>"John R. Jackson" wrote:

> > >What are the complete contents a typical /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug
> > >file for one of the failed runs?

> >Don't have any from a failed run. Below is my only sendbackup*debug
> >file, which is from the successful run.  
> > 
> ># cat /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug
> >sendbackup: debug 1 pid 17143 ruid 507 euid 507 start time Fri May  4
> >20:45:05 2001
> >/usr/local/libexec/sendbackup: version 2.4.2p2
> >sendbackup: got input request: GNUTAR /home/amanda 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0
> >OPTIONS |;bsd-auth;
> >  parsed request as: program `GNUTAR'
> >                     disk `/home/amanda'
> >                     lev 0
> >                     since 1970:1:1:0:0:0
> >                     opt `|;bsd-auth;'
> >sendbackup: try_socksize: send buffer size is 65536
> >sendbackup: stream_server: waiting for connection: 0.0.0.0.2865
> >sendbackup: stream_server: waiting for connection: 0.0.0.0.2866
> >  waiting for connect on 2865, then 2866
> >sendbackup: stream_accept: connection from 192.168.1.100.2867
> >sendbackup: stream_accept: connection from 192.168.1.100.2868
> >  got all connections
> >sendbackup-gnutar: doing level 0 dump as listed-incremental to
> >/usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/dellmachine_home_amanda_0.new
> >sendbackup-gnutar: doing level 0 dump from date: 1970-01-01  0:00:00 
> > GMT
> >sendbackup: spawning /usr/local/libexec/runtar in pipeline
> >sendbackup: argument list: gtar --create --file - --directory
> >/home/amanda --one-file-system --listed-incremental
> >/usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/dellmachine_home_amanda_0.new
> >--sparse --ignore-failed-read --totals .
> >sendbackup-gnutar: /usr/local/libexec/runtar: pid 17144
> >sendbackup: pid 17143 finish time Fri May  4 20:45:05 2001

> ... This looks just like a failed run.
> I didn't think this ever worked for you. ...

Can you pls tell me what gives this away as a failed run?  To me, it
looks very much like a sendbackup*debug from a successful run (i have my
sources ;).  The time elapsed is small because only a very small
directory was involved.

thank you,
george

Reply via email to