[AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Bernie Doran
what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter did not 
fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no possible 
way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your next 
door neighbor!  I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes untill 
dave w9ad ran across me.  I could find only three or four ssb stations 
between 3.6 and 3.7.   the low end is almost not used, if it is not going to 
be used the band might as well be changed back where it was.  And yes, I 
know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are generals, not 
an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are an 
extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!   I 
will be back on the low end tonight around 3.7 +or -15, maybe I can get a 
ssb to respond.  Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk to 
me!!   I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for several 
days without a nibble.Just about ready to throw in the towel and get rid 
of my junk. Bernie 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Edward Swynar
Hi Bernie,

I sorta hung up my Viking II  RCA AR-88LF combo into retirement mode up on
the shelf here several years back  for the very reason you mentioned about
40-meters...

I'd call  call CQ at various hours of the day with no responses whatsoever.
So I finally stopped trying.

As for 75-meters, well, I guess some old habits are slow to die...but from
what I've been hearing up  around the window of 3800-3885-KHz, more than
a few of the regular AM denizens seem to actually enjoy the challenges of
standing-up to the random (and by times, downright vicious!) heckling from a
few of the more expressive within the SSB crowd...

NOT the sort of place you'd really want to demonstrate the joys  pleasures
of AM phone, to visitors in the shack!

The part of the band around 3.7-MHz seems far more civilized. I enjoy
SWL'ing the gentlemen who come down there for some interesting technical
QSOs on AM...

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ


***



- Original Message -
From: Bernie Doran qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:03 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter did
not
 fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no
possible
 way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your next
 door neighbor!  I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes
untill
 dave w9ad ran across me.  I could find only three or four ssb stations
 between 3.6 and 3.7.   the low end is almost not used, if it is not going
to
 be used the band might as well be changed back where it was.  And yes, I
 know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are generals,
not
 an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are an
 extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!   I
 will be back on the low end tonight around 3.7 +or -15, maybe I can get a
 ssb to respond.  Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk to
 me!!   I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for several
 days without a nibble.Just about ready to throw in the towel and get
rid
 of my junk. Bernie


 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread j...@n9ami.com
There is lots of AM activity here on 3870 Mondays San Diego net, Wed 
West Coast AMI Net, Saturday Morning Northern Nevada/Ca. Round Table. 
Every time I call CQ here 80% of the time I can find someone to chat 
with on AM.

 On 9/27/2009 8:16:54 AM, Edward Swynar (gswy...@durham.net) wrote:
  Hi Bernie,
 
  I sorta hung up my Viking II  RCA AR-88LF combo into retirement mode up
  on Y
  the shelf here several years back for the very reason you mentioned
  about
  40-meters...
 
  I'd call  call CQ at various hours of the day with no responses 
whatsoever.
  So I finally stopped trying.
 
  As for 75-meters, well, I guess some old habits are slow to die...but 
from
  what I've
  been hearing up  around the window of 3800-3885-KHz, more than
  a few of the regular AM denizens seem to actually enjoy the 
challenges of
  standing-up to the random (and by times, downright vicious!) heckling 
from
  a
  few of the more expressive within the SSB crowd...
 
  NOT the sort of place
  you'd really want to demonstrate the joys  pleasures
  of AM phone, to visitors in the shack!
 
  The part of the band around 3.7-MHz seems far more civilized. I enjoy
  SWL'ing
  the gentlemen who come down there for some interesting technical
  QSOs on AM...
 
  ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
 
 
  ***
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Bernie Doran
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread sbjohnston

Why the endless congregating around the so-called calling 
frequencies?  Maybe it's the watering hole effect - people tend to 
go where they know the action is, even if it is too crowded and 
dangerous.

I've noticed a growing trend of 100w-class stations reporting less 
success in recent years.  I have a theory that this is due to the 
ever-climbing local noise levels in our neighborhoods.  This noise will 
tend to mask the weaker signals at the receive end, resulting in fewer 
possible recipients for low and medium power CQs.
I find I have to be very diligent about tracking down and eliminating 
sources of noise in my own house just to keep my receive noise level 
reasonable.

I'm seeing the same thing in AM and FM broadcasting - long-time 
home-based listeners to our radio stations are having more trouble in 
recent years hearing the same old stations transmitting with the same 
power levels - the background noise is covering up the fringe 
reception.  Mobile reception doesn't seem to be as troubled - except by 
the recent trend of traffic light systems that produce VHF interference 
at intersections.

Another factor on both ends of the potential amateur contacts may be 
the more limited antenna options many operators are stuck with - makes 
it harder to use the 100w power level.

Steve WD8DAS

sbjohns...@aol.com
http://www.wd8das.net/
-
Radio is your best entertainment value.
-

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Dennis Gilliam
On the broadcast frequencies, most of the noise comes from 'Hybrid
Digital', or HD implementation.  Some of that trash on the ham bands
is overmodulated PSK-31 or other digital mode comms stuff.  The rest
is good old hash from crappy appliances and bad electrical
distribution grid.

The digital encroachment axiom is bad enough in a technical sense, but
the accompanying popular devotion is leading real radio straight into
hell.  Next thing you know some hams will be doing podcasts!

Just one old buzzards' take, your mileage may vary.

73 W7TFO


-- 
Looking for the truth is like looking at the sun:  It is sometimes
better to not go directly at it.
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
I don't operate at night, but appreciate not having to tune all around the 
band looking for a good AM qso.

3880 is tough for me, some plasma TV interference on 3880 at nasty high 
levels, 3870 is clear.

I suppose I could learn the garbage for an extra ticket, but don't know 
where/who gives the test.
Besides, I balk at having to take the test, when my station is all home 
brew, the the person giving the test likely could not figure out how to 
operate it, let alone build it.

I have a commercial FCC license, does that not count for anything? (no).

Brett



- Original Message - 
From: Edward Swynar gswy...@durham.net
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 Hi Bernie,

 I sorta hung up my Viking II  RCA AR-88LF combo into retirement mode up 
 on
 the shelf here several years back  for the very reason you mentioned about
 40-meters...

 I'd call  call CQ at various hours of the day with no responses 
 whatsoever.
 So I finally stopped trying.

 As for 75-meters, well, I guess some old habits are slow to die...but from
 what I've been hearing up  around the window of 3800-3885-KHz, more 
 than
 a few of the regular AM denizens seem to actually enjoy the challenges of
 standing-up to the random (and by times, downright vicious!) heckling from 
 a
 few of the more expressive within the SSB crowd...

 NOT the sort of place you'd really want to demonstrate the joys  
 pleasures
 of AM phone, to visitors in the shack!

 The part of the band around 3.7-MHz seems far more civilized. I enjoy
 SWL'ing the gentlemen who come down there for some interesting technical
 QSOs on AM...

 ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ


 ***



 - Original Message -
 From: Bernie Doran qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:03 AM
 Subject: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter did
 not
 fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no
 possible
 way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your next
 door neighbor!  I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes
 untill
 dave w9ad ran across me.  I could find only three or four ssb stations
 between 3.6 and 3.7.   the low end is almost not used, if it is not going
 to
 be used the band might as well be changed back where it was.  And yes, I
 know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are generals,
 not
 an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are an
 extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!   I
 will be back on the low end tonight around 3.7 +or -15, maybe I can get a
 ssb to respond.  Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk to
 me!!   I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for 
 several
 days without a nibble.Just about ready to throw in the towel and get
 rid
 of my junk. Bernie


 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Rob Atkinson
Brett,

Glad ur plasma qrm stays put.  the stuff like that I get seems to
slowly make its way up and down the band.  I am having fairly good
luck with one of those MFJ phase canceling boxes; it either eliminates
or attenuates a lot of junk.   DX Engineering makes a higher quality
product that does the same thing but I think through 360 degrees (the
MFJ covers a bit less range).  Mine has made some qsos go from
tolerable to pleasant.  Noise level usually drops a few S units when
its in and one of the best things is that because it is an analog
device there isn't any dsp type distortion.
Not an ad for MFJ but a plug for the method.  Timewave may make one
too.  Only reason I use the MFJ is that a guy had one new in box for
sale at Dayton 2 years ago for $70.

73

Rob K5UJ


On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Brett Gazdzinski
brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net wrote:
 I don't operate at night, but appreciate not having to tune all around the
 band looking for a good AM qso.

 3880 is tough for me, some plasma TV interference on 3880 at nasty high
 levels, 3870 is clear.

 I suppose I could learn the garbage for an extra ticket, but don't know
 where/who gives the test.
 Besides, I balk at having to take the test, when my station is all home
 brew, the the person giving the test likely could not figure out how to
 operate it, let alone build it.

 I have a commercial FCC license, does that not count for anything? (no).

 Brett
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Bernie Doran
hi Rob: yep I made a contact on 7290, almost still in shock. I just do not 
hear any activity most of the time, just seems like a shame.   some of our 
Canadian friends do operate 3725 consistently so they are down there. I 
believe there was a post a short time ago from a chap that did order a bunch 
of low end crystals to sell and also wondered what happened.I was just 
running the ft1000 of 7290 with a 40 w carrier, 40 is probably my favorite 
band. It really changed fast when I was talking with Rick.
- Original Message - 
From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 Hi Bernie,

 I heard u in a qso this a.m. with WA3MJY and enjoyed reading the mail
 and was gg to jump in and relay to da botayas that u were trying to
 tell each other that the other guy had faded out but didn't get to the
 rig before another QSO came up out of the aether...but anyway if some
 sort of effort is made to populate 3.6 to 3.7 I'll give it a try--I
 think the so called am window is used because there's a safety in
 numbers notion and maybe a lot of the guys have their dipoles cut for
 the top of 75 and/or have xtals up there (yes a few run rock bound
 stuff) in addition to the other reasons.  I know a few hams who don't
 want to upgrade now that there is no code test.  But yes, there's some
 nice clear real estate down there below 3700.

 I tried to do my part to keep 7160 open this morning; tried calling cq
 and found someone already there on LSB, so I qsy up to 7165 which
 sounded clear for a few khz up and down and ran 300 w. and had a great
 qso with Kevin WB0JZG but the SSB gang was getting restless and when
 we wrapped it up some UFL (that's unidentified flying lid) preached a
 nice sermonette and finished by telling us if we want broadcast audio
 to go buy broadcast stations.  On the other hand I got this very nice
 email a few minutes ago from a ham who I won't identify because he may
 not like my forwarding his email to a reflector so I'll just put in
 the text:

 I was monitoring 7.165 sunday morning and heard you and WB0JZG in
 qso. I wish to congratulate you on your AM station and the broadcast
 quality signal heard on sunday morning - very nice S9 + 10 carrier
 with fantastic audio. Also your qrz bio was informative and humorus at
 the same time. Enjoyable to read. In fone I operate mostly SSB but AM
 adds spice, variety and enjoyment to my operating activities. I was
 listening to you both on a restored Collins 75 A1. My AM transmitter
 is a Collins 32 V2 with 2 channel EQ to give added mid range to base
 generated by the Collins. I have made AM contacts on my Icom 7800 and
 alpha 89. More fun using the Collins on AM.

 Well, that made my day especially after I saw the subject line which
 was Your AM signal in my in-box and I got geared up for a flame from
 some p.o. s/b operator!

 73

 Rob K5UJ
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Bernie Doran
Hi Brett: I think most of the hamvention/ swapmeets have VEs  so unless they 
are miles away that is a possible option. regretfully for some it is 
difficult or impossible to get to a test location.
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Gazdzinski brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


I don't operate at night, but appreciate not having to tune all around the
 band looking for a good AM qso.

 3880 is tough for me, some plasma TV interference on 3880 at nasty high
 levels, 3870 is clear.

 I suppose I could learn the garbage for an extra ticket, but don't know
 where/who gives the test.
 Besides, I balk at having to take the test, when my station is all home
 brew, the the person giving the test likely could not figure out how to
 operate it, let alone build it.

 I have a commercial FCC license, does that not count for anything? (no).

 Brett



 - Original Message - 
 From: Edward Swynar gswy...@durham.net
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:16 AM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 Hi Bernie,

 I sorta hung up my Viking II  RCA AR-88LF combo into retirement mode up
 on
 the shelf here several years back  for the very reason you mentioned 
 about
 40-meters...

 I'd call  call CQ at various hours of the day with no responses
 whatsoever.
 So I finally stopped trying.

 As for 75-meters, well, I guess some old habits are slow to die...but 
 from
 what I've been hearing up  around the window of 3800-3885-KHz, more
 than
 a few of the regular AM denizens seem to actually enjoy the challenges of
 standing-up to the random (and by times, downright vicious!) heckling 
 from
 a
 few of the more expressive within the SSB crowd...

 NOT the sort of place you'd really want to demonstrate the joys 
 pleasures
 of AM phone, to visitors in the shack!

 The part of the band around 3.7-MHz seems far more civilized. I enjoy
 SWL'ing the gentlemen who come down there for some interesting technical
 QSOs on AM...

 ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ


 ***



 - Original Message -
 From: Bernie Doran qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:03 AM
 Subject: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter did
 not
 fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no
 possible
 way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your next
 door neighbor!  I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes
 untill
 dave w9ad ran across me.  I could find only three or four ssb stations
 between 3.6 and 3.7.   the low end is almost not used, if it is not 
 going
 to
 be used the band might as well be changed back where it was.  And yes, I
 know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are generals,
 not
 an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are an
 extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!   I
 will be back on the low end tonight around 3.7 +or -15, maybe I can get 
 a
 ssb to respond.  Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk to
 me!!   I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for
 several
 days without a nibble.Just about ready to throw in the towel and get
 rid
 of my junk. Bernie


 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List

[AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread D. Chester
 From: Bernie Doran qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com

 what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter did 
 not
 fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no 
 possible
 way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your next
 door neighbor!  Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk to
 me!!   I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for several
 days without a nibble.Just about ready to throw in the towel and get 
 rid
 of my junk. Bernie

I got on the air later in the evening, about 11 PM local time, and had a 
good QSO on 3885 with no QRM, SSB or otherwise.  The QSO outlasted me, and I 
consider myself a night-owl.  I have found it easy to operate down below 
during the autumn/winter months when the QRN is low, but during static 
season, activity drops off, and usually about the only activity I can find 
is up in the Ghetto.  When condx improve, I find the Ghetto too crowded, not 
only with SSB QRM, but with AM stations, and any QSO established very 
quickly accumulates 5, 6, 7 or more stations and I don't care for large 
groups, so I find that the ideal time to QSY down lower in the band.


I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes untill
 dave w9ad ran across me.

My solution to that was to build my automated CQ caller.  I just turn it on, 
the recorded CQ is transmitted, and after the initial call it automatically 
stands by for 30 seconds and then transmits another CQ, until I manually 
take control of the station.  That way I con work on a project at the bench, 
read something, or round up my tools and tidy up the shack while the CQ is 
running.  If, during one of the stand-by periods, I hear someone come back, 
I run over and take manual control of the station and reply to the CQ.  That 
way, I am not wasting a half hour or more sitting at the rig calling CQ 
before I can contact someone when the band is sparsely populated.


 I could find only three or four ssb stations
 between 3.6 and 3.7.   the low end is almost not used, if it is not going 
 to
 be used the band might as well be changed back where it was.

Well, from what I have read on some of the CW mailing lists, they are trying 
to gather support for a petition to the FCC to do just that.  They feel that 
a big hunk of  the  cw band was stolen from them.  Their justification for 
changing it back is that phone stations are rarely using the segment from 
3600 to about 3680, so it should be returned to CW. But in rebuttal, I 
would point out that the CW ops have not lost any  frequencies.  It is still 
perfectly legal to operate CW on 3600-3700, so if they find that segment 
devoid of phone activity, there is no reason why they can't operate CW 
there, just as they did befor the phone band expansion.  But most of the 
time, unless there is a QRMtest going on, there is plenty of empty space 
between 3500 and 3600 as well.  And I can't see altering the band 
allocations just to accommodate QRMtests that might occur a  few weekend 
nights a year.

But they do bring up a point.  When the band was first expanded, there was a 
big scramble to get on the air on the new frequencies, and there was 
loads of AM activity down in the lower part of the band.  People were 
ecstatically commenting on how much better it was down there, away  from all 
the QRM and chaos up in the Ghetto.  But as weeks passed, the activity down 
below gradually dwindled, and one by one, stations migrated back up to the 
old frequencies, until it became somewhat of a rarity to hear any AM below 
3875, and particularly, below 3600.  The SSB activity on 3600-3700 has 
fallen off as well.

At one time the entire CW band from 3500 to 3750, past the old Novice band, 
was as congested with CW activity as 3500-3580 is now.  But just  before the 
change, 3600-3700 was almost always empty of signals, except for a few early 
evening traffic nets and a few RTTY/data signals.  That was one reason the 
FCC reallocated the frequencies.  Use it or lose it.

If we don't start using those frequencies, next thing we know amateurs will 
be kicked off part of the band and we'll be listening to Brother Stair on 
those frequencies.


And yes, I
 know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are generals, 
 not
 an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are an
 extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!

That brings out the point that the situation on the bottom end of the phone 
band is more a matter of Incentive Licensing and licence class sub-subbands, 
than phone vs CW/data allocations.


 I will be back on the low end tonight around 3.7 +or -15, maybe I can get 
 a
 ssb to respond.

Try calling CQ-AM.  You might be surprised how many SSB'ers will try out 
their ricebox appliances on AM for the first time.  Once in a great while, 
someone will like AM well enough to want to try it again, and eventually end 
up setting up a real AM 

Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread AirRadio
Don,
 I have informed folks this end, we will give it a go over the next few 
weeks, now we are over the equinox the low bands will start to wake up a 
bit. :-)
73 Max M0GHQ/KJ4ISS


- Original Message - 
From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 9:03 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 From: Bernie Doran qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com

 what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter did
 not
 fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no
 possible
 way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your next
 door neighbor!  Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk to
 me!!   I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for 
 several
 days without a nibble.Just about ready to throw in the towel and get
 rid
 of my junk. Bernie

 I got on the air later in the evening, about 11 PM local time, and had a
 good QSO on 3885 with no QRM, SSB or otherwise.  The QSO outlasted me, and 
 I
 consider myself a night-owl.  I have found it easy to operate down below
 during the autumn/winter months when the QRN is low, but during static
 season, activity drops off, and usually about the only activity I can find
 is up in the Ghetto.  When condx improve, I find the Ghetto too crowded, 
 not
 only with SSB QRM, but with AM stations, and any QSO established very
 quickly accumulates 5, 6, 7 or more stations and I don't care for large
 groups, so I find that the ideal time to QSY down lower in the band.


I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes untill
 dave w9ad ran across me.

 My solution to that was to build my automated CQ caller.  I just turn it 
 on,
 the recorded CQ is transmitted, and after the initial call it 
 automatically
 stands by for 30 seconds and then transmits another CQ, until I manually
 take control of the station.  That way I con work on a project at the 
 bench,
 read something, or round up my tools and tidy up the shack while the CQ is
 running.  If, during one of the stand-by periods, I hear someone come 
 back,
 I run over and take manual control of the station and reply to the CQ. 
 That
 way, I am not wasting a half hour or more sitting at the rig calling CQ
 before I can contact someone when the band is sparsely populated.


 I could find only three or four ssb stations
 between 3.6 and 3.7.   the low end is almost not used, if it is not going
 to
 be used the band might as well be changed back where it was.

 Well, from what I have read on some of the CW mailing lists, they are 
 trying
 to gather support for a petition to the FCC to do just that.  They feel 
 that
 a big hunk of  the  cw band was stolen from them.  Their justification 
 for
 changing it back is that phone stations are rarely using the segment from
 3600 to about 3680, so it should be returned to CW. But in rebuttal, I
 would point out that the CW ops have not lost any  frequencies.  It is 
 still
 perfectly legal to operate CW on 3600-3700, so if they find that segment
 devoid of phone activity, there is no reason why they can't operate CW
 there, just as they did befor the phone band expansion.  But most of the
 time, unless there is a QRMtest going on, there is plenty of empty space
 between 3500 and 3600 as well.  And I can't see altering the band
 allocations just to accommodate QRMtests that might occur a  few weekend
 nights a year.

 But they do bring up a point.  When the band was first expanded, there was 
 a
 big scramble to get on the air on the new frequencies, and there was
 loads of AM activity down in the lower part of the band.  People were
 ecstatically commenting on how much better it was down there, away  from 
 all
 the QRM and chaos up in the Ghetto.  But as weeks passed, the activity 
 down
 below gradually dwindled, and one by one, stations migrated back up to the
 old frequencies, until it became somewhat of a rarity to hear any AM below
 3875, and particularly, below 3600.  The SSB activity on 3600-3700 has
 fallen off as well.

 At one time the entire CW band from 3500 to 3750, past the old Novice 
 band,
 was as congested with CW activity as 3500-3580 is now.  But just  before 
 the
 change, 3600-3700 was almost always empty of signals, except for a few 
 early
 evening traffic nets and a few RTTY/data signals.  That was one reason the
 FCC reallocated the frequencies.  Use it or lose it.

 If we don't start using those frequencies, next thing we know amateurs 
 will
 be kicked off part of the band and we'll be listening to Brother Stair on
 those frequencies.


And yes, I
 know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are generals,
 not
 an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are an
 extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!

 That brings out the point that the situation on the bottom end of the 
 phone
 band is more a matter of Incentive Licensing and licence class 
 sub

Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Bernie Doran
Hi Don: yep, I probably work about 50% ssb at the low end and about half 
will try AM.
- Original Message - 
From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 4:03 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


 From: Bernie Doran qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com

 what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter did
 not
 fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no
 possible
 way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your next
 door neighbor!  Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk to
 me!!   I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for 
 several
 days without a nibble.Just about ready to throw in the towel and get
 rid
 of my junk. Bernie

 I got on the air later in the evening, about 11 PM local time, and had a
 good QSO on 3885 with no QRM, SSB or otherwise.  The QSO outlasted me, and 
 I
 consider myself a night-owl.  I have found it easy to operate down below
 during the autumn/winter months when the QRN is low, but during static
 season, activity drops off, and usually about the only activity I can find
 is up in the Ghetto.  When condx improve, I find the Ghetto too crowded, 
 not
 only with SSB QRM, but with AM stations, and any QSO established very
 quickly accumulates 5, 6, 7 or more stations and I don't care for large
 groups, so I find that the ideal time to QSY down lower in the band.


I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes untill
 dave w9ad ran across me.

 My solution to that was to build my automated CQ caller.  I just turn it 
 on,
 the recorded CQ is transmitted, and after the initial call it 
 automatically
 stands by for 30 seconds and then transmits another CQ, until I manually
 take control of the station.  That way I con work on a project at the 
 bench,
 read something, or round up my tools and tidy up the shack while the CQ is
 running.  If, during one of the stand-by periods, I hear someone come 
 back,
 I run over and take manual control of the station and reply to the CQ. 
 That
 way, I am not wasting a half hour or more sitting at the rig calling CQ
 before I can contact someone when the band is sparsely populated.


 I could find only three or four ssb stations
 between 3.6 and 3.7.   the low end is almost not used, if it is not going
 to
 be used the band might as well be changed back where it was.

 Well, from what I have read on some of the CW mailing lists, they are 
 trying
 to gather support for a petition to the FCC to do just that.  They feel 
 that
 a big hunk of  the  cw band was stolen from them.  Their justification 
 for
 changing it back is that phone stations are rarely using the segment from
 3600 to about 3680, so it should be returned to CW. But in rebuttal, I
 would point out that the CW ops have not lost any  frequencies.  It is 
 still
 perfectly legal to operate CW on 3600-3700, so if they find that segment
 devoid of phone activity, there is no reason why they can't operate CW
 there, just as they did befor the phone band expansion.  But most of the
 time, unless there is a QRMtest going on, there is plenty of empty space
 between 3500 and 3600 as well.  And I can't see altering the band
 allocations just to accommodate QRMtests that might occur a  few weekend
 nights a year.

 But they do bring up a point.  When the band was first expanded, there was 
 a
 big scramble to get on the air on the new frequencies, and there was
 loads of AM activity down in the lower part of the band.  People were
 ecstatically commenting on how much better it was down there, away  from 
 all
 the QRM and chaos up in the Ghetto.  But as weeks passed, the activity 
 down
 below gradually dwindled, and one by one, stations migrated back up to the
 old frequencies, until it became somewhat of a rarity to hear any AM below
 3875, and particularly, below 3600.  The SSB activity on 3600-3700 has
 fallen off as well.

 At one time the entire CW band from 3500 to 3750, past the old Novice 
 band,
 was as congested with CW activity as 3500-3580 is now.  But just  before 
 the
 change, 3600-3700 was almost always empty of signals, except for a few 
 early
 evening traffic nets and a few RTTY/data signals.  That was one reason the
 FCC reallocated the frequencies.  Use it or lose it.

 If we don't start using those frequencies, next thing we know amateurs 
 will
 be kicked off part of the band and we'll be listening to Brother Stair on
 those frequencies.


And yes, I
 know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are generals,
 not
 an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are an
 extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!

 That brings out the point that the situation on the bottom end of the 
 phone
 band is more a matter of Incentive Licensing and licence class 
 sub-subbands,
 than phone vs CW/data allocations.


 I will be back on the low end tonight around 3.7

Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Bry Carling
Bernie be sure to check these spots:

3678, 3685, 3700, 3705, 3735 kHz

A LOT Of AM ops have obtained crystals on those frequencies - 
ones that they got since the band was opened up to phone.

Bry, AF4K

On 9/27/2009 8:03:10 AM, Bernie Doran (qedconsulta...@embarqmail.com) 
wrote:

   what is this fascination with 3880 to 3885? last evening my s meter
 did
   not
   fall below +20 tuning through that area and each side. there is no
   possible
   way to have a QSO at times like that unless you are talking to your
 next
   door neighbor! I gave up and went to 3705, called cq for 30 minutes
   untill
   dave w9ad ran across me. I could find only three or four ssb
   stations
   between 3.6 and 3.7. the low end is almost not used, if it is not
 going
   to
   be used the band might as well be changed back where it was. And yes,
 I
   know this has been brought up before, and yes I know there are
 generals,
   not
   an excuse for most, a few hours with the license manual and you are
 an
   extra. I talked with a 13 year girl a while back that was an extra!!
 I
   will be back on the low end tonight around 3.7 +or -15, maybe I can 
 get a
  
   ssb to respond. Of course maybe it is just that no one wants to talk
 to
   me!! I have also been listening and calling on 7160 and 7290 for
 several
  
   days without a nibble. Just about ready to throw in the towel and get
   rid
   of my junk. Bernie


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Bill McCourt - WF1L
Hi Group,

Name here is Bill and I am essentially a newbie to AM Operating.  I've just 
completed assembly of my vintage AM station and have spen time fruitlessly 
calling CQ on 7.290 and 7.160 when I can get in between the SSB lids.  Was able 
to finally complete a QSO with Warren, W1GUD down in Tampa tonight on 7.155 as 
he was wrapping up a round table with a couple other guys that the QRN and QRM 
was keeping me from copying.

I'll be out there only on 40 until I can get my long wire antenna back up then 
80/160 will be open to me as well.

Watch for me.  I'm running a Johnson Viking 1 and an HQ 170-A from up here near 
DC.

73

Bill-WF1L
Reston, VA

--- On Sun, 9/27/09, Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net
Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 12:27 PM

Hi Bernie,

I heard u in a qso this a.m. with WA3MJY and enjoyed reading the mail
and was gg to jump in and relay to da botayas that u were trying to
tell each other that the other guy had faded out but didn't get to the
rig before another QSO came up out of the aether...but anyway if some
sort of effort is made to populate 3.6 to 3.7 I'll give it a try--I
think the so called am window is used because there's a safety in
numbers notion and maybe a lot of the guys have their dipoles cut for
the top of 75 and/or have xtals up there (yes a few run rock bound
stuff) in addition to the other reasons.  I know a few hams who don't
want to upgrade now that there is no code test.  But yes, there's some
nice clear real estate down there below 3700.

I tried to do my part to keep 7160 open this morning; tried calling cq
and found someone already there on LSB, so I qsy up to 7165 which
sounded clear for a few khz up and down and ran 300 w. and had a great
qso with Kevin WB0JZG but the SSB gang was getting restless and when
we wrapped it up some UFL (that's unidentified flying lid) preached a
nice sermonette and finished by telling us if we want broadcast audio
to go buy broadcast stations.  On the other hand I got this very nice
email a few minutes ago from a ham who I won't identify because he may
not like my forwarding his email to a reflector so I'll just put in
the text:

I was monitoring 7.165 sunday morning and heard you and WB0JZG in
qso. I wish to congratulate you on your AM station and the broadcast
quality signal heard on sunday morning - very nice S9 + 10 carrier
with fantastic audio. Also your qrz bio was informative and humorus at
the same time. Enjoyable to read. In fone I operate mostly SSB but AM
adds spice, variety and enjoyment to my operating activities. I was
listening to you both on a restored Collins 75 A1. My AM transmitter
is a Collins 32 V2 with 2 channel EQ to give added mid range to base
generated by the Collins. I have made AM contacts on my Icom 7800 and
alpha 89. More fun using the Collins on AM.

Well, that made my day especially after I saw the subject line which
was Your AM signal in my in-box and I got geared up for a flame from
some p.o. s/b operator!

73

Rob K5UJ
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



  
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
I like 40 meters, but during the daytime, say 10am to about 2 pm.
I have no time for radio until winter is here, plus I think 40 works better 
in the daytime when there is some sunspot activity. I have no idea what 40 
does at night, must go real long, but up till now, its always been filled 
with sw broadcast at any sane hour.

I put the 40 meter antenna up a bit higher yesterday, since the vertical 
came down and sold at the hamfest today.

While at the fest today, I had a K2 I was trying to sell and heard a good AM 
signal on 40 but did not catch who it was.
There was an sx111, and an SX16, and a nc183, each for $100.00 I think.

I cleaned out the basement and made $600.00 towards the flex 5000.

Brett



- Original Message - 
From: Bill McCourt - WF1L wemcco...@yahoo.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters


Hi Group,

Name here is Bill and I am essentially a newbie to AM Operating. I've just 
completed assembly of my vintage AM station and have spen time fruitlessly 
calling CQ on 7.290 and 7.160 when I can get in between the SSB lids. Was 
able to finally complete a QSO with Warren, W1GUD down in Tampa tonight on 
7.155 as he was wrapping up a round table with a couple other guys that the 
QRN and QRM was keeping me from copying.

I'll be out there only on 40 until I can get my long wire antenna back up 
then 80/160 will be open to me as well.

Watch for me. I'm running a Johnson Viking 1 and an HQ 170-A from up here 
near DC.

73

Bill-WF1L
Reston, VA

--- On Sun, 9/27/09, Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 12:27 PM

Hi Bernie,

I heard u in a qso this a.m. with WA3MJY and enjoyed reading the mail
and was gg to jump in and relay to da botayas that u were trying to
tell each other that the other guy had faded out but didn't get to the
rig before another QSO came up out of the aether...but anyway if some
sort of effort is made to populate 3.6 to 3.7 I'll give it a try--I
think the so called am window is used because there's a safety in
numbers notion and maybe a lot of the guys have their dipoles cut for
the top of 75 and/or have xtals up there (yes a few run rock bound
stuff) in addition to the other reasons. I know a few hams who don't
want to upgrade now that there is no code test. But yes, there's some
nice clear real estate down there below 3700.

I tried to do my part to keep 7160 open this morning; tried calling cq
and found someone already there on LSB, so I qsy up to 7165 which
sounded clear for a few khz up and down and ran 300 w. and had a great
qso with Kevin WB0JZG but the SSB gang was getting restless and when
we wrapped it up some UFL (that's unidentified flying lid) preached a
nice sermonette and finished by telling us if we want broadcast audio
to go buy broadcast stations. On the other hand I got this very nice
email a few minutes ago from a ham who I won't identify because he may
not like my forwarding his email to a reflector so I'll just put in
the text:

I was monitoring 7.165 sunday morning and heard you and WB0JZG in
qso. I wish to congratulate you on your AM station and the broadcast
quality signal heard on sunday morning - very nice S9 + 10 carrier
with fantastic audio. Also your qrz bio was informative and humorus at
the same time. Enjoyable to read. In fone I operate mostly SSB but AM
adds spice, variety and enjoyment to my operating activities. I was
listening to you both on a restored Collins 75 A1. My AM transmitter
is a Collins 32 V2 with 2 channel EQ to give added mid range to base
generated by the Collins. I have made AM contacts on my Icom 7800 and
alpha 89. More fun using the Collins on AM.

Well, that made my day especially after I saw the subject line which
was Your AM signal in my in-box and I got geared up for a flame from
some p.o. s/b operator!

73

Rob K5UJ
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio

Re: [AMRadio] AM 75- 80 meters

2009-09-27 Thread Rob Atkinson
Bill,

Sorry u having trouble finding hams to work.  One other thing to keep
in mind (not only you Bill but others) is on any given evening, some %
of ops this time of year are QRT because of wx.  For example I'm shut
down right now because thunderstorms moving through tonight.you
don't have to be right under them--QRN from them will make operating
miserable for any ham within a few hundred miles of one depending on
time of day.  Anyway welcome to AM Bill you will find as I have that
it is a lot of fun and all the ops are great people.

73

Rob K5UJ

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Bill McCourt - WF1L
wemcco...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Group,

 Name here is Bill and I am essentially a newbie to AM Operating.  I've just 
 completed assembly of my vintage AM station and have spen time fruitlessly 
 calling CQ on 7.290 and 7.160 when I can get in between the SSB lids.  Was 
 able to finally complete a QSO with Warren, W1GUD down in Tampa tonight on 
 7.155 as he was wrapping up a round table with a couple other guys that the 
 QRN and QRM was keeping me from copying.

 I'll be out there only on 40 until I can get my long wire antenna back up 
 then 80/160 will be open to me as well.

 Watch for me.  I'm running a Johnson Viking 1 and an HQ 170-A from up here 
 near DC.

 73

 Bill-WF1L
 Reston, VA

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html