Re: use of chg-robot and cleaning for HP MSL3040
On 2021-11-10 11:47 a.m., David Simpson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just wanted to double check the use of /chg-robot/ which im using in
> amanda.conf for an HP MSL3040 SAS tape library.… that this is indeed
> the right type of /changer-driver/? (I have defined this stanza and
> think it looks ok).
>
Correct, e.g.
define changer HP_G2 {
tpchanger "chg-robot:/dev/LTOchanger"
property "tape-device" "0=tape:/dev/nst0"
property "use-slots" "1-7"
property "load-poll" "13s poll 5s"
device-property "LEOM" "TRUE"
}
>
> The other question is around cleaning. Presumably when the library
> itself alerts for cleaning, its up to the admin to fit it in around
> the backup cycle. That’s the way im reading the docs at the moment for
> this changer-driver.
>
> thanks
> David
>
>
> -
>
> David Simpson - Senior Systems Engineer
>
> ARCCA, Redwood Building,
>
> King Edward VII Avenue,
>
> Cardiff, CF10
> 3NB
>
>
>
>
> David Simpson - peiriannydd uwch systemau
>
> ARCCA, Adeilad Redwood,
>
> King Edward VII Avenue,
>
> Caerdydd, CF10 3NB
>
>
>
use of chg-robot and cleaning for HP MSL3040
Hi all, Just wanted to double check the use of chg-robot which im using in amanda.conf for an HP MSL3040 SAS tape library that this is indeed the right type of changer-driver? (I have defined this stanza and think it looks ok). The other question is around cleaning. Presumably when the library itself alerts for cleaning, its up to the admin to fit it in around the backup cycle. That's the way im reading the docs at the moment for this changer-driver. thanks David - David Simpson - Senior Systems Engineer ARCCA, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3NB David Simpson - peiriannydd uwch systemau ARCCA, Adeilad Redwood, King Edward VII Avenue, Caerdydd, CF10 3NB
Re: Solaris 11.4 64 binaries
Am 10.11.21 um 05:36 schrieb Chris Hassell: I have. We have a community release due… way … way way overdue. I’m afraid it’s been only myself doing it. (A lot of change has been disruptive, I’m afraid). Well, why not share development with the users within let's say github or so, and get feedback etc along the way? It's hard to understand why Betsol completely ignores (at least in termes of patches, solving issues ...) the community edition for so long. I think many of the ml-users here think so as well.
