Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM BANDWARMING

2006-11-22 Thread k0ng


Don: If there is a vote, I vote for 3650 as 3610 is a bit close to the CW/digi
portion if running "Hi Fi" AM.(might serve as a band edge marker too??)

I am only "QRP" with a hundred Watts but hope to be on when its "1201".

73, Charlie,  K0NG




__
AMRadio mailing list
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net


RE: [AMRadio] Re: AM BANDWARMING

2006-11-22 Thread Bob Peters
I just checked my Antenna and tuning on 3.645 and matches a okkk am
awaiting the 15th now...

Bob W1PE


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd, KA1KAQ
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 2:45 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM BANDWARMING


On 11/22/06, Donald Chester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect some readers may have misinterpreted this thread, so let's 
> clarify the issue.

> The idea is to occupy several frequencies throughout the new 
> allocations, and for each station to hop between these QSO's, so that 
> the entire AM presence on the new frequencies doesn't end up on one 
> frequency in one huge roundtable.  Better to keep each group limited 
> in size to 3 or 4 participants at most, and for each participant to 
> shuffle from one AM group to another throughout the early morning and 
> evening of the 15th.

Good luck there, Don! I've been trying to get that to happen for a while
now, instead the 'Clump Factor' results. And if I or others leave a
conversation to start up another one, often the other conversation ends
up on that frequency.

I'll be there, regardless of whether I've upgrade to Extra or not.
Here's hoping enough participants show up to make this idea work. If
nothing else, 3-4 people calling CQ on different frequencies should
offer some respectable AM beacons for others to home in on. Other than
the few bad nights we've had recently, I've heard a lot of activity on
75 as well as 160.

~ Todd,  KA1KAQ
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net

__
AMRadio mailing list
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net


Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM BANDWARMING

2006-11-22 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ

On 11/22/06, Donald Chester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I suspect some readers may have misinterpreted this thread, so let's clarify
the issue.



The idea is to occupy several frequencies throughout the new allocations,
and for each station to hop between these QSO's, so that the entire AM
presence on the new frequencies doesn't end up on one frequency in one huge
roundtable.  Better to keep each group limited in size to 3 or 4
participants at most, and for each participant to shuffle from one AM group
to another throughout the early morning and evening of the 15th.


Good luck there, Don! I've been trying to get that to happen for a
while now, instead the 'Clump Factor' results. And if I or others
leave a conversation to start up another one, often the other
conversation ends up on that frequency.

I'll be there, regardless of whether I've upgrade to Extra or not.
Here's hoping enough participants show up to make this idea work. If
nothing else, 3-4 people calling CQ on different frequencies should
offer some respectable AM beacons for others to home in on. Other than
the few bad nights we've had recently, I've heard a lot of activity on
75 as well as 160.

~ Todd,  KA1KAQ
__
AMRadio mailing list
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net


Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM BANDWARMING

2006-11-22 Thread Bry Carling
> So far, the specific frequencies I have heard mentioned are:  3610, 3650
> and 
> 3685.  Any others?  How many separate frequencies should we attempt?  I 
> think we should try for four in the new Extra class segment.

Don - 3645 would be a good frequency because is it 5 kHz below
3650, AND because I have a good supply of crystals for that spot.

73 - Bry, AF4K


__
AMRadio mailing list
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net