RE: [AMRadio] Pictures of homebrew rx, new 4D32 project, other homebrew things

2004-01-24 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
John,
Wow, for some reason, when I look at them on your site,
they look very good, very large, and the don't fit on my laptop screen,
but you can read the labels on things!
 
Thanks for posting them for me.

Brett
N2DTS

> 
> 
> Ok Bret your pictures or at
> http://wa5bxo.shacknet.nu/N2DTS/
> 
> CUL, 73
> John, WA5BXO
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Brett Gazdzinski
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:54 AM
> To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [AMRadio] Pictures of homebrew rx, new 4D32 project, 
> other homebrew
> things
> 
> I have pictures of various things if anyone wants a look,
> the jay pegs are big, so beware if you ask to see something.
> I burnt them onto a cd so I could unload my lap top hard drive.
> 
> Anyplace I could post these things?
> 
> Brett
> N2DTS
> ___
> AMRadio mailing list
> AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> AMRadio mailing list
> AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio


RE: [AMRadio] 4D32 rig testing

2004-01-24 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
Dave,
many people run them on low voltage, that is ok with me.

I have been running mine on the high voltage for 15 years
with no crap outs at all, not a single problem with them.

The low voltage transformer frequently went because it was overloaded,
and removing the vacuum rectifiers reduces the load a lot.

peter Dahl sells replacements, they are likely not cheap,
but are good transformers.

The only mod transformer I ever blew out was in the 30K1 I had, testing
it with 20hz at 100% modulation at full power.
Stupid, but I did not know anything then, and the 30K1 cost me less
than the peter Dahl 32v3 mod transformer ($200.00).

Serial number 9, I wonder if its on the air now, it used to sound 
very good when I sold it to someone down south.

Brett
N2DTS

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Knepper
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 4:10 PM
> To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 4D32 rig testing
> 
> 
> Please excuse my ignorance among the experts but shouldn't 
> one be careful
> not to push the voltage rating on the secondary of the modulation
> transformer when increasing the plate voltage on the RF 
> amplifier? or on the
> primary winding when pushing higher voltage on the mod. tubes.
> 
> On all of my 32V's at the Collins Radio Center, I put the 
> toggle switch on
> the rear to 600 volts, not 700 volts.  Know where I can get a 
> replacement
> mod. transformer for the 32V transmitter?  I don't!
> 
> Inquiring minds would like to know!  Why sacrifice a 
> modulation transformer,
> which are expensive and rare these days.
> 
> Thank you
> Dave, W3ST
> Secretary to the Collins Radio Association
> Publisher of the Collins Journal
> www.collinsra.com
> - Original Message -
> From: "Donald Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 3:47 PM
> Subject: RE: [AMRadio] 4D32 rig testing
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > >Collins runs them at over 700 volts in class C plate
> > >modulated service (32V series).
> > >If they don't arc over, and you don't exceed the plate dissipation,
> > >what would be the problem?
> > >
> >
> > That's a good point.  I recall an article pre-WW2 in QST 
> which described
> > getting high peak audio power from modulator tubes by 
> running unusually
> high
> > voltage on them, but staying within the rated dissipation 
> rating.  A point
> > was made that for example, the 807 is rated for a maximum 
> of 600 volts
> plate
> > modulated.  That means the peak voltage would be at  least 
> 1200 volts, and
> > that doesn't hurt them, and is still within factory 
> specified ratings.  So
> > for intermittent service, you should be able to run as much 
> as 1200 DC
> volts
> > on an 807.  I think the limit on plate modulated voltage 
> would be the
> point
> > where arcovers would begin.
> >
> > However, I do recall using a quad of p-p parallel 2A3's in my audio
> driver.
> > I didn't have a proper driver transformer at the time, so I 
> ran them @ 400
> > volts/30 m.a. each tube.  They are rated at 300 volts/40 
> m.a. maximum in
> the
> > RCA manual.  That way I could get plenty of peak driving 
> voltage to the
> > class B grids, despite having a driver transformer with too 
> much stepdown,
> > but with exactly the same plate dissipation as per RCA recommended
> ratings.
> > They worked great, and drove the modulator tubes with very little
> > distortion.  But I noticed that within a  few months, the 
> 2A3's would get
> > weak.  I went through a couple of sets that way.  Finally, 
> I obtained a
> > proper driver transformer with the proper turns ratio, and 
> slowered the
> > plate voltage back to 300v, and changed the bias so that 
> each tube would
> > draw 40 m.a., and now I have had the same set of 2A3's for almost 10
> years,
> > and they still test good.  Maybe just  a coincidence, but 
> at the current
> > price of a new 2A3, I don't feel like trying to find out.
> >
> > My conclusion is that some tubes may not take overvoltage 
> very well, while
> > others will not be harmed, and the only way to find out 
> which ones is to
> try
> > them and see.  If your tubes seem to be short lived, go back to the
> > recommended parameters.
> >
> > -K4KYV
> >
> > _
> > High-speed users-be more efficient online with the new MSN Premium
> Internet
> > Software. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1
> >
> > ___
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> 
> ___
> AMRadio mailing list
> AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio


RE: [AMRadio] 4D32 rig testing

2004-01-24 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
Don,
I was in qso with Jay, n2wwl today, and we were talking about
the 32v3, and the voltage it runs at, Jay runs his on the low voltage
position,
about 600 volts on the plates.
I run mine on the 700 volt tap, 180 to 200 ma.

The panel meter says 800 volts high voltage, but I put my
DMM on it and was very surprised to find 940 volts on the plates.

I have been running them that way for 15 years with the same tubes
in them, and used to use them quite a lot.

I get 100 watts out, and 350 watts pep.
I have solid stated the power supplies, which explains the high
voltage.

I think, as long as you don't exceed the plate dissipation,
you are likely ok with most tubes.

Brett
N2DTS

>
>
>
> >Collins runs them at over 700 volts in class C plate
> >modulated service (32V series).
> >If they don't arc over, and you don't exceed the plate dissipation,
> >what would be the problem?
> >
>
> That's a good point.  I recall an article pre-WW2 in QST
> which described
> getting high peak audio power from modulator tubes by running
> unusually high
> voltage on them, but staying within the rated dissipation
> rating.  A point
> was made that for example, the 807 is rated for a maximum of
> 600 volts plate
> modulated.  That means the peak voltage would be at  least
> 1200 volts, and
> that doesn't hurt them, and is still within factory specified
> ratings.  So
> for intermittent service, you should be able to run as much
> as 1200 DC volts
> on an 807.  I think the limit on plate modulated voltage
> would be the point
> where arcovers would begin.
>
> However, I do recall using a quad of p-p parallel 2A3's in my
> audio driver.
> I didn't have a proper driver transformer at the time, so I
> ran them @ 400
> volts/30 m.a. each tube.  They are rated at 300 volts/40 m.a.
> maximum in the
> RCA manual.  That way I could get plenty of peak driving
> voltage to the
> class B grids, despite having a driver transformer with too
> much stepdown,
> but with exactly the same plate dissipation as per RCA
> recommended ratings.
> They worked great, and drove the modulator tubes with very little
> distortion.  But I noticed that within a  few months, the
> 2A3's would get
> weak.  I went through a couple of sets that way.  Finally, I
> obtained a
> proper driver transformer with the proper turns ratio, and
> slowered the
> plate voltage back to 300v, and changed the bias so that each
> tube would
> draw 40 m.a., and now I have had the same set of 2A3's for
> almost 10 years,
> and they still test good.  Maybe just  a coincidence, but at
> the current
> price of a new 2A3, I don't feel like trying to find out.
>
> My conclusion is that some tubes may not take overvoltage
> very well, while
> others will not be harmed, and the only way to find out which
> ones is to try
> them and see.  If your tubes seem to be short lived, go back to the
> recommended parameters.
>
> -K4KYV
>
> _
> High-speed usersbe more efficient online with the new MSN
> Premium Internet
> Software. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1
>
> ___
> AMRadio mailing list
> AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>



Re: [AMRadio] 4D32 rig testing

2004-01-24 Thread David Knepper
Please excuse my ignorance among the experts but shouldn't one be careful
not to push the voltage rating on the secondary of the modulation
transformer when increasing the plate voltage on the RF amplifier? or on the
primary winding when pushing higher voltage on the mod. tubes.

On all of my 32V's at the Collins Radio Center, I put the toggle switch on
the rear to 600 volts, not 700 volts.  Know where I can get a replacement
mod. transformer for the 32V transmitter?  I don't!

Inquiring minds would like to know!  Why sacrifice a modulation transformer,
which are expensive and rare these days.

Thank you
Dave, W3ST
Secretary to the Collins Radio Association
Publisher of the Collins Journal
www.collinsra.com
- Original Message -
From: "Donald Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] 4D32 rig testing


>
>
> >Collins runs them at over 700 volts in class C plate
> >modulated service (32V series).
> >If they don't arc over, and you don't exceed the plate dissipation,
> >what would be the problem?
> >
>
> That's a good point.  I recall an article pre-WW2 in QST which described
> getting high peak audio power from modulator tubes by running unusually
high
> voltage on them, but staying within the rated dissipation rating.  A point
> was made that for example, the 807 is rated for a maximum of 600 volts
plate
> modulated.  That means the peak voltage would be at  least 1200 volts, and
> that doesn't hurt them, and is still within factory specified ratings.  So
> for intermittent service, you should be able to run as much as 1200 DC
volts
> on an 807.  I think the limit on plate modulated voltage would be the
point
> where arcovers would begin.
>
> However, I do recall using a quad of p-p parallel 2A3's in my audio
driver.
> I didn't have a proper driver transformer at the time, so I ran them @ 400
> volts/30 m.a. each tube.  They are rated at 300 volts/40 m.a. maximum in
the
> RCA manual.  That way I could get plenty of peak driving voltage to the
> class B grids, despite having a driver transformer with too much stepdown,
> but with exactly the same plate dissipation as per RCA recommended
ratings.
> They worked great, and drove the modulator tubes with very little
> distortion.  But I noticed that within a  few months, the 2A3's would get
> weak.  I went through a couple of sets that way.  Finally, I obtained a
> proper driver transformer with the proper turns ratio, and slowered the
> plate voltage back to 300v, and changed the bias so that each tube would
> draw 40 m.a., and now I have had the same set of 2A3's for almost 10
years,
> and they still test good.  Maybe just  a coincidence, but at the current
> price of a new 2A3, I don't feel like trying to find out.
>
> My conclusion is that some tubes may not take overvoltage very well, while
> others will not be harmed, and the only way to find out which ones is to
try
> them and see.  If your tubes seem to be short lived, go back to the
> recommended parameters.
>
> -K4KYV
>
> _
> High-speed users-be more efficient online with the new MSN Premium
Internet
> Software. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1
>
> ___
> AMRadio mailing list
> AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio



RE: [AMRadio] 4D32 rig testing

2004-01-24 Thread Donald Chester



Collins runs them at over 700 volts in class C plate
modulated service (32V series).
If they don't arc over, and you don't exceed the plate dissipation,
what would be the problem?



That's a good point.  I recall an article pre-WW2 in QST which described 
getting high peak audio power from modulator tubes by running unusually high 
voltage on them, but staying within the rated dissipation rating.  A point 
was made that for example, the 807 is rated for a maximum of 600 volts plate 
modulated.  That means the peak voltage would be at  least 1200 volts, and 
that doesn't hurt them, and is still within factory specified ratings.  So 
for intermittent service, you should be able to run as much as 1200 DC volts 
on an 807.  I think the limit on plate modulated voltage would be the point 
where arcovers would begin.


However, I do recall using a quad of p-p parallel 2A3's in my audio driver.  
I didn't have a proper driver transformer at the time, so I ran them @ 400 
volts/30 m.a. each tube.  They are rated at 300 volts/40 m.a. maximum in the 
RCA manual.  That way I could get plenty of peak driving voltage to the 
class B grids, despite having a driver transformer with too much stepdown, 
but with exactly the same plate dissipation as per RCA recommended ratings.  
They worked great, and drove the modulator tubes with very little 
distortion.  But I noticed that within a  few months, the 2A3's would get 
weak.  I went through a couple of sets that way.  Finally, I obtained a 
proper driver transformer with the proper turns ratio, and slowered the 
plate voltage back to 300v, and changed the bias so that each tube would 
draw 40 m.a., and now I have had the same set of 2A3's for almost 10 years, 
and they still test good.  Maybe just  a coincidence, but at the current 
price of a new 2A3, I don't feel like trying to find out.


My conclusion is that some tubes may not take overvoltage very well, while 
others will not be harmed, and the only way to find out which ones is to try 
them and see.  If your tubes seem to be short lived, go back to the 
recommended parameters.


-K4KYV

_
High-speed users—be more efficient online with the new MSN Premium Internet 
Software. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1




RE: [AMRadio] Pictures of homebrew rx, new 4D32 project, other homebrew things

2004-01-24 Thread John Coleman
Ok Bret your pictures or at
http://wa5bxo.shacknet.nu/N2DTS/

CUL, 73
John, WA5BXO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brett Gazdzinski
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:54 AM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] Pictures of homebrew rx, new 4D32 project, other homebrew
things

I have pictures of various things if anyone wants a look,
the jay pegs are big, so beware if you ask to see something.
I burnt them onto a cd so I could unload my lap top hard drive.

Anyplace I could post these things?

Brett
N2DTS
___
AMRadio mailing list
AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio





[AMRadio] RCA TT-4 transmitting tube manual now online

2004-01-24 Thread patrick jankowiak
I am sure this is one of our favorites. I know it is one of mine, so I
scanned one of them and here it is for your exquisite pleasure..

Please report any errors, 
(some pages are slightly crooked, but I am more concerned with
omissions, bad links etc)

http://208.190.133.201/rcatt4/rcatt4.html