Errors with amcheck (ioctl, tapes in rack)

2004-03-16 Thread Pablo Quinta Vidal
Hi all !!
When I run amcheck Diaria y get this:
amcheck-server: slot 1: rewinding tape: Inappropriate ioctl for device
  ..(this for all the slots)...
ERROR: new tape not found in rack
  (expecting a new tape)
  .
How can I solve this??
Thanks.
_
Protege tu correo del spam y los virus con MSN 8. Prueba gratis dos meses 
MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=es-esXAPID=199DI=1055



amrecover error

2004-03-16 Thread Sergio Pereira
Hi List,

when trying to recover a file using amrecover I get this error message:

Continue [?/Y/n/s/t]?
EOF, check amidxtaped.timestamp.debug file on bkpserver.
amrecover: short block 0 bytes
UNKNOWN file
amrecover: Can't read file header
extract_list - child returned non-zero status: 1


what is it?
thx,

sergio




Re: amrecover error

2004-03-16 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 12:57pm, Sergio Pereira wrote

 when trying to recover a file using amrecover I get this error message:
 
 Continue [?/Y/n/s/t]?
 EOF, check amidxtaped.timestamp.debug file on bkpserver.

And what are the contents of the file it's telling you to check?

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


Re: amrecover error

2004-03-16 Thread Sergio Pereira
it's a text file with some network configuration, nothing else. I doing
some tests with amrecover because I don't want to run into problems when
the real recover show up.

thx,

sergio


On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 13:06, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
 On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 12:57pm, Sergio Pereira wrote
 
  when trying to recover a file using amrecover I get this error message:
  
  Continue [?/Y/n/s/t]?
  EOF, check amidxtaped.timestamp.debug file on bkpserver.
 
 And what are the contents of the file it's telling you to check?
-- 



Re: amrecover error

2004-03-16 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
Please respond below quoted text -- it makes it easier to follow the 
conversation.

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 1:26pm, Sergio Pereira wrote
 On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 13:06, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
  On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 12:57pm, Sergio Pereira wrote
 
   when trying to recover a file using amrecover I get this error message:
  
   Continue [?/Y/n/s/t]?
   EOF, check amidxtaped.timestamp.debug file on bkpserver.
 
  And what are the contents of the file it's telling you to check?

 it's a text file with some network configuration, nothing else. I doing
 some tests with amrecover because I don't want to run into problems when
 the real recover show up.

That's not what I meant.  The error message tells you to look at the file 
amidxtaped.timestamp.debug which should be in /tmp/amanda on the host 
bkpserver.  What are the contents of *that* file?

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


Re: amrecover error

2004-03-16 Thread Sergio Pereira
here it is.


amidxtaped: debug 1 pid 14387 ruid 1030 euid 1030: start at Tue Mar 16
13:53:41 2004
amidxtaped: version 2.4.4p2
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  SECURITY USER root
amidxtaped: time 0.000: bsd security: remote host backupserver user root
local user amanda
amidxtaped: time 0.000: amandahosts security check passed
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  CONFIG=daily
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  LABEL=daily1
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  FSF=1
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  HEADER
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  DEVICE=file:/amandatapes/daily
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  HOST=^backupserver$
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  DISK=^/etc$
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  DATESTAMP=20040316
amidxtaped: time 0.000:  END
amidxtaped: time 0.001: amrestore_nargs=0
amidxtaped: time 0.001: Ready to execv amrestore with:
path = /usr/local/amanda/sbin/amrestore
argv[0] = amrestore
argv[1] = -p
argv[2] = -h
argv[3] = -l
argv[4] = daily1
argv[5] = -f
argv[6] = 1
argv[7] = file:/amandatapes/daily
argv[8] = ^backserver$
argv[9] = ^/etc$
argv[10] = 20040316
Wrong label: 'daily6'
amidxtaped: time 0.003: amrestore terminated normally with status: 1
amidxtaped: time 0.003: rewinding tape ...
amidxtaped: time 0.004: done
amidxtaped: time 0.004: pid 14387 finish time Tue Mar 16 13:53:41 2004


On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 13:26, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
 Please respond below quoted text -- it makes it easier to follow the 
 conversation.
 
 On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 1:26pm, Sergio Pereira wrote
  On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 13:06, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
   On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 12:57pm, Sergio Pereira wrote
  
when trying to recover a file using amrecover I get this error message:
   
Continue [?/Y/n/s/t]?
EOF, check amidxtaped.timestamp.debug file on bkpserver.
  
   And what are the contents of the file it's telling you to check?
 
  it's a text file with some network configuration, nothing else. I doing
  some tests with amrecover because I don't want to run into problems when
  the real recover show up.
 
 That's not what I meant.  The error message tells you to look at the file 
 amidxtaped.timestamp.debug which should be in /tmp/amanda on the host 
 bkpserver.  What are the contents of *that* file?
-- 



Re: amrecover error

2004-03-16 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 1:56pm, Sergio Pereira wrote

 path = /usr/local/amanda/sbin/amrestore
 argv[0] = amrestore
 argv[1] = -p
 argv[2] = -h
 argv[3] = -l
 argv[4] = daily1
 argv[5] = -f
 argv[6] = 1
 argv[7] = file:/amandatapes/daily
 argv[8] = ^backserver$
 argv[9] = ^/etc$
 argv[10] = 20040316
 Wrong label: 'daily6'

Here's your error -- you have the wrong tape loaded.  It's looking for 
daily6, but you have daily1 there.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


Re: Errors with amcheck (ioctl, tapes in rack)

2004-03-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 11:39, Pablo Quinta Vidal wrote:
Hi all !!
When I run amcheck Diaria y get this:

amcheck-server: slot 1: rewinding tape: Inappropriate ioctl for
 device ..(this for all the slots)...
ERROR: new tape not found in rack
   (expecting a new tape)
   .

How can I solve this??
Thanks.

Not enough info given to even venture a swag, sorry.

We need you to post your amanda.conf and whatever other 
(chg-scsi.conf?) .conf files you are using, what OS/version etc 
before we can start guessing.

_
Protege tu correo del spam y los virus con MSN 8. Prueba gratis dos
 meses MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=es-esXAPID=199DI=1055

-- 
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


filesystem limit?

2004-03-16 Thread Geoff Swavley
Hi All,

I was wondering if anyone could tell me why amanda seems to split
my filesystem into 2 holding files? An error has occurred so these filesare
left on the disk. Here is the filesystem listing:
at the files:

465921 drwxr-xr-x   4 amanda   sys   512 Mar 17 00:45
/holding2/schedule8
2096641 drwx--   2 amanda   sys   512 Mar 13 05:22
/holding2/schedule8/20040312
209666 2301584 -rw---   1 amanda   sys  2355658752 Mar 13 05:22
/holding2/schedule8/20040312/pokolbin._u20.0.1
209665 31472648 -rw---   1 amanda   sys  32212254720 Mar 13 05:07
/holding2/schedule8/20040312/pokolbin._u20.0
2038401 drwx--   2 amanda   sys   512 Mar 17 00:45
/holding2/schedule8/20040317

Has it got something to do with  a 32GB limit? What does the .1 and .0 refer
to?
Obviously the .1 ias the 2nd file of the filesystem??

thanks all. Here is the error email I received:

Subject: schedule8 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR March 12, 2004
   Date:Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:26:54 +1100 (EST)
   From:   Amanda Archiving Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


These dumps were to tape schedule8-WEEK3.
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: short write]].
Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
Run amflush to flush them to tape.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: schedule8-WEEK4.

FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
  pokolbin   /u20 lev 0 FAILED [out of tape]


STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:00
Run Time (hrs:min) 9:41
Dump Time (hrs:min)6:34   6:34   0:00
Output Size (meg)   32966.532966.50.0
Original Size (meg) 32966.532966.50.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Filesystems Dumped1  1  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  1426.7 1426.7--

Tape Time (hrs:min)0:00   0:00   0:00
Tape Size (meg) 0.00.00.0
Tape Used (%)   0.00.00.0
Filesystems Taped 0  0  0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) -- -- --

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label Time  Size  %Nb
  schedule8-WEEK3   0:00   0.00.0 0


NOTES:
  taper: tape schedule8-WEEK3 kb 31851520 fm 1 writing file: short write
  driver: going into degraded mode because of tape error.


DUMP SUMMARY:
 DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS  KB/s MMM:SS  KB/s
-- - 
pokolbin /u200 3375766433757664   --  394:211426.7  FAILED  

(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p2)

geoffs :-)
--
Geoff Swavley   Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Sys Admin  Snail : Level 8, 10 Valentine Ave,
Support and Network Operations  Parramatta   NSW   2150
Dept of Infrastructure, PlanningSydney  Australia
and Natural Resources   Phone : 61-2-98957125
http://www.radx.net/~geoffs Fax   : 61-2-98957086
Mobile: 61-422-002005   Home  : 61-2-96593637
--
 Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs
  no risk. - Setanti, Joaquin de




Re: filesystem limit?

2004-03-16 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 at 8:02am, Geoff Swavley wrote

 I was wondering if anyone could tell me why amanda seems to split
 my filesystem into 2 holding files? An error has occurred so these filesare

This is normal, and the size of the chunks are set by the 'chunksize' 
parameter in amanda.conf.

 NOTES:
   taper: tape schedule8-WEEK3 kb 31851520 fm 1 writing file: short write
   driver: going into degraded mode because of tape error.

How big are your tapes?  It looks like you hit EOT here...

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


emailing the correct report.

2004-03-16 Thread jlm17
I have a question about the name of the log file generated by amdump. So the format is 
log.date.number, where number starts at 0. If I run two amdumps in one day, would log.date.0 be the 
log file for the first amdump to start, or the first amdump to finish?

The reason I am asking this is because I am doing something like this as a cron task:

amdump config
amreport config -l logfile
If log.date.0 is the logfile for the first amdump to start, then I know which log file goes to which 
dump because I can start each amdump off by at least one minute. If however it is the first to 
finish, then I can't know what the logfile's name should be to run the amreport on.


Re: filesystem limit?

2004-03-16 Thread Geoff Swavley
35GB AIT-1 tapes (Native) plus I also have compression on the
drives DISABLED (advice from the list about double compressing a file,
resulting in a larger file than what you started with). It has slowed down
the backups but the large (already compressed thanks to oracle) export
database files seem to fit on the tape now.

Those two files add up as follows:
2355658752+
32212254720
---
34567913472
---

and the filesystem is 33.7GB so it should just fit on:
-
HOST  FILESYSTEM  TOTAL  USED
pokolbin   /u2036144364  33701475
-
TOTALS:  36144364  33701475




Maybe I'm living too close to the edge? Maybe the tape is bad towards the end ...
I'll change the tape and try flushing again. Hm ... that's
3 tapes now and all with the same flush error:

Subject:  schedule8 AMFLUSH MAIL REPORT FOR March 17, 2004
   Date:  Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:28:57 +1100 (EST)
   From:  Amanda Archiving Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The dumps were flushed to tape schedule8-WEEK3.
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: I/O error]].
Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
Run amflush again to flush them to tape.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: schedule8-WEEK4.

FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
  pokolbin   /u20 lev 0 FAILED [out of tape]


STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:00
Run Time (hrs:min) 1:10
Dump Time (hrs:min)0:00   0:00   0:00
Output Size (meg)   0.00.00.0
Original Size (meg) 0.00.00.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Filesystems Dumped0  0  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) -- -- --

Tape Time (hrs:min)0:00   0:00   0:00
Tape Size (meg) 0.00.00.0
Tape Used (%)   0.00.00.0
Filesystems Taped 0  0  0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) -- -- --

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label Time  Size  %Nb
  schedule8-WEEK3   0:00   0.00.0 0


NOTES:
  taper: tape schedule8-WEEK3 kb 3440992 fm 1 writing file: I/O error


DUMP SUMMARY:
 DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS  KB/s MMM:SS  KB/s
-- - 
pokolbin /u200 N/A  0   --N/A   N/A   FAILED  

(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p2)





Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:

 On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 at 8:02am, Geoff Swavley wrote

  I was wondering if anyone could tell me why amanda seems to split
  my filesystem into 2 holding files? An error has occurred so these filesare

 This is normal, and the size of the chunks are set by the 'chunksize'
 parameter in amanda.conf.

  NOTES:
taper: tape schedule8-WEEK3 kb 31851520 fm 1 writing file: short write
driver: going into degraded mode because of tape error.

 How big are your tapes?  It looks like you hit EOT here...

 --
 Joshua Baker-LePain
 Department of Biomedical Engineering
 Duke University

geoffs :-)
--
Geoff Swavley   Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Sys Admin  Snail : Level 8, 10 Valentine Ave,
Support and Network Operations  Parramatta   NSW   2150
Dept of Infrastructure, PlanningSydney  Australia
and Natural Resources   Phone : 61-2-98957125
http://www.radx.net/~geoffs Fax   : 61-2-98957086
Mobile: 61-422-002005   Home  : 61-2-96593637
--
 Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs
  no risk. - Setanti, Joaquin de




Re: filesystem limit?

2004-03-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 16:02, Geoff Swavley wrote:
Hi All,

I was wondering if anyone could tell me why amanda seems to split
my filesystem into 2 holding files? An error has occurred so these
 filesare left on the disk. Here is the filesystem listing:
at the files:

465921 drwxr-xr-x   4 amanda   sys   512 Mar 17 00:45
/holding2/schedule8
2096641 drwx--   2 amanda   sys   512 Mar 13 05:22
/holding2/schedule8/20040312
209666 2301584 -rw---   1 amanda   sys  2355658752 Mar 13
 05:22 /holding2/schedule8/20040312/pokolbin._u20.0.1
209665 31472648 -rw---   1 amanda   sys  32212254720 Mar 13
 05:07 /holding2/schedule8/20040312/pokolbin._u20.0
2038401 drwx--   2 amanda   sys   512 Mar 17 00:45
/holding2/schedule8/20040317

Has it got something to do with  a 32GB limit? What does the .1
 and .0 refer to?
Obviously the .1 ias the 2nd file of the filesystem??

thanks all. Here is the error email I received:

Subject: schedule8 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR March 12, 2004
   Date:Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:26:54 +1100 (EST)
   From:   Amanda Archiving Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


These dumps were to tape schedule8-WEEK3.
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: short write]].
Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
Run amflush to flush them to tape.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: schedule8-WEEK4.

FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
  pokolbin   /u20 lev 0 FAILED [out of tape]


STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:00
Run Time (hrs:min) 9:41
Dump Time (hrs:min)6:34   6:34   0:00
Output Size (meg)   32966.532966.50.0
Original Size (meg) 32966.532966.50.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Filesystems Dumped1  1  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  1426.7 1426.7--

Tape Time (hrs:min)0:00   0:00   0:00
Tape Size (meg) 0.00.00.0
Tape Used (%)   0.00.00.0
Filesystems Taped 0  0  0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) -- -- --

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label Time  Size  %Nb
  schedule8-WEEK3   0:00   0.00.0 0


NOTES:
  taper: tape schedule8-WEEK3 kb 31851520 fm 1 writing file: short
 write driver: going into degraded mode because of tape error.


DUMP SUMMARY:
 DUMPER STATSTAPER
 STATS HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS  KB/s
 MMM:SS  KB/s --
 -  pokolbin /u20   
 0 3375766433757664   --  394:211426.7  FAILED  

(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p2)

This looks to me as if you ran out of tape.  Did you just add these to 
the disklist?  How did you determine the tapetype?  Is the tape 
drives hardware compressor enabled?  Amtapetype can determine this 
and tell you.

The latter case in particular can and will hide the true capacity of a 
tape from amanda.  Please understand that amanda counts bytes sent to 
the drive when making its judgements as to tape fitting.  Enabling 
the drives compressor makes amanda think the tape is much larger than 
it really is so this users recommendation is and always has been to 
shut off any hardware compression and use only software compression.

Yes, it takes time and cpu horsepower to do software compression, but 
it can beat the socks off the hardware compressor for most 
compressable data, sometimes smunching things down to 10% of the 
original byte count.  Since amanda tracks the size of the compressed 
file, amanda then knows exactly how much has been moved to the media 
and very very rarely will amanda hit an EOT then.

When adding a new path to amanda's disklist, I always set the 
compression on, then look at the mailed report from the next run.  If 
compression only saved 5 or 10 percent, then that data in that path 
should be considered as already compressed, like a directory full of 
rpm's or tar.gz's.  Binary executables generally will fall into this 
category too, so one shouldn't waste the cpu horsepower to even try.  
OTOH, your /etc dir will probably smunch to 20% of its original size 
and should be compressed on most systems.

Also, keep in mind that amanda, generally speaking, cannot handle a 
disklist entry thats truely bigger than the tape because amanda 
cannot, without patching, span a single entry across more than one 
tape.  Because that involves tape operations that amanda may not have 
full control over, thereby endangering the data, that limitation 
isn't something the authors are working to fix as its not really 
considered broken by anyone except the fellow who bought a too small 
tape drive.

Disklist entries can be 

Re: emailing the correct report.

2004-03-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 16:46, jlm17 wrote:
I have a question about the name of the log file generated by
 amdump. So the format is log.date.number, where number starts at 0.
 If I run two amdumps in one day, would log.date.0 be the log file
 for the first amdump to start, or the first amdump to finish?

The reason I am asking this is because I am doing something like
 this as a cron task:

amdump config
amreport config -l logfile

If log.date.0 is the logfile for the first amdump to start, then I
 know which log file goes to which dump because I can start each
 amdump off by at least one minute. If however it is the first to
 finish, then I can't know what the logfile's name should be to run
 the amreport on.

Amdump will mail you a report if properly configured, why not use that 
one?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


Re: filesystem limit?

2004-03-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 17:51, Geoff Swavley wrote:
35GB AIT-1 tapes (Native) plus I also have compression on the
drives DISABLED (advice from the list about double compressing a
 file, resulting in a larger file than what you started with). It
 has slowed down the backups but the large (already compressed
 thanks to oracle) export database files seem to fit on the tape
 now.

Those two files add up as follows:
2355658752+
32212254720
---
34567913472
---

Thats rather close.  How many bytes is a filemark on that tape?

and the filesystem is 33.7GB so it should just fit on:
-
HOST  FILESYSTEM  TOTAL  USED
pokolbin   /u2036144364  33701475
-
TOTALS:  36144364  33701475




Maybe I'm living too close to the edge? Maybe the tape is bad
 towards the end ... I'll change the tape and try flushing again.
 Hm ... that's 3 tapes now and all with the same flush error:

Subject:  schedule8 AMFLUSH MAIL REPORT FOR March 17, 2004
   Date:  Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:28:57 +1100 (EST)
   From:  Amanda Archiving Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The dumps were flushed to tape schedule8-WEEK3.
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: I/O error]].
Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
Run amflush again to flush them to tape.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: schedule8-WEEK4.

FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
  pokolbin   /u20 lev 0 FAILED [out of tape]


STATISTICS:
  Total   Full  Daily
      
Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:00
Run Time (hrs:min) 1:10
Dump Time (hrs:min)0:00   0:00   0:00
Output Size (meg)   0.00.00.0
Original Size (meg) 0.00.00.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Filesystems Dumped0  0  0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) -- -- --

Tape Time (hrs:min)0:00   0:00   0:00
Tape Size (meg) 0.00.00.0
Tape Used (%)   0.00.00.0
Filesystems Taped 0  0  0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) -- -- --

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label Time  Size  %Nb
  schedule8-WEEK3   0:00   0.00.0 0


NOTES:
  taper: tape schedule8-WEEK3 kb 3440992 fm 1 writing file: I/O
 error


DUMP SUMMARY:
 DUMPER STATSTAPER
 STATS HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS  KB/s
 MMM:SS  KB/s --
 -  pokolbin /u20   
 0 N/A  0   --N/A   N/A   FAILED  

(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p2)

Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
 On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 at 8:02am, Geoff Swavley wrote

  I was wondering if anyone could tell me why amanda seems to
  split my filesystem into 2 holding files? An error has
  occurred so these filesare

 This is normal, and the size of the chunks are set by the
 'chunksize' parameter in amanda.conf.

  NOTES:
taper: tape schedule8-WEEK3 kb 31851520 fm 1 writing file:
  short write driver: going into degraded mode because of tape
  error.

 How big are your tapes?  It looks like you hit EOT here...

 --
 Joshua Baker-LePain
 Department of Biomedical Engineering
 Duke University

geoffs :-)

-- Geoff Swavley   Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX
 Sys Admin  Snail : Level 8, 10 Valentine Ave,
 Support and Network Operations  Parramatta   NSW   2150
 Dept of Infrastructure, PlanningSydney  Australia and
 Natural Resources   Phone : 61-2-98957125
 http://www.radx.net/~geoffs Fax   : 61-2-98957086
 Mobile: 61-422-002005   Home  : 61-2-96593637
 ---
--- Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself
 incurs no risk. - Setanti, Joaquin de

-- 
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


Re: filesystem limit?

2004-03-16 Thread Jonathan Dill
Geoff Swavley wrote:

I was wondering if anyone could tell me why amanda seems to split
my filesystem into 2 holding files? An error has occurred so these filesare
 

It sounds like you have other, unrelated problems, but check the setting 
of chunksize in amanda.conf, that is usually what determines dumps 
getting split up into multiple holding files.  In any case, it is not 
determined by the filesystem--you can give amanda a chunksize that is 
too large for some filesystem type, in which case it will keep writing 
until it gets an I/O error.  The holding files are concatenated during 
writing to tape, at which point the holding file size becomes irrelevant.

Most modern filesystems can support file sizes up to the TB range--I'm 
using a chunksize of 256GB on Linux XFS, it could be larger but Why go 
larger than the size of the holding disk?  Exceptions include (but are 
not limited to) ext2, SGI efs, iso9660, FAT(12|16|32), NFSv2, not sure 
about ufs, hfs, NTFS, I'm sure there are others.  2 GB and 8 GB are 
typical limits.  But as I said AFAIK amanda will not automagically set 
the chunksize for the holding disk filesystem type, it would just keep 
writing until it got an I/O error, but then there have been a lot of 
changes from 2.4.2 to 2.4.4 that I am just catching up with now.

--jonathan