[AMRadio] Moble AM... On 160?

2007-03-24 Thread Bow
 

This is am interesting piece of work:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v652/ranickel/Top%20Band%20Goes%20Mobile/

>From a 1963 Popular Electronics, I found it on the Glowbug mailing list.

This might be a good "Starter build for a person like me, but the largest
antenna I have is for 80 meters...

How would one move this to the 80 meter band?

Bow

W5EFR


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VJB
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 09:30
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] League dumps threat to AM

The ARRL, a small, non-profit publishing company in Newington Connecticut,
has abandoned a threat to impose a system of bandwidth segregation on the
various modes and activities on HF below 10 meters.

In an email to the club's volunteer administrators, Dave Sumner, the
company's highest-paid, unelected staffer, seems to have acknowledged the
overwhelming opposition arrayed against his group's plan the past several
years.

The threat to AM was specific and unquestionable -- it would have imposed
the first-ever, numerical constraints on bandwidth without providing a means
for licensees to ensure compliance and ward off unwarranted complaints from
those who do not participate in this mode and activity.

The scheme would also have characterized AM as a "footnote" that otherwise
would not be in compliance with their misguided system of bandwidth
segregation.

Sumner wrote, in part,

Quote
Regulation by bandwidth rather than by mode of emission remains
controversial below 28 MHz because of perceived potential impact on
established operating patterns, so these proposals were removed from the
list with one narrow exception.

Those who subscribe to the ARRL can pursue the full text, which contains
several insults and additional patronizing language to those of us who dared
to question the scheme their group tried to slip through.

Keywords:
--And for the truly paranoid
--don't know all the facts
--making their complaints and threats
--have other motives

It is important to note that the club continues to try to sneak through the
small, remaining portion of their scheme that opponents had not, until now,
chosen to challenge.

Fresh opposition remarks about the fraction the League continues to push are
now being filed and accepted on the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System.

The latest challenges join the carefully considered, well-reasoned arguments
that gave the ARRL a severe spanking and refuted that group's earlier threat
to AM that they now have abandoned.

This appears to be the system of feedback the group in Newington prefers.

Paul/VJB


 


Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word unsubscribe in the message body.

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/731 - Release Date: 3/23/2007
15:27
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/731 - Release Date: 3/23/2007
15:27
 

__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Otis / K5SWK on the air 3880

2007-03-24 Thread A.R.S. - W5AMI

Otis/K5SWK is on the air right now (7:45PM CDT)

A rare event, at least in recent times...

73
Brian / w5ami


--
Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names
the streets after them. - Bill Vaughan
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] League dumps threat to AM

2007-03-24 Thread Mike Sawyer
Paul,
Thanks for blowing the whistle on this bunch of gangsters from 
Newington. I outright refuse to support anything that the (be)League(d) does 
anymore. Ed Hare was the only exception and he got trounced by the 
'powers-that-be' that reign over the ARRgghhL. I've been reading up on the 
threads at eham.com and qrz.com,  and there seems to be quite a number that 
believe this is the last straw with the (be)League(d).
Mod-U-Lator,
Mike(y)
W3SLK
- Original Message - 
From: "VJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 11:30 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] League dumps threat to AM


The ARRL, a small, non-profit publishing company in
Newington Connecticut, has abandoned a threat to
impose a system of bandwidth segregation on the
various modes and activities on HF below 10 meters.

In an email to the club's volunteer administrators,
Dave Sumner, the company's highest-paid, unelected
staffer, seems to have acknowledged the overwhelming
opposition arrayed against his group's plan the past
several years.

The threat to AM was specific and unquestionable -- it
would have imposed the first-ever, numerical
constraints on bandwidth without providing a means for
licensees to ensure compliance and ward off
unwarranted complaints from those who do not
participate in this mode and activity.

The scheme would also have characterized AM as a
"footnote" that otherwise would not be in compliance
with their misguided system of bandwidth segregation.

Sumner wrote, in part,

Quote
Regulation by bandwidth rather than by mode of
emission remains controversial below 28 MHz because of
perceived potential impact on established operating
patterns, so these proposals were removed from the
list with one narrow exception.

Those who subscribe to the ARRL can pursue the full
text, which contains several insults and additional
patronizing language to those of us who dared to
question the scheme their group tried to slip through.

Keywords:
--And for the truly paranoid
--don't know all the facts
--making their complaints and threats
--have other motives

It is important to note that the club continues to try
to sneak through the small, remaining portion of their
scheme that opponents had not, until now, chosen to
challenge.

Fresh opposition remarks about the fraction the League
continues to push are now being filed and accepted on
the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System.

The latest challenges join the carefully considered,
well-reasoned arguments that gave the ARRL a severe
spanking and refuted that group's earlier threat to AM
that they now have abandoned.

This appears to be the system of feedback the group in
Newington prefers.

Paul/VJB




__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: 4-400

2007-03-24 Thread John King
Paul and the reflector, CQ magazine for November 1957,
the annual antenna issue, has a very good and lengthy
article on the construction of an HF amplifier
utilizing two 4-400 A tubes. It uses a multiband
switching grid input and I think the grid coil turret
was the Harrington. It used a B&W final tank coil. I
think there might have also been an AM modulator, I
really don't remember for sure. My magazines are in
Louisiana and i am in Colorado, otherwise, I could
pass along the page number. 73, John, K5PGW   



 

No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: 4-400

2007-03-24 Thread VJB
I would guess the tube was nearing market during the
Korean War. I know the early to mid-1950s is the time
frame for the T-368 transmitter, specified with a
4-400 in the final.  I have a 1957 Crosley T-368C that
came with an old red script Eimac 4-400, JAN-type. The
T-368 was the successor to the BC-610, so maybe some
military historians on here know the development
chronology. --Paul/VJB




 

Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html 
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Mfg date for 4-400 series

2007-03-24 Thread Rick Brashear
Thanks Barrie, that's just the info I was looking for.
73,
Rick/K5IZ


Rick:

Not too far into the transmitting volume I find the 4-65, which has 5 pages.
(Built a push-pull pair of these for 6M in the middle 1950s)

Next is the 4-125A, with 3 pages.

Next is the 4-250A, with 3 pages.

Next is the 4-400A, with one page.

Then comes the 4X500A, followed by the 4-1000A, which has three pages.

I have five volumes of the HB-3.  I have this particular book out at the
moment because I've been helping a local ham with a 160M 813 project.

73, Barrie, W7ALW


__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Mfg date for 4-400 series

2007-03-24 Thread Barrie Smith

Rick:

Not too far into the transmitting volume I find the 4-65, which has 5 pages.
(Built a push-pull pair of these for 6M in the middle 1950s)

Next is the 4-125A, with 3 pages.

Next is the 4-250A, with 3 pages.

Next is the 4-400A, with one page.

Then comes the 4X500A, followed by the 4-1000A, which has three pages.

I have five volumes of the HB-3.  I have this particular book out at the
moment because I've been helping a local ham with a 160M 813 project.

73, Barrie, W7ALW

> Hi Barrie...
>
> In your HB-3, where exactly is the 4-400 data located?  I found mine in
the
> Transmitting volume and the other 4-tubes in last volume of the original
> set.  I was also surprised to find only one (1) sheet of data.  Is this
> consistent with your HB-3?
>
> Thanks,
> Rick/K5IZ
>
> I have an HB-3 here that shows a data sheet for the 4-400A dated 9-62.
>
> I also have an Eimac catalog from the early 1950s that shows the 4-400.
>
> 73, Barrie, W7ALW
>
>
>
> __
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>


__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] League dumps threat to AM

2007-03-24 Thread VJB
The ARRL, a small, non-profit publishing company in
Newington Connecticut, has abandoned a threat to
impose a system of bandwidth segregation on the
various modes and activities on HF below 10 meters.

In an email to the club's volunteer administrators,
Dave Sumner, the company's highest-paid, unelected
staffer, seems to have acknowledged the overwhelming
opposition arrayed against his group's plan the past
several years.

The threat to AM was specific and unquestionable -- it
would have imposed the first-ever, numerical
constraints on bandwidth without providing a means for
licensees to ensure compliance and ward off
unwarranted complaints from those who do not
participate in this mode and activity.

The scheme would also have characterized AM as a
"footnote" that otherwise would not be in compliance
with their misguided system of bandwidth segregation.

Sumner wrote, in part,

Quote
Regulation by bandwidth rather than by mode of
emission remains controversial below 28 MHz because of
perceived potential impact on established operating
patterns, so these proposals were removed from the
list with one narrow exception.

Those who subscribe to the ARRL can pursue the full
text, which contains several insults and additional
patronizing language to those of us who dared to
question the scheme their group tried to slip through.

Keywords:
--And for the truly paranoid
--don't know all the facts
--making their complaints and threats
--have other motives

It is important to note that the club continues to try
to sneak through the small, remaining portion of their
scheme that opponents had not, until now, chosen to
challenge.

Fresh opposition remarks about the fraction the League
continues to push are now being filed and accepted on
the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System.

The latest challenges join the carefully considered,
well-reasoned arguments that gave the ARRL a severe
spanking and refuted that group's earlier threat to AM
that they now have abandoned.

This appears to be the system of feedback the group in
Newington prefers.

Paul/VJB


 

Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] New Guy to AM

2007-03-24 Thread Jim Candela
>From Bow, W5RFR
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] New Guy to AM

>Thanks Jim.

>How come I couldn't find that PDF on the AM Window site? I must not have
>the secret decoder ring yet! LOL
 
>I would love to try a QSO on AM.

>7PM is a bit to early for my to play Radio on a Friday night! I am a full
>time collage student at night, work full time during the day, and I'm
>married.. So there is that Honey doo list! ;)


Reply by Jim, WD5JKO,

I couldn't find it either. I had to Google for it. I'm sure the link is
somewhere buried at AMFONE, but I'm like you, I could not find it either.


So Bow when do you sleep? Sometimes it's is tough to play AM at that busy
time. If you can escape into the ham shack more then 30 minutes, and get on
the air, you are greeted with an in the face confrontation about, "your
getting into the VCR"! ;-(

Regards,
Jim

__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Mfg date for 4-400 series

2007-03-24 Thread Rick Brashear
Hi Barrie...

In your HB-3, where exactly is the 4-400 data located?  I found mine in the
Transmitting volume and the other 4-tubes in last volume of the original
set.  I was also surprised to find only one (1) sheet of data.  Is this
consistent with your HB-3?

Thanks,
Rick/K5IZ

I have an HB-3 here that shows a data sheet for the 4-400A dated 9-62.

I also have an Eimac catalog from the early 1950s that shows the 4-400.

73, Barrie, W7ALW



__
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.