2.4.5b1-200440430 amcheck problem
Greetings all; I just this morning installed yesterdays snapshot of 2.4.5b1, and the regularly scheduled amcheck reports this: /usr/local/sbin/amcheck: error while loading shared libraries: libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory But 'ls -l /usr/local/lib/libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so' returns this: -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 404855 May 1 17:09 /usr/local/lib/libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so Which appears to be identical in ownership and perms to all previous vesions still living there. Me puzzled. Need advice... -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: 2.4.5b1-200440430 amcheck problem
On Saturday 01 May 2004 17:18, Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings all; I just this morning installed yesterdays snapshot of 2.4.5b1, and the regularly scheduled amcheck reports this: /usr/local/sbin/amcheck: error while loading shared libraries: libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory But 'ls -l /usr/local/lib/libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so' returns this: -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 404855 May 1 17:09 /usr/local/lib/libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so Which appears to be identical in ownership and perms to all previous vesions still living there. Me puzzled. Need advice... I backed up one version, to the 29ths snapshot, same deal. Backed up and reinstalled the 23rds snapshot, works. Now trying those in between will post when I know which one killed it. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: 2.4.5b1-200440430 amcheck problem
On Saturday 01 May 2004 17:18, Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings all; I just this morning installed yesterdays snapshot of 2.4.5b1, and the regularly scheduled amcheck reports this: /usr/local/sbin/amcheck: error while loading shared libraries: libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory But 'ls -l /usr/local/lib/libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so' returns this: -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 404855 May 1 17:09 /usr/local/lib/libamserver-2.4.5b1-20040430.so Which appears to be identical in ownership and perms to all previous vesions still living there. Me puzzled. Need advice... Ok, I started at the version from the 26th of April, and thats the first broken one. Reinstalling the 23rd snapshot, which works. Comments? -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
New to Amanda- discouraged by some absurd limitations..
I was looking forward to using Amanda to backup 4-5 machines on my LAN and one over the Internet, but something seems incredibly stupid about the way Amanda forces the user to operate. Please tell me I'm wrong; maybe I'm misunderstanding the documentation. If I want to perform daily backups to CDRs, and I expect to have around 10 megs of data change per day, do I really have to waste an entire CDR every day?
Re: New to Amanda- discouraged by some absurd limitations..
On Saturday 01 May 2004 23:51, Justin Gombos wrote: I was looking forward to using Amanda to backup 4-5 machines on my LAN and one over the Internet, but something seems incredibly stupid about the way Amanda forces the user to operate. Please tell me I'm wrong; maybe I'm misunderstanding the documentation. If I want to perform daily backups to CDRs, and I expect to have around 10 megs of data change per day, do I really have to waste an entire CDR every day? In order to do an incremental, there must be a full level 0 of that same disklist entry to be used to determine whats been changed and needs the incremental to be recorded. That means that your relatively small 700Mb cd-r is probably going to be too small to be really usefull. There are both dependability and security reasons why amanda must use a different media each day, and they are not what one could call open for discussion. Much of this came about because of the lack of random access to a tapes contents, and because the tape itself may be ejected (which will rewind it) in between sessions by someone unknown to the operator or to the crontab entry that runs amanda. These individual media may be re-used according to the tapecycle setting in the file amanda.conf when their time on the shelf has expired by having used up all other tapes in the tapelist, at which point the oldest one becomes todays media. There is another name in this amanda.conf, dumpcycle, which tells amanda how many days she has to do a full backup of every entry in the disklist, typically set for 7 days. And yet another, runspercycle which you would set to 5 if no backups are done over the weekends, and amanda uses this to tell her that even though 7 days is the time limit, she only has 5 actual runs in those 7 days to get it all done in. Amanda will, given enough time, work out her own schedule that will achieve this AND attempt to balance the amount of media used so about the same amount is used on each run. Breaking the disklist up into many smaller subdir entrys and using tar, not dump, allows amanda to do a much better job of balanceing the media usage. To demo how well that can work, I have about 65Gb of data on 2 machines here, and I'm using a 4Gb (DDS2) tape in a 4 tape changer, one tape a nightly run. dumpcycle is 7, runspercycle is 7, and tapecycle is 28. Typically amanda will do about 3.6 gigs of mixed fulls and incrementals per nightly run, so it all fits on the one tape I allow her to use. Having a changer, I could let amand use 2 or even 4 tapes a night, but the write time for 4 tapes would be well into the next day with these slow tapes. Also be reminded that amanda cannot span a single disklist entry across 2 tapes, but will restart the failed entry on a fresh tape if allowed to use the changer, another argument in favor of smaller disklist entrys. I use compression only on those disklist entries that will compress, no use wasting cpu time to do the compression on a directory full of tar.gz stuffs. Amanda is now learning how to use media other than tape, read the docs for details on that. Amanda can do one heck of a job safeguarding your data, but amanda doesn't always take well to being bossed around. Most of us don't try once we understand how amanda works. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: New to Amanda- discouraged by some absurd limitations..
On Saturday May 01 2004 08:51 pm, Justin Gombos wrote: I was looking forward to using Amanda to backup 4-5 machines on my LAN and one over the Internet, but something seems incredibly stupid about the way Amanda forces the user to operate. Please tell me I'm wrong; maybe I'm misunderstanding the documentation. If I want to perform daily backups to CDRs, and I expect to have around 10 megs of data change per day, do I really have to waste an entire CDR every day? AFAIK, you are not wrong. At least with regard to tapes: Amanda does not put multiple backups on the same tape. However it also distributes the fulls over the tapecycle so add at least full/tapecycle to your estimate of space required. What does a CD-R cost these days? About 35-40 cents apiece? -- Stephen Carville http://www.heronforge.net/~stephen/gnupgkey.txt -- Right wing socialists hate privacy as much as left wing socialists hate guns.
