Re: chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4 problem

2002-10-29 Thread John Koenig
At 1:09 PM -0600 10/29/02, Paul T. Root wrote:

Hi,
	I have a problem with the zd-mtx script. I traced it down
to the point in the script where it decides it needs to run the
cleaning tape. Line 968 or so:




I do not have a useful answer. Instead, another question.
This cleaning stuff is new to my radar screen...

Is the "chg-zd-mtx" changer module that exists between AMANDA and the 
MTX program supposed to determine when a cleaning occurs? (or any 
changer module for that matter?)





Re: disk offline

2002-10-29 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 3:20pm, Chad Morland wrote

> Error from sendsize*debug:
> runtar: error [must be invoked by operator]
> 
> However, amanda is in my operator group.
> torbackup# id amanda
> uid=1000(amanda) gid=1000(amanda) groups=1000(amanda), 5(operator)

Are you using inetd or xinetd?  If it's xinetd, you need "groups = yes" in 
your amanda service file to pick up secondary groups.

When you configured and compiled amanda, what USER and GROUP did you 
define?  You did 'make install' as root, right?

> And the from amandad*.debug:
> 
> (Environment variables cut out)
> Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 000-00360708 SEQ 1035907903
> SECURITY USER amanda
> SERVICE noop
> OPTIONS features=feff9f00;
> 
> 
> sending nack:
> 
> Amanda 2.4 NAK HANDLE 000-00360708 SEQ 1035907903
> ERROR unknown service: noop

This is a result of running 2.4.3 on the server but not on this client (I 
think).  It's not a problem in itself.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University




Re: disk offline

2002-10-29 Thread Chad Morland
Error from sendsize*debug:
runtar: error [must be invoked by operator]

However, amanda is in my operator group.
torbackup# id amanda
uid=1000(amanda) gid=1000(amanda) groups=1000(amanda), 5(operator)

And the from amandad*.debug:

(Environment variables cut out)
Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 000-00360708 SEQ 1035907903
SECURITY USER amanda
SERVICE noop
OPTIONS features=feff9f00;


sending nack:

Amanda 2.4 NAK HANDLE 000-00360708 SEQ 1035907903
ERROR unknown service: noop


-CM
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Baker-LePain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chad Morland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: disk offline


> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 2:39pm, Chad Morland wrote
>
> > backup. /backup lev 0 FAILED [disk /backup offline on
> > backup.domain.com?] (I have also tried using the device
> > [/dev/vinum/striped])
> >
> *snip*
> >
> > My backup partition is a 430G striped vinum partition on FreeBSD. I
have
> > followed everything that is in the FAQ on this subject but nothing
seems
> > to be solving it. Anyone have any ideas on how to solve this?
>
> What's in /tmp/amandad*debug and /tmp/sendsize*debug on backup?  Can
you
> access the device *as the amanda user*?
>
> --
> Joshua Baker-LePain
> Department of Biomedical Engineering
> Duke University
>
>




Re: disk offline

2002-10-29 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 2:39pm, Chad Morland wrote

> backup. /backup lev 0 FAILED [disk /backup offline on
> backup.domain.com?] (I have also tried using the device
> [/dev/vinum/striped])
> 
*snip*
> 
> My backup partition is a 430G striped vinum partition on FreeBSD. I have
> followed everything that is in the FAQ on this subject but nothing seems
> to be solving it. Anyone have any ideas on how to solve this?

What's in /tmp/amandad*debug and /tmp/sendsize*debug on backup?  Can you 
access the device *as the amanda user*?

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University




disk offline

2002-10-29 Thread Chad Morland
I am having some problems getting amanda to run. I have used amanda
before and this is the first time that I have encountered this problem.
I followed the instuctions from the backup and recovery chapter and
amcheck is not reporting any problems. However, when I run amdump I get
the following sent to me in the report about 30 seconds after running
the command:

backup. /backup lev 0 FAILED [disk /backup offline on
backup.domain.com?] (I have also tried using the device
[/dev/vinum/striped])

and further down:

NOTES:
  planner: Adding new disk torbackup.inquent.com:/backup.
  driver: WARNING: got empty schedule from planner
  taper: tape DailySet11 kb 0 fm 0 [OK]

My backup partition is a 430G striped vinum partition on FreeBSD. I have
followed everything that is in the FAQ on this subject but nothing seems
to be solving it. Anyone have any ideas on how to solve this?







-CM




Amanda 2.4.3b4 chio changer problems

2002-10-29 Thread Paul T. Root
Since upgrading from 2.4.2p1 to 2.4.3b3 and 2.4.3b4 I get this
problem. The changer does do the change, but I guess the script
doesn't wait to check. So as long as I know that I'm not on the
last tape, I ignore it. But I'd rather it work.

You know, I'm wondering if maybe this wasn't an OS upgrade.
I'm running FreeBSD 4.7-Stable. But this was happening in
4.6-Stable for a while too.

Any ideas?

Paul.


Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk /amanda/hold: 4659412 KB disk space available, that's plenty
amcheck-server: slot 1: date 20021029 label IACES22 (active tape)
amcheck-server: fatal slot chio:: /dev/ch0: CHIOMOVE: Invalid argument
ERROR: label IACES23 or new tape not found in rack
   (expecting tape IACES23 or a new tape)
NOTE: skipping tape-writable test
Server check took 72.793 seconds

Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check

Client check: 4 hosts checked in 1.587 seconds, 0 problems found

(brought to you by Amanda 2.4.3b4)




chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4 problem

2002-10-29 Thread Paul T. Root
Hi,
	I have a problem with the zd-mtx script. I traced it down
to the point in the script where it decides it needs to run the
cleaning tape. Line 968 or so:

  if [ $autoclean -ne 0 -a $accesscount -gt $autocleancount ]
  then
  internal_call=`expr $internal_call + 1`
  loadslot clean > /dev/null 2>&1
  status=$?
  internal_call=`expr $internal_call - 1`

The changer was in slot 8 of 10. The cleaning tape is in slot 1.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Paul.



Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk /amanda/hold: 12242301 KB disk space available, that's plenty
amcheck-server: slot 8: date 20021029 label Aces46 (active tape)
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
amcheck-server: slot /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx-2.4.3b4:: loadslot: 
not found
ERROR: label Aces47 or new tape not found in rack
   (expecting tape Aces47 or a new tape)
NOTE: skipping tape-writable test
Server check took 139.449 seconds

Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check

Client check: 11 hosts checked in 2.540 seconds, 0 problems found

(brought to you by Amanda 2.4.3b4)



--
Paul T. Root			CCSA, CCSE, CCNA
Qwest Communications		PAG: +1 (877) 693-7155
600 Stinson Blvd, Flr 1S	WRK: +1 (612) 664-3385
Minneapolis, MN  55413		FAX: +1 (612) 664-4778



Forcing write to tape (or cleaning up tapelist)?

2002-10-29 Thread Charlie Bebber
I guess during the initial tape cycle, the tapes got run in the wrong
order.  Specifically, we have a tape, sb-prod07, that was in the wrong
slot and now every subsequent cycle expects that tape to be the next in
sequence.

How can I straighten this out?  The more I look into it, the more
disorganised it appears.  For example, here's my
/etc/amanda/DailySet1/tapelist:

20021018 sb-prod18 reuse
20021016 sb-prod16 reuse
20021014 sb-prod14 reuse
20021013 sb-prod13 reuse
20021012 sb-prod12 reuse
20021011 sb-prod11 reuse
20021010 sb-prod10 reuse
20021009 sb-prod09 reuse
20021006 sb-prod06 reuse
20021005 sb-prod05 reuse
20021004 sb-prod04 reuse
20021003 sb-prod03 reuse
20021002 sb-prod02 reuse
20021001 sb-prod01 reuse
20020929 sb-prod27 reuse
20020928 sb-prod26 reuse
20020927 sb-prod25 reuse
20020926 sb-prod24 reuse
20020925 sb-prod23 reuse
20020924 sb-prod22 reuse
20020923 sb-prod21 reuse
20020922 sb-prod20 reuse
20020921 sb-prod19 reuse
20020920 sb-prod17 reuse
20020919 sb-prod28 reuse
20020918 sb-prod15 reuse
20020910 sb-prod08 reuse
20020909 sb-prod07 reuse

I've got 28 tapes that I'd like to cycle through, but when they're out
of order like this, it fails every night as it expects the wrong tape to
be loaded.

At any rate, I'd _really_ appreciate any tips on how to get this all
cleaned up.

Thanks in advance,

-Charlie





Re: New file tape type for backup to disk.

2002-10-29 Thread Niall O Broin
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:29:32AM -0500, Brian Kennedy wrote:

> I've got the backups running smoothly, some scripts to change "tapes" 
> (move symlinks) but I cant get a recover to work.  

OK - a little background on my setup so that later becomes clear - I have a
partition /backup on a server called backup. In /backup I have created my
"tapes" and I backup to backup:/backup/tape where tape is a symlink to the
appropriate "tape" (I've a notion that a more 'elegant' olsution to this
whole kludge would be a hacked mtx of some sort, but I digress)

> amrecover conf
>  .. select some files and extract..
> Restore files into..
> continue?  Y
> Load tape ...
> continue?  Y
> and then:
> amrecover: error reading tape: Connection reset by peer
> extract_list - child returned non-zero status: 1
> 
> any clues as to what is wrong?

I think amanda doesn't know where it should be looking - below an extract
from our local operations manual:



At this point using physical tapes, it's time to load the desired tape. But
because we are using amanda's ability to use virtual tapes on disk, rather
than loading a tape we must tell amanda where the "tape" is. The 't' option
at this prompt allows us to do so

Continue [?/Y/n/t]? t
New tape device [?]: backup:file:/backup/TIZdaily04
  
Here we've told amanda where the "tape" is. The syntax is as in the example
above backup:file:/backup/ followed by the tape name.



Now here's the bit that ISN'T in our operations manual - you can't tell
amanda to use a tape called  file:/backup/store  because then it tries to
use a host called file. I'm presuming your store is a symlink analogous to
my tape ?  I start amrecover like this (my configuration is TIZ)

amrecover TIZ -s backup -t backup

and I don't even bother specifying a tape device.

I have moaned about this already, and the problem is essentially the
overloading of :  . As it's an eminently workaroundable :-) problem, I don't
suppose there's a huge incentive to fix it.




Kindest regards,




Niall  O Broin



Re: a few backups in to one tape

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:23:05PM +0300, Lishtovny Denis wrote:
> Everyday amanda2.4 doing backup into one tape. (one day, one tape).
> Is it possible to do two or more backups into one tape? (14*2=28 Gb) (two
> days, one tape).
> If it is possible, please tell me how.

Short answer:  No.

Detailed answer:  No.  Between backups, amanda does not have control of
the tape drive.  If something else rewinds it, you would be overwriting
your old backup with the new one, which would be Very Bad.

Accurate answer:  Amanda does not support this, but you could allocate a
large holding disk and then 'forget' to switch tapes every night, causing
the backups to stay on the holding disk.  When the holding disk fills up
to your satisfaction, switch tapes and manually run amflush.  Personally,
I find this to be too much of a hassle to do intentionally, but amflush
is the only way to get amanda to put multiple runs on one tape.




Re: Performance degrading over time?

2002-10-29 Thread Frank Smith


--On Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:43:30 +0100 "Patrick M. Hausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


As you can see from April up until August the dumpsize increased
about 1.5 fold while the dump _time_ increased by a factor of
about 2.5. Dump rate dropped from 7.5 K/s to 4.6 K/s.

From August until now the dump size increased by about 10%
while dump time continues to grow dramatically.

I'll look into the "lots of small files added?" question.


Since your dumper and taper times are always nearly identical you probably
aren't using a holding disk and are dumping directly to tape.  And since
the rates for one filesystem have remained constant while the other one has
dropped I would look into possible recent changes on the larger (slower)
filesystem. Try doing a dump to /dev/null and see how fast (or slow) that is.
If data isn't fed to the tape fast enough the tape drive has to stop and
reposition itself every time it runs out of data, which will slow it down
considerably.

Frank



Thanks,
Patrick
---
5. April 2002 15:29

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:54   1:53   0:00   (0:01 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   48155.548155.50.0
Original Size (meg) 48155.548155.50.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Tape Used (%)  24.1   24.10.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7284.9 7284.9--
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7282.8 7282.8--

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1199200  1199200   -- 6:27 3100.76:28 3089.9
allianz01 c1t0d0s6   0 48112064 48112064   --   106:22 7538.5  106:23 7537.7

1. Mai 2002 01:25

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:51   1:49   0:00   (0:02 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   49187.349187.30.0
Original Size (meg) 49187.349187.30.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Tape Used (%)  24.6   24.60.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7700.0 7700.0--
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7698.5 7698.5--

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1201184  1201184   -- 5:50 3427.75:52 3416.7
allianz01 c1t0d0s6   0 49166592 49166592   --   103:11 7941.9  103:11 7941.6

1. Juni 2002 01:26

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:53   1:51   0:00   (0:02 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   50107.250107.20.0
Original Size (meg) 50107.250107.20.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Tape Used (%)  25.1   25.10.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7674.4 7674.4--
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7672.9 7672.9--

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1202656  1202656   -- 5:45 3487.65:46 3476.1
allianz01 c1t0d0s6   0 50107072 50107072   --   105:41 7902.1  105:41 7901.9

1. Juli 2002 01:30

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:58   1:56   0:00   (0:02 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   51813.251813.20.0
Original Size (meg) 51813.251813.20.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Tape Used (%)  25.9   25.90.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7640.7 7640.7--
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7639.2 7639.2--

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1634400  1634400   -- 6:50 3985.36:51 

New file tape type for backup to disk.

2002-10-29 Thread Brian Kennedy
I'm trying this sucker out planning to make use of it for a couple 
satalite offices, but having some trouble.

I've got the backups running smoothly, some scripts to change "tapes" 
(move symlinks) but I cant get a recover to work.  

amrecover conf
 .. select some files and extract..
Restore files into..
continue?  Y
Load tape ...
continue?  Y
and then:
amrecover: error reading tape: Connection reset by peer
extract_list - child returned non-zero status: 1

from the amrecover.*.debug:

amrecover: stream_client_privileged: connected to 10.12.0.2.10083
amrecover: stream_client_privileged: our side is 0.0.0.0.719
amrecover: try_socksize: receive buffer size is 65536
Started amidxtaped with arguments "6 -h -p file:/backup/store ^ns$ ^//haff/mydoc$ 20021029"
amrecover: error reading tape: Connection reset by peer
amrecover: pid 32699 finish time Tue Oct 29 10:11:25 2002
amrecover: pid 32690 finish time Tue Oct 29 10:12:21 2002


any clues as to what is wrong?

Thanks...
...Brian



a few backups in to one tape

2002-10-29 Thread Lishtovny Denis
Hello All.
My backup data is ~14 Gb
I have 6 tapes in backup device per 40 Gb each.
Everyday amanda2.4 doing backup into one tape. (one day, one tape).
Is it possible to do two or more backups into one tape? (14*2=28 Gb) (two
days, one tape).
If it is possible, please tell me how.
Thanks.
Sorry for my bad english.







Re: tru64 5.1 & 2.4.2p2

2002-10-29 Thread Jeremy Heslop
Toby,

I have a few Tru64 5.1 alphas and I got the same error when using amanda 
2.4.2p2. I fixed it by commenting out the ruserok line in 
common-src/amanda.h.

#ifndef HAVE_RUSEROK_DECL
//extern int ruserok P((const char *rhost, int suser,
//const char *ruser, const char *luser));
#endif

It then compiled fine without any problems and we have been backing up 
these machines since the've been upgraded to 5.1. Hope this helps,

Jeremy

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amanda 2.4.2p2 on tru64 5.1 - make stops on error:


cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../config -I./../regex-src-g   -c alloc.c
cc: Warning: amanda.h, line 946: In this declaration, parameter 1 has a 
different type than specified in an earlier declaration of this function. 
(mismatparam)
extern int ruserok P((const char *rhost, int suser,
---^
cc: Error: amanda.h, line 946: In this declaration, the type of "ruserok" 
is not compatible with the type of a previous declaration of "ruserok" at 
line number 705 in file /usr/include/unistd.h. (notcompat)
extern int ruserok P((const char *rhost, int suser,
---^
*** Exit 1
Stop.
*** Exit 1
Stop.


Found a message in the archives that points to 
ftp://gandalf.cc.purdue.edu/pub/amanda/configure.jfkoenig as a possible 
solution, but ftp on gandalf.cc.purdue.edu does not seem to be up.

Would that file help me? Does anyone have a copy to send me?


Thanks


--
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, mr development, cleveland, ohio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
440-483-5323

--
-
Jeremy Heslop
Unix System Administrator
Horn Point Laboratory
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Office - 410-221-8241  Fax - 410-221-8490
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: compression

2002-10-29 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:41:57PM +1100, Craig Dewick wrote:
> Hey there Joseph!
> 
> It's good to see a familiar name here on the list...
> 
> > I would like to know where and what do I insert into the amanda.conf for
> > allow tape compression to work.
> >
> > the tape unit is a hp1537A in a six stacker based unit.
> 
> Can it be done with jumers on the drive, or by DIP switches in the
> autochanger's electronics? You're probably better off to set it via
> hardware, though if that's not possible there should be a way to configure
> the SCSI side of the Amanda software which communicates directly with the
> tape drive to enable compression.

HP-1537A?  I think that is the same changer I have.

It has 2 DIP switches that control two things:

 - what state compression begins in when power is first applied
 - whether this state is changeable by software control

IIRC, those particular switches are internal (requiring case
removal).  hp.doc, support, doc/manuals is a good site for
online documentation.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322  (609) 683-7220 (fax)



Re: Performance degrading over time?

2002-10-29 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all!

Jay Lessert wrote:

> So the first thing is to look at two AMANDA MAIL
> REPORT outputs:  one from a "fast" run in June, and one from a "slow"
> run yesterday.
> 
> Look at Estimate Time, Dump Time, Tape Time, Dump Rate, and Taper Rate
> for your one file system.  Where is the increase happening?
>
> My personal bet is estimate time, and that your 6GB of growth is in the
> form of a large number of small files, but that is a wild guess.

The dump time is increasing way beyond the growth rate of data
to be dumped.

> If you give us actual data, we can do much better.  :-)

See below.

As you can see from April up until August the dumpsize increased
about 1.5 fold while the dump _time_ increased by a factor of
about 2.5. Dump rate dropped from 7.5 K/s to 4.6 K/s.

>From August until now the dump size increased by about 10%
while dump time continues to grow dramatically.

I'll look into the "lots of small files added?" question.

Thanks,
Patrick
---
5. April 2002 15:29

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:54   1:53   0:00   (0:01 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   48155.548155.50.0
Original Size (meg) 48155.548155.50.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- -- 
Tape Used (%)  24.1   24.10.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7284.9 7284.9-- 
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7282.8 7282.8-- 

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1199200  1199200   -- 6:27 3100.76:28 3089.9
allianz01 c1t0d0s6   0 48112064 48112064   --   106:22 7538.5  106:23 7537.7

1. Mai 2002 01:25

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:51   1:49   0:00   (0:02 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   49187.349187.30.0
Original Size (meg) 49187.349187.30.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- -- 
Tape Used (%)  24.6   24.60.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7700.0 7700.0-- 
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7698.5 7698.5-- 

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1201184  1201184   -- 5:50 3427.75:52 3416.7
allianz01 c1t0d0s6   0 49166592 49166592   --   103:11 7941.9  103:11 7941.6

1. Juni 2002 01:26

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:53   1:51   0:00   (0:02 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   50107.250107.20.0
Original Size (meg) 50107.250107.20.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- -- 
Tape Used (%)  25.1   25.10.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7674.4 7674.4-- 
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7672.9 7672.9-- 

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1202656  1202656   -- 5:45 3487.65:46 3476.1
allianz01 c1t0d0s6   0 50107072 50107072   --   105:41 7902.1  105:41 7901.9

1. Juli 2002 01:30

STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Dump Time (hrs:min)1:58   1:56   0:00   (0:02 start, 0:00 idle)
Output Size (meg)   51813.251813.20.0
Original Size (meg) 51813.251813.20.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- -- 
Tape Used (%)  25.9   25.90.0
Filesystems Dumped2  2  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  7640.7 7640.7-- 
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  7639.2 7639.2-- 

DUMP SUMMARY:
  DUMPER STATS  TAPER
STATS
HOSTNAME  DISK   L  ORIG-KB   OUT-KB COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s  MMM:SS KB/s
-- 
allianz01 c0t0d0s0   0  1634400  1634400   -- 6:50 3985.36:51 3974.2
allianz01 c1t0d0s6  

Re: compression

2002-10-29 Thread Craig Dewick
Hey there Joseph!

It's good to see a familiar name here on the list...

> I would like to know where and what do I insert into the amanda.conf for
> allow tape compression to work.
>
> the tape unit is a hp1537A in a six stacker based unit.

Can it be done with jumers on the drive, or by DIP switches in the
autochanger's electronics? You're probably better off to set it via
hardware, though if that's not possible there should be a way to configure
the SCSI side of the Amanda software which communicates directly with the
tape drive to enable compression.

Regards,

Craig.

-- 
   Craig Dewick. Send email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
 Point your web client at "www.sunshack.org" or "www.sunshack.net" to access my
 archive of Sun technical information and links to other places. For info about
 Sun Ripened Kernels, go to "www.sunrk.com.au" or "www.sun-surplus.com"