[amibroker] Re: Feature Suggestion: Tabs for Parameters window

2010-07-19 Thread rise_t575


I see. Thanks for the info.

Btw - is there a place where I can see the development roadmap?

--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko  wrote:
>
>   Hello,
> 
> Sorry, but it is against the development roadmap that includes parameter 
> window to become dockable as other
> docking windows. Since docking windows can be docked as tabs that would 
> create nested "tabs inside tabs" that would
> be unreadable/too convoluted.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> 
> On 2010-07-19 14:14, rise_t575 wrote:
> >
> > Bump.
> >
> > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "rise_t575"  wrote:
> >> Tomasz,
> >>
> >> I think it could be a great feature to allow user-defined tabs within the 
> >> AA's "Parameters" window - similar to the tabs within AA's "Settings" 
> >> window.
> >>
> >> This would give users the possibility for creating complex, categorized&  
> >> well designed parameter menus as a second dimension to the 
> >> "_Section_Begin" / "Section_End" sections - and it could help to prevent 
> >> rather "endless"&  cluttered lists of parameters in the case of complex 
> >> code with many parameters.
> >>
> >> What does anyone else think about this idea?
> >>
> >> Thanks for considering.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >  IMPORTANT PLEASE READ 
> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> >
> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>




Re: [amibroker] Re: Feature Suggestion: Tabs for Parameters window

2010-07-19 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
  Hello,

Sorry, but it is against the development roadmap that includes parameter window 
to become dockable as other
docking windows. Since docking windows can be docked as tabs that would create 
nested "tabs inside tabs" that would
be unreadable/too convoluted.

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com

On 2010-07-19 14:14, rise_t575 wrote:
>
> Bump.
>
> --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "rise_t575"  wrote:
>> Tomasz,
>>
>> I think it could be a great feature to allow user-defined tabs within the 
>> AA's "Parameters" window - similar to the tabs within AA's "Settings" window.
>>
>> This would give users the possibility for creating complex, categorized&  
>> well designed parameter menus as a second dimension to the "_Section_Begin" 
>> / "Section_End" sections - and it could help to prevent rather "endless"&  
>> cluttered lists of parameters in the case of complex code with many 
>> parameters.
>>
>> What does anyone else think about this idea?
>>
>> Thanks for considering.
>>
>
>
>
> 
>
>  IMPORTANT PLEASE READ 
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[amibroker] Re: Feature Suggestion: Tabs for Parameters window

2010-07-19 Thread rise_t575


Bump.

--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "rise_t575"  wrote:
>
> Tomasz,
> 
> I think it could be a great feature to allow user-defined tabs within the 
> AA's "Parameters" window - similar to the tabs within AA's "Settings" window.
> 
> This would give users the possibility for creating complex, categorized & 
> well designed parameter menus as a second dimension to the "_Section_Begin" / 
> "Section_End" sections - and it could help to prevent rather "endless" & 
> cluttered lists of parameters in the case of complex code with many 
> parameters.
> 
> What does anyone else think about this idea?
> 
> Thanks for considering.
>