[amsat-bb] ARISSat-1 Operation Survey

2012-01-16 Thread Clint Bradford
The ARISSat-1 team created an "Ops Survey" last September. Have the results 
been published anywhere?

Clint Bradford, K6LCS

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 Operation Survey

2012-01-16 Thread Clayton Coleman W5PFG
They are on page 25 of the 2011 AMSAT Symposium Proceedings.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Clint Bradford  wrote:
> The ARISSat-1 team created an "Ops Survey" last September. Have the results 
> been published anywhere?
>
> Clint Bradford, K6LCS
>
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 Operation Survey

2012-01-16 Thread Clint Bradford
Hmmm ... The survey opened up in September. The Symposium was in November. 
There's been survey data entered since November ...

Just being inquisitive. Like with the volunteer work I do for NASA/ARISS, we 
LOVE the data!

Clint K6LCS



On Jan 16, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Clayton Coleman W5PFG wrote:
They are on page 25 of the 2011 AMSAT Symposium Proceedings.

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] HNI4/AJ5C follow up

2012-01-16 Thread Bob Herrell
Good contacts for today, Jan 16, 2012 on AO-27 1907z pass: K0BAM, N8RO,
WA4NVM, and AC0RA. de Bob HI4/AJ5C
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Student CubeSat "Imagine The Future"

2012-01-16 Thread Trevor .
ITF-1 (YUI) CubeSat aiming for a 2013 launch, see 

http://www.uk.amsat.org/3809 

73 Trevor M5AKA


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Icom 910h

2012-01-16 Thread Pedro Cruz
Hello to all

Any one use the Main and sub data sockets form thew icom 910 in staellite mode 
.?

If yes how it is connected?


Best 73!

Pedro Cruz  - CU2JX
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates

2012-01-16 Thread Gordon JC Pearce

On 16/01/12 00:27, Ted wrote:


'I'd take the cheapie chinese radios any day'.

Perhaps that is the mentality that makes the EU economic model the mess that
it is today. Also, any, and I mean any economist will tell you that in hard
times the average consumer (which includes notoriously cheap hams) will shop
price above all else. That is why the chinese have everyone by the fortune
cookies...


No, it's more to do with the standard of construction, performance and 
availability of parts and service information.  The Chinese are streets 
ahead here.


It's particularly galling when you realise you could buy five cheapy 
Chinese radios for the cost of one from a major American manufacturer - 
and still expect to have all five working in two year's time!



ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our community.


It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.


But since the US FCC has turned into nothing more than a bunch of political


The FCC is not relevant to my interests.  I love breaking FCC regulations.

--
Gordon MM0YEQ
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates

2012-01-16 Thread Andre

Op 16-1-2012 22:13, Gordon JC Pearce schreef:

ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our
community.


It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.
CE is not realy worth anything, all it means is that the manufactor 
claims not to use toxic paints and stuff like that, it is not even tested.


73 Andre PE1RDW
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates

2012-01-16 Thread Joe
And the Chinese have a excellent record in meeting that requirement 
don't they?

:-)
I love the latest contaminated item from them.  Radioactive tissue 
holders..

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 1/16/2012 3:41 PM, Andre wrote:

Op 16-1-2012 22:13, Gordon JC Pearce schreef:

ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our
community.


It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.
CE is not realy worth anything, all it means is that the manufactor 
claims not to use toxic paints and stuff like that, it is not even 
tested.


73 Andre PE1RDW
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
program!

Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SpaceX Launch Postponed

2012-01-16 Thread B J
http://moonandback.com/2012/01/16/date-pushed-back-on-spacex-plans-for-dragon-iss-rendezvous/

No new date was announced.

73s

Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] More On SpaceX Delay

2012-01-16 Thread B J
http://www.spacenews.com/venture_space/011612-spacex-postpones-station-bound-dragon-launch.html
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/01/dragon-slips-spacex-determined-return-us-crewed-access-leo/

73s

Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: HNI4/AJ5C follow up

2012-01-16 Thread k6yk
HI Bob, 
Well, if we can get the locals on the east coast to be quiet 
for a minute we could have made it.  I heard you a couple of times on
the 19:10 pass today, and gave a couple of calls. But the locals were 
covering everything up.  I had a 4 degree elevation pass on that one. 

73,
John, K6YK
 
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:43:15 -0400 Bob Herrell 
writes:
> Good contacts for today, Jan 16, 2012 on AO-27 1907z pass: K0BAM, 
> N8RO,
> WA4NVM, and AC0RA. de Bob HI4/AJ5C
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the 
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> 
 

53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4f14dd5cb114430195fst02vuc
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Radio Pirates

2012-01-16 Thread Gregg Wonderly

On 1/16/2012 3:13 PM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:

On 16/01/12 00:27, Ted wrote:


'I'd take the cheapie chinese radios any day'.

Perhaps that is the mentality that makes the EU economic model the mess that
it is today. Also, any, and I mean any economist will tell you that in hard
times the average consumer (which includes notoriously cheap hams) will shop
price above all else. That is why the chinese have everyone by the fortune
cookies...


No, it's more to do with the standard of construction, performance and 
availability of parts and service information.  The Chinese are streets ahead 
here.


It's particularly galling when you realise you could buy five cheapy Chinese 
radios for the cost of one from a major American manufacturer - and still 
expect to have all five working in two year's time!



ANY of these POS non type certified radios have no place in our community.


It's CEPT and CE approved, good enough for me.


But since the US FCC has turned into nothing more than a bunch of political


The FCC is not relevant to my interests.  I love breaking FCC regulations.

The biggest issue that causes recession and then depression in the economy, is 
when the value in the economy out strips the cash available to support that 
value.  When everyone buys the "cheapest" item, and it is a defective item, that 
then doesn't live long enough in the economy, that can cause people to replace 
it, in an emergency purchase, with a "credit purchase", which then presses the 
economy with more value, and less cash.


In our current economy, things like "cheap TVs", "cheap PCs", and "cheap 
appliances", in general, can result in the economy needing to "inflate" faster 
than the "printing" of money is occurring in our "world banks".


There is plenty of reason to pay the more expensive price, especially, if it is 
for something that will last longer in the economy, especially, if you resale it.


Certainly, if our economy inflated faster, we could all just spend money on all 
kinds of cheap junk, and keep everyone busy, working all day creating as much 
cheap stuff as we could.  But, the economy of the world, is really designed to 
work that way, and more importantly, all the off shore manufacturing, is moving 
"our cash" out of reach of our "local economies", and that, in the end, is what 
creates recession, which is then nearly impossible to correct "overnight", 
because the spending habits and the supply chains are not also being 
restructured to keep "injected cash" in the local economy, and thus it doesn't 
help anyone, except the offshore economies of the producers.


Gregg Wonderly
W5GGW
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite

2012-01-16 Thread Joe Leikhim
Has anyone seen this. I am surprised a shuttle mission permitted this 
type of booster. From what I believed, safety concerns prevented most 
types of boosters.


http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1

--
Joe Leikhim

Leikhim and Associates
Communications Consultants
Oviedo, Florida

www.Leikhim.com

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

Note to GMail Account users. Due to an abnormally high volume of spam 
originating from bogus GMail accounts, I have found it necessary to block 
certain GMail traffic. Please phone me if you believe your message was not 
received.

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Model Rocket Booster Engine for Picosatellite

2012-01-16 Thread Trevor .
--- On Tue, 17/1/12, Joe Leikhim  wrote:
> Date: Tuesday, 17 January, 2012, 3:43
> Has anyone seen this. I am surprised
> a shuttle mission permitted this type of booster. From what
> I believed, safety concerns prevented most types of
> boosters.
> 
> http://www.rocketryplanet.com/content/view/3706/30/#axzz1jgQ85qx1

There are several CubeSats being developed that will carry thrusters, for 
example Delfi-n3Xt 
http://delfispace.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=14&Itemid=18
 

The safety concerns you mention relate to satellites fitted with conventional 
rocket fuel motors. 

The Delfi-n3Xt approach uses nitrogen as the propellant and there are other 
approaches that would also be safe to fly.

73 Trevor M5AKA


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb