Re: amrecover unable to connect to remote client

2002-08-17 Thread Frank Smith

You need amandaidx and amidxtape entries on the server in order
to restore. Note that they are 'stream tcp nowait' services as
opposed to the 'dgram udp wait' used for the amanda entry.  All
the clients need is the single amanda entry.
   You also need an entry in .amandahosts on the server of the form
client.domain.com   root
in order to allow root on the client to connect to the server and
restore files.

Frank


--On Sunday, August 18, 2002 05:16:44 +0100 Mark Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have just tried to restore some files from my tape server to my client
> and keep getting connection refused ( I ended up restoring them to the
> tape server at a tmp location and then using scp to get them to the
> client)
> 
> Am I correct in thinking that to restore to clients you have to have
> amandaidx as well as amanda in /etc/xinetd.d in the clients xinetd.d
> directory ? (thus using RH, you have to install amanda-server rpm as
> well)
> 
> as I have specified in both .amandahosts that root can connect (just in
> case)
> 
> cheers
> 
> Mark
>  
> -- 
> ---
> To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism;
> to steal from many is research.



--
Frank Smith[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator Voice: 512-374-4673
Hoover's Online Fax: 512-374-4501



amrecover unable to connect to remote client

2002-08-17 Thread Mark Cooke

Hi,

I have just tried to restore some files from my tape server to my client
and keep getting connection refused ( I ended up restoring them to the
tape server at a tmp location and then using scp to get them to the
client)

Am I correct in thinking that to restore to clients you have to have
amandaidx as well as amanda in /etc/xinetd.d in the clients xinetd.d
directory ? (thus using RH, you have to install amanda-server rpm as
well)

as I have specified in both .amandahosts that root can connect (just in
case)

cheers

Mark
 
-- 
---
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism;
to steal from many is research.




Re: Tapetype for Onstream SC50

2002-08-17 Thread Gene Heskett

On Saturday 17 August 2002 20:27, Tanniel Simonian wrote:
>I spent about 10 hours running tapetype for an Onstream SC50, and
> only to lose the information to a power surge.
>
>Can anyone give me the tapetype of an Onstream SC50?
>
>If not, then I will run tapetype again, and put down the
> information for everyone's else benefit.
>
>Just wish it didn't take forever.

It has to fill the tape up twice in two different formats in order 
to determine the capacity, and unforch, there isn't any magic 
speedup button for that.

Be aware that the OnStream drives of the 30 and 50 gig sizes have 
been the cause of a goodly amount to troubles as reported on this 
list.  There appears to be some incompatibility when attempting to 
recover.  I've never dealt with either, but many here have, usually 
with less than stellar results.

Maybe someone who has made one of them work as advertised can come 
forward with their "magic twanger" story and relate how its done.  
Oh, oh...  The "Magic Twanger" phrase dates me as being pretty 
ancient. :-)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.12% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly



Tapetype for Onstream SC50

2002-08-17 Thread Tanniel Simonian

I spent about 10 hours running tapetype for an Onstream SC50, and only to
lose the information to a power surge.

Can anyone give me the tapetype of an Onstream SC50?

If not, then I will run tapetype again, and put down the information for
everyone's else benefit.

Just wish it didn't take forever.