[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 17:10:04 + 2007 --- . - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 2.x |OOo 2.4 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 07:09:39 + 2007 --- @fs: I thought it goes without saying. :) No idea what test_di.cxx is, but I would imagine tests of the two functions with null and non-null arguments, added to cppu/qa (see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Binary/Modules/CPPU#Tests). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 07:52:51 + 2007 --- No idea what test_di.cxx is, http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Binary/Modules/CPPU#Tests SCNR test_di.cxx seems to contain a rudimentary test for UNO_QUERY_THROW. Okay, I will try to learn an unknown unit test framework and hope to finish this before the CWS comes back from QA :-\ Do you want me to create a new test case file? UNO_SET_THROW doesn't seem to fit into neither test_any.cxx nor test_unotype.cxx. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 08:01:10 + 2007 --- @fs: If there are already tests for Reference in another cppu test directory outside cppu/qa (probably using a unit test framework you are already familiar with), it is of course OK to add any new tests there. I only mentioned cppu/qa because it should be the canonical place to add any new tests (and, yes, those Reference tests should then go into a new file like test_reference.cxx). (The current mess of tests in the udk modules is definitely unfortunate, but due to historic circumstances and lack of energy to straighten it out completely. As I said, by default, new tests should go into qa sub-directories.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 08:28:47 + 2007 --- unit tests added to cppu/qa/test_reference.cxx. Given that the UNO_QUERY_THROW tests are very rudimentary, and use the deprecated test framework, I decided to create the UNO_SET_THROW tests in cppu/qa instead of cppu/tests. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 08:44:08 + 2007 --- verified - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 14 06:58:57 + 2007 --- @fs: If you tell me where the unit tests are... ;) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 14 20:02:13 + 2007 --- Sigh. You could have said you want to have this when you approved the patch, couldn't you? What kind of unit tests do you imagine for this kind of functionality? Something like checkInvalidInterfaceQuery in test_di.cxx? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|fs|sb --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 13 19:41:32 + 2007 --- fs- sb: please verify in CWS basmgr03 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 29 19:40:19 + 2007 --- committed to CWS basmgr03 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|sb|fs --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 08:30:22 + 2007 --- @fs: Is this correct? Yes, it is, see http://udk.openoffice.org/common/man/libraryversioning.html. Not looking at the third patch, I trust you that it is good now. :) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|sb|fs
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 06:59:13 +
2007 ---
1 @since tags missing (see
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/UNO_%40since_Tags).
2 Is
template class interface_type
inline Reference interface_type ::Reference( const Reference interface_type
rRef, ...
instead of
template class interface_type
inline Reference interface_type ::Reference const Reference rRef, ...
working on all relevant compilers?
3 Please add an explicit comment
UDK_3.3 { # OOo 2.4
in util/cppu.map.
4 Tab problems (e.g., in the definition of iset_throw).
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |47096) better patch :-\ --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 06:15:34 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=47096) better patch :-\ - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 07:01:17 + 2007 --- Ignore 2 above (the existing code already has constructs like that). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |47097) patch, Mk III --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 07:55:40 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=47097) patch, Mk III - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|fs|sb --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 07:57:43 + 2007 --- new patch: - added since tag (it's confusing to have UDK 3.2.8 in @since, but UDK_3.3 in cppu.map. Is this correct?) - untabified new code (though this is inconsistent with the existing code, then :) - added comment in map file - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |STARTED Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.x --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 08:44:55 + 2007 --- okay, will commit to CWS basmgr03 then. Thanks a lot. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 20:13:32 + 2007 --- fs-sb: please review. I would like to commit this to a current CWS of mine, if you don't object. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |47093) patch --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 20:12:55 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=47093) patch - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 80044] let an UNO_SET_THROW compl ement the existing UNO_QUERY_THROW
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80044 Issue #|80044 Summary|let an UNO_SET_THROW complement the existing UNO_QUERY |_THROW Component|udk Version|current Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|PATCH Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|sb Reported by|fs --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 20:12:16 + 2007 --- The attached patch implements what has been proposed in http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=interface-discussmsgNo=703, and discussed in the respective thread (http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=interface-discussby=threadfrom=1501923 - this display is incomplete, since some of the posters use broken mail-news-gateways). That is, it implements a UNO_SET_THROW for the css.uno.Reference template, which allows constructs such as Reference XFoo xFoo( xFooSupplier-getFoo(), UNO_SET_THROW ); resp. xFoo.set( xFooSupplier-getFoo(), UNO_SET_THROW ); - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
