Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-20 Thread Dominador Sagun
NPR hahahahaha

WW4Q



-Original Message-
From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brett Gazdzinski
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:22 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

What a wacko thing to say.
Bush was the guy who started listening to everyone's phone calls...

No one I know listens to radio much, I listen to NPR for news, and xpn
for 
music from time to time, everyone else uses XM or the ipod.

Really old farts still listen to AM broadcast, the god station on rush
the 
Nazi...

Brett


- Original Message - 
From: BILL GUYGER bguy...@sbcglobal.net
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


 The FCC Chairman just came out saying he sees broadband for all as
being 
 the future and broadcasting as somewhere down the list probably on the

 order of the Town Crier. This is I'm sure part of Obama bin Biden's
plan 
 to impliment Big Brother. Orwell was just a bit off on his date.

 Bill AD5OL




 
 From: Dominador Sagun dsa...@teltronics.com
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 10:54:05 AM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

 After thinking about it, AM radio is a part of my life.
 I listen to WFLA, WGUL, WLSSon my commute to and from work.

 Long Live AM 75 meter phone.

 WW4Q

 Dominador Sagun
 Manufacturing Engineer
 Teltronics, Inc. - Ideas that Communicate
 2150 Whitfield Industrial Way
 Sarasota, Fl 34243
 (ph) 941-753-5000 x7241
 www.teltronics.com



 -Original Message-
 From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bernie Doran
 Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:54 AM
 To: kf5...@arrl.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

 yep, I listen to AM more that watching TV, by at least three times,
 likewise
 when driving. Bernie
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brian Zwiener bzwie...@sbcglobal.net
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:52 PM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


 I wonder where you got that information. Plenty of people listen to
 AM/FM
 commercial AND LPFM. Even low power analog TV. If this will impact HAM
 Radio, I can promise you there will be a war that will be all over the
 news
 media and Internet. And I really hope this does not start another
never
 ending thread:)

 --- On Thu, 3/18/10, D. Chester k4...@charter.net wrote:

 From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
 To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:33 PM

 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber
 feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

 But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by
 congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference. The
law
 is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to
 continue
 proliferating.

 The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals
 so
 that they don't generate interference. The FCC inspectors are legally
 obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer
crap.
 As
 much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part
15
 would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a
 stronger station doesn't cut it.

 Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting.
 Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the
 feds
 decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for
national
 security.

 Don k4kyv

 ___

 This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

 http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
 http://gigliwood.com/abcd/

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives

Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-20 Thread Barry Sherwood
Long Live AM! God Save AM! Where would I be now if it were not for Late Night  
Art Bell!


Barry Sherwood
KF5GC



--- On Sat, 3/20/10, Dominador Sagun dsa...@teltronics.com wrote:

 From: Dominador Sagun dsa...@teltronics.com
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
 To: Brett Gazdzinski brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net, Discussion of AM 
 Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Saturday, March 20, 2010, 9:44 AM
 NPR hahahahaha
 
 WW4Q
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
 On Behalf Of Brett Gazdzinski
 Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:22 PM
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
 
 What a wacko thing to say.
 Bush was the guy who started listening to everyone's phone
 calls...
 
 No one I know listens to radio much, I listen to NPR for
 news, and xpn
 for 
 music from time to time, everyone else uses XM or the
 ipod.
 
 Really old farts still listen to AM broadcast, the god
 station on rush
 the 
 Nazi...
 
 Brett



  
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-20 Thread Barry Sherwood
Yep it is like taking away candy from a kid. People are addicted to talk radio. 
You can only listen to the same song for so long before brain rot sets in. LOL

Barry Sherwood
KF5GC


--- On Sat, 3/20/10, BILL GUYGER bguy...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 From: BILL GUYGER bguy...@sbcglobal.net
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
 amradio@mailman.qth.net, Brett Gazdzinski brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net
 Date: Saturday, March 20, 2010, 10:42 AM
 You wouldn't believe the calls that
 we get when we have to take one of our AM's off the air
 after midnight for maintenance and people can't hear Art
 Bell or his replacement George Noory.
 
 Bill AD5OL
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Barry Sherwood barry_sherw...@yahoo.com
 To: Brett Gazdzinski brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net;
 Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Sat, March 20, 2010 9:16:46 AM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
 
 Long Live AM! God Save AM! Where would I be now if it were
 not for Late Night  Art Bell!
 
 
 Barry Sherwood
 KF5GC
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net
 with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 


  
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread Bernie Doran
yep, I listen to AM more that watching TV, by at least three times, likewise 
when driving. Bernie
- Original Message - 
From: Brian Zwiener bzwie...@sbcglobal.net
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


I wonder where you got that information. Plenty of people listen to AM/FM 
commercial AND LPFM. Even low power analog TV. If this will impact HAM 
Radio, I can promise you there will be a war that will be all over the news 
media and Internet. And I really hope this does not start another never 
ending thread:)

--- On Thu, 3/18/10, D. Chester k4...@charter.net wrote:

From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:33 PM

 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by
congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference. The law
is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to continue
proliferating.

The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals so
that they don't generate interference. The FCC inspectors are legally
obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer crap. As
much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part 15
would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a
stronger station doesn't cut it.

Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting.
Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the feds
decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for national
security.

Don k4kyv

___

This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread sbjohnston
 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

Commercial broadcast listening is a shallow decline, non-commercial 
public radio is in a shallow climb.  FM has more listeners than AM, but 
AM is still a contender.  In most markets at least one AM is in the top 
few stations in the ratings.

Broadcasting isn't as cool as it once was, and that a long-term 
problem, but many people *are* listening to radio.  But the same is 
true for ham radio - to a far greater degree unfortunately.  It is not 
considered cool by the general population - but there are quite a few 
participants.

And if noise proves a strong limit to the ability to receive in either 
case, it will help drive people away.  I've have three responses to my 
noise item in QST's Technical Correspondence column from inactive hams 
that said they tried to get on the air recently but the noise level on 
receive was just too high and they put the gear away again.

Steve WD8DAS

sbjohns...@aol.com
http://www.wd8das.net/

Radio is your best entertainment value.






-Original Message-
From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thu, Mar 18, 2010 10:33 pm
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber 
feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by
congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference.  The  
law
is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to 
continue
proliferating.

The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals 
so
that they don't generate interference.  The FCC inspectors are legally
obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer crap. 
 As
much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part 15
would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a
stronger station doesn't cut it.

Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting.
Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the 
feds
decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for 
national
security.

Don k4kyv

___

This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

  
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread Dominador Sagun
After thinking about it, AM radio is a part of my life.
I listen to WFLA, WGUL, WLSSon my commute to and from work.

Long Live AM 75 meter phone.

WW4Q

Dominador Sagun
Manufacturing Engineer
Teltronics, Inc. - Ideas that Communicate
2150 Whitfield Industrial Way
Sarasota, Fl 34243
(ph) 941-753-5000 x7241
www.teltronics.com



-Original Message-
From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bernie Doran
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:54 AM
To: kf5...@arrl.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

yep, I listen to AM more that watching TV, by at least three times,
likewise 
when driving. Bernie
- Original Message - 
From: Brian Zwiener bzwie...@sbcglobal.net
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


I wonder where you got that information. Plenty of people listen to
AM/FM 
commercial AND LPFM. Even low power analog TV. If this will impact HAM 
Radio, I can promise you there will be a war that will be all over the
news 
media and Internet. And I really hope this does not start another never 
ending thread:)

--- On Thu, 3/18/10, D. Chester k4...@charter.net wrote:

From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:33 PM

 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber
feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by
congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference. The law
is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to
continue
proliferating.

The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals
so
that they don't generate interference. The FCC inspectors are legally
obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer crap.
As
much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part 15
would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a
stronger station doesn't cut it.

Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting.
Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the
feds
decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for national
security.

Don k4kyv

___

This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted

Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread BILL GUYGER
The FCC Chairman just came out saying he sees broadband for all as being the 
future and broadcasting as somewhere down the list probably on the order of the 
Town Crier. This is I'm sure part of Obama bin Biden's plan to impliment Big 
Brother. Orwell was just a bit off on his date.

Bill AD5OL





From: Dominador Sagun dsa...@teltronics.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 10:54:05 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

After thinking about it, AM radio is a part of my life.
I listen to WFLA, WGUL, WLSSon my commute to and from work.

Long Live AM 75 meter phone.

WW4Q

Dominador Sagun
Manufacturing Engineer
Teltronics, Inc. - Ideas that Communicate
2150 Whitfield Industrial Way
Sarasota, Fl 34243
(ph) 941-753-5000 x7241
www.teltronics.com



-Original Message-
From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bernie Doran
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:54 AM
To: kf5...@arrl.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

yep, I listen to AM more that watching TV, by at least three times,
likewise 
when driving. Bernie
- Original Message - 
From: Brian Zwiener bzwie...@sbcglobal.net
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


I wonder where you got that information. Plenty of people listen to
AM/FM 
commercial AND LPFM. Even low power analog TV. If this will impact HAM 
Radio, I can promise you there will be a war that will be all over the
news 
media and Internet. And I really hope this does not start another never 
ending thread:)

--- On Thu, 3/18/10, D. Chester k4...@charter.net wrote:

From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:33 PM

 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber
feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by
congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference. The law
is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to
continue
proliferating.

The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals
so
that they don't generate interference. The FCC inspectors are legally
obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer crap.
As
much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part 15
would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a
stronger station doesn't cut it.

Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting.
Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the
feds
decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for national
security.

Don k4kyv

___

This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help

Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread Rob Atkinson
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, BILL GUYGER bguy...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

The FCC Chairman just came out saying he sees broadband for all as
being the future and broadcasting as somewhere down the list probably
on the order of the Town Crier. 

Your interpretation obviously, but okay, whatever.

This is I'm sure part of Obama bin Biden's plan to impliment Big
Brother. Orwell was just a bit off on his date.

The President, _our_ President (whether you like it or believe it, or
not) does not micromanage the FCC but more important, these fantastic
conclusions don't belong in a forum about ham AM--save it for some
political fever swamp where the echo chamber is alive and well.  Be
sure to use a spell checker too.

73

Rob
K5UJ
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread John Cox
Thanks Robb,
I would like to see 0 Political, and Religious commentary in my life.
I have my opinions and would just as soon that others keep theirs to 
themselves.
Its just opinion and no more no matter what your parents preached to you.
I look at Amfone every day and every now and then I see a little bit of 
Political or Religious wisdom tacked onto the end of the message and 
wonder if he or she took their medication today.
 I get enough Politics watching the evening news and living here in the 
bible belt way to much religion in my day to day interaction with my 
neighbors.
73, John
K6HSG





- Original Message - 
From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


 On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, BILL GUYGER bguy...@sbcglobal.net 
 wrote:

 The FCC Chairman just came out saying he sees broadband for all as
 being the future and broadcasting as somewhere down the list probably
 on the order of the Town Crier. 

 Your interpretation obviously, but okay, whatever.

 This is I'm sure part of Obama bin Biden's plan to impliment Big
 Brother. Orwell was just a bit off on his date.

 The President, _our_ President (whether you like it or believe it, or
 not) does not micromanage the FCC but more important, these fantastic
 conclusions don't belong in a forum about ham AM--save it for some
 political fever swamp where the echo chamber is alive and well.  Be
 sure to use a spell checker too.

 73

 Rob
 K5UJ
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2756 - Release Date: 03/19/10 
07:33:00

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation EVERYONE READ

2010-03-19 Thread Jim Wilhite
Before we get carried away with this topic let's stop right now.  Life 
does not come with a guarantee so you can read what you will into any 
message.  John, there will be references to things every so often that 
you may not like nor approve.

The great number of posts here are fine and, with any topic will deviate 
a bit.  You are not required to read every post, but I do and if I have 
an issue I will say so.  I suppose the current political situation is 
feeding the frenzy, but as long as the posts are not overtly bias or 
improper we choose to let them go.  That is the case here.

73

Jim/W5JO
Moderator


- Original Message - 



 Thanks Robb,
 I would like to see 0 Political, and Religious commentary in my life.
 I have my opinions and would just as soon that others keep theirs to
 themselves.
 Its just opinion and no more no matter what your parents preached to 
 you.
 I look at Amfone every day and every now and then I see a little bit 
 of
 Political or Religious wisdom tacked onto the end of the message and
 wonder if he or she took their medication today.
 I get enough Politics watching the evening news and living here in the
 bible belt way to much religion in my day to day interaction with my
 neighbors.
 73, John
 K6HSG





 - Original Message - 
 From: Rob Atkinson ranchoro...@gmail.com
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


 On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, BILL GUYGER bguy...@sbcglobal.net
 wrote:

 The FCC Chairman just came out saying he sees broadband for all as
 being the future and broadcasting as somewhere down the list probably
 on the order of the Town Crier. 

 Your interpretation obviously, but okay, whatever.

 This is I'm sure part of Obama bin Biden's plan to impliment Big
 Brother. Orwell was just a bit off on his date.

 The President, _our_ President (whether you like it or believe it, or
 not) does not micromanage the FCC but more important, these fantastic
 conclusions don't belong in a forum about ham AM--save it for some
 political fever swamp where the echo chamber is alive and well.  Be
 sure to use a spell checker too.

 73

 Rob
 K5UJ

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
What, you want big government?
What are you, some sort of democrat?

Brett

- Original Message - 
From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation


 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber 
 feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

 But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by
 congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference.  The  law
 is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to continue
 proliferating.

 The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals so
 that they don't generate interference.  The FCC inspectors are legally
 obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer crap. 
 As
 much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part 15
 would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a
 stronger station doesn't cut it.

 Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting.
 Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the 
 feds
 decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for national
 security.

 Don k4kyv

 ___

 This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

 http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
 http://gigliwood.com/abcd/

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-19 Thread W5AMI
Okay this is enough.  What the hell is going on here of late??

Get back on AM discussion, that means Amateur Radio and operating AM.  I
think one moderator has already sent a warning out, seeing that things were
starting to get out of hand.  If this crap continues with any of you, I/we
will bump you off, and if that don't work, I'll shut the whole damned thing
for good!  I'm done with it.  Get back on track with this list folks.

w5ami
admin AMRadio



On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Brett Gazdzinski 
brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net wrote:

 What a wacko thing to say.
 Bush was the guy who started listening to everyone's phone calls...

 No one I know listens to radio much, I listen to NPR for news, and xpn for
 music from time to time, everyone else uses XM or the ipod.

 Really old farts still listen to AM broadcast, the god station on rush the
 Nazi...

 Brett


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-18 Thread D. Chester
 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by 
congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference.  The  law 
is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to continue 
proliferating.

The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals so 
that they don't generate interference.  The FCC inspectors are legally 
obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer crap.  As 
much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part 15 
would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a 
stronger station doesn't cut it.

Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting. 
Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the feds 
decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for national 
security.

Don k4kyv

___

This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/ 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation

2010-03-18 Thread Brian Zwiener
I wonder where you got that information. Plenty of people listen to AM/FM 
commercial AND LPFM. Even low power analog TV. If this will impact HAM Radio, I 
can promise you there will be a war that will be all over the news media and 
Internet. And I really hope this does not start another never ending thread:) 

--- On Thu, 3/18/10, D. Chester k4...@charter.net wrote:

From: D. Chester k4...@charter.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:33 PM

 What is to interfere with?
 All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber feed,
 spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

 No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

 You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

 I don't think so...


 Brett

But still, these are all licensed services, and the FCC is mandated by 
congress to protect licensed users from unlicensed interference.  The  law 
is the law. Somebody is not doing their job as this is allowed to continue 
proliferating.

The state is legally obligated to properly install its traffic signals so 
that they don't generate interference.  The FCC inspectors are legally 
obligated to check out interference from poorly designed consumer crap.  As 
much money as the government wastes on trivial stuff, enforcing Part 15 
would be a drop in the ocean as far as their budget goes. Listen to a 
stronger station doesn't cut it.

Evidently, someone in officialdom thinks HF is still worth protecting. 
Remember, they denied us a real 60m ham band because after 11SE01, the feds 
decided that frequencies in that vicinity were essential for national 
security.

Don k4kyv

___

This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/ 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation (was ILLEGAL STUFF ON E BAY)

2010-03-17 Thread Robert Nickels
Not to detract from Steve's point, because I agree that RFI from 
unintentional radiators is a major problem for hams, especially those 
who enjoy full-range AM audio on HF.  But it's important to understand 
how the FCC approaches the wide range of Part 15 issues - here are a 
couple of good resources:

FCC:  http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/procedures.html#sec1
ARRL:  http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/part15.html#Myths
An A2LA-certified RF test lab:  www.radiomet.com/documents/FCC_Guide.pdf

Once you're familiar with the terminology used to characterize 
unlicensed devices,  I think most will agree that our problems stem 
primarily from both Class A (intended for commercial, industrial, and 
business use) and B (residential)  Unintentional Radiators.  This can 
involve both Conducted (interference that is carried along power lines 
and other conductors to other devices, i.e. our receivers) and Radiated 
emissions (what Steve measured with his spectrum analyzer).  The vast 
majority of such devices are subject to Verification, which is the 
lowest level of compliance.  Manufacturers are on the honor system to 
do the appropriate testing and label the product accordingly.

Even when manufacturers make a good faith effort to comply with Part 15 
Verification requirements, the real world implementation may not reflect 
what was seen in the laboratory.  Take for example the noisy LED traffic 
light that Steve posted about some time ago.  Suppose the manufacturer 
recommended that shielded cable be used between the switchmode 
controller and the lights to mitigate radiated RFI, but the installers 
just re-used the unshielded wires that were used for the old 
incandescent systems.   Instant antenna!  As hams, we know the length of 
the wires and whether they're run inside a metal pole or along the side 
of a wooden one will make a big difference also.  Just a made-up example 
to show that the problem may often not be as simple as going back on the 
manufacturer of one of the devices in question.

Still, the intent of Part 15 is to protect licensed users from 
interference from unlicensed devices, and the best option we have to 
enforce current regulations (or potentially get better ones)  is to 
continue to elevate our concerns to the FCC and those who oversee the 
agency.

73, Bob W9RAN


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation (was ILLEGAL STUFF ON E BAY)

2010-03-17 Thread Paul Christensen
 Still, the intent of Part 15 is to protect licensed users from
 interference from unlicensed devices, and the best option we have to
 enforce current regulations (or potentially get better ones)  is to
 continue to elevate our concerns to the FCC and those who oversee the
 agency.

 73, Bob W9RAN

Excellent advise, Bob.  Part 15 needs to get current with the times.  As 
more consumers replace their household appliances with models that 
incorporate RFI/EMI emitting technology, the problem will only become worse. 
The certification section was last re-written at time when nearly all of our 
major household appliances did not contain SMPS and microprocessors.

Today, household appliances are exempt from Part 15 certification and 
problems associated with these unintentional radiators are dealt with after 
they generate interference to licensed services.  The FCC could help itself 
in this matter with a rule change that includes appliances in the 
certification requirement.  A bit of time spent on a rule change would pay 
great dividends in reducing their time spent on the enforcement effort.

Paul, W9AC

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation (was ILLEGAL STUFF ON E BAY)

2010-03-17 Thread Rob Atkinson
I'll bet there is _a lot_ of money in the hands of industry lobbyists
who badly want that rule to not change.

rob
K5UJ

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net wrote:
 Still, the intent of Part 15 is to protect licensed users from
 interference from unlicensed devices, and the best option we have to
 enforce current regulations (or potentially get better ones)  is to
 continue to elevate our concerns to the FCC and those who oversee the
 agency.

 73, Bob W9RAN

 Excellent advise, Bob.  Part 15 needs to get current with the times.  As
 more consumers replace their household appliances with models that
 incorporate RFI/EMI emitting technology, the problem will only become worse.
 The certification section was last re-written at time when nearly all of our
 major household appliances did not contain SMPS and microprocessors.

 Today, household appliances are exempt from Part 15 certification and
 problems associated with these unintentional radiators are dealt with after
 they generate interference to licensed services.  The FCC could help itself
 in this matter with a rule change that includes appliances in the
 certification requirement.  A bit of time spent on a rule change would pay
 great dividends in reducing their time spent on the enforcement effort.

 Paul, W9AC

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation (was ILLEGAL STUFF ON E BAY)

2010-03-17 Thread Brett Gazdzinski
What is to interfere with?
All radio stuff is going 900 MHz or higher, cable satellite or fiber feed, 
spread spectrum, phasing noise and interference null, etc.

No one listens to AM anymore, or even FM much.

You think anyone is going to worry about ham radio?

I don't think so...


Brett


- Original Message - 
From: Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net
To: w9...@oneradio.net; Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FCC Non-cooperation (was ILLEGAL STUFF ON E BAY)


 Still, the intent of Part 15 is to protect licensed users from
 interference from unlicensed devices, and the best option we have to
 enforce current regulations (or potentially get better ones)  is to
 continue to elevate our concerns to the FCC and those who oversee the
 agency.

 73, Bob W9RAN

 Excellent advise, Bob.  Part 15 needs to get current with the times.  As
 more consumers replace their household appliances with models that
 incorporate RFI/EMI emitting technology, the problem will only become 
 worse.
 The certification section was last re-written at time when nearly all of 
 our
 major household appliances did not contain SMPS and microprocessors.

 Today, household appliances are exempt from Part 15 certification and
 problems associated with these unintentional radiators are dealt with 
 after
 they generate interference to licensed services.  The FCC could help 
 itself
 in this matter with a rule change that includes appliances in the
 certification requirement.  A bit of time spent on a rule change would pay
 great dividends in reducing their time spent on the enforcement effort.

 Paul, W9AC

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html