Re: tapecycle off by 1?
Sean Noonan wrote: > > In my amanda.conf, I have the following: > > tapecycle 135 tapes > > But here's what the report said: "These dumps were to tapes love129, > love130, love131. The next 6 tapes Amanda expects to used are: a new tape, > love132, love133, love134, love1, love2. Did you give it love132, love133, love134, love135, love1 and love2? Did it like those 6 tapes? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - HMC UNIX Systems Manager
Re: tapecycle off by 1?
> I've been waiting to reach the 135th tape. For weeks and weeks now, I see > "The next 6 tapes Amanda expects to used are: a new tape, a new tape, a new > tape, a new tape, a new tape, a new tape". I've been waiting for it to say > it expects tape #1 again. > > Today was suppose to be the big day. > > But here's what the report said: "These dumps were to tapes love129, > love130, love131. The next 6 tapes Amanda expects to used are: a new tape, > love132, love133, love134, love1, love2. > > My question is how come it's not expecting love135, after all that's what I > have specified in amanda.conf. Kinda looks like a "x-1" error. But I'm > sure I'm just missing something, and hoping the list can help me... Probably you missed (skipped) a tape someday. Check your tapelist if every tape love1-love131 was used.
tapecycle off by 1?
Hi everyone, I'm running 2.4.2 from the CVS tree from about two months ago on a FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE machine with an HP SureStore 12000e DDS-2 changer. In my amanda.conf, I have the following: tapecycle 135 tapes I've been waiting to reach the 135th tape. For weeks and weeks now, I see "The next 6 tapes Amanda expects to used are: a new tape, a new tape, a new tape, a new tape, a new tape, a new tape". I've been waiting for it to say it expects tape #1 again. Today was suppose to be the big day. But here's what the report said: "These dumps were to tapes love129, love130, love131. The next 6 tapes Amanda expects to used are: a new tape, love132, love133, love134, love1, love2. My question is how come it's not expecting love135, after all that's what I have specified in amanda.conf. Kinda looks like a "x-1" error. But I'm sure I'm just missing something, and hoping the list can help me... TIA, Sean Noonan
