[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 User mba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Component|utilities |api QA contact|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 07:41:41 + 2007 --- bean belongs to the API project - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 Issue #|80023 Summary|bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h Component|utilities Version|680m221 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|PATCH Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|mh Reported by|pmladek --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 11:21:32 + 2007 --- I had problems to compile the bean module with IMB Java on ppc: IBM Java version: --- cut --- $ java -version java version 1.5.0 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build pxp32dev-20070511(SR5)) IBM J9 VM (build 2.3, J2RE 1.5.0 IBM J9 2.3 Linux ppc-32 j9vmxp3223-20070426 (JIT enabled) J9VM - 20070420_12448_bHdSMR JIT - 20070419_1806_r8 GC - 200704_19) JCL - 20070511 --- cut --- I has got the following error message: --- cut --- In file included from com_sun_star_beans_LocalOfficeWindow.c:41: /usr/lib/jvm/java/include/jawt.h:302: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '_ _attribute__' before 'jboolean' dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxlngppc.pro/slo/com_sun_star_beans_L ocalOfficeWindow.obj' ---* tg_merge.mk *--- ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build-src68 0-m221/build/src680-m221/bean/native/unix --- cut --- Here is the snippet from jawt.h: --- cut --- _JNI_IMPORT_OR_EXPORT_ jboolean JNICALL JAWT_GetAWT(JNIEnv* env, JAWT* awt); --- cut --- The problem is that _JNI_IMPORT_OR_EXPORT_ is defined in jawt_md.h and com_sun_star_beans_LocalOfficeWindow.c includes it after jawt.h Yeah, it looks like a bug in the IBM Java. On the other hand, the jawt.h includes a sample code where only jawt_md.h is included. I have found this sample even in Sun JDK. I have checked gcj, Sun JDK and IBM JDK. It seems that jawt_md.h includes the other two: jawt.h and jni.h in all three implemtations. So, it should be enough to include just the jawt_md.h. I'll attach the proposed patch. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |47077) Proposed change. --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 11:22:37 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=47077) Proposed change. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 16:21:49 + 2007 --- ericb-pmladeck FYI, no problem building m221 with IBM dk1.4.2, on Linux PowerPC - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[util-issues] [Issue 80023] bean: jawt_md.h should be included before jawt.h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80023 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 25 20:41:52 + 2007 --- pmladek-ericb I believe you. I think that there is a bug in the IBM JDK 1.5.0. Anyway, I think the includes in OOo are unnecessary complex. We could change the order of jawt_md.h and jawt.h at least. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
