Re: problems with index creation
Le samedi 02 juillet 2005 à 13:31 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Eric DOUTRELEAU wrote: Hi with changing index to index yes it didn't solved my problem. and the output if the commands give me the same output. the only thing that i can see about the hosts that failed is that they a lot of partition to backup. one has 20 and the othr 36 Selon Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote: Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to my problems. i will test that that night thanks for your answer Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: i have a problem with index creation. i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are always empty. Just to confirm, do you have just the word index, or is it index yes? Should be the latter. Do you specify spindle numbers for those DLEs to prevent all 20 and 36 from trying to be backed up at the same time? yes i did the backup are running fine it s only the index the problem I seem to recall some problem with udp packet size and large number of DLEs. well it was what i was thinking of i will search the archive for that.
Re: problems with index creation
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 05:15, Eric Doutreleau wrote: [...] On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote: Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to my problems. i will test that that night thanks for your answer Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: i have a problem with index creation. i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are always empty. Just to confirm, do you have just the word index, or is it index yes? Should be the latter. This is correct, it should be index yes in the config. WRT spindle numbers, they should correspond to the drives per box. So you can use 1 for the 1st driv, 2 for the 2nd drive etc, per box. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Re: problems with index creation
Hi with changing index to index yes it didn't solved my problem. and the output if the commands give me the same output. the only thing that i can see about the hosts that failed is that they a lot of partition to backup. one has 20 and the othr 36 Selon Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote: Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to my problems. i will test that that night thanks for your answer Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: i have a problem with index creation. i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are always empty. Just to confirm, do you have just the word index, or is it index yes? Should be the latter. I wonder what amadmin config_name disklist hostname dle_name would show for dumptypes with just index? -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax) This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: problems with index creation
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Eric DOUTRELEAU wrote: Hi with changing index to index yes it didn't solved my problem. and the output if the commands give me the same output. the only thing that i can see about the hosts that failed is that they a lot of partition to backup. one has 20 and the othr 36 Selon Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote: Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to my problems. i will test that that night thanks for your answer Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: i have a problem with index creation. i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are always empty. Just to confirm, do you have just the word index, or is it index yes? Should be the latter. Do you specify spindle numbers for those DLEs to prevent all 20 and 36 from trying to be backed up at the same time? I seem to recall some problem with udp packet size and large number of DLEs. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
problems with index creation
i have a problem with index creation.
i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are
always empty.
here is some debug
on the client the sendbackup.
we can see in it that the index is created succesfully.
more sendbackup.20050630231107.debug
sendbackup: debug 1 pid 13721 ruid 33 euid 33: start at Thu Jun 30
23:11:07 2005/usr/lib/amanda/sendbackup: version 2.4.4p2
parsed request as: program `DUMP'
disk `/var/spool/imap21'
device `/var/spool/imap21'
level 3
since 2005:6:27:21:57:9
options `|;bsd-auth;compress-fast;index;'
sendbackup: try_socksize: send buffer size is 65536
sendbackup: time 0.001: stream_server: waiting for connection:
0.0.0.0.57878
sendbackup: time 0.001: stream_server: waiting for connection:
0.0.0.0.57879
sendbackup: time 0.001: stream_server: waiting for connection:
0.0.0.0.57880
sendbackup: time 0.001: waiting for connect on 57878, then 57879, then
57880
sendbackup: time 0.003: stream_accept: connection from
157.159.21.10.12394
sendbackup: time 0.003: stream_accept: connection from
157.159.21.10.12395
sendbackup: time 0.003: stream_accept: connection from
157.159.21.10.12396
sendbackup: time 0.003: got all connections
sendbackup: time 0.003: spawning /usr/bin/gzip in pipeline
sendbackup: argument list: /usr/bin/gzip --fast
sendbackup-dump: time 0.004: pid 13723: /usr/bin/gzip --fast
sendbackup: time 0.007: dumping device '/dev/sdc8' with 'ext3'
sendbackup: time 0.012: started index creator: /sbin/restore -tvf -
21 | sed
-e '
s/^leaf[]*[0-9]*[ ]*\.//
t
/^dir[ ]/ {
s/^dir[ ]*[0-9]*[ ]*\.//
s%$%/%
t
}
d
'
sendbackup: time 0.013: spawning /sbin/dump in pipeline
sendbackup: argument list: dump 3usf 1048576 - /dev/sdc8
sendbackup: time 0.099: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Date of this level 3
dump: Thu
Jun 30 23:11:07 2005
sendbackup: time 0.101: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Date of last level 2
dump: Tue
Jun 28 00:01:32 2005
sendbackup: time 0.102: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Dumping /dev/sdc8
(/var/spool/imap21) to standard output
sendbackup: time 0.103: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Excluding inode 8
(journal inode) from dump
sendbackup: time 0.104: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Excluding inode 7
(resize inode) from dump
sendbackup: time 0.711: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Label: none
sendbackup: time 0.713: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Writing 10 Kilobyte
records
sendbackup: time 0.714: 93: normal(|): DUMP: mapping (Pass I)
[regular files]
sendbackup: time 13.240: 93: normal(|): DUMP: mapping (Pass II)
[directories]
sendbackup: time 14.550: 93: normal(|): DUMP: estimated 39683
blocks.
sendbackup: time 14.553: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Volume 1 started with
block 1
at: Thu Jun 30 23:11:21 2005
sendbackup: time 14.575: 93: normal(|): DUMP: dumping (Pass III)
[directories]
sendbackup: time 15.580: 93: normal(|): DUMP: dumping (Pass IV)
[regular files]
sendbackup: time 36.977: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Volume 1 completed at:
Thu Jun 30 23:11:44 2005
sendbackup: time 36.979: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Volume 1 39880 blocks
(38.95MB)
sendbackup: time 36.980: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Volume 1 took 0:00:23
sendbackup: time 36.981: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Volume 1 transfer
rate: 1733 kB/s
sendbackup: time 36.981: 62:size(|): DUMP: 39880 blocks (38.95MB)
sendbackup: time 36.982: 93: normal(|): DUMP: finished in 23
seconds, throughput 1733 kBytes/sec
sendbackup: time 36.990: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Date of this level 3
dump: Thu Jun 30 23:11:07 2005
sendbackup: time 36.991: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Date this dump
completed: Thu Jun 30 23:11:44 2005
sendbackup: time 36.992: index created successfully
sendbackup: time 36.994: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Average transfer rate:
1733 kB/s
sendbackup: time 36.995: 93: normal(|): DUMP: DUMP IS DONE
sendbackup: time 36.995: pid 13721 finish time Thu Jun 30 23:11:44 2005
on the server
in the amdump file
driver: send-cmd time 8298.861 to dumper2: FILE-DUMP
03-00541 /holddisk/disk/20050630/molure._var_spool_imap23.3 molure
feff9ffe0f /var/spool/imap23 NODEVICE 3 2005:6:27:22:0:6 4194304
DUMP 24448 |;bsd-auth;compress-fast;index;
driver: finished-cmd time 8329.237 dumper2 dumped
molure:/var/spool/imap23
driver: send-cmd time 8488.135 to taper: FILE-WRITE
01-00570 /holddisk/disk/20050630/molure._var_spool_imap23.3 molure
feff9ffe0f /var/spool/imap23 3 20050630
driver: startaflush: FIRST molure /var/spool/imap23 2 963920466
driver: finished-cmd time 8488.421 taper wrote molure:/var/spool/imap23
all seems ok but the index file is empty as the dump file is not.
my client is running Fedora core 2.
has anyone seen already that kind of problem?
thanks in advance for any help
Re: problems with index creation
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: i have a problem with index creation. i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are always empty. Just to confirm, do you have just the word index, or is it index yes? Should be the latter. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
Re: problems with index creation
Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to my problems. i will test that that night thanks for your answer Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: i have a problem with index creation. i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are always empty. Just to confirm, do you have just the word index, or is it index yes? Should be the latter.
Re: problems with index creation
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote: Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to my problems. i will test that that night thanks for your answer Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: i have a problem with index creation. i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are always empty. Just to confirm, do you have just the word index, or is it index yes? Should be the latter. I wonder what amadmin config_name disklist hostname dle_name would show for dumptypes with just index? -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
