxlngx6.pro/inc/private -I../inc -I../inc/pch -I../inc -I../unx/inc 
-I../unxlngx6.pro/inc -I. -
I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/inc/stl -
I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/inc/external -
I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/inc -
I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/solenv/unxlngx6/inc -
I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/solenv/inc 
-I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/res -
I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/solver/680/unxlngx6.pro/inc/stl -
I/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/opt/java/include -
I/opt/java/include/linux -I/opt/java/include/native_threads/include 
-I/usr/X11R6/include  -I. -
I../res -I. -pipe  -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -fno-use-cxa-atexit 
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -g -Wall -
Wextra -Wendif-labels -Wshadow -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor 
-Werror   -fpic -
DLINUX -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC341 -DX86_64 -DCVER=C341 -DNPTL -DGLIBC=2 -DX86_64 -
D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DNEW_SOLAR -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1 -DSTLPORT_VERSION=400 -
DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -D__DMAKE -DUNIX -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -
DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.0.2 -DSUPD=680 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -
DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DCUI -DSOLAR_JAVA -DOOH680=OOH680 
  -
DSHAREDLIB -D_DLL_   -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs -DEXCEPTIONS_ON  -o 
../unxlngx6.pro/slo/component_context.o 
/data/oo/BuildDir/ooo_OOH680_m4_src/cppuhelper/source/component_context.cxx 
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
../unxlngx6.pro/inc/cppuhelper/com/sun/star/uno/Exception.hpp:42: warning: 
'com::sun::star::uno::Exception::Exception()': visibility attribute ignored 
because it
../unxlngx6.pro/inc/cppuhelper/com/sun/star/uno/Exception.hdl:24: warning: 
conflicts with previous 
declaration here

and thus the build fails. Do I have to add the same configure switch there as 
well? Does this mean that 
system-stlport is unusable on openSUSE systems? ;-)



-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]