Re: [PATCH resent] drm/amd/display: Fix exception handling in dm_validate_stream_and_context()

2023-03-24 Thread Hamza Mahfooz



On 3/24/23 14:19, Markus Elfring wrote:

May longer identifiers (or even the complete SHA-1 ID) occasionally also
be tolerated for the tag “Fixes”?

How do you think about the proposed change possibilities?


Well, the hash length is restricted by convention (see
./scripts/checkpatch.pl in the kernel tree), so to propose that change
it would have done more broadly than just for amd-gfx.



Regards,
Markus


--
Hamza



Re: [PATCH resent] drm/amd/display: Fix exception handling in dm_validate_stream_and_context()

2023-03-24 Thread Markus Elfring
>> The label “cleanup” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
>> the detail in the implementation of the function 
>> “dm_validate_stream_and_context”
>> that it was determined already that corresponding variables contained
>> still null pointers.
>>
>> 1. Thus return directly if
>>    * a null pointer was passed for the function parameter “stream”
>>  or
>>    * a call of the function “dc_create_plane_state” failed.
>>
>> 2. Use a more appropriate label instead.
>>
>> 3. Delete two questionable checks.
>>
>> 4. Omit extra initialisations (for the variables “dc_state” and 
>> “dc_plane_state”)
>>    which became unnecessary with this refactoring.
>>
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> Fixes: 5468c36d628524effbb89a9503eb1a2318804759 ("drm/amd/display: Filter 
>> Invalid 420 Modes for HDMI TMDS")
>
> Please truncate the hash to 12 characters.

May longer identifiers (or even the complete SHA-1 ID) occasionally also
be tolerated for the tag “Fixes”?

How do you think about the proposed change possibilities?

Regards,
Markus


Re: [PATCH resent] drm/amd/display: Fix exception handling in dm_validate_stream_and_context()

2023-03-24 Thread Hamza Mahfooz

Hi Markus,

On 3/24/23 11:42, Markus Elfring wrote:

Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 16:21:32 +0100

The label “cleanup” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
the detail in the implementation of the function 
“dm_validate_stream_and_context”
that it was determined already that corresponding variables contained
still null pointers.

1. Thus return directly if
* a null pointer was passed for the function parameter “stream”
  or
* a call of the function “dc_create_plane_state” failed.

2. Use a more appropriate label instead.

3. Delete two questionable checks.

4. Omit extra initialisations (for the variables “dc_state” and 
“dc_plane_state”)
which became unnecessary with this refactoring.


This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Fixes: 5468c36d628524effbb89a9503eb1a2318804759 ("drm/amd/display: Filter Invalid 
420 Modes for HDMI TMDS")


Please truncate the hash to 12 characters.


Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring 


Also please ensure that your Signed-off-by matches the "From:" entry in 
the email.



---
  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 20 ---
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
index eeaeca8b51f4..3086613f5f5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
@@ -6426,19 +6426,19 @@ static enum dc_status 
dm_validate_stream_and_context(struct dc *dc,
struct dc_stream_state *stream)
  {
enum dc_status dc_result = DC_ERROR_UNEXPECTED;
-   struct dc_plane_state *dc_plane_state = NULL;
-   struct dc_state *dc_state = NULL;
+   struct dc_plane_state *dc_plane_state;
+   struct dc_state *dc_state;

if (!stream)
-   goto cleanup;
+   return dc_result;

dc_plane_state = dc_create_plane_state(dc);
if (!dc_plane_state)
-   goto cleanup;
+   return dc_result;

dc_state = dc_create_state(dc);
if (!dc_state)
-   goto cleanup;
+   goto release_plane_state;

/* populate stream to plane */
dc_plane_state->src_rect.height  = stream->src.height;
@@ -6475,13 +6475,9 @@ static enum dc_status 
dm_validate_stream_and_context(struct dc *dc,
if (dc_result == DC_OK)
dc_result = dc_validate_global_state(dc, dc_state, true);

-cleanup:
-   if (dc_state)
-   dc_release_state(dc_state);
-
-   if (dc_plane_state)
-   dc_plane_state_release(dc_plane_state);
-
+   dc_release_state(dc_state);
+release_plane_state:
+   dc_plane_state_release(dc_plane_state);
return dc_result;
  }

--
2.40.0



--
Hamza