RE: [PATCH] drm/display: guard if clause

2022-09-01 Thread Chen, Guchun
Yes, exactly. The logic in two successive if checks of "(update_type != 
UPDATE_TYPE_FAST) " is incorrect still.

Possibly we can update code by dropping one if check as below. Anyway, this 
needs confirm from display team @Lee, Alvin @Lei, Jun.

if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST) {
dc->hwss.post_unlock_program_front_end(dc, context);
if (dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config)
dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config(dc, context);
}

Regards,
Guchun

-Original Message-
From: Koenig, Christian  
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 7:07 PM
To: Song, Asher ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Lee, Alvin 
; Lei, Jun ; Chen, Guchun 

Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/display: guard if clause

Well please adjust the subject line, that should read something like 
"drm/amd/display:..." or "drm/amdgpu:...".

Am 01.09.22 um 11:11 schrieb Asher Song:
> To eliminate the following compiling error, guard if clause.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c: In function 
> 'commit_planes_for_stream':
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3521:2: error: this 
> 'if' clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3523:3: note: ...this 
> statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by 
> the 'if'
> if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
> ^~
>
> Signed-off-by: Asher Song 
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> index b49237390cce..66072ac1bb4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> @@ -3505,11 +3505,12 @@ static void commit_planes_for_stream(struct dc *dc,
>   top_pipe_to_program->stream_res.tg);
>   }
>   
> - if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
> + if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST){
>   dc->hwss.post_unlock_program_front_end(dc, context);
>   if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
>   if (dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config)
>   dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config(dc, context);
> + }

That looks like a step into the right directly, but please re-read the code:

if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST) {

     if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
     
}

That's certainly still not correct.

Regards,
Christian.


>   
>   /* Since phantom pipe programming is moved to 
> post_unlock_program_front_end,
>* move the SubVP lock to after the phantom pipes have been setup



Re: [PATCH] drm/display: guard if clause

2022-09-01 Thread Christian König
Well please adjust the subject line, that should read something like 
"drm/amd/display:..." or "drm/amdgpu:...".


Am 01.09.22 um 11:11 schrieb Asher Song:

To eliminate the following compiling error, guard if clause.

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c: In function 
'commit_planes_for_stream':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3521:2: error: this 'if' 
clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3523:3: note: ...this 
statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 
'if'
if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
^~

Signed-off-by: Asher Song 
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
index b49237390cce..66072ac1bb4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
@@ -3505,11 +3505,12 @@ static void commit_planes_for_stream(struct dc *dc,
top_pipe_to_program->stream_res.tg);
}
  
-	if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)

+   if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST){
dc->hwss.post_unlock_program_front_end(dc, context);
if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
if (dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config)
dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config(dc, context);
+   }


That looks like a step into the right directly, but please re-read the code:

if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST) {

    if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
    
}

That's certainly still not correct.

Regards,
Christian.


  
  	/* Since phantom pipe programming is moved to post_unlock_program_front_end,

 * move the SubVP lock to after the phantom pipes have been setup




[PATCH] drm/display: guard if clause

2022-09-01 Thread Asher Song
To eliminate the following compiling error, guard if clause.

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c: In function 
'commit_planes_for_stream':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3521:2: error: this 'if' 
clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3523:3: note: ...this 
statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 
'if'
if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
^~

Signed-off-by: Asher Song 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
index b49237390cce..66072ac1bb4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
@@ -3505,11 +3505,12 @@ static void commit_planes_for_stream(struct dc *dc,
top_pipe_to_program->stream_res.tg);
}
 
-   if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
+   if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST){
dc->hwss.post_unlock_program_front_end(dc, context);
if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
if (dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config)
dc->hwss.commit_subvp_config(dc, context);
+   }
 
/* Since phantom pipe programming is moved to 
post_unlock_program_front_end,
 * move the SubVP lock to after the phantom pipes have been setup
-- 
2.25.1