Re: [AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

2008-01-28 Thread Mark Martinec
Robert,

 On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 01:53 +0100, mouss wrote:
  Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
   I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned
   part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero
   in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content?
   If I take the source of the message without the attachment, it scores
   plenty high enough to kill.
 
  if the attachment is large, it will be skipped. The size is
  configurable, but spending cycles on huge messages is generally not
  worth the trouble. Up so far, spam rarely comes in large messages.

 The whole message is less than 30K and contains usually video.zip and is
 a virus. We use ClamAV with SaneSecurity, the first one we got with
 Trojan.Pandex Virus was not found in the ClamAV db, anyone else picking
 these up? We're starting to get more and more of these.

Infected or banned contents cause spam checking to be skipped
currently (but one should not rely on this).

  Mark

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


Re: [AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

2008-01-26 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 01:53 +0100, mouss wrote:
 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
  I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned
  part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero
  in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content? If
  I take the source of the message without the attachment, it scores
  plenty high enough to kill.

 
 if the attachment is large, it will be skipped. The size is 
 configurable, but spending cycles on huge messages is generally not 
 worth the trouble. Up so far, spam rarely comes in large messages.

The whole message is less than 30K and contains usually video.zip and is
a virus. We use ClamAV with SaneSecurity, the first one we got with
Trojan.Pandex Virus was not found in the ClamAV db, anyone else picking
these up? We're starting to get more and more of these.

-- 
Robert


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


Re: [AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

2008-01-25 Thread mouss
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
 I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned
 part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero
 in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content? If
 I take the source of the message without the attachment, it scores
 plenty high enough to kill.
   

if the attachment is large, it will be skipped. The size is 
configurable, but spending cycles on huge messages is generally not 
worth the trouble. Up so far, spam rarely comes in large messages.
 My question, is there a way for amavis to filter with SA and only send
 through according to banned policies if CLEAN?

   


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


[AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

2008-01-25 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned
part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero
in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content? If
I take the source of the message without the attachment, it scores
plenty high enough to kill.

My question, is there a way for amavis to filter with SA and only send
through according to banned policies if CLEAN?

-- 
Robert


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/