[amsat-bb] AMSAT Store

2012-01-12 Thread Martha
The AMSAT store is now up and running!

-- 
73- Martha
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread Thomas Doyle
This may have been discussed previously but just in case it has not.

I purchased an interesting radio that might be an inexpensive way to
operate full duplex on the FM sats.
The radio cost $65 including shipping and all accessories. It runs 2W on
both 2M and 70cm. It has
almost all the bells and whistles you would expect on a dual band handi. 99
memories - tone squelch ...

In addition to the low cost the radio is very small. See pic - I have
fairly normal size hands so you can see how
small it is.

http://www.tomdoyle.org/UV-X4.jpg

I purchased it expecting the worst. Much to my surprise it actually works
quite well. The menu system is
the most intuitive I have found on any radio. The only negatives I could
find were

- no channel lockout when scanning - I put the local weather station in one
of the memories.
  Since it is always on you can not use the scan function.

- I fully expected a radio of such a small size would not have adequate
sound from the speaker.
  In fact the sound from the speaker is really loud. Everything is set
using a rotary digital switch
  with detents. This works great for selecting channels and using the menu
functions. There are
  only 9 detent positions for the volume. The lowest volume setting is
mute, one click up and it is
  loud and it keeps getting louder as you go up. There was nothing wrong
with my radio - they
  all do it.

- no DTMF pad

None of these negatives affect the use of the radio with an FM sat. You
could buy a pair of these
for $130 including shipping. Add a diplexer and Elk/Arrow antenna and I
think you would be good to
go with a very compact low cost full duplex portable FM station.

I bought mine from http://www.maintradingcompany.com and received excellent
service. In case you
were wondering what the goofy looking LED between the switch and the
antenna is - it is for the
flashlight function the radio offers as a feature. The flashlight feature
is invaluable :-)

Sent from my computer.

W9KE  Tom Doyle
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread Clayton Coleman W5PFG
Excellent idea and post, Tom.

I have posted two YouTube videos of the Baeofeng UV-3R being used for
satellite work.  I would suspect performance of the UV-X4 to be
similar in nature.  AC0RA and I have made a few Baofeng to Baofeng
contacts to test the performance on several of the LEO FM satellites.
Timing and antenna orientation is key and I would recommend two the
radios be used for full-duplex, as in your suggestion Tom.

Here's a video of receiving AO-27 using the stock rubber duck:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYZyC_vkew0

here's a video of receiving AO-51 using an Arrow:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRN4uJXvnK0

(I did make a contact on this AO-51 pass, though I wouldn't recommend
it because of the semi-duplex limitation)

73,
Clayton
W5PFG

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com wrote:
 This may have been discussed previously but just in case it has not.

 I purchased an interesting radio that might be an inexpensive way to
 operate full duplex on the FM sats.
 The radio cost $65 including shipping and all accessories. It runs 2W on
 both 2M and 70cm. It has
 almost all the bells and whistles you would expect on a dual band handi. 99
 memories - tone squelch ...

 In addition to the low cost the radio is very small. See pic - I have
 fairly normal size hands so you can see how
 small it is.

 http://www.tomdoyle.org/UV-X4.jpg

 I purchased it expecting the worst. Much to my surprise it actually works
 quite well. The menu system is
 the most intuitive I have found on any radio. The only negatives I could
 find were

 - no channel lockout when scanning - I put the local weather station in one
 of the memories.
  Since it is always on you can not use the scan function.

 - I fully expected a radio of such a small size would not have adequate
 sound from the speaker.
  In fact the sound from the speaker is really loud. Everything is set
 using a rotary digital switch
  with detents. This works great for selecting channels and using the menu
 functions. There are
  only 9 detent positions for the volume. The lowest volume setting is
 mute, one click up and it is
  loud and it keeps getting louder as you go up. There was nothing wrong
 with my radio - they
  all do it.

 - no DTMF pad

 None of these negatives affect the use of the radio with an FM sat. You
 could buy a pair of these
 for $130 including shipping. Add a diplexer and Elk/Arrow antenna and I
 think you would be good to
 go with a very compact low cost full duplex portable FM station.

 I bought mine from http://www.maintradingcompany.com and received excellent
 service. In case you
 were wondering what the goofy looking LED between the switch and the
 antenna is - it is for the
 flashlight function the radio offers as a feature. The flashlight feature
 is invaluable :-)

 Sent from my computer.

 W9KE  Tom Doyle
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread KP4TR (Ramon Gonzalez)
Looks like a knock off of Yaesu VX-3. For $65 not bad

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 12, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Clayton Coleman W5PFG kayakfis...@gmail.com 
wrote:

 Excellent idea and post, Tom.
 
 I have posted two YouTube videos of the Baeofeng UV-3R being used for
 satellite work.  I would suspect performance of the UV-X4 to be
 similar in nature.  AC0RA and I have made a few Baofeng to Baofeng
 contacts to test the performance on several of the LEO FM satellites.
 Timing and antenna orientation is key and I would recommend two the
 radios be used for full-duplex, as in your suggestion Tom.
 
 Here's a video of receiving AO-27 using the stock rubber duck:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYZyC_vkew0
 
 here's a video of receiving AO-51 using an Arrow:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRN4uJXvnK0
 
 (I did make a contact on this AO-51 pass, though I wouldn't recommend
 it because of the semi-duplex limitation)
 
 73,
 Clayton
 W5PFG
 
 On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com wrote:
 This may have been discussed previously but just in case it has not.
 
 I purchased an interesting radio that might be an inexpensive way to
 operate full duplex on the FM sats.
 The radio cost $65 including shipping and all accessories. It runs 2W on
 both 2M and 70cm. It has
 almost all the bells and whistles you would expect on a dual band handi. 99
 memories - tone squelch ...
 
 In addition to the low cost the radio is very small. See pic - I have
 fairly normal size hands so you can see how
 small it is.
 
 http://www.tomdoyle.org/UV-X4.jpg
 
 I purchased it expecting the worst. Much to my surprise it actually works
 quite well. The menu system is
 the most intuitive I have found on any radio. The only negatives I could
 find were
 
 - no channel lockout when scanning - I put the local weather station in one
 of the memories.
  Since it is always on you can not use the scan function.
 
 - I fully expected a radio of such a small size would not have adequate
 sound from the speaker.
  In fact the sound from the speaker is really loud. Everything is set
 using a rotary digital switch
  with detents. This works great for selecting channels and using the menu
 functions. There are
  only 9 detent positions for the volume. The lowest volume setting is
 mute, one click up and it is
  loud and it keeps getting louder as you go up. There was nothing wrong
 with my radio - they
  all do it.
 
 - no DTMF pad
 
 None of these negatives affect the use of the radio with an FM sat. You
 could buy a pair of these
 for $130 including shipping. Add a diplexer and Elk/Arrow antenna and I
 think you would be good to
 go with a very compact low cost full duplex portable FM station.
 
 I bought mine from http://www.maintradingcompany.com and received excellent
 service. In case you
 were wondering what the goofy looking LED between the switch and the
 antenna is - it is for the
 flashlight function the radio offers as a feature. The flashlight feature
 is invaluable :-)
 
 Sent from my computer.
 
 W9KE  Tom Doyle
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread John Geiger
You can find them for $46 shipped on ebay.

73s John AA5JG

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, KP4TR (Ramon Gonzalez) 
kp4tr.ra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Looks like a knock off of Yaesu VX-3. For $65 not bad

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 12, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Clayton Coleman W5PFG kayakfis...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Excellent idea and post, Tom.
 
  I have posted two YouTube videos of the Baeofeng UV-3R being used for
  satellite work.  I would suspect performance of the UV-X4 to be
  similar in nature.  AC0RA and I have made a few Baofeng to Baofeng
  contacts to test the performance on several of the LEO FM satellites.
  Timing and antenna orientation is key and I would recommend two the
  radios be used for full-duplex, as in your suggestion Tom.
 
  Here's a video of receiving AO-27 using the stock rubber duck:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYZyC_vkew0
 
  here's a video of receiving AO-51 using an Arrow:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRN4uJXvnK0
 
  (I did make a contact on this AO-51 pass, though I wouldn't recommend
  it because of the semi-duplex limitation)
 
  73,
  Clayton
  W5PFG
 
  On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  This may have been discussed previously but just in case it has not.
 
  I purchased an interesting radio that might be an inexpensive way to
  operate full duplex on the FM sats.
  The radio cost $65 including shipping and all accessories. It runs 2W on
  both 2M and 70cm. It has
  almost all the bells and whistles you would expect on a dual band
 handi. 99
  memories - tone squelch ...
 
  In addition to the low cost the radio is very small. See pic - I have
  fairly normal size hands so you can see how
  small it is.
 
  http://www.tomdoyle.org/UV-X4.jpg
 
  I purchased it expecting the worst. Much to my surprise it actually
 works
  quite well. The menu system is
  the most intuitive I have found on any radio. The only negatives I could
  find were
 
  - no channel lockout when scanning - I put the local weather station in
 one
  of the memories.
   Since it is always on you can not use the scan function.
 
  - I fully expected a radio of such a small size would not have adequate
  sound from the speaker.
   In fact the sound from the speaker is really loud. Everything is set
  using a rotary digital switch
   with detents. This works great for selecting channels and using the
 menu
  functions. There are
   only 9 detent positions for the volume. The lowest volume setting is
  mute, one click up and it is
   loud and it keeps getting louder as you go up. There was nothing wrong
  with my radio - they
   all do it.
 
  - no DTMF pad
 
  None of these negatives affect the use of the radio with an FM sat. You
  could buy a pair of these
  for $130 including shipping. Add a diplexer and Elk/Arrow antenna and I
  think you would be good to
  go with a very compact low cost full duplex portable FM station.
 
  I bought mine from http://www.maintradingcompany.com and received
 excellent
  service. In case you
  were wondering what the goofy looking LED between the switch and the
  antenna is - it is for the
  flashlight function the radio offers as a feature. The flashlight
 feature
  is invaluable :-)
 
  Sent from my computer.
 
  W9KE  Tom Doyle
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
 author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread George Henry
Main drawback appears to be that they are not full duplex...  but at those 
prices, why not buy TWO?


George, KA3HSW



- Original Message 
 From: Clayton Coleman W5PFG kayakfis...@gmail.com
 To: Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com
 Cc: AMSAT-BB@amsat.org
 Sent: Thu, January 12, 2012 11:49:11 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use
 
 Excellent idea and post, Tom.
 
 I have posted two YouTube videos of the  Baeofeng UV-3R being used for
 satellite work.  I would suspect  performance of the UV-X4 to be
 similar in nature.  AC0RA and I have made  a few Baofeng to Baofeng
 contacts to test the performance on several of the  LEO FM satellites.
 Timing and antenna orientation is key and I would  recommend two the
 radios be used for full-duplex, as in your suggestion  Tom.
 
 Here's a video of receiving AO-27 using the stock rubber duck:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYZyC_vkew0
 
 here's a video of  receiving AO-51 using an Arrow:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRN4uJXvnK0
 
 (I did make a contact on  this AO-51 pass, though I wouldn't recommend
 it because of the semi-duplex  limitation)
 
 73,
 Clayton
 W5PFG
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread George Henry
Hmmm... the review on QRZ says they're not full duplex.  Guess they actually 
ARE.

Oops. My bad.



From: Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com
To: George Henry ka3...@att.net
Cc: AMSAT amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thu, January 12, 2012 1:40:25 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

You might want to take a quick look at the posting that started this thread. 

73 W9KE tom ...


On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:01 PM, George Henry ka3...@att.net wrote:

Main drawback appears to be that they are not full duplex...  but at those
prices, why not buy TWO?


George, KA3HSW



- Original Message 
 From: Clayton Coleman W5PFG kayakfis...@gmail.com
 To: Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com
 Cc: AMSAT-BB@amsat.org
 Sent: Thu, January 12, 2012 11:49:11 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

 Excellent idea and post, Tom.

 I have posted two YouTube videos of the  Baeofeng UV-3R being used for
 satellite work.  I would suspect  performance of the UV-X4 to be
 similar in nature.  AC0RA and I have made  a few Baofeng to Baofeng
 contacts to test the performance on several of the  LEO FM satellites.
 Timing and antenna orientation is key and I would  recommend two the
 radios be used for full-duplex, as in your suggestion  Tom.

 Here's a video of receiving AO-27 using the stock rubber duck:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYZyC_vkew0

 here's a video of  receiving AO-51 using an Arrow:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRN4uJXvnK0

 (I did make a contact on  this AO-51 pass, though I wouldn't recommend
 it because of the semi-duplex  limitation)

 73,
 Clayton
 W5PFG
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



-- 

Sent from my computer.

tom ...


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread Thomas Doyle
You might want to take a quick look at the posting that started this
thread.

73 W9KE tom ...

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:01 PM, George Henry ka3...@att.net wrote:

 Main drawback appears to be that they are not full duplex...  but at those
 prices, why not buy TWO?


 George, KA3HSW



 - Original Message 
  From: Clayton Coleman W5PFG kayakfis...@gmail.com
  To: Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com
  Cc: AMSAT-BB@amsat.org
  Sent: Thu, January 12, 2012 11:49:11 AM
  Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use
 
  Excellent idea and post, Tom.
 
  I have posted two YouTube videos of the  Baeofeng UV-3R being used for
  satellite work.  I would suspect  performance of the UV-X4 to be
  similar in nature.  AC0RA and I have made  a few Baofeng to Baofeng
  contacts to test the performance on several of the  LEO FM satellites.
  Timing and antenna orientation is key and I would  recommend two the
  radios be used for full-duplex, as in your suggestion  Tom.
 
  Here's a video of receiving AO-27 using the stock rubber duck:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYZyC_vkew0
 
  here's a video of  receiving AO-51 using an Arrow:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRN4uJXvnK0
 
  (I did make a contact on  this AO-51 pass, though I wouldn't recommend
  it because of the semi-duplex  limitation)
 
  73,
  Clayton
  W5PFG
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




-- 

Sent from my computer.

tom ...
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] pc sat

2012-01-12 Thread jerry keeton
are attempts still in the works for restoring pcsat ? Just came over and seen 
echo s from command-1  A couple other calls as well .

Jerry WB5LHD
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Very Interesting Radio - Possible Sat Use

2012-01-12 Thread Tony Langdon

At 06:01 AM 1/13/2012, George Henry wrote:

Main drawback appears to be that they are not full duplex...  but at those
prices, why not buy TWO?


All of my full duplex sat operation has been with 2 radios, so why 
not. :)  There are some advantages of running two radios, especially 
where the uplink is on UHF, as with some radios, adjusting the uplink 
for Doppler can be fiddly.  With 2 radios, you simply tweak the 
relevant VFO knob. :)


73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: pc sat

2012-01-12 Thread Bob Bruninga
 are attempts still in the works for restoring pcsat ? 
 Just came over and seen echo s from command-1  A couple other calls as
well .

Yes, I got in and got control, and that freed up power, but almost
immediately several stations hit it with digipeats before I got the digi
turned off.  So it crashed on the next eclipse.

Im going to try real hard to remember to try again on Friday.

Bob, WB4aPR

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: pc sat

2012-01-12 Thread Greg D.

Hi Bob,

Is this something where a West Coast command station would be more likely to 
succeed, given the satellite's West-to-East orbit.  Catch it while it's still 
over the ocean, before the mass of home station beacons come in to view?  That 
was our unfair advantage in making contacts with MIR / ISS astronauts...  I 
recall having a nice chat with John Blaha on the MIR station years ago. Caught 
him just as he came up over the horizon, as I was driving west down the hill on 
my way in to work.  

Just a thought.

Greg  KO6TH


 From: bruni...@usna.edu
 To: jkb...@wildblue.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:44:05 -0500
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: pc sat
 
  are attempts still in the works for restoring pcsat ? 
  Just came over and seen echo s from command-1  A couple other calls as
 well .
 
 Yes, I got in and got control, and that freed up power, but almost
 immediately several stations hit it with digipeats before I got the digi
 turned off.  So it crashed on the next eclipse.
 
 Im going to try real hard to remember to try again on Friday.
 
 Bob, WB4aPR
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Icom 451 questions

2012-01-12 Thread John Geiger
A local friend here has an Icom 451A 70cm all mode which he might sell me.  
What is the typical selling price for these rigs?  It is in good physical 
condition with the mic and power cord. Are there any typical problems that show 
up with these rigs as they age, that I should be looking out for?

73s John AA5JG
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 451 questions

2012-01-12 Thread STeve Andre'

On 01/12/12 23:19, John Geiger wrote:

A local friend here has an Icom 451A 70cm all mode which he might sell me.  
What is the typical selling price for these rigs?  It is in good physical 
condition with the mic and power cord. Are there any typical problems that show 
up with these rigs as they age, that I should be looking out for?

73s John AA5JG
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


During my quest for x75 Icom rigs, I was told a few times that
the 471 did not have a service manual, and you had to use a
271 manual for it.  Since I have not ever seen one, I tend to
think that is true.

I've only used a 471 once, but I have respect for it.  The
larger problem with it may be its age, and getting some of
the specialty ICs could be hard.  I seem to remember a few
of them selling on ebay in the $200 area?

--STeve Andre'
wb8wsf  en72

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb