Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Hi Vijay, I can also provide another review for performance-metrics. I see there have been already two reviewers. Do we still need one more? Thanks, Jensen On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:53 PM Vijay Gurbani wrote: > Dear Danny: Excellent, and thank you for your time on this. > > We still need one more reviewer for performance-metrics and two for > path-vector. > > All: Please step up. > > Thank you. > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:32 AM Danny Alex Lachos Perez < > dlachos...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Jan & Vijay >> >> I will review the Performance Metrics document. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Danny Lachos >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jan Seedorf wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward >>> with all the remaining milestones. >>> >>> Thus, this email starts a WGLC for >>> draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, so >>> from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. >>> >>> We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part of >>> the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the draft as >>> part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. >>> >>> - Vijay and Jan >>> >>> ___ >>> alto mailing list >>> alto@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >>> >> ___ >> alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > ___ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Hi Vijay, I can also review the performance metrics document. Best, Kai -Original Messages- From:"Vijay Gurbani" Sent Time:2020-09-30 02:53:35 (Wednesday) To: "Danny Alex Lachos Perez" Cc: "IETF ALTO" Subject: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12 Dear Danny: Excellent, and thank you for your time on this. We still need one more reviewer for performance-metrics and two for path-vector. All: Please step up. Thank you. On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:32 AM Danny Alex Lachos Perez wrote: Hello Jan & Vijay I will review the Performance Metrics document. Best regards, Danny Lachos On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jan Seedorf wrote: Dear all, as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward with all the remaining milestones. Thus, this email starts a WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, so from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part of the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the draft as part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. - Vijay and Jan ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Dear Danny: Excellent, and thank you for your time on this. We still need one more reviewer for performance-metrics and two for path-vector. All: Please step up. Thank you. On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:32 AM Danny Alex Lachos Perez < dlachos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jan & Vijay > > I will review the Performance Metrics document. > > Best regards, > > Danny Lachos > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jan Seedorf wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward >> with all the remaining milestones. >> >> Thus, this email starts a WGLC for >> draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, so >> from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. >> >> We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part of >> the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the draft as >> part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. >> >> - Vijay and Jan >> >> ___ >> alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > ___ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] Interested in reviewing unified-props? And other drafts as well
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:48 AM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO < luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com> wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > > > My apologies for my lack of responsiveness, I have had a number of > subsequent events impeding me to concentrate on this. > > > > My answer is yes, and I take October 9th as hard deadline for providing > my review. Is that correct? > > Dear Luis: Thank you for getting back to me with an affirmative response. Yes, Oct 9 is the hard deadline. I appreciate your time and attention to moving this work forward. Ciao, - vijay ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Hello Jan & Vijay I will review the Performance Metrics document. Best regards, Danny Lachos On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jan Seedorf wrote: > Dear all, > > as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward > with all the remaining milestones. > > Thus, this email starts a WGLC for > draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, so > from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. > > We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part of > the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the draft as > part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. > > - Vijay and Jan > > ___ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
