Re: [AMRadio] AM Power Level

2003-05-19 Thread Bob Bruhns
Hi Joe,

Generally for 100% positive modulation, 1500W PEP translates
into a 375Watt carrier.  (These are output levels.)  But in
the real work=ld, this ain't necessarily so...  Check
WA5BXO's website, there is some interesting reading on AM
power regarding carrier and modulation vs. PEP.

http://www.qsl.net/wa5bxo/

In particular on John's WA5BXO site, check AM Tech Page,
Natural Asymmetrical Modulation, and Amplitude Modulation
and PEP.

  Bacon, WA3WDR


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] AM Power Level


 I'm a new subscriber to the list, and I have not
discovered the way to do a search
 through the old archives.  Forgive me if this has already
been covered.

 I'm currently in the process of collecting the parts to
build a Class-E Am transmitter
 and Class-H modulator for 75 meters.  (I was quite
surprised at the relative
 simplicity of the circuit!)  While I have been a
boatanchor collector for years, and
 also an on-and-off-again Electric radio subscriber (though
I have every issue) I have
 never yet been on the air in AM mode.  Listening on 75 off
and on over the years
 has me itching to finally change that.

 I'm interested to know if I understand the newer FCC power
guidelines correctly and
 how peak power on AM is measured.  The FCC now stipulates
1500 watts peak
 output.  Am I correct in understanding that in AM, the
peak output at 100%
 modulation is four times the carrier level?  Does this
mean that if one is to be strictly
 within the FCC rules, you can have a carrier of only 375
watts in the AM mode?

 My proposed transmitter will be capable of a unmodulated
600 watt carrier.
 Fortunately, it appears to be a simple matter to reduce
power in a Class-E amp just
 by lowering the supply / modulation voltage to the MOSFET
drains.

 Any help in furthering my understanding is appreciated.

 Thanks!

 73,
 Joe
 N6DGY


 ___
 AMRadio mailing list
 AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio




Re: [AMRadio] Camp X Field Day

2003-05-19 Thread Eddy Swynar
Hi Matthew,

Does your group have plans to include a vintage, 40's era set-up at the
site, as well as the more modern gear...?

A receiver like the RCA AR-88 comes to mind, which WAS, indeed, used in the
original Camp X radio room (condfirmed by photos in the lobby of Lear
Seating, which is presently located nearby).

~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ






- Original Message -
From: VE3ZQW-Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 11:39 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Camp X Field Day


 On the weekend of June 7-8 the Camp X Historical Society
(www.campxhistoricalsociety.ca) with the radio amateurs of the Durham Region
will be doing their annual radio re-activation of the former Spy training
and SIGINT operation known as Camp X.
 Operation will be on all HF bands with all modes planned. Callsign for the
event will be VE3SCX.  Frequencies will depend on conditions at the time.
 Camp X, located outside of Toronto, was in operation from 1941 til 1969
teaching the art of intelligence, sabotage while operation as a relay
station between Great Britain, Canada, and the USA.
 Next year our group will be building a museum to pay tribute to these
secret warriors.

 Many thanks and 73's

  Matthew Batten-VE3ZQW
 President-CXHS
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
 multipart/alternative
   text/plain (text body -- kept)
   text/html
 The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
 or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
 to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
 ___
 AMRadio mailing list
 AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio



RE: [AMRadio] AM Power Level

2003-05-19 Thread Joe Bento
Thanks all for your help.  There are far more variables than I thought in 
calculating 
the actual PEP output of an AM transmitter.  It will be some time yet till I'm 
ready to 
get on the air in AM mode.  Besides the class-E project, I need to give my 
Hallicrafters SX-117 receiver an alignment.  It's become somewhat deaf over the 
years.  Otherwise, I do not currently have another HF receiver suitable for AM. 
 My 
older Kenwood transceiver is good for CW and SSB only.

Thanks for the help!


73
Joe Bento
N6DGY
Pleasant Grove, Utah