Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
Dear Jensen: Thank you, this is excellent information. You don't have to hurry up your release schedule due to my query. I just want to document the implementations that are in the path of progress, or have been implemented (even on older releases of the I-Ds). Also, thanks to Richard, Sabine, Wendy for getting back to me on implementations as well. I think I have all I need for the shepherd writeups. Cheers, - vijay On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:18 PM Jensen Zhang wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > Sorry for my late reply. > > I want to mention that Kai and I are implementing the latest version of > these three documents. The implementation will be open-source on GitHub > [1]. But it is still in progress. We may have a release by the next IETF. > > As Richard mentioned, we have an implementation for a very early version > of the path vector document [2]. It is only for OpenFlow-based networks. > And we didn't integrate unified properties. > > I remember Danny also has an implementation of the unified properties > document. > > [1] https://github.com/openalto/sextant > [2] https://github.com/openalto/mercator-setup > > Best, > Jensen > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:30 AM Wendy Roome wrote: > >> Vijay, >> >> >> >> My server did support PID properties and allowed endpoints to inherit >> them, and had a “get-all-props” extension. >> >> >> >> But it didn’t implement the current version. >> >> >> >>- Wendy >> >> >> >> *From: *alto on behalf of "Y. Richard Yang" < >> y...@cs.yale.edu> >> *Date: *Thu, November 12, 2020 at 12:58 >> *To: *"Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" < >> sabine.randriam...@nokia-bell-labs.com> >> *Cc: *IETF ALTO >> *Subject: *Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, >> path-vector >> >> >> >> Hi Vijay, >> >> >> >> - I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by >> Wendy Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we >> just posted. >> >> >> >> - I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in >> super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path >> vector without the integration of unified properties. >> >> >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - >> FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: >> >> Hi Vijay, >> >> >> >> To my knowledge, >> >> >> >> - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the >> latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, >> >> - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Sabine >> >> >> >> *From:* alto *On Behalf Of *Vijay Gurbani >> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM >> *To:* IETF ALTO >> *Subject:* [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, >> path-vector >> >> >> >> All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. >> >> >> >> As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are >> any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware >> of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the >> drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. >> >> >> >> If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please >> drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. >> I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- >> preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd >> writeup. >> >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> - vijay >> >> ___ >> alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> >> -- >> >> Richard >> >> ___ alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> ___ >> alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > ___ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
Hi Vijay, Sorry for my late reply. I want to mention that Kai and I are implementing the latest version of these three documents. The implementation will be open-source on GitHub [1]. But it is still in progress. We may have a release by the next IETF. As Richard mentioned, we have an implementation for a very early version of the path vector document [2]. It is only for OpenFlow-based networks. And we didn't integrate unified properties. I remember Danny also has an implementation of the unified properties document. [1] https://github.com/openalto/sextant [2] https://github.com/openalto/mercator-setup Best, Jensen On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:30 AM Wendy Roome wrote: > Vijay, > > > > My server did support PID properties and allowed endpoints to inherit > them, and had a “get-all-props” extension. > > > > But it didn’t implement the current version. > > > >- Wendy > > > > *From: *alto on behalf of "Y. Richard Yang" < > y...@cs.yale.edu> > *Date: *Thu, November 12, 2020 at 12:58 > *To: *"Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" < > sabine.randriam...@nokia-bell-labs.com> > *Cc: *IETF ALTO > *Subject: *Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, > path-vector > > > > Hi Vijay, > > > > - I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by > Wendy Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we > just posted. > > > > - I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in > super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path > vector without the integration of unified properties. > > > > Richard > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - > FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: > > Hi Vijay, > > > > To my knowledge, > > > > - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the > latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, > > - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. > > > > Best regards, > > Sabine > > > > *From:* alto *On Behalf Of *Vijay Gurbani > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM > *To:* IETF ALTO > *Subject:* [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, > path-vector > > > > All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. > > > > As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are > any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware > of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the > drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. > > > > If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please > drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. > I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- > preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd > writeup. > > > > Thank you. > > > > - vijay > > ___ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > > -- > > Richard > > ___ alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > ___ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
Vijay, My server did support PID properties and allowed endpoints to inherit them, and had a “get-all-props” extension. But it didn’t implement the current version. Wendy From: alto on behalf of "Y. Richard Yang" Date: Thu, November 12, 2020 at 12:58 To: "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" Cc: IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector Hi Vijay, - I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by Wendy Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we just posted. - I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path vector without the integration of unified properties. Richard On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: Hi Vijay, To my knowledge, - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. Best regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM To: IETF ALTO Subject: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd writeup. Thank you. - vijay ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto -- Richard ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
Hi Vijay, - I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by Wendy Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we just posted. - I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path vector without the integration of unified properties. Richard On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > > > To my knowledge, > > > > - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the > latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, > > - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. > > > > Best regards, > > Sabine > > > > *From:* alto *On Behalf Of *Vijay Gurbani > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM > *To:* IETF ALTO > *Subject:* [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, > path-vector > > > > All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. > > > > As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are > any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware > of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the > drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. > > > > If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please > drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. > I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- > preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd > writeup. > > > > Thank you. > > > > - vijay > ___ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > -- Richard ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
Hi Vijay, To my knowledge, - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. Best regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM To: IETF ALTO Subject: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd writeup. Thank you. - vijay ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
[alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd writeup. Thank you. - vijay ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
