Re: amanda not using smbclient for samba clients?

2007-11-28 Thread Dan Brown
Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
 Dan Brown schrieb:
 # disklist
 # Design Resources Mac
 coralie //coralie/design_resources_archive/ tar-comp-srvbest-ne
 coralie //coralie/design_resources/ tar-comp-srvbest-ne
 
 The first column is the name of the machine who connect to the samba
 share, not the client. Here's one of my DLEs for example:
 
 nucleus.mr.lfmg.de//amplicon/backup$  SMB_Low_Client-Fast
 
 Explanation: Nucleus does the connect to my client Amplicon and collect
 the data.
 
 The machine must not be the backupserver itself. E. g. if you have a
 remote subnet, connected with a slow connection, you can configure a
 remote linux machine to collect and compact your data and then transfer
 it from there to your backup server to save bandwidth. It's wasting
 bandwidth of the WAN connection to transfer the whole samba data to your
 backup server and do the compact there. Surely you can do this in your
 local subnet too, to keep the load of your backupserver low.

It can't be the backup server itself or shouldn't?  I was following the
15 minute setup example on zmanda.com and it used the backup server
itself.  Isn't that the point of having --with-smbclient in the compile
script?  It doesn't really matter how loaded down the backup server is,
as long as the computers with the shares I am backing up don't
experience a huge load.

Out of curiosity I've changed it to the backup server itself:

ministryofinformation //coralie/design_resources_archive/
tar-comp-srvbest-ne

but now on the target computer I see no connection attempts at all via
tcpdump.  These computers are all on the same subnet and are qualified
addresses of an internal domain (although it's FQDN would be
ministryofinformation.thezoo).


---
Dan Brown


Re: amanda not using smbclient for samba clients?

2007-11-27 Thread Marc Muehlfeld

Dan Brown schrieb:

# disklist
# Design Resources Mac
coralie //coralie/design_resources_archive/ tar-comp-srvbest-ne
coralie //coralie/design_resources/ tar-comp-srvbest-ne


The first column is the name of the machine who connect to the samba share, 
not the client. Here's one of my DLEs for example:


nucleus.mr.lfmg.de//amplicon/backup$  SMB_Low_Client-Fast

Explanation: Nucleus does the connect to my client Amplicon and collect the 
data.

The machine must not be the backupserver itself. E. g. if you have a remote 
subnet, connected with a slow connection, you can configure a remote linux 
machine to collect and compact your data and then transfer it from there to 
your backup server to save bandwidth. It's wasting bandwidth of the WAN 
connection to transfer the whole samba data to your backup server and do the 
compact there. Surely you can do this in your local subnet too, to keep the 
load of your backupserver low.



Marc


--
Marc Muehlfeld (Leitung Systemadministration)
Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und Laboratoriumsmedizin Dr. Klein und Dr. Rost
Lochhamer Str. 29 - D-82152 Martinsried
Telefon: +49(0)89/895578-0 - Fax: +49(0)89/895578-78
http://www.medizinische-genetik.de


Re: amanda not using smbclient for samba clients?

2007-11-27 Thread Marc Muehlfeld

Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
The machine must not be the backupserver itself. 


You mean:

The machine does not have to be the backupserver itself

Right?


Oh hell. Better I go back home. Getting up at 6am doesn't seem to be good for 
me. :-)



Marc


--
Marc Muehlfeld (Leitung Systemadministration)
Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und Laboratoriumsmedizin Dr. Klein und Dr. Rost
Lochhamer Str. 29 - D-82152 Martinsried
Telefon: +49(0)89/895578-0 - Fax: +49(0)89/895578-78
http://www.medizinische-genetik.de


Re: amanda not using smbclient for samba clients?

2007-11-27 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Marc Muehlfeld schrieb:
 Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
 The machine must not be the backupserver itself. 

 You mean:

 The machine does not have to be the backupserver itself

 Right?
 
 Oh hell. Better I go back home. Getting up at 6am doesn't seem to be
 good for me. :-)

Same here, same here.
The problem is: I *am* at home.

;)

Greets, Stefan