Re: access as amanda not allowed from amanda@foo.sys.si.tlan] amandahostsauth failed
On Feb 15, 2001, David Klasinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if I do it as user amanda, then it fails. I have users root and amanda in
> .amandahosts.
What are the exact contents of .amandahosts on the client?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicampoliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist*Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
Re: access as amanda not allowed from amanda@foo.sys.si.tlan] amandahostsauth failed
On Thursday 15 February 2001 09:06, Gerhard den Hollander wrote: > > You get a message saying Banzai ! > Did you install the WWII - japanese slang add-on to Amanda ? > > [Just kidding] ;> > Ehm > do you have the .amandahosts in user amandas homedir ? > or only in roots homedir ? In amandas home dir. root doesn't even have .amandahosts > The amanda FAQ (docs/FAQ in the source tree) sez this > > Q: Why does `amcheck' say `access as not allowed...' > > A: There must be something wrong with .amandahosts configuration (or > .rhosts, if you have configured --without-amandahosts). That I know. But, the fact is there's nothing wrong with it. I have about two dozen machines setup in exactly the same way that this one is. All of them work... This is because I compiled amanda client and made a tgz package that I install on each machine... And then change the .amandahosts file... >Make sure you specify the names exactly as they appear in the error > message after the `@' sign in .amandahosts/.rhosts. You'll need a > fully-qualified domain name or not, depending on how your client > resolves IP addresses to host names. Well I'll double check, but I can be pretty sure that everything is setup exactly like it is on all the other hosts. -- David Klasinc Turbolinux Inc. http://www.turbolinux.com
Re: access as amanda not allowed from amanda@foo.sys.si.tlan] amandahostsauth failed
* David Klasinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:53:33AM +0100) > Banzai! > I get the above message when trying to backup one specific host. Client and You get a message saying Banzai ! Did you install the WWII - japanese slang add-on to Amanda ? [Just kidding] > server are bot v2.4.2 and if I do amcheck as root then everything works fine, > if I do it as user amanda, then it fails. I have users root and amanda in > ..amandahosts. > Any ideas what could be wrong? Ehm do you have the .amandahosts in user amandas homedir ? or only in roots homedir ? The amanda FAQ (docs/FAQ in the source tree) sez this Q: Why does `amcheck' say `access as not allowed...' A: There must be something wrong with .amandahosts configuration (or .rhosts, if you have configured --without-amandahosts). First, if the is not what you expect (i.e., not what you have specified in the --with-user flag, at configure time), check the inetd configuration file: you must have specified the wrong username there. Make sure you specify the names exactly as they appear in the error message after the `@' sign in .amandahosts/.rhosts. You'll need a fully-qualified domain name or not, depending on how your client resolves IP addresses to host names. HTH Gerhard, <@jasongeo.com> == The Acoustic Motorbiker == -- __O Also by the time I'm 60, I want to get better at the art of living. =`\<, And still be riding an acoustic motorbike. (=)/(=) -- not exactly Mark Knopfler
access as amanda not allowed from amanda@foo.sys.si.tlan] amandahostsauth failed
Banzai! I get the above message when trying to backup one specific host. Client and server are bot v2.4.2 and if I do amcheck as root then everything works fine, if I do it as user amanda, then it fails. I have users root and amanda in .amandahosts. Any ideas what could be wrong? Thanks, -- David Klasinc Turbolinux Inc. http://www.turbolinux.com
