Re: Tapetype and Offline

2003-01-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:10:12PM -0500, Michael J. Pawlowsky wrote:
> 
> This is what I got from tapetype...  after 8 hours!

That is how long it takes your drive, at near optimum speed,
to twice write 19.5GB.  If it is too slow, get a faster drive.

> Is it ok to have filemark 0 kbytes?

Some formats keep the control data on a separate track and
so waste no space between files for searchable marks.

> 
> ]# tapetype -e 20480m -f /dev/nst0
> wrote 622535 32Kb blocks in 95 files in 14145 seconds (short write)
> wrote 625716 32Kb blocks in 191 files in 14295 seconds (short write)
> define tapetype HP-DLT-40i {
> comment "just produced by tapetype program"
> length 19503 mbytes
> filemark 0 kbytes
> speed 1404 kps
> }
> 
> 
> It seems to be working.. doing first backup now.. will try restore tomorrow morning.

Let us know the results.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322  (609) 683-7220 (fax)



Tapetype and Offline

2003-01-11 Thread Michael J. Pawlowsky

This is what I got from tapetype...  after 8 hours!
Is it ok to have filemark 0 kbytes?

]# tapetype -e 20480m -f /dev/nst0
wrote 622535 32Kb blocks in 95 files in 14145 seconds (short write)
wrote 625716 32Kb blocks in 191 files in 14295 seconds (short write)
define tapetype HP-DLT-40i {
comment "just produced by tapetype program"
length 19503 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 1404 kps
}


It seems to be working.. doing first backup now.. will try restore tomorrow morning.


Cheers,
Mike
-
Hlade's Law:If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person --
they will find an easier way to do it.