Re: Spanning multiple tapes

2003-11-16 Thread Danny Ybarra
I found this statement in the WHATS.NEW file.  Can you
explain what it means?  Sorry for being such a newbie
but I really want to start using Amanda.

* MULTIPLE TAPES IN ONE RUN

I've rewritten the taper - it now supports one run
spanning multiple tapes if you have a tape-changer. 
The necessary changes in support of this have also
been made to driver and reporter - planner already had
support.  There are a couple other places that should
probably be updated, like amcheck.  Dumps are not
split across tapes - when taper runs into the end of a
tape,
it loads the next tape and tells driver to try sending
the dump again.

If you are feeling brave, set "runtapes" to something
other than 1.

The new taper also keeps the tape open the entire time
it is writing the files out - no more having amchecks
or other accesses/rewinds in the middle of the run
screw you royally if they hit when the tape is closed
for writing a filemark.


--- Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2003 22:21, Danny Ybarra
> wrote:
> >Ok I'm confused then.  If you have a list of
> entries
> >in your list how do you tell amanda what entries go
> on
> >what tape if you have a autoloader?
> 
> You don't, thats all up to the 'planner'.  You can
> hint as to how its 
> supposed to order things a wee bit by use of the
> 'dumporder' 
> directive in your amanda.conf.
> 
> >Also will it just prompt you to put another tape in
> if you
> >are using a single HP DAT drive?
> 
> Possibly one of the changer scripts, like
> chg-manual, might do this.
> Here I use chg-scsi, and its totally silent at the
> console, sending 
> you an email if something goes toes up.  As amanda
> is designed to be 
> run in the middle of the night by cron, it really
> doesn't expect 
> there to be a human 'lifeguard' around in case
> something gets a tummy 
> ache.  So it handles the errors it knows howto
> handle, or sends you 
> an email so you can handle it the next day and then
> goes silently 
> away.
> 
> >--- Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sunday 16 November 2003 01:18, Danny Ybarra
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> >I'm new to amanda but I read that amanda now
> spans
> >> >multiple tapes.  How do you set that up on a
> Dell
> >>
> >> 132T
> >>
> >> >LTO Autoloader?  I also want to use that feature
> on
> >>
> >> a
> >>
> >> >regular single HP DAT drive.
> >>
> >> Amanda can use more than one tape, however it
> cannot
> >> span a single
> >> disklist entry to two or more tapes.  Each
> disklist
> >> entry must be
> >> smaller than 1 tape.
> >>
> >> I'm watching amanda use 2 tapes here, and just
> saw
> >> it switch to the
> >> next tape.  Unforch, the file it failed on was
> over
> >> half a tape, so
> >> it wasted about 1.5 gigs in changing the tapes.
> >> Looks like I'll need
> >> to re-arrange that entry into 2 or 3 to make it
> into
> >> smaller pieces.
> >> I'm seeing, in the status reports, that amanda
> seems
> >> to be ignoreing
> >> my dumporder "STSTSTST", as its often been seen
> to
> >> do a 70 meg DLE, a
> >> 600Mb DLE, then a 2.1Gb DLE and a 1.1Gb DLE, in
> that
> >> order while
> >> filling up a teeny 4Gb tape which wound up with:
> >>
> >> dumped  :  12   7721415k   7503717k
> >> (102.90%) ( 22.21%)
> >> wait for writing:   8   3018755k   2801057k
> >> (107.77%) (  8.68%)
> >> wait to flush   :   0 0k 0k
> >> (100.00%) (  0.00%)
> >> writing to tape :   1   2296810k   2296810k
> >> (100.00%) (  6.61%)
> >> failed to tape  :   0 0k 0k (
> >> 0.00%) (  0.00%)
> >> taped   :   3   2405850k   2405850k
> >> (100.00%) (  6.92%)
> >>   tape 1:   3   2405850k   2405850k
> >> DailySet1-28
> >>   tape 2:   0 0k 0k
> >> DailySet1-01
> >>
> >> which says I'll have to run a flush in the
> morning
> >> as its going to EOT
> >> the second tape with quite a bit left in /dumps.
> >> 3018755k+2296810k
> >> will be about a 1.6Gb overflow, and my indice
> saver
> >> will fail with
> >> EOT.
> >>
> >> Suggested change to planner algorythm:  When
> >> runtapes is >1, juggle
> >> the order to achieve a best fit within the
> tapetypes
> >> capacity as
> >> entered in amanda.conf, overriding the
> 'dumporder'
> >> specified, setting
> >> up a seperate list for each allowed tape.
> >>
> >> And even greater modifcation would be to write
> that
> >> amount of data,
> >> then change tapes even without hitting EOT,
> thereby
> >> saving the time
> >> and wear on the drive it wastes in writing till
> EOT
> >> is encountered
> >> before doing the tape change.  In this case it
> would
> >> have saved about
> >> an 1 hr & 9 mins, or used that time to put about
> >> another gigabyte of
> >> smaller DLE's on the first tape used tonight.
> >>
> >> Just my $0.02.  That, and another buck, might get
> >> you a cuppa most
> >> places :-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers, Gene
> >> AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
> >> 99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV
> >> 

jjj

2003-11-16 Thread G.Frankl




THIS IS THE XXI.TH CENTURY'S PRODUCT !!!
We'll not send to advertizing flow !!!
  you make some big bucks! it has worked so well this's the third work  
in my life but the first forever. i quir my boring job and work at
  this about a one two hours of a day processing orders, including
my drive to the bank! so go for it, you will be glad you need!
 
  Dear Friend!  you can earn lot of money per year sending advertise!!!
You can earn $XX,XXX or more in the next at 90 days abdication of the 
advertis and sending legal business e-mails to your clients. Seem Impossible ? Read on for details; 
is there a catch; NO, there is no catch, just you send a response email and 
be on your way to financial freedom.
 
Two years ago ,the coporation I worked at for the past fifteen years downsized and my
position was eliminated.  After unproductive job interviews,I decided to open my own business.
Over the past year, I incurred many unforeseen financial problems. I owed my family , friends
and creditorsover 35,000$. The economy was  taking a toll on my business, and I just couldn't
seem to make ends  meet. I  had to refinance and borow against my home to support my family 
and struggiling business . AT THAT MOMENT something significant happened in my life and 
I am writing to share The experience in hopes that this will change your life FOREVER
FINANCIALLY !!! I received , in my opinion , were not cost effective . They were either too
dificult for me  to comprehend or the  initial investement was too much for me to risk to see  if 
they would work or not. One claimed that I would make a million dollars in one year …it didn't 
tell me I'd have to write a book to make it! But like I was saying , in December  I received this
Program. THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT !!! After  reading it several times , to make sure I was
reading it correctly, I couldn't believe my eyes. Here was  a MONEY MAKING PHENOMENON.
I could invest as much as I wanted to start, without putting me further into debt. After I go a
pencil and paper  and figured it out , I would at least get my money back. I decided”WHY
 NOT”.My first step in making $50,000 in 90 days was done.
 
 So many people are participating that those involved 
are doing, much better than ever before. Since everyone makes more as more people
try it out, it's beenvery exciting to be a part of lately. You will understand once you 
experience it.
"HERE IS THE OCASSION"
You save it, Now For Future Reference:
The following income opportunity is one you may be interested in taking a look
 at. It can be started with VERY LITTLE investment and the income return is TREMENDOUS!!!
 
$$$
If you would like to make a lot of money in less than 90 days!
Please read the enclosed program...THEN READ IT AGAIN !!!
$$$
 
and your nothing other ploy, just you must a free programme 
copy this response email adress : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BEST REGARDS!
Gabor Frankl ,EBM work. 


<><>

RE: moved to new disk, now amanda wants to do level 0's on whole system

2003-11-16 Thread Dana Bourgeois
Sun's tar used to have a bug where it wouldn't copy more than like 25 levels
of directories.  I first ran across this under SunOS but heard that as of
about Solaris 2.6 the bug is gone.  YMMV


Dana Bourgeois


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Siegerman
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: moved to new disk, now amanda wants to do level 
> 0's on whole system
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:20:23AM -0500, Jay Fenlason wrote:
> > Also, cp/fr may not have correctly reset the modification 
> times of the 
> > files when it copied them.  Oh, and they may not handle links well 
> > either.  To copy directory trees, I usually use "( cd 
> /fromdir ; tar 
> > cf - . ) | ( cd /todir ; tar xpf -)", which preserves modification 
> > times, and permissions.
> 
> I've had problems with tar, too.  Unfortunately, that was so 
> long ago that I forget what they were.  Maybe it stores only 
> mtime in the tarball, and on extraction sets both mtime and 
> atime to the saved mtime value.  Oh, and I think it likes to 
> (try to) copy the contents of special files, FIFOs, and the 
> like, instead of recreating them in the destination tree.
> 
> Until recently, I used the cpio variant of your suggestion:
>   cd /fromdir
>   find . -depth -print0 | cpio -padmu0 /todir
> (You need GNU find and cpio for the "0" part to work.  -depth 
> is to get the directories' mtimes copied properly.  It makes 
> each directory come *after* its contents in the file listing. 
>  Without -depth, the directory would come first; cpio would 
> properly set its mtime, and then stomp on it by creating the 
> directory's
> contents.)
> 
> But then I discovered rsync.  Rsync rocks.  "rsync -aH" 
> copies everything the kernel lets you copy (i.e. not ctimes, 
> and not inumbers).  The only problem with rsync is the weird 
> way it gives meaning to a trailing slash; these two are *not* 
> equivalent:
>   rsync -aH srcdir/ destdir
>   rsync -aH srcdir destdir
> 
> Then again, I'm not sure whether either cpio or rsync can 
> deal with a username that's changed its numerical userid, or 
> similarly for groups.  I think some tar's can.  Or maybe it's 
> cpio that can handle that; can't remember.  And gtar probably 
> doesn't have any of those problems -- people are using it for 
> backups after all
> :-) -- but it's not always available, and even non-GNU cpio's 
> do everything but the "0" trick.
> 
> But all of those -- tar, cpio, rsync -- are kludges.  Is it 
> just me, or do other people also find it ludicrous that 30+ 
> years on, UNIX still doesn't have a proper copy command?
> 
> --
> 
> |  | /\
> |-_|/  >   Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |  |  /
> It must be said that they would have sounded better if the 
> singer wouldn't throw his fellow band members to the ground 
> and toss the drum kit around during songs.
>   - Patrick Lenneau
> 
> 


Re: Spanning multiple tapes

2003-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 16 November 2003 01:18, Danny Ybarra wrote:
>I'm new to amanda but I read that amanda now spans
>multiple tapes.  How do you set that up on a Dell 132T
>LTO Autoloader?  I also want to use that feature on a
>regular single HP DAT drive.
>
Amanda can use more than one tape, however it cannot span a single 
disklist entry to two or more tapes.  Each disklist entry must be 
smaller than 1 tape.

I'm watching amanda use 2 tapes here, and just saw it switch to the 
next tape.  Unforch, the file it failed on was over half a tape, so 
it wasted about 1.5 gigs in changing the tapes.  Looks like I'll need 
to re-arrange that entry into 2 or 3 to make it into smaller pieces.
I'm seeing, in the status reports, that amanda seems to be ignoreing 
my dumporder "STSTSTST", as its often been seen to do a 70 meg DLE, a 
600Mb DLE, then a 2.1Gb DLE and a 1.1Gb DLE, in that order while 
filling up a teeny 4Gb tape which wound up with:

dumped  :  12   7721415k   7503717k (102.90%) ( 22.21%)
wait for writing:   8   3018755k   2801057k (107.77%) (  8.68%)
wait to flush   :   0 0k 0k (100.00%) (  0.00%)
writing to tape :   1   2296810k   2296810k (100.00%) (  6.61%)
failed to tape  :   0 0k 0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
taped   :   3   2405850k   2405850k (100.00%) (  6.92%)
  tape 1:   3   2405850k   2405850k DailySet1-28
  tape 2:   0 0k 0k DailySet1-01

which says I'll have to run a flush in the morning as its going to EOT 
the second tape with quite a bit left in /dumps.  3018755k+2296810k 
will be about a 1.6Gb overflow, and my indice saver will fail with 
EOT.

Suggested change to planner algorythm:  When runtapes is >1, juggle 
the order to achieve a best fit within the tapetypes capacity as 
entered in amanda.conf, overriding the 'dumporder' specified, setting 
up a seperate list for each allowed tape.

And even greater modifcation would be to write that amount of data, 
then change tapes even without hitting EOT, thereby saving the time 
and wear on the drive it wastes in writing till EOT is encountered 
before doing the tape change.  In this case it would have saved about 
an 1 hr & 9 mins, or used that time to put about another gigabyte of 
smaller DLE's on the first tape used tonight.

Just my $0.02.  That, and another buck, might get you a cuppa most 
places :-)

- -- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


Re: lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 16 November 2003 17:18, Phil Homewood wrote:
>Willy Wittesaele wrote:
>> it's now about 1 week that i'm subscribed to this list
>> because I just started using the amanda backup program
>> and this is the list that generates the most of spam and/or
>> virusses
>
>Ah, You want the amanda *backup* program. This appears to be the
>Antisocial Misdirected Autoresponder Notification Dumping Archive.
>I made the same mistake.
>
>:-/
>
>(Seriously, though: can we shoot the people who send this
>virus responder junk here? Or at least reject their mail
>at amanda.org before it gets to the lists? Please?)

I'll second that motion.  One message a few hours ago was stripped of 
what I'd assume was a copy of swen, and that generated 5 more 
autoresponder replies to be deleted.

OTOH, all 6, after the stripping by whatever stripped it, were about 
130 kilobytes less than 1 copy of the virii, (140.5k) so we have a 
net gain in usable bandwidth.

They get in because this is an open list.  However, after the last few 
weeks I'd vote to close it, and allow read only of its archives for 
the general public, with write privs only to those subscribed.  No 
more trouble than it is to subscribe, and as quick as it can be done, 
I don't see a very good reason to keep it open to every spam spewer 
on the planet.

Oh, and I vote for the use of the 'shoot' option at least as a last 
resort.

- -- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


amanda installer dups libraries

2003-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings everybody;

I just found a bit of a space waster in the way amanda installs its 
libraries.

I inserts the snapshot date into the main library name and then builds 
the links based on that.

Unforch, that had gone on un-noticed and I had a set of identical 
libraries in /usr/local/lib that amounted to around 50 megabytes 
worth.

So those with space constraints that are also building each snapshot 
should probably take a good look at your lib dirs and see if you've 
also have many copies of the amanda libraries that can be subjected 
to a quick game of space patrol, leaving only the newest dated ones.

I don't know if this is intentional, I suspect it was, but I fail to 
see any compelling reason for it.  Most of the time if a new snapshot 
fails, one can step back a snapshot and redo the make install to 
revert.

Discussion perhaps?

- -- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Willy Wittesaele
hello ,

it's now about 1 week that i'm subscribed to this list
because I just started using the amanda backup program
and this is the list that generates the most of spam and/or virusses

what's going on here ?

willy


Spanning multiple tapes

2003-11-16 Thread Danny Ybarra
I'm new to amanda but I read that amanda now spans
multiple tapes.  How do you set that up on a Dell 132T
LTO Autoloader?  I also want to use that feature on a
regular single HP DAT drive.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree


Re: backup lasts forever on large fs (fwd)

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Bijnens
Zoltan Kato wrote:
/home is not NFS mounted and the directories are not transient (they are
the actual home dirs of individual users). runtar is seduid root. I tryed
to run the gtar command from the log file manually as root, and found that
it ONLY works when I run it from /home:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /home/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /opt/sfw/bin/gtar --create --file /dev/null --directory /home
--one-file-system --listed-incremental
/usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/rozi.cab.u-szeged.hu_home_h0_0.new
--sparse --ignore-failed-read --totals --files-from
/tmp/amanda/sendsize._home__h0.20031113235902.include 2>&1|less
But then how is it possible that sendsize (or whatever other program) can
collect the filenames in
/tmp/amanda/sendsize._home__h0.20031113235902.include but gtar fails
unless started from /home (note that the --directory /home is present on
the command line which should cd to /home). Any idea? How should I
specify the include/exclude directives in the disklist entries?
There must be something special about that /home partition.
Give us as much info as possible.
What version of gtar are you using?
What are the mount options of that filesystem?
How is this extremely large filesytem created (one large disk? volume 
manager? ...)

- -- 
Paul @ Home


RE: amanda article on sun.com

2003-11-16 Thread Dana Bourgeois
Plus at least on 2.6, ufsdump cleans tar's clock when it comes to speed.


Dana Bourgeois


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon LaBadie
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 8:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: amanda article on sun.com
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 04:24:17PM +1300, Steve Wray wrote:
> > Its interesting that they don't configure it to use gnu 
> tar... and so 
> > far as I can tell, none of the config that they give would 
> use gnutar 
> > to backup Solaris boxes.
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:02, Galen Johnson wrote:
> > > Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > > >Recently posted to the "Big Admin"
> > > >section of Sun's website is a pretty
> > > >long article on setting up amanda.
> > > >
> > > >Haven't read it yet, so I'm unable
> > > >to comment on its content.
> > > >
> > > 
> >http://enews.sun.com/CTServlet?id=47250049-814460813:10687624
99806
> > >
> > >   or
> > >
> > >http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/backups_amanda.html
> >

Strictly a guess at the rationale:

  standard Solaris does not come with gnutar
  an optionally installed package does include it,
  but it is version 1.13, not suitable for amanda.

- -- 
Jon H. LaBadie  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322  (609) 683-7220 (fax)


Drive TandbergDLT8000 -changer DL0101H

2003-11-16 Thread Ismaël BALLO
Hi,


I use amanda-2.4.4 with Redhat 7.3

I've got the autoloader( 1 drive, 10 slots) under /dev/sg0 and the
tapedrive under /dev/sg1.

I try to use scripts like chg-multi (chg-scsi, chg-zd-scsi, etc..)
but they all come with configuration scripts and I don't know how to
feed them...


Do you have ever tried to configure such Autoloader(Tandberg) ?
What did you use ?

Moreover, when I try sipmle command like this, it gives me :

mtx -f /dev/sg0 unload 5

Unloading Data Transfer Element into Storage Element 5...mtx: Request
Sense: Long Report=yes
mtx: Request Sense: Valid Residual=no
mtx: Request Sense: Error Code=70 (Current)
mtx: Request Sense: Sense Key=Hardware Error
mtx: Request Sense: FileMark=no
mtx: Request Sense: EOM=no
mtx: Request Sense: ILI=no
mtx: Request Sense: Additional Sense Code = 44
mtx: Request Sense: Additional Sense Qualifier = 00
mtx: Request Sense: BPV=no
mtx: Request Sense: Error in CDB=no
mtx: Request Sense: SKSV=no
MOVE MEDIUM from Element Address 82 to 4 Failed

and DLT puts in alarm with coderror Cmer202023 
so I don't know what to use...


Bye.Thanks for the help !


Re: lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Josh Welch
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:14:48PM -0600, Josh Welch wrote:

It doesn't seem irrational to close the list to posting from subscribers 
only. Most of the lists I read these days require subscription for 
posting. You have to subscribe to read the list, 


Not really, you have to subscribe to get it delivered.
You can read it on yahoo and on marc.theaimsgroup.com
and maybe other archives.
Valid point, but I still think its not irrational to restrict posting to 
subscribers.

Josh



Re: Spanning multiple tapes

2003-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 16 November 2003 22:21, Danny Ybarra wrote:
>Ok I'm confused then.  If you have a list of entries
>in your list how do you tell amanda what entries go on
>what tape if you have a autoloader?

You don't, thats all up to the 'planner'.  You can hint as to how its 
supposed to order things a wee bit by use of the 'dumporder' 
directive in your amanda.conf.

>Also will it just prompt you to put another tape in if you
>are using a single HP DAT drive?

Possibly one of the changer scripts, like chg-manual, might do this.
Here I use chg-scsi, and its totally silent at the console, sending 
you an email if something goes toes up.  As amanda is designed to be 
run in the middle of the night by cron, it really doesn't expect 
there to be a human 'lifeguard' around in case something gets a tummy 
ache.  So it handles the errors it knows howto handle, or sends you 
an email so you can handle it the next day and then goes silently 
away.

>--- Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sunday 16 November 2003 01:18, Danny Ybarra
>>
>> wrote:
>> >I'm new to amanda but I read that amanda now spans
>> >multiple tapes.  How do you set that up on a Dell
>>
>> 132T
>>
>> >LTO Autoloader?  I also want to use that feature on
>>
>> a
>>
>> >regular single HP DAT drive.
>>
>> Amanda can use more than one tape, however it cannot
>> span a single
>> disklist entry to two or more tapes.  Each disklist
>> entry must be
>> smaller than 1 tape.
>>
>> I'm watching amanda use 2 tapes here, and just saw
>> it switch to the
>> next tape.  Unforch, the file it failed on was over
>> half a tape, so
>> it wasted about 1.5 gigs in changing the tapes.
>> Looks like I'll need
>> to re-arrange that entry into 2 or 3 to make it into
>> smaller pieces.
>> I'm seeing, in the status reports, that amanda seems
>> to be ignoreing
>> my dumporder "STSTSTST", as its often been seen to
>> do a 70 meg DLE, a
>> 600Mb DLE, then a 2.1Gb DLE and a 1.1Gb DLE, in that
>> order while
>> filling up a teeny 4Gb tape which wound up with:
>>
>> dumped  :  12   7721415k   7503717k
>> (102.90%) ( 22.21%)
>> wait for writing:   8   3018755k   2801057k
>> (107.77%) (  8.68%)
>> wait to flush   :   0 0k 0k
>> (100.00%) (  0.00%)
>> writing to tape :   1   2296810k   2296810k
>> (100.00%) (  6.61%)
>> failed to tape  :   0 0k 0k (
>> 0.00%) (  0.00%)
>> taped   :   3   2405850k   2405850k
>> (100.00%) (  6.92%)
>>   tape 1:   3   2405850k   2405850k
>> DailySet1-28
>>   tape 2:   0 0k 0k
>> DailySet1-01
>>
>> which says I'll have to run a flush in the morning
>> as its going to EOT
>> the second tape with quite a bit left in /dumps.
>> 3018755k+2296810k
>> will be about a 1.6Gb overflow, and my indice saver
>> will fail with
>> EOT.
>>
>> Suggested change to planner algorythm:  When
>> runtapes is >1, juggle
>> the order to achieve a best fit within the tapetypes
>> capacity as
>> entered in amanda.conf, overriding the 'dumporder'
>> specified, setting
>> up a seperate list for each allowed tape.
>>
>> And even greater modifcation would be to write that
>> amount of data,
>> then change tapes even without hitting EOT, thereby
>> saving the time
>> and wear on the drive it wastes in writing till EOT
>> is encountered
>> before doing the tape change.  In this case it would
>> have saved about
>> an 1 hr & 9 mins, or used that time to put about
>> another gigabyte of
>> smaller DLE's on the first tape used tonight.
>>
>> Just my $0.02.  That, and another buck, might get
>> you a cuppa most
>> places :-)
>>
>> --
>> Cheers, Gene
>> AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
>> 99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV
>> hillbilly
>> Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this
>> message
>> by Gene Heskett are:
>> Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights
>> reserved.
>
>__
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
>http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.



Re: Spanning multiple tapes

2003-11-16 Thread Danny Ybarra
Ok I'm confused then.  If you have a list of entries
in your list how do you tell amanda what entries go on
what tape if you have a autoloader?  Also will it just
prompt you to put another tape in if you are using a
single HP DAT drive?


--- Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2003 01:18, Danny Ybarra
> wrote:
> >I'm new to amanda but I read that amanda now spans
> >multiple tapes.  How do you set that up on a Dell
> 132T
> >LTO Autoloader?  I also want to use that feature on
> a
> >regular single HP DAT drive.
> >
> Amanda can use more than one tape, however it cannot
> span a single 
> disklist entry to two or more tapes.  Each disklist
> entry must be 
> smaller than 1 tape.
> 
> I'm watching amanda use 2 tapes here, and just saw
> it switch to the 
> next tape.  Unforch, the file it failed on was over
> half a tape, so 
> it wasted about 1.5 gigs in changing the tapes. 
> Looks like I'll need 
> to re-arrange that entry into 2 or 3 to make it into
> smaller pieces.
> I'm seeing, in the status reports, that amanda seems
> to be ignoreing 
> my dumporder "STSTSTST", as its often been seen to
> do a 70 meg DLE, a 
> 600Mb DLE, then a 2.1Gb DLE and a 1.1Gb DLE, in that
> order while 
> filling up a teeny 4Gb tape which wound up with:
> 
> dumped  :  12   7721415k   7503717k
> (102.90%) ( 22.21%)
> wait for writing:   8   3018755k   2801057k
> (107.77%) (  8.68%)
> wait to flush   :   0 0k 0k
> (100.00%) (  0.00%)
> writing to tape :   1   2296810k   2296810k
> (100.00%) (  6.61%)
> failed to tape  :   0 0k 0k ( 
> 0.00%) (  0.00%)
> taped   :   3   2405850k   2405850k
> (100.00%) (  6.92%)
>   tape 1:   3   2405850k   2405850k
> DailySet1-28
>   tape 2:   0 0k 0k
> DailySet1-01
> 
> which says I'll have to run a flush in the morning
> as its going to EOT 
> the second tape with quite a bit left in /dumps. 
> 3018755k+2296810k 
> will be about a 1.6Gb overflow, and my indice saver
> will fail with 
> EOT.
> 
> Suggested change to planner algorythm:  When
> runtapes is >1, juggle 
> the order to achieve a best fit within the tapetypes
> capacity as 
> entered in amanda.conf, overriding the 'dumporder'
> specified, setting 
> up a seperate list for each allowed tape.
> 
> And even greater modifcation would be to write that
> amount of data, 
> then change tapes even without hitting EOT, thereby
> saving the time 
> and wear on the drive it wastes in writing till EOT
> is encountered 
> before doing the tape change.  In this case it would
> have saved about 
> an 1 hr & 9 mins, or used that time to put about
> another gigabyte of 
> smaller DLE's on the first tape used tonight.
> 
> Just my $0.02.  That, and another buck, might get
> you a cuppa most 
> places :-)
> 
> -- 
> Cheers, Gene
> AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
> 99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV
> hillbilly
> Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this
> message
> by Gene Heskett are:
> Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights
> reserved.
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree


Re: lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:14:48PM -0600, Josh Welch wrote:
> 
> It doesn't seem irrational to close the list to posting from subscribers 
> only. Most of the lists I read these days require subscription for 
> posting. You have to subscribe to read the list, 

Not really, you have to subscribe to get it delivered.
You can read it on yahoo and on marc.theaimsgroup.com
and maybe other archives.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322  (609) 683-7220 (fax)


Re: lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Josh Welch
Steve Lane wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:31:09PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:

I'll second that motion.  
---cut---

They get in because this is an open list.  However, after the last few 
weeks I'd vote to close it, and allow read only of its archives for 
the general public, with write privs only to those subscribed.  No 
more trouble than it is to subscribe, and as quick as it can be done, 
I don't see a very good reason to keep it open to every spam spewer 
on the planet.


Man, I second _that_ motion!!!


Oh, and I vote for the use of the 'shoot' option at least as a last 
resort.


First resort, anyone?

--
Steve Lane   /"\
Doudna Lab   \ /  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
U. C. BerkeleyX Against HTML Email
 / \
It doesn't seem irrational to close the list to posting from subscribers 
only. Most of the lists I read these days require subscription for 
posting. You have to subscribe to read the list, and why would we want 
people posting who aren't interested in reading the list? It doesn't 
seem like it would be that much greater of a burden administratively 
speaking, so I don't know why it would be such a bad idea.

Of course, I don't run the list either, so its just me spewing electrons.

Josh



Re: lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Steve Lane
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:31:09PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I'll second that motion.  
---cut---
> They get in because this is an open list.  However, after the last few 
> weeks I'd vote to close it, and allow read only of its archives for 
> the general public, with write privs only to those subscribed.  No 
> more trouble than it is to subscribe, and as quick as it can be done, 
> I don't see a very good reason to keep it open to every spam spewer 
> on the planet.

Man, I second _that_ motion!!!

> Oh, and I vote for the use of the 'shoot' option at least as a last 
> resort.

First resort, anyone?


--
Steve Lane   /"\
Doudna Lab   \ /  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
U. C. BerkeleyX Against HTML Email
 / \



BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP.

2003-11-16 Thread COL AHMED SALEM.
 BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP.
 
 Good day,
 It may surprise you to receive this e-mail from me,
 especially when we haven't had any previous dealings.
 However I contacted you through this means because I
 received encouraging information about you. Secondly,
 I am using this means so that my personality can be
 sheilded until I am sure of your willingness to assist
 me in achieving the purposes of this business which
 will be of a high benefit to you and to my family. I
 am Lieutenant Colonel Salem Ahmed Military Commander
 of POLISARIO(Political Front for the Liberation of
 Western Sahara) and a member of council of the
 National Secretariat of Western Sahara(Saharawi
 Democratic Republic). Prior to my promotion to this
 rank/command, I was the second in command to the
 former military Commander General Sahid Adbelahib. He
 was however killed in battle in early January.
 THE PURPOSE OF CONTACTING YOU:
 The struggle for the liberation of the Saharawi people
 from the strong grip of Morocco and it's despotic
 government, haszaenjoyed funding from private,
 religious and corporate organizations around the
 world, people and organizations recognizes our
 struggle. These organizations are the ones who
 assist/aid POLISARIO with funds and materials in
 execution of this war with Morocco. Before the death
 of my former Military commander(General Adbelahib), we
 were given some funds(US$38,000,000.00) by an
 international solid mineral multi-national company
 donor to procure ammunitions for POLISARIO. My boss
 moved and deposited these funds with a private
 security/finance company in Europe. In my bid to audit
 our quarterly accounts I realized that the records of
 the $38Million was not reflected in the books. As I
 continued my private investigation I unclosed the
 source of these funds. I found out that it was my boss
 who delete every record of this larges from the
 accounting books because his intentions is to keep
 this particular funds for himself. I called him to a
 meeting(two of us) over this issue - that was in March
 last year. He told me at the meeting that the funds as
 part of the donations POLISARIO(Political Front for
 the Liberation of Western Sahara) get year in and year
 out is to be kept for his use and the future of his
 family since the future of the survival of the
 struggle is uncertain. I saw his reasons and readily
 agreed with him because he promised me a good fraction
 of the money there and then, especially when I know
 that the money will never have a record trace ever.
 However, as fate may have it General Adbelahib died at
 the wafront and I became the military commander in
 Feburary 2nd. And in addition to that the only only
 person on earth who has previlege of knowing the
 information of this cash deposit. I have all the
 relevant documents pertaining to this deposit. I now
 want to claim this funds knowing fully well that I
 have all the relating documents needed to claim these
 funds. These documents are the Certificate of Deposit
 with which the Cash was deposited, and also the
 Deposit Agreement. I therefore want you to
 team/partner with me to collect the funds in Europe as
 I require a foreigner to perfect this operation. Let
 me know your terms. I will provide all the necessary
 documents in my disposal to lay to claim these funds -
 which as the requirement agreed-up with the
 security/finance company. The issue is this: I will
 transfer legal ownership of these funds to you so that
 you can then be the new beneficiary of the funds that
 way my link with the funds terminated for a smooth
 movement of the funds to you.
 There are no risks involved in this business because I
 remain here and hold all machineries involved in this
 business. I should also clearly state here that as
 long as you keep this business confidential there is
 no means whereby risk can be imported to it. This is
 because someone elses knowledge remain the only thing
 that can import any risk to this deal. This is a
 simple and straight forward business, but must be kept
 highly confidential so that we can record success in
 it within the next 10 working days. Upon the receipt
 of a positive response from you, I will give you
 further details; outlining the method of operation
 which has been mastered to pull this transaction
 through soonest.
 Therefore, if you are interested, please do reach me
 via e-mail, while I perfect a better communication
 means for this project. Let me reiterate it again, I
 will want everything about this transaction to be
 treated in strictest confidence even if you are not
 interested.
 I await your response.
 Yours,
 Col. Salem Ahmed.
 Military Commander,
 Western Sahara





Re: amanda installer dups libraries

2003-11-16 Thread Stephen Walton
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 20:42, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings everybody;
> 
> I just found a bit of a space waster in the way amanda installs its 
> libraries...I had a set of identical 
> libraries in /usr/local/lib that amounted to around 50 megabytes 
> worth.

Well, I have two ways around such:

1.  When I build amanda, since no one else needs her libraries, I use
configure with --prefix=/opt/amanda-${version} so that they all go into
/opt.  Then I update a symlink /opt/amanda -> /opt/amanda-${version} and
test.  Only when I'm happy do I 'rm -rf' the previous version.

2.  For other software I use checkinstall to build an RPM on the fly,
which I can then easily erase/update.  Search at Google for
"checkinstall home page".

-- 
Stephen Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, CSU Northridge



Re: lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 16 November 2003 17:18, Phil Homewood wrote:
>Willy Wittesaele wrote:
>> it's now about 1 week that i'm subscribed to this list
>> because I just started using the amanda backup program
>> and this is the list that generates the most of spam and/or
>> virusses
>
>Ah, You want the amanda *backup* program. This appears to be the
>Antisocial Misdirected Autoresponder Notification Dumping Archive.
>I made the same mistake.
>
>:-/
>
>(Seriously, though: can we shoot the people who send this
>virus responder junk here? Or at least reject their mail
>at amanda.org before it gets to the lists? Please?)

I'll second that motion.  One message a few hours ago was stripped of 
what I'd assume was a copy of swen, and that generated 5 more 
autoresponder replies to be deleted.

OTOH, all 6, after the stripping by whatever stripped it, were about 
130 kilobytes less than 1 copy of the virii, (140.5k) so we have a 
net gain in usable bandwidth.

They get in because this is an open list.  However, after the last few 
weeks I'd vote to close it, and allow read only of its archives for 
the general public, with write privs only to those subscribed.  No 
more trouble than it is to subscribe, and as quick as it can be done, 
I don't see a very good reason to keep it open to every spam spewer 
on the planet.

Oh, and I vote for the use of the 'shoot' option at least as a last 
resort.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.



Re: lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Phil Homewood
Willy Wittesaele wrote:
> it's now about 1 week that i'm subscribed to this list
> because I just started using the amanda backup program
> and this is the list that generates the most of spam and/or virusses

Ah, You want the amanda *backup* program. This appears to be the
Antisocial Misdirected Autoresponder Notification Dumping Archive.
I made the same mistake.

:-/

(Seriously, though: can we shoot the people who send this
virus responder junk here? Or at least reject their mail
at amanda.org before it gets to the lists? Please?)
-- 
Phil Homewood, Systems Janitor, http://www.SnapGear.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +61 7 3435 2810 Fx: +61 7 3891 3630
SnapGear - Custom Embedded Solutions and Security Appliances


lots of virus e-mails & spam

2003-11-16 Thread Willy Wittesaele
hello ,

it's now about 1 week that i'm subscribed to this list
because I just started using the amanda backup program
and this is the list that generates the most of spam and/or virusses

what's going on here ?

willy




InterScan NT Alert

2003-11-16 Thread VirusAdmin
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.

Date:   Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:29:33 -
Method: Mail
From:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File:   readnow.zip
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus:  WORM_MIMAIL.F-1 


Infected E-Mail

2003-11-16 Thread qmvc
>> O e-mail enviado para você <<<
  De / Assunto

[EMAIL PROTECTED] / don't be late!  qqiqmpam

  foi encontrado um vírus no arquivo Anexado,
e este vírus, não foi enviado para você.

  Informações sobre o Vírus:
+++ Virus Scanner : readnow.doc.scr : W32/Mimail-F

   Se você tiver futuras questões,
   por favor, consulte o
nosso  especialista de E-mail:

 

 Para a sua informação, nós incluímos
   uma parte filtrada da 
 mensagem original do E-mail.

* -- A mensagem original segue abaixo: -- *



Will meet tonight as we agreed, because on Wednesday I don't think I'll make it,

so don't be late. And yes, by the way here is the file you asked for.
It's all written there. See you.

qqiqmpam


ALERT - GroupShield ticket number OA78_1069010575_EXCHANGE_1 was generated

2003-11-16 Thread GroupShield for Exchange (EXCHANGE)
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.

To:
Amanda-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent:
-437591552,29600886

Subject:
don't be late!  qqiqmpam

Attachment Details:-

Attachment Name: readnow.zip
File: readnow.zip
Infected? Yes
Repaired? No
Blocked? No
Deleted? No
Virus Name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




<>

don't be late! qqiqmpam

2003-11-16 Thread john


Will meet tonight as we agreed, because on Wednesday I don't think I'll make it,

so don't be late. And yes, by the way here is the file you asked for.
It's all written there. See you.

qqiqmpam


readnow.zip
Description: Zip compressed data


Infected E-Mail

2003-11-16 Thread qmvc
>> O e-mail enviado para você <<<
  De / Assunto

[EMAIL PROTECTED] / don't be late!  ikiiopwo

  foi encontrado um vírus no arquivo Anexado,
e este vírus, não foi enviado para você.

  Informações sobre o Vírus:
+++ Virus Scanner : readnow.doc.scr : W32/Mimail-F

   Se você tiver futuras questões,
   por favor, consulte o
nosso  especialista de E-mail:

 

 Para a sua informação, nós incluímos
   uma parte filtrada da 
 mensagem original do E-mail.

* -- A mensagem original segue abaixo: -- *



Will meet tonight as we agreed, because on Wednesday I don't think I'll make it,

so don't be late. And yes, by the way here is the file you asked for.
It's all written there. See you.

ikiiopwo


ALERT - GroupShield ticket number OA76_1069009523_EXCHANGE_1 was generated

2003-11-16 Thread GroupShield for Exchange (EXCHANGE)
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.

To:
Amanda-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent:
1727310336,29600884

Subject:
don't be late!  ikiiopwo

Attachment Details:-

Attachment Name: readnow.zip
File: readnow.zip
Infected? Yes
Repaired? No
Blocked? No
Deleted? No
Virus Name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




<>

InterScan NT Alert

2003-11-16 Thread VirusAdmin
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.

Date:   Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:09:44 -
Method: Mail
From:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File:   readnow.zip
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus:  WORM_MIMAIL.F-1 


don't be late! ikiiopwo

2003-11-16 Thread john


Will meet tonight as we agreed, because on Wednesday I don't think I'll make it,

so don't be late. And yes, by the way here is the file you asked for.
It's all written there. See you.

ikiiopwo


readnow.zip
Description: Zip compressed data


Infected E-Mail

2003-11-16 Thread qmvc
>> O e-mail enviado para você <<<
  De / Assunto

[EMAIL PROTECTED] / your account udonooap

  foi encontrado um vírus no arquivo Anexado,
e este vírus, não foi enviado para você.

  Informações sobre o Vírus:
+++ Virus Scanner : message.html : W32/Mimail-A
+++ Virus Scanner : message.zip : W32/Mimail-A

   Se você tiver futuras questões,
   por favor, consulte o
nosso  especialista de E-mail:

 

 Para a sua informação, nós incluímos
   uma parte filtrada da 
 mensagem original do E-mail.

* -- A mensagem original segue abaixo: -- *


Hello there,

I would like to inform you about important information regarding your
email address. This email address will be expiring.
Please read attachment for details.

---
Best regards, Administrator
udouooao


ALERT - GroupShield ticket number OA70_1069002497_EXCHANGE_1 was generated

2003-11-16 Thread GroupShield for Exchange (EXCHANGE)
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.

To:
Amanda-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent:
-993212928,29600867

Subject:
your account udonooap

Attachment Details:-

Attachment Name: message.zip
File: message.zip
Infected? Yes
Repaired? No
Blocked? No
Deleted? No
Virus Name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




<>

your account udonooap

2003-11-16 Thread admin

Hello there,

I would like to inform you about important information regarding your
email address. This email address will be expiring.
Please read attachment for details.

---
Best regards, Administrator
udouooao


message.zip
Description: Zip compressed data


InterScan NT Alert

2003-11-16 Thread VirusAdmin
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.

Date:   Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:12:23 -
Method: Mail
From:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File:   message.zip
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus:  WORM_MIMAIL.A 


Letter from Russia

2003-11-16 Thread Valentin
Dear Friend,
 
I send you this letter from a library of our small city and I pray that this letter 
reached your address.

My name is Valentin, I'm student and I live with my blind mother in Russia. I work 
very hard every day to be able take care of my mother, but my salary is very small 
because my studies are not finished. 
 
Due to the crisis our authorities recently stoped gas in our district. Now we cannot 
heat our home because we don't have gas anymore. I don't know what to do, because the 
winter is coming and the temperature outside can be lower than minus 20 degrees 
Celsius. I'm afraid that the temperature inside our home will be very cold and we will 
not be able to survive.
 
Therefore I send you this desperate message with a prayer in my heart and I hope you 
can help us. If you have any old warm clothes, warm blankets, sleeping bag, electric 
heater or portable stove, high-calories food, vitamins, medicaments against cold, I 
will be very grateful to you if you could send it to our postal address which is: 
 
Valentin Mihailin,
Ryleeva Street, 6-45,
Kaluga. 248030,
Russia. 
 
If you think that it would be better or easier for you to help with some money, please 
write me back and I will give you details for sending it safely if you agree. This way 
to help is very good because the necessities here are not very expensive.
 
I pray to hear from you soon. From all my heart I wish you Happiness, Love and Peace. 

God Bless You,
 
Valentin and my Mother Elena.
Kaluga. Russia. 


Re: Balance Due, account

2003-11-16 Thread Oscar Emerson



ybyymlcwhj

picvpqmn  lmpkfb dntsm bgszvmeuopxsyg vqipig bij
 bvedadnyzr  lbmz
zlikpn uuow

  
ELIMINATE
  YOUR CREDIT CARD DEBT WITHOUT BANKRUPTCY
  
  
Tired of making minimum payments and barely getting by?
  

This
  is not consolidation or negotiation...

This is COMPLETE
  DEBT ELIMINATION

STOP
  MAKING PAYMENTS IMMEDIATELY
  
  

  

  Are
you drowning in debt?
Here's what we can do for YOU...


  


- Terminate your credit card debt
- Allow you to stop making payments immediately
- Obtain a ZERO BALANCE statement from your creditors

Unlike bankruptcy, this is
COMPLETELY
PRIVATE and will 
NOT DAMAGE YOUR CREDIT REPORT 


 You
will NOT lose your home or any other assets!

 Request
  your FREE CONSULTATION now 


To be removed,
click here and scroll to the bottom of the page





mxlzxts tb cupku iawqppkcc xzy h qmjqshnyn
lwuuwkaon
nsyulpxjavgxfc q


Re: Spanning multiple tapes

2003-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 16 November 2003 01:18, Danny Ybarra wrote:
>I'm new to amanda but I read that amanda now spans
>multiple tapes.  How do you set that up on a Dell 132T
>LTO Autoloader?  I also want to use that feature on a
>regular single HP DAT drive.
>
Amanda can use more than one tape, however it cannot span a single 
disklist entry to two or more tapes.  Each disklist entry must be 
smaller than 1 tape.

I'm watching amanda use 2 tapes here, and just saw it switch to the 
next tape.  Unforch, the file it failed on was over half a tape, so 
it wasted about 1.5 gigs in changing the tapes.  Looks like I'll need 
to re-arrange that entry into 2 or 3 to make it into smaller pieces.
I'm seeing, in the status reports, that amanda seems to be ignoreing 
my dumporder "STSTSTST", as its often been seen to do a 70 meg DLE, a 
600Mb DLE, then a 2.1Gb DLE and a 1.1Gb DLE, in that order while 
filling up a teeny 4Gb tape which wound up with:

dumped  :  12   7721415k   7503717k (102.90%) ( 22.21%)
wait for writing:   8   3018755k   2801057k (107.77%) (  8.68%)
wait to flush   :   0 0k 0k (100.00%) (  0.00%)
writing to tape :   1   2296810k   2296810k (100.00%) (  6.61%)
failed to tape  :   0 0k 0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
taped   :   3   2405850k   2405850k (100.00%) (  6.92%)
  tape 1:   3   2405850k   2405850k DailySet1-28
  tape 2:   0 0k 0k DailySet1-01

which says I'll have to run a flush in the morning as its going to EOT 
the second tape with quite a bit left in /dumps.  3018755k+2296810k 
will be about a 1.6Gb overflow, and my indice saver will fail with 
EOT.

Suggested change to planner algorythm:  When runtapes is >1, juggle 
the order to achieve a best fit within the tapetypes capacity as 
entered in amanda.conf, overriding the 'dumporder' specified, setting 
up a seperate list for each allowed tape.

And even greater modifcation would be to write that amount of data, 
then change tapes even without hitting EOT, thereby saving the time 
and wear on the drive it wastes in writing till EOT is encountered 
before doing the tape change.  In this case it would have saved about 
an 1 hr & 9 mins, or used that time to put about another gigabyte of 
smaller DLE's on the first tape used tonight.

Just my $0.02.  That, and another buck, might get you a cuppa most 
places :-)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.