[PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
After removal of the legacy EEPROM driver and I2C_CLASS_DDC support in olpc_dcon there's no i2c client driver left supporting I2C_CLASS_DDC. Class-based device auto-detection is a legacy mechanism and shouldn't be used in new code. So we can remove this class completely now. Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_dp.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/intel_gmbus.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_hdmi_i2c.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_ddc.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_i2c.c|1 - drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_ddc.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/cyber2000fb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/i740fb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfb_i2c.c | 15 +-- drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/i2c-matroxfb.c | 12 drivers/video/fbdev/s3fb.c|1 - drivers/video/fbdev/tdfxfb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/tridentfb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/via/via_i2c.c |1 - include/linux/i2c.h |1 - 31 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
[PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
After removal of the legacy EEPROM driver and I2C_CLASS_DDC support in olpc_dcon there's no i2c client driver left supporting I2C_CLASS_DDC. Class-based device auto-detection is a legacy mechanism and shouldn't be used in new code. So we can remove this class completely now. Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_dp.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/intel_gmbus.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_hdmi_i2c.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_ddc.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_i2c.c|1 - drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_ddc.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/cyber2000fb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/i740fb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfb_i2c.c | 15 +-- drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/i2c-matroxfb.c | 12 drivers/video/fbdev/s3fb.c|1 - drivers/video/fbdev/tdfxfb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/tridentfb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/via/via_i2c.c |1 - include/linux/i2c.h |1 - 31 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:55 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > We're not in a hurry. It's just my experience with patch series' affecting > > multiple subsystems that typically the decision was to apply the full > > series via one tree. Also to avoid inquires from maintainers like: > > Shall I take it or are you going to take it? > > Of course there may be different opinions. Please advise. > > Ok, then this turns out to be a negotation thing between the drm/fbdev > maintainers and me. I *can* take all the patches, of course. But since > the number of patches touching the non-i2c subsystems is high, I'd like > to hear their preference, too. > I don't have a preference if you would prefer to take these via i2c. Alex
[PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
After removal of the legacy EEPROM driver and I2C_CLASS_DDC support in olpc_dcon there's no i2c client driver left supporting I2C_CLASS_DDC. Class-based device auto-detection is a legacy mechanism and shouldn't be used in new code. So we can remove this class completely now. Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_dp.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/intel_gmbus.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_hdmi_i2c.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_ddc.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c |1 - drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c|1 - drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_i2c.c|1 - drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_ddc.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/cyber2000fb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/i740fb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/intelfb/intelfb_i2c.c | 15 +-- drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/i2c-matroxfb.c | 12 drivers/video/fbdev/s3fb.c|1 - drivers/video/fbdev/tdfxfb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/tridentfb.c |1 - drivers/video/fbdev/via/via_i2c.c |1 - include/linux/i2c.h |1 - 31 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
On 13.11.2023 18:49, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree. > > Are we in a hurry here, i.e. does it block further development of the > i801 smbus driver? My gut feeling says the patches should rather go via > drm and fbdev trees, but I may be convinced otherwise. > We're not in a hurry. It's just my experience with patch series' affecting multiple subsystems that typically the decision was to apply the full series via one tree. Also to avoid inquires from maintainers like: Shall I take it or are you going to take it? Of course there may be different opinions. Please advise.
Re: [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
> We're not in a hurry. It's just my experience with patch series' affecting > multiple subsystems that typically the decision was to apply the full > series via one tree. Also to avoid inquires from maintainers like: > Shall I take it or are you going to take it? > Of course there may be different opinions. Please advise. Ok, then this turns out to be a negotation thing between the drm/fbdev maintainers and me. I *can* take all the patches, of course. But since the number of patches touching the non-i2c subsystems is high, I'd like to hear their preference, too. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support
> Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree. Are we in a hurry here, i.e. does it block further development of the i801 smbus driver? My gut feeling says the patches should rather go via drm and fbdev trees, but I may be convinced otherwise. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
