RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.

2022-04-14 Thread Wan, Gavin
[AMD Official Use Only]

Dear Paul,

Thanks for you comments. Let me do it.

Thanks,
Gavin

-Original Message-
From: Paul Menzel 
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 1:59 PM
To: Wan, Gavin 
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.

Dear Gavin,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 13.04.22 um 17:26 schrieb Gavin Wan:

Should you re-roll your patch (v2), please remove the dot/period from the end 
of the git commit message summary (subject).

> [why] These static variables saves the RLC Scratch registers address.

s/saves/save/

>When we installed multiple GPUs (for example: XGMI setting) and

s/installed/install/

>multiple GPUs call the function at same time. The RLC Scratch

… same time, the RLC …

>registers address are changed each other. Then it caused

s/caused/causes/

>reading/writing to wrong GPU.

I see from other patches posted here, that [why] is put on a separate line, so 
you do not need to indent the text.

[why]

These static …

>
> [fix] Removed the static from the variables. The variables are
>in stack.

Same here, though *how* instead of *fix* seems more common.

s/Removed/Remove/
s/in stack/on the stack/

>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Wan 
> Change-Id: Iee78849291d4f7a9688ecc5165bec70ee85cdfbe

Without the Gerrit URL that line is useless.


Kind regards.

Paul


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 10 +-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> index d5eea031c3e3..d18a05a20566 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> @@ -868,11 +868,11 @@ static u32 amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(struct amdgpu_device 
> *adev, u32 offset, u32 v
>   uint32_t timeout = 5;
>   uint32_t i, tmp;
>   uint32_t ret = 0;
> - static void *scratch_reg0;
> - static void *scratch_reg1;
> - static void *scratch_reg2;
> - static void *scratch_reg3;
> - static void *spare_int;
> + void *scratch_reg0;
> + void *scratch_reg1;
> + void *scratch_reg2;
> + void *scratch_reg3;
> + void *spare_int;
>
>   if (!adev->gfx.rlc.rlcg_reg_access_supported) {
>   dev_err(adev->dev,


Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.

2022-04-14 Thread Paul Menzel

Dear Gavin,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 13.04.22 um 17:26 schrieb Gavin Wan:

Should you re-roll your patch (v2), please remove the dot/period from 
the end of the git commit message summary (subject).



[why] These static variables saves the RLC Scratch registers address.


s/saves/save/


   When we installed multiple GPUs (for example: XGMI setting) and


s/installed/install/


   multiple GPUs call the function at same time. The RLC Scratch


… same time, the RLC …


   registers address are changed each other. Then it caused


s/caused/causes/


   reading/writing to wrong GPU.


I see from other patches posted here, that [why] is put on a separate 
line, so you do not need to indent the text.


[why]

These static …



[fix] Removed the static from the variables. The variables are
   in stack.


Same here, though *how* instead of *fix* seems more common.

s/Removed/Remove/
s/in stack/on the stack/



Signed-off-by: Gavin Wan 
Change-Id: Iee78849291d4f7a9688ecc5165bec70ee85cdfbe


Without the Gerrit URL that line is useless.


Kind regards.

Paul



---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 10 +-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
index d5eea031c3e3..d18a05a20566 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
@@ -868,11 +868,11 @@ static u32 amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev, u32 offset, u32 v
uint32_t timeout = 5;
uint32_t i, tmp;
uint32_t ret = 0;
-   static void *scratch_reg0;
-   static void *scratch_reg1;
-   static void *scratch_reg2;
-   static void *scratch_reg3;
-   static void *spare_int;
+   void *scratch_reg0;
+   void *scratch_reg1;
+   void *scratch_reg2;
+   void *scratch_reg3;
+   void *spare_int;
  
  	if (!adev->gfx.rlc.rlcg_reg_access_supported) {

dev_err(adev->dev,


Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.

2022-04-14 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 11:27 AM Gavin Wan  wrote:
>
> [why] These static variables saves the RLC Scratch registers address.
>   When we installed multiple GPUs (for example: XGMI setting) and
>   multiple GPUs call the function at same time. The RLC Scratch
>   registers address are changed each other. Then it caused
>   reading/writing to wrong GPU.
>
> [fix] Removed the static from the variables. The variables are
>   in stack.

Please add:
Fixes: 5d447e29670148 ("drm/amdgpu: add helper for rlcg indirect reg access")

With that added.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher 

>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Wan 
> Change-Id: Iee78849291d4f7a9688ecc5165bec70ee85cdfbe
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 10 +-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> index d5eea031c3e3..d18a05a20566 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> @@ -868,11 +868,11 @@ static u32 amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(struct amdgpu_device 
> *adev, u32 offset, u32 v
> uint32_t timeout = 5;
> uint32_t i, tmp;
> uint32_t ret = 0;
> -   static void *scratch_reg0;
> -   static void *scratch_reg1;
> -   static void *scratch_reg2;
> -   static void *scratch_reg3;
> -   static void *spare_int;
> +   void *scratch_reg0;
> +   void *scratch_reg1;
> +   void *scratch_reg2;
> +   void *scratch_reg3;
> +   void *spare_int;
>
> if (!adev->gfx.rlc.rlcg_reg_access_supported) {
> dev_err(adev->dev,
> --
> 2.32.0
>