Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
> On 19 Oct 2020, at 20:42, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > We probably should add all 3 to W=2 builds (wrapped in cc-option). > I've filed https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1180 to > follow up on. It looks as though the URL mangling has been fixed. If anyone sees that specific URL mangled, please let me know. jch signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 20:16 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:13:35PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > > > > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ > > > > > > > > > > Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you > > > can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. > > > > Actually, the problem is at Oracle's end somewhere in the ocfs2 > > list ... if you could fix it, that would be great. The usual real > > mailing lists didn't get this transformation > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201017160928.12698-1-t...@redhat.com/ > > > > but the ocfs2 list archive did: > > > > https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2020-October/015330.html > > > > I bet Oracle IT has put some spam filter on the list that mangles > > URLs this way. > > *sigh*. I'm sure there's a way. I've raised it with someone who > should be able to fix it. As someone who works for IBM I can only say I feel your pain ... James ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ > > > > Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you > can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. Actually, the problem is at Oracle's end somewhere in the ocfs2 list ... if you could fix it, that would be great. The usual real mailing lists didn't get this transformation https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201017160928.12698-1-t...@redhat.com/ but the ocfs2 list archive did: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2020-October/015330.html I bet Oracle IT has put some spam filter on the list that mangles URLs this way. James ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> clang has a number of useful, new warnings see
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$
>
Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you can't,
please send email from a non-Red Hat email address.
I don't understand why this is a useful warning to fix. What actual
problem is caused by the code below?
> return and break
>
> switch (c->x86_vendor) {
> case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
> intel_p5_mcheck_init(c);
> return 1;
> - break;
Sure, it's unnecessary, but it's not masking a bug. It's not unclear.
Why do we want to enable this warning?
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:13:35PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > > > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ > > > > > > > Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you > > can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. > > Actually, the problem is at Oracle's end somewhere in the ocfs2 list > ... if you could fix it, that would be great. The usual real mailing > lists didn't get this transformation > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201017160928.12698-1-t...@redhat.com/ > > but the ocfs2 list archive did: > > https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2020-October/015330.html > > I bet Oracle IT has put some spam filter on the list that mangles URLs > this way. *sigh*. I'm sure there's a way. I've raised it with someone who should be able to fix it. ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ > > > > Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you can't, > please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. I didn't get it this way, neither did lore. It's on your end. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201017160928.12698-1-t...@redhat.com/ > I don't understand why this is a useful warning to fix. Precision in coding style intent and code minimization would be the biggest factors IMO. > What actual problem is caused by the code below? Obviously none. ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
