tuning questions

2009-04-14 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I just got Amanda 2.5.2p1 up and running and really like it.  I have a couple 
of questions regarding my configuration--just want to be sure I'm running 
things optimally.

I defined a tapetype of HARDDISK with 

  define tapetype HARDDISK {
   length 10 mbytes
  }

Last night my backups used 74% of the tape space.  What happens when the data I 
want to backup exceeds the size I've defined?  Should I increase the size in 
the definition.

Also, I'm using the the default cycle parameters as follows

  dumpcycle 4 weeks
  runspercycle 20
  tapecycle 25 tapes

with a crontab of

  45 0 * * 2-6 /usr/sbin/amdump DailySet1

What if I want backups to occur Monday thru Saturday (actually, early Tuesday 
thru early Sunday mornings)?  Should I increase runspercycle and tapecycle to 
24 and, say, 35?  And change my crontab to

  45 0 * * 2-7 /usr/sbin/amdump DailySet1

?  Basically, I have new data being stored on Saturdays that I would like to 
get backed up early Sunday morning.

Thanks,
Brandon





adding tapes to cycle

2009-05-04 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I am currently using the following default settings:

  dumpcycle 4 weeks
  runspercycle 20
  tapecycle 25 tapes

If wanted to, say, have an 8 week dumpcycle could I simply add and label 25 
tapes and change the parameters above to

  dumpcycle 8 weeks
  runspercycle 40
  tapecycle 50 tapes

and expect Amanda to do the right thing?

Thanks,
Brandon


Re: adding tapes to cycle

2009-05-05 Thread Brandon Metcalf

- Chris Hoogendyk  wrote:
> 
> 
> Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
> >
> >
> > Brandon Metcalf wrote:
> >> I am currently using the following default settings:
> >>
> >>   dumpcycle 4 weeks
> >>   runspercycle 20
> >>   tapecycle 25 tapes
> >>
> >> If wanted to, say, have an 8 week dumpcycle could I simply add and 
> >> label 25 tapes and change the parameters above to
> >>
> >>   dumpcycle 8 weeks
> >>   runspercycle 40
> >>   tapecycle 50 tapes
> >>
> >> and expect Amanda to do the right thing?
> >
> > Short answer: Yes. Of course.
> >
> > A bit more: You can change your configuration and then feed it a few 
> > more tapes at a time until you reach your full number of tapes. As 
> > long as it has a new labeled tape each time it wants one, it will 
> > continue to work. When you run out of new labeled tapes, then there 
> > need to be enough tapes that there will be an old one that can be 
> > re-used. Typically, you have a few more tapes than specified in 
> > tapecycle. If runtapes is greater than 1, then you need more --  see: 
> > http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Tapecycle.
> 
> I want to amend my comments with one caveat.
> 
> While Amanda will do "the right thing," to some extent it will be 
> hamstrung by your configuration. You will typically only have one full 
> backup at a time (within a dumpcycle). You will have the constant threat 
> of having a full for some DLE overwritten, and the incrementals that 
> relate to that full becoming meaningless, before you have another full. 
> In addition, a single tape failure can result in multiple DLE's not 
> being recoverable.
> 
> If you changed your original scheme to
> 
>dumpcycle 2 weeks
>runspercycle 10
>tapecycle 25 tapes
> 
> Then you would always have a full backup, and often two.
> 
> If you add 25 tapes and make your new scheme
> 
>dumpcycle 4 weeks
>runspercycle 20
>tapecycle 50 tapes
> 
> Then, again, you will always have a full backup.
> 
> I don't know if your intention in stretching out the tapecycle is to 
> have more coverage, or whether you have too much data for your 
> network/server/tapes to handle in the shorter cycle. I would be 
> concerned about redundancy. If you aren't having trouble with too much 
> data, I would use a scheme like
> 
>dumpcycle 1 week
>runspercycle 5
>tapecycle 50 tapes
> 
> or, perhaps, 2, 10 and 50.

My motivation behind asking the question was to have more coverage.  I 
certainly don't have a problem with too much data as I'm using virtual tapes on 
a large NAS RAID array.  I was thinking that by increasing the number of tapes 
and the dumpcycle and runspercycle parameters, I could recover further back in 
time.  It sounds like this may not be the case which is probably due to my lack 
of understand of exactly how Amanda uses these parameters in its algorithms.

Assuming that I don't have a issue with too much data and I would like the 
following to happen

  * a full backup once per week
  * backups 6 days per week
  * the ability to go back a couple of months

Would a config like the following work?

  dumpcycle 1 week
  runspercycle 6
  tapecycle 75

And could I simply add all of the virtual tapes and once and change the above 
parameters and be OK?

Thanks for the help.

Brandon


amanda and smbclient

2009-05-13 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I realize this is more of a smbclient issue, but thought someone might
have an answer as to how files residing on Windows shares can be
backed up without ensuring they are not in use.  The problem is

  sendbackup: info BACKUP=/usr/bin/smbclient
  sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/bin/gzip -dc |/usr/bin/smbclient -xpGf - ...
  sendbackup: info COMPRESS_SUFFIX=.gz
  sendbackup: info end
  | Domain=[MAI] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790 Service Pack 1] Server=[Windows
  Server 2003 5.2]
  ? NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file ...

Is my only solution making sure that all users shutdown the
applications that are opening the files causing this problem?

Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


Amanda always doing full backup?

2009-05-14 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I recently changed my config from

  dumpcycle 4 weeks
  runspercycle 20
  tapecycle 25 tapes

to

  dumpcycle 2 weeks
  runspercycle 12
  tapecycle 50 tapes

backups are working fine, but I'm confused by the following output
which is just an example of one device:

  $ amadmin DailySet1 find quercus sda8

  date   hostdisk lv tape or file file part status
  2009-04-23 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-045   -- OK
  2009-04-24 quercus sda8  1 DailySet1-055   -- OK
  2009-04-25 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-065   -- OK
  2009-04-28 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-076   -- OK
  2009-04-29 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-086   -- OK
  2009-04-30 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-096   -- OK
  2009-05-01 quercus sda8  1 DailySet1-106   -- OK
  2009-05-02 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-116   -- OK
  2009-05-05 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-126   -- OK
  2009-05-06 quercus sda8  1 DailySet1-136   -- OK
  2009-05-07 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-146   -- OK
  2009-05-08 quercus sda8  1 DailySet1-156   -- OK
  2009-05-09 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-166   -- OK
  2009-05-10 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-176   -- OK
  2009-05-12 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-186   -- OK
  2009-05-13 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-196   -- OK
  2009-05-14 quercus sda8  0 DailySet1-206   -- OK

It seems that for the last fews days Amanda is doing a full backup
every night.  The filesystem on sda8 contains only the lost+found
directory and it or its contents are not changing.

However, according to the backup report, incrementals are definitely
happening:


  STATISTICS:
Total   Full  Incr.
        
  Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:22
  Run Time (hrs:min) 0:57
  Dump Time (hrs:min)0:32   0:23   0:10
  Output Size (meg)7173.5 6151.5 1022.0
  Original Size (meg) 15388.110798.0 4590.0
  Avg Compressed Size (%)46.6   57.0   22.3   (level:#disks ...)
  Filesystems Dumped   17 15  2   (1:2)
  Avg Dump Rate (k/s)  3791.0 4639.5 1804.5

  Tape Time (hrs:min)0:13   0:11   0:02
  Tape Size (meg)  7173.8 6151.8 1022.1
  Tape Used (%)   4.13.50.6   (level:#disks ...)
  Filesystems Taped17 15  2   (1:2)

  Chunks Taped  0  0  0
  Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  9187.6 9193.1 9154.3

  USAGE BY TAPE:
Label  Time  Size  %NbNc
DailySet1-20   0:13  7346016K4.117 0

So, I guess my question has to do with interpreting the output from
'amadmin find'.  Do the '0s' indicated full backups?


-- 
Brandon


Re: Amanda always doing full backup?

2009-05-14 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:

 m> Small disk are often promoted to try to get a balanced schedule.
 m> If it is a problem, you can set the 'maxpromoteday' for this disk.


Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner.  I guess
the only reason it would be a problem is if I'm running out of space
on which I stored the backups?

Also, I guess the planner will quit promoting full dumps once it does
enough backups with the new config?


-- 
Brandon


relabel (was Re: Amanda always doing full backup?)

2009-05-14 Thread Brandon Metcalf
d == dus...@zmanda.com writes:

 d> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Brandon Metcalf
 d>  wrote:
 d> > Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. ??I guess
 d> > the only reason it would be a problem is if I'm running out of space
 d> > on which I stored the backups?

 d> This is one of many reasons that oversubscribing your vtapes is a
 d> problematic configuration.  If your vtapes are oversubscribed, you
 d> need to pay *very* close attention to what Amanda is doing, and make
 d> adjustments early, before Amanda finds a vtape with 0kb available.


Makes sense.  And I've managed to mess up my virtual tapes.  Based on
your email I thought I would delete some of my virtual tapes using
rm(1).  I did, but then wanted to add some back.  I recreated them
with mkdir(1), but when I try to label them I get

  amlabel: label DailySet1-25 already on a tape

I assume this is because /etc/amanda/DailySet1/tapelist already has
this label listed.

Do I need to relabel the tapes I deleted and then added back?

-- 
Brandon


Re: relabel (was Re: Amanda always doing full backup?)

2009-05-14 Thread Brandon Metcalf
b == bran...@cedar.geronimoalloys.com writes:

 b> d == dus...@zmanda.com writes:

 b>  d> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Brandon Metcalf
 b>  d>  wrote:
 b>  d> > Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. ??I guess
 b>  d> > the only reason it would be a problem is if I'm running out of space
 b>  d> > on which I stored the backups?

 b>  d> This is one of many reasons that oversubscribing your vtapes is a
 b>  d> problematic configuration.  If your vtapes are oversubscribed, you
 b>  d> need to pay *very* close attention to what Amanda is doing, and make
 b>  d> adjustments early, before Amanda finds a vtape with 0kb available.


 b> Makes sense.  And I've managed to mess up my virtual tapes.  Based on
 b> your email I thought I would delete some of my virtual tapes using
 b> rm(1).  I did, but then wanted to add some back.  I recreated them
 b> with mkdir(1), but when I try to label them I get

 b>   amlabel: label DailySet1-25 already on a tape

 b> I assume this is because /etc/amanda/DailySet1/tapelist already has
 b> this label listed.

 b> Do I need to relabel the tapes I deleted and then added back?


Figured it out.  I needed to use amrmtape(8).

-- 
Brandon


exclude lists

2009-05-19 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I have defined an exclude list in a dumptype using

  exclude list "/etc/amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list"

with entries like

  $ cat /etc/amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list
  ./dumps
  ./opt/dell/srvadmin/shared/.ipc

I have a couple of questions about the entries.  Based on the
documentation I've read and the tests I've run, the leading '.' is
required which means these are relative paths to the device where
these directories live.

First, am I correct in thinking the '.' are required?  If so, how can
Amanda be told to exclude, for example, /dumps on sda1 but still
backup /dumps on sda2 other than defining different dumps types with
their own exclude list?

Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


Re: exclude lists

2009-05-19 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:

 m> The '.' is required, all excludes are relative to the dle you back up.

 m> Brandon Metcalf wrote:
 m> > I have defined an exclude list in a dumptype using
 m> >
 m> >   exclude list "/etc/amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list"
 m> >
 m> > with entries like
 m> >
 m> >   $ cat /etc/amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list
 m> >   ./dumps
 m> >   ./opt/dell/srvadmin/shared/.ipc
 m> >
 m> > I have a couple of questions about the entries.  Based on the
 m> > documentation I've read and the tests I've run, the leading '.' is
 m> > required which means these are relative paths to the device where
 m> > these directories live.
 m> >
 m> > First, am I correct in thinking the '.' are required?  If so, how can
 m> > Amanda be told to exclude, for example, /dumps on sda1 but still
 m> > backup /dumps on sda2 other than defining different dumps types with
 m> > their own exclude list?
 m> >
 m> You can't.


Seems like a nice feature would be to allow the DLE to be specified in
the exclude list.


-- 
Brandon


Re: exclude lists

2009-05-19 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:

 m> Brandon Metcalf wrote:
 m> >  m> > First, am I correct in thinking the '.' are required?  If so, how 
can
 m> >  m> > Amanda be told to exclude, for example, /dumps on sda1 but still
 m> >  m> > backup /dumps on sda2 other than defining different dumps types with
 m> >  m> > their own exclude list?
 m> >  m> >
 m> >  m> You can't.
 m> >
 m> >
 m> > Seems like a nice feature would be to allow the DLE to be specified in
 m> > the exclude list.
 m> >

 m> The 'exclude list' can be a relative path to the dle.


So, you're saying I can specify one dumptype with

  exclude list "./amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list"

or is it

  exclude list "amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list"

and have this file exist on each DLE?


Re: exclude lists

2009-05-19 Thread Brandon Metcalf
P == paul.bijn...@xplanation.com writes:

 P> On 2009-05-19 15:35, Brandon Metcalf wrote:
 P> > m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:
 P> >
 P> >  m> >
 P> >  m> >
 P> >  m> > Seems like a nice feature would be to allow the DLE to be specified 
in
 P> >  m> > the exclude list.
 P> >  m> >
 P> >
 P> >  m> The 'exclude list' can be a relative path to the dle.
 P> >
 P> >
 P> > So, you're saying I can specify one dumptype with
 P> >
 P> >   exclude list "./amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list"
 P> >
 P> > or is it
 P> >
 P> >   exclude list "amanda/DailySet1/exclude-list"
 P> >
 P> > and have this file exist on each DLE?

 P> Specify it as:

 P> exclude list optional append ".exclude-list"

 P> And have a file (optionally) in the directory of each DLE,
 P> e.g.  /.exclude-list   (only for the root DLE)
 P>/var/.exclude-list   (only for the /var DLE)
 P>/space/.exclude-list (only for the /space DLE)

 P> Have a look in the man page for the exact meaning of "optional" and 
"append".


Thanks for the feedback from everyone.




-- 
Brandon


recover when backup server dies

2009-06-10 Thread Brandon Metcalf
How do I list all images on a virtual tape using amrestore?  For
example, if I have the following virtual tape setup

  $ ls /nas1/amanda/vtapes/DailySet1/slots
  dataslot11  slot15  slot19  slot22  slot26  slot3   slot6
  infoslot12  slot16  slot2   slot23  slot27  slot30  slot7
  slot1   slot13  slot17  slot20  slot24  slot28  slot4   slot8
  slot10  slot14  slot18  slot21  slot25  slot29  slot5   slot9

I can list an image with

  $ amrestore -p \
  > /nas1/amanda/vtapes/DailySet1/slots/slot1/00013.quercus.sda11.1 blah
  amrestore: 0: skipping quercus.sda11.20090527.1

But how to I list all images on the virtual tape in slot1?  According
to the man page for amrestore I can do something like

  amrestore -p /dev/nrmt9 blah

for a real tape.  What is the equivalent for a virtual tape?

Also, is amrestore the restore tool to use if an Amanda backup server
is unavailable and amrecover is not possible?

Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


Re: recover when backup server dies

2009-06-10 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:

 m> Same things as a real changer, you must tell it to use slot1.

 m> $amtape  slot 1
 m> $amrestore -p file:/nas1/amanda/vtapes/DailySet1/slots blah


Ah.  I was leaving off 'file:'.

Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


understanding a restore

2009-06-15 Thread Brandon Metcalf
After selecting the directory I need to restore in amrecover, "list"
shows me the following:

  TAPE DailySet1-09:9 LEVEL 0 DATE 2009-06-05
  /path/to/data
  TAPE DailySet1-17:9 LEVEL 1 DATE 2009-06-14
  /path/to/data

This seems to imply that since the full backup was done on 2009-06-05
nothing was changed to cause an incremental until 2009-06-14, but I
know this isn't the case.  Or at least there is nothing that changed
that wasn't part of the level 1 backup shown above, but this doesn't
seem reasonable given that data changes daily at this location.

I'm sure this is a case of me misintepreting what I'm seeing.  What's
the real story?


-- 
Brandon


Re: understanding a restore

2009-06-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
h == hoogen...@bio.umass.edu writes:

 h> Brandon Metcalf wrote:
 h> > After selecting the directory I need to restore in amrecover, "list"
 h> > shows me the following:
 h> >
 h> >   TAPE DailySet1-09:9 LEVEL 0 DATE 2009-06-05
 h> >   /path/to/data
 h> >   TAPE DailySet1-17:9 LEVEL 1 DATE 2009-06-14
 h> >   /path/to/data
 h> >
 h> > This seems to imply that since the full backup was done on 2009-06-05
 h> > nothing was changed to cause an incremental until 2009-06-14, but I
 h> > know this isn't the case.  Or at least there is nothing that changed
 h> > that wasn't part of the level 1 backup shown above, but this doesn't
 h> > seem reasonable given that data changes daily at this location.
 h> >
 h> > I'm sure this is a case of me misintepreting what I'm seeing.  What's
 h> > the real story?

 h> Every level 1 backup backs up all changes since the last level 0. That
 h> means that the level 1 from 6/14 contains all the changes since 6/5.

 h> So, if file x changed on 6/6, it will be backed up on every level 1
 h> after that until there is another level 0. If enough changes happen,
 h> Amanda may go to level 2. If things weren't done this way, you would
 h> have way too many tapes to refer to in order to accomplish a full restore.


Makes sense.  Thanks for the reply.


-- 
Brandon


incremental restore

2009-06-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I've been looking through the docs, but can't find anything on this.
Is there a way with amrecover to restore only the data in the latest
level 1 backup?  For example, let's say I've extracted all of the data
from a level 0 backup, but now I just need to get the data from the
latest level 1 since that backup.  I can't seem to find a way to do
this in amrecover.

Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


Re: incremental restore

2009-06-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:


 m> Just enter 'S'  (skip) when it ask for the level 0 tape.


Beautiful.  Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


starting from scratch with vtapes

2009-07-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I had to rebuild the disk array where our vtapes were stored.  After I
recreate the vtapes is there anything in /etc/amanda/DailySet1/ that I
should also remove or recreate to start with a full set of backups?

Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


Re: starting from scratch with vtapes

2009-07-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
d == dus...@zmanda.com writes:

 d> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Brandon
 d> Metcalf wrote:
 d> > I had to rebuild the disk array where our vtapes were stored. ??After I
 d> > recreate the vtapes is there anything in /etc/amanda/DailySet1/ that I
 d> > should also remove or recreate to start with a full set of backups?

 d> If you lost all of your data, you should probably also 'amrmtape' all
 d> of the tapes Amanda still thinks it has.


I already emptied out tapelist, so I guess this isn't going to work.
Any manual steps I can take to get going with new level 0 backups?


-- 
Brandon


Re: starting from scratch with vtapes

2009-07-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
d == dus...@zmanda.com writes:

 d> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Brandon
 d> Metcalf wrote:
 d> > I already emptied out tapelist, so I guess this isn't going to work.
 d> > Any manual steps I can take to get going with new level 0 backups?

 d> Blow away all of your old trace logs.


Does this mean remove /etc/amanda/DailySet1/curinfo/*,
/etc/amanda/DailySet1/curinfo.orig*, /etc/amanda/DailySet1/log.* ?

Just trying to understand what is defined as a trace log.

-- 
Brandon


Re: starting from scratch with vtapes

2009-07-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:

 m> amadmin CONF force '*'


Thanks everyone for the help.

-- 
Brandon


udp or tcp

2009-07-21 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I have Amanda working with the default settings for the client:

  service amanda
  {
  disable = no
  socket_type = dgram
  protocol= udp
  wait= yes
  user= backup
  group   = disk
  groups  = yes
  server  = /usr/local/libexec/amandad
  server_args = -auth=bsd amdump
  }

Is it better to use tcp and stream since with udp there is no error
correction or does Amanda build in the error checking at the
application level?  Any other settings that would be preferred over
what is shown above?

Thanks.

-- 
Brandon


bsd works but not bsdtcp

2009-07-23 Thread Brandon Metcalf
I've changed all of my Amanda hosts to use bsdtcp instead of bsd
authentication, but one isn't cooperating.  The client works using

  service amanda
  {
  socket_type = dgram
  protocol= udp
  wait= yes
  user= backup
  group   = backup
  groups  = yes
  server  = /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
  server_args = -auth=bsd amdump amindexd amidxtaped
  disable = no
  }

but times out under amcheck when using

  service amanda
  {
  socket_type = stream
  protocol= tcp
  wait= yes
  user= backup
  group   = backup
  groups  = yes
  server  = /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
  server_args = -auth=bsdtcp amdump amindexd amidxtaped
  disable = no
  }

The only thing interesting in the amcheck debug log is

  amcheck-clients: time 30.234: security_seterror(handle=0x805ecf0, 
driver=0xb7eae2e0 (BSD) error=timeout waiting for ACK)

Not sure where to look next.

-- 
Brandon


Re: bsd works but not bsdtcp

2009-07-23 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:

 m> Brandon Metcalf wrote:
 m> > I've changed all of my Amanda hosts to use bsdtcp instead of bsd
 m> > authentication, but one isn't cooperating.  The client works using
 m> >
 m> >   service amanda
 m> >   {
 m> >   socket_type = dgram
 m> >   protocol= udp
 m> >   wait= yes
 m> >   user= backup
 m> >   group   = backup
 m> >   groups  = yes
 m> >   server  = /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
 m> >   server_args = -auth=bsd amdump amindexd amidxtaped
 m> >   disable = no
 m> >   }
 m> >
 m> > but times out under amcheck when using
 m> >
 m> >   service amanda
 m> >   {
 m> >   socket_type = stream
 m> >   protocol= tcp
 m> >   wait= yes
 m> >   user= backup
 m> >   group   = backup
 m> >   groups  = yes
 m> >   server  = /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
 m> >   server_args = -auth=bsdtcp amdump amindexd amidxtaped
 m> >   disable = no
 m> >   }
 m> >
 m> wait = no
 m> > The only thing interesting in the amcheck debug log is
 m> >
 m> >   amcheck-clients: time 30.234: security_seterror(handle=0x805ecf0, 
driver=0xb7eae2e0 (BSD) error=timeout waiting for ACK)
 m> >

 m> Change your dumptype to use bsdtcp:
 m>  auth "bsdtcp"


I added this to the global dumptype which all of the types I'm using
refer to and this resulted in all of my clients failing when running
amcheck:

  WARNING: cedar: selfcheck request failed: recv error: Connection reset by peer
  WARNING: maisrv02: selfcheck request failed: Connection refused
  WARNING: quercus: selfcheck request failed: Connection refused

cedar is the host that I was originally having trouble with.

-- 
Brandon


Re: bsd works but not bsdtcp

2009-07-23 Thread Brandon Metcalf
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:

 m> Do the clients are set for the bsdtcp auth?

Yes.  Changing wait from yes to no fixed the problem.

-- 
Brandon