Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Monday 09 February 2004 12:59, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: >On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 12:51pm, Gene Heskett wrote > >> Actually, I've heard that if its only off by point double ought >> zip, "thats close enough for the girls I go with!" :) > >Around here we can say "good enough for gov't work" and mean it, > given that most of our grants come from the gov't. > >> With that, if I haven't mentioned it before, I will be out of >> pocket for a bit, I'm flying to upstate MI tomorrow morning to >> apply the > >Good luck, and, err, enjoy upstate MI at this time of year... Heh. Yeah, I hear there is a foot+ of white stuff just laying around. When they specify a + sign, thats when you call for a dozer to come and make your rented 4wd a trail. Susan, the only employee at the moment, has been warned. :) -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 12:51pm, Gene Heskett wrote > Actually, I've heard that if its only off by point double ought zip, > "thats close enough for the girls I go with!" :) Around here we can say "good enough for gov't work" and mean it, given that most of our grants come from the gov't. > With that, if I haven't mentioned it before, I will be out of pocket > for a bit, I'm flying to upstate MI tomorrow morning to apply the Good luck, and, err, enjoy upstate MI at this time of year... Heh. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Monday 09 February 2004 12:21, Jon LaBadie wrote: >On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote >> >> > I also go into the source and change the columns with single >> > decimal digits to having zero decimal digits and no decimal >> > point. Do I really care if the tape rate was 975.8 KB/sec as >> > compared to 976? Or that u07's /var FS compressed to 43.2 >> > percent of its original size vs 43%? >> >> YES! For $DEITY's sake, man, don't carelessly toss away >> precious significant digits! >> >> Ahem. This aside has been brought to you by my type A, >> engineering past. > >The $NETHERDEITY you say! The digits are not tossed, just not > reported. They are recoverable by dividing two other columns. ;) Chuckle, I see everyones humor bone is in good shape today. Actually, I've heard that if its only off by point double ought zip, "thats close enough for the girls I go with!" :) With that, if I haven't mentioned it before, I will be out of pocket for a bit, I'm flying to upstate MI tomorrow morning to apply the defib paddles to a tv station thats been dark a bit too long and the license is in danger. Hopefully I can get it to breathing regularly again. NDI what I'm walking into, but the price & fringies are ok. I've got my scope, a DVM, a decent soldering iron and some small hand tools packed, anything else I'll let petty cash buy, & fedex deliver. I hear the place is toolless. Ick... I'll likely be around the rest of the evening but will do a gracefull shutdown late tonight. Asking the nearly computer illiterate missus to keep the tapes changed runs up my phone bill :-) OTOH, she did it for a couple of weeks 2 years ago. I'll resign from the lists, else my 10 meg mailbox will be full in a day or 2. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 12:21pm, Jon LaBadie wrote > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote > > > > > I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits > > > to having zero decimal digits and no decimal point. Do I really care if > > > the tape rate was 975.8 KB/sec as compared to 976? Or that u07's /var FS > > > compressed to 43.2 percent of its original size vs 43%? > > > > YES! For $DEITY's sake, man, don't carelessly toss away > > precious significant digits! > > > > Ahem. This aside has been brought to you by my type A, engineering past. > > The $NETHERDEITY you say! The digits are not tossed, just not reported. > They are recoverable by dividing two other columns. ;) Yeah, but I'm also lazy... ;) -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Monday 09 February 2004 11:09, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >Hi, Gene, > >on Montag, 09. Februar 2004 at 17:03 you wrote to amanda-users: (brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1) >>> >>>2.4.4p2 is out too :-) > >GH> So is 2.4.5p1, works great here. :-) > >I only see 2.4.5b1 here ... are you ahead of us? Thats a typu, sorry. Been running it 2 days now. Dunno why Jean-Louis called it a beta though. From the ChangeLog: 2004-02-02 Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * server-src/driver.c: Build holding disk name with timestamp. * server-src/holding.c (is_datestr): Check also for timestamp. * server-src/planner.c: Flush today's dump with autoflush. * server-src/find.c: Find holding disk with timestamp. * server-src/find.h (find_result_t): Add timestamp field. * NEWS: holding disk disk use timestamped directory. * NEWS: autoflush flush today's dump. 2004-02-02 Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * changer-src/chg-zd-mtx.sh.in: Works if all slot and tape are full. 2004-02-02 Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * server-src/amverifyrun.sh.in: Do not execute amverify if no tape to verify. 2004-02-02 Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * server-src/amdump.sh.in: Do not redirect to /dev/null. 2004-02-02 Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/acinclude.m4i: Define CF_WAIT_INT. * configure.in: Call CF_WAIT_INT. * common-src/amanda.h: Try to make waitpid doesn't warn. 2004-02-02 Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure.in: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(amanda, 2.4.5b1). So it looks like some of the requests for a finer timestamp are being addressed. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote > > > I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits > > to having zero decimal digits and no decimal point. Do I really care if > > the tape rate was 975.8 KB/sec as compared to 976? Or that u07's /var FS > > compressed to 43.2 percent of its original size vs 43%? > > YES! For $DEITY's sake, man, don't carelessly toss away > precious significant digits! > > Ahem. This aside has been brought to you by my type A, engineering past. The $NETHERDEITY you say! The digits are not tossed, just not reported. They are recoverable by dividing two other columns. ;) -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote > I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits > to having zero decimal digits and no decimal point. Do I really care if > the tape rate was 975.8 KB/sec as compared to 976? Or that u07's /var FS > compressed to 43.2 percent of its original size vs 43%? YES! For $DEITY's sake, man, don't carelessly toss away precious significant digits! Ahem. This aside has been brought to you by my type A, engineering past. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:57:31PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > Amanda users, > > do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows? > This is just test, no production cycle yet. > > -- - > u03 -xport/home 1 29370 3297 11.2 2:53 19.1 0:04 753.3 > u03 /opt2 174590 9691 5.6 3:34 45.2 0:11 873.0 > u03 /usr0 503910 158394 31.4 24:42 106.9 2:43 974.5 > u03 -sr/openwin 1 720 47 6.5 0:07 6.3 0:001149.1 > u03 /var0 245600 129929 52.9 13:09 164.7 2:17 950.6 > u07 -xport/home 13670140 3.8 0:03 45.0 0:002079.7 > u07 /home 1 10 1 10.0 0:00 0.0 0:00 4.0 > u07 /usr1 15950 1635 10.3 0:28 58.4 0:17 95.5 > u07 /var0 83740 36156 43.2 0:56 649.5 0:37 975.8 > Aside from what has already been noted; you might read up on the "columnspec" setting to adjust the spacing of your report columns. I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits to having zero decimal digits and no decimal point. Do I really care if the tape rate was 975.8 KB/sec as compared to 976? Or that u07's /var FS compressed to 43.2 percent of its original size vs 43%? -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
Hi, Gene, on Montag, 09. Februar 2004 at 17:03 you wrote to amanda-users: >>> (brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1) >> >>2.4.4p2 is out too :-) GH> So is 2.4.5p1, works great here. :-) I only see 2.4.5b1 here ... are you ahead of us? -- best regards, Stefan Stefan G. Weichinger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Monday 09 February 2004 10:57, Paul Bijnens wrote: >Eugen Leitl wrote: >> do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows? >> This is just test, no production cycle yet. > >All fine. > >> planner: Full dump of u03:/var promoted from 25 days ahead. > >Are you sure you want to run with a dumpcycle that large? >Dumpcyle != tapecycle. Actually tapecycle is best at least twice >the dumpcycle. > >> DUMPER STATSTAPER >> STATS HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s >> MMM:SS KB/s -- >> - u03 >> -xport/home 1 29370 3297 11.2 2:53 19.1 0:04 753.3 u03 >>/opt2 174590 9691 5.6 3:34 45.2 0:11 >> 873.0 u03 /usr0 503910 158394 31.4 24:42 106.9 >> 2:43 974.5 u03 -sr/openwin 1 720 47 6.5 >> 0:07 6.3 0:001149.1 > >Have a look at the "colspec" parameter in amanda.conf. It avoids >running the columns together. When going production, you numbers > will even be larger. > >> (brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1) > >2.4.4p2 is out too :-) So is 2.4.5p1, works great here. :-) -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
On Monday 09 February 2004 09:57, Eugen Leitl wrote: >Amanda users, > >do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows? >This is just test, no production cycle yet. > > Original Message >Subject: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004 >Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:36:20 +0100 (MET) >From: Amanda Operator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >These dumps were to tape DailySet111. >The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape. > > >STATISTICS: > Total Full Daily > >Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:20 >Run Time (hrs:min) 1:08 >Dump Time (hrs:min)0:46 0:39 0:07 >Output Size (meg) 331.3 316.9 14.5 >Original Size (meg) 1032.8 813.7 219.1 >Avg Compressed Size (%)32.1 38.96.6 > (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Dumped9 3 >6 (1:5 2:1) Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 123.3 139.5 > 34.8 > >Tape Time (hrs:min)0:06 0:06 0:01 >Tape Size (meg) 331.3 316.9 14.5 >Tape Used (%) 2.92.70.1 > (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Taped 9 3 >6 (1:5 2:1) Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 918.9 964.9 > 449.4 > >USAGE BY TAPE: > Label Time Size %Nb > DailySet111 0:06 331.32.9 9 > > >NOTES: > planner: Full dump of u03:/var promoted from 25 days ahead. > planner: Full dump of u07:/var promoted from 25 days ahead. > planner: Full dump of u03:/usr promoted from 24 days ahead. > taper: tape DailySet111 kb 339744 fm 9 [OK] > > >DUMP SUMMARY: > DUMPER STATSTAPER > STATS HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s > MMM:SS KB/s -- > - u03 > -xport/home 1 29370 3297 11.2 2:53 19.1 0:04 753.3 u03 > /opt2 174590 9691 5.6 3:34 45.2 0:11 873.0 > u03 /usr0 503910 158394 31.4 24:42 106.9 2:43 > 974.5 u03 -sr/openwin 1 720 47 6.5 0:07 6.3 > 0:001149.1 u03 /var0 245600 129929 52.9 13:09 > 164.7 2:17 950.6 u07 -xport/home 13670140 3.8 > 0:03 45.0 0:002079.7 u07 /home 1 10 1 > 10.0 0:00 0.0 0:00 4.0 u07 /usr1 15950 > 1635 10.3 0:28 58.4 0:17 95.5 u07 /var0 > 83740 36156 43.2 0:56 649.5 0:37 975.8 > >(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1) Looks fine (before my word wrap got to it that is) Now is the time to start adding the rest of the DLE's to the disklist. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
Eugen Leitl wrote: do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows? This is just test, no production cycle yet. All fine. planner: Full dump of u03:/var promoted from 25 days ahead. Are you sure you want to run with a dumpcycle that large? Dumpcyle != tapecycle. Actually tapecycle is best at least twice the dumpcycle. DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s -- - u03 -xport/home 1 29370 3297 11.2 2:53 19.1 0:04 753.3 u03 /opt2 174590 9691 5.6 3:34 45.2 0:11 873.0 u03 /usr0 503910 158394 31.4 24:42 106.9 2:43 974.5 u03 -sr/openwin 1 720 47 6.5 0:07 6.3 0:001149.1 Have a look at the "colspec" parameter in amanda.conf. It avoids running the columns together. When going production, you numbers will even be larger. (brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1) 2.4.4p2 is out too :-) -- Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511 Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUMFax +32 16 397.512 http://www.xplanation.com/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** * I think I've got the hang of it now: exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, * * quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, * * stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt, abort, hangup, * * PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e, kill -1 $$, shutdown, * * kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ...* * ... "Are you sure?" ... YES ... Phew ... I'm out * ***
Does this report look okay? ---> [Fwd: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004]
Amanda users,
do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
This is just test, no production cycle yet.
Original Message
Subject: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:36:20 +0100 (MET)
From: Amanda Operator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These dumps were to tape DailySet111.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:20
Run Time (hrs:min) 1:08
Dump Time (hrs:min)0:46 0:39 0:07
Output Size (meg) 331.3 316.9 14.5
Original Size (meg) 1032.8 813.7 219.1
Avg Compressed Size (%)32.1 38.96.6 (level:#disks ...)
Filesystems Dumped9 3 6 (1:5 2:1)
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 123.3 139.5 34.8
Tape Time (hrs:min)0:06 0:06 0:01
Tape Size (meg) 331.3 316.9 14.5
Tape Used (%) 2.92.70.1 (level:#disks ...)
Filesystems Taped 9 3 6 (1:5 2:1)
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 918.9 964.9 449.4
USAGE BY TAPE:
Label Time Size %Nb
DailySet111 0:06 331.32.9 9
NOTES:
planner: Full dump of u03:/var promoted from 25 days ahead.
planner: Full dump of u07:/var promoted from 25 days ahead.
planner: Full dump of u03:/usr promoted from 24 days ahead.
taper: tape DailySet111 kb 339744 fm 9 [OK]
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
-- -
u03 -xport/home 1 29370 3297 11.2 2:53 19.1 0:04 753.3
u03 /opt2 174590 9691 5.6 3:34 45.2 0:11 873.0
u03 /usr0 503910 158394 31.4 24:42 106.9 2:43 974.5
u03 -sr/openwin 1 720 47 6.5 0:07 6.3 0:001149.1
u03 /var0 245600 129929 52.9 13:09 164.7 2:17 950.6
u07 -xport/home 13670140 3.8 0:03 45.0 0:002079.7
u07 /home 1 10 1 10.0 0:00 0.0 0:00 4.0
u07 /usr1 15950 1635 10.3 0:28 58.4 0:17 95.5
u07 /var0 83740 36156 43.2 0:56 649.5 0:37 975.8
(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1)
