[amsat-bb] Kauai BL02 Contacts

2012-09-04 Thread Tom Deeble - KA6SIP

Greetings from the North Shore of Kauai,

Today I was able to test that all my sat gear made the trip from California in 
working order.  Contacts were made via FO-29  AO-27 as far away as Montana  
Colorado using a dual FT-817 setup with an Arrow antenna and ARR 440 preamp.

I am fortunate to be here until Friday 9/14 and will try for more sat contacts. 
 My wife is busy setting up plans for us and her parents, to celebrate her 
parents 60th wedding anniversary.  So, my sat operating time is very limited, 
at least this week.

Here are passes I'll try to operate thru Friday 9/7.

Tuesday 9/4/12
FO-29  2220-2225Z  12:20-12:25 HAST
AO-27  2325-2330Z  13:25-13:30 HAST

Wednesday 9/5/12
FO-29  2126-2133Z  11:26-11:33 HAST
AO-27  2251-2254Z  12:51-12:54 HAST
SO-50  0024-0032Z  14:24-14:32 HAST

Friday 9/7/12
FO-29  2121-2127Z  11:21-11:27 HAST
SO-50  2341-2346Z  13:41-13:46 HAST

These are subject to change as there are frequent short rains and I don't have 
a weather-proof setup.

Later I'll try to post more times for this weekend and next week.

73's - KA6SIP/P in BL02


Tom Deeble - KA6SIP
Mt. Diablo Amateur Radio Club Membership Chairman
ka6...@aol.com
PACIFICON - ARRL National Convention October 12-14
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] postponed CubeSats deployment from ISS

2012-09-04 Thread Masahiro Arai

JAXA announced CubeSats deployment from ISS scheduled 10th Sep. is
postponed due to re-planned additional EVA at 5th Sep. New deployment
date is not set yet.


73

Masa  JN1GKZ

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] VE5SAT's DO60/DO61 activation on Sunday

2012-09-04 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi!

Tim VE5SAT (AC2GK) is having problems getting his posts to show up 
here on the -BB, and asked me to forward a message on his behalf.
Please direct any e-mails for Tim to his e-mail address:

tim.repas @ usask.ca  (of course, please remove spaces around the @)

73!





Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK 

(Tim's message is below)



Hi all,

Thanks for all the contacts Sunday on my first attempt at activating 
2 grids at once.  For those who care I operated from 51N , 106.4275W 
in Douglas Provincial Park (Saskatchewan).

From 2 sets of recordings I counted 21 unique callsigns on AO-27 and
SO-50, I will have QSLs (paper) out this week. If you don't see your
callsign below and you think it should be contact me and I will take 
another look at the recordings.

73's
Tim - VE5SAT / AC2GK

*AO-27 21:01UTC*
AC0RA
WD9EWK
K4FEG
WA4NVM
K8YSE
VE4AMU
W0DHB
W5PFG
KN6ZA
AA5CK
WC7V
KF7MYK
N6NUG
NQ6E


*SO-50 21:15UTC*
AC0RA
WC7V
K8YSE
KB1RVT
KO4MA/M
NX9B
K4INA
WI9I
K4MOA
WA5KBH


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] AO 40 replacement status

2012-09-04 Thread John Becker
OK I have got to ask what is the status?
Seems to be the best kept secret.



John, W0JAB

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO40 replacement !!!

2012-09-04 Thread Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich

Just read a posting about a possible replacement for the ill fated super
sophisticated over-engineered ultra complex AO40 satellite.
My perception is that any attempt to create a New Generation Molnya 
Orbit Satellite
must undergo a very serious and comprehensive engineering research , in 
order
to keep it within an area of simplicity that will make possible a much 
higher

degree of reliability.
No, it is not a call for an ultra simple parrot satellite, or a medium 
level of sophistication...
what I am proposing is to achieve a consensus on how to keep the new 
satellite
within engineering performance parameters that will help to keep costs 
down,
increase the MTBF ( Mean Time Between Failures ) of its equipment, and 
also to

achieve a high degree of operational control so that it can be kept working
for a long time.
In the meantime, until an AO40 Molnya satellite may be designed and 
funds can
be found to build it and then obtain a piggy back ride on a launch... it 
would

be nice to try to assemble one or more satellites that could follow the very
effective and practical designs of the RS10, RS12 and RS 15...
If such satellites are built they will certainly be most welcome at a 
worldwide
scale, especially now that heliophysicists ( i.e. solar scientists ) are 
almost sure
that the present solar cycle and the one following are going to bring 
monthly

sunspot averages not seen in more than a century !!!
Maybe this posting could start a very productive thread on the AMSAT.BB 
amigos !!!
It would be nice to hear opinions and points of view from all around the 
world

on this topic
73 and DX
Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich ( AKA Arnie Coro )
Emergency Coordinator IARU Region II Area C
Host of Dxers Unlimited radio hobby program
Radio Havana Cuba
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO40 replacement !!!

2012-09-04 Thread Kevin Muenzler
In my opinion (it's worth every penny you just paid for it) if they are
going to create a new super sophisticated Phase III Part Deux it should
perhaps be taken to the ISS in pieces, assembled there and blown into a
long-period orbit.  But then that's just my opinion.  If I remember
correctly AO-40 was damaged by a collision with the launch vehicle shortly
after separation.  Of course a new generation of easy-sats that can be
worked using a J-pole setup would be nice too.

Kevin Muenzler, WB5RUE
Grid EL09uf
Eagle Creek Observatory
http://www.eaglecreekobservatory.org
I can melt ice with my mind, it just takes a few minutes.


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 5:21 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO40 replacement !!!

Just read a posting about a possible replacement for the ill fated super
sophisticated over-engineered ultra complex AO40 satellite.
My perception is that any attempt to create a New Generation Molnya Orbit
Satellite must undergo a very serious and comprehensive engineering research
, in order to keep it within an area of simplicity that will make possible a
much higher degree of reliability.
No, it is not a call for an ultra simple parrot satellite, or a medium level
of sophistication...
what I am proposing is to achieve a consensus on how to keep the new
satellite within engineering performance parameters that will help to keep
costs down, increase the MTBF ( Mean Time Between Failures ) of its
equipment, and also to achieve a high degree of operational control so that
it can be kept working for a long time.
In the meantime, until an AO40 Molnya satellite may be designed and funds
can be found to build it and then obtain a piggy back ride on a launch... it
would be nice to try to assemble one or more satellites that could follow
the very effective and practical designs of the RS10, RS12 and RS 15...
If such satellites are built they will certainly be most welcome at a
worldwide scale, especially now that heliophysicists ( i.e. solar scientists
) are almost sure that the present solar cycle and the one following are
going to bring monthly sunspot averages not seen in more than a century !!!
Maybe this posting could start a very productive thread on the AMSAT.BB
amigos !!!
It would be nice to hear opinions and points of view from all around the
world on this topic
73 and DX
Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich ( AKA Arnie Coro ) Emergency Coordinator IARU
Region II Area C Host of Dxers Unlimited radio hobby program Radio Havana
Cuba ___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO40 replacement !!!

2012-09-04 Thread John Becker
At 05:40 PM 9/4/2012, you wrote:
In my opinion (it's worth every penny you just paid for it) if they are
going to create a new super sophisticated Phase III Part Deux it should
perhaps be taken to the ISS in pieces, assembled there and blown into a
long-period orbit.  But then that's just my opinion. 


Right you are.






___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO40 replacement !!!

2012-09-04 Thread Greg Dolkas
Hi Kevin,

Two comments...

1.  I belive it was AO-10 that was damaged by a collision with the launch
vehicle.  AO-40 had a problem with it's on-board rocket motor, which
exploded shortly after it's first burn, taking a good bit of the satellite
with it.  Only through an extraordinary effort by the command team did they
get what was left working again.  Amazing bird (and amazing command team!).

2.  ISS assembly is an interesting idea, but I have a really hard time
believing you'd get anything resembling a rocket motor to be shipped up to
the ISS.  That would comdemn the bird to be in a low and short-lived
orbit.  Unless they could convince the Russians to turn the Progress around
and fire the retro engines the other way to RAISE it's orbit instead of
trashing it into the planet?  Bolt our sat to the side.  Sort of a SuitSat
on steroids?  Wonder how high it could go?

But, keep the ideas coming.

Greg  KO6TH


On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Muenzler 
ke...@eaglecreekobservatory.org wrote:

 In my opinion (it's worth every penny you just paid for it) if they are
 going to create a new super sophisticated Phase III Part Deux it should
 perhaps be taken to the ISS in pieces, assembled there and blown into a
 long-period orbit.  But then that's just my opinion.  If I remember
 correctly AO-40 was damaged by a collision with the launch vehicle shortly
 after separation.  Of course a new generation of easy-sats that can be
 worked using a J-pole setup would be nice too.

 Kevin Muenzler, WB5RUE
 Grid EL09uf
 Eagle Creek Observatory
 http://www.eaglecreekobservatory.org
 I can melt ice with my mind, it just takes a few minutes.


 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
 Behalf Of Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich
 Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 5:21 PM
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO40 replacement !!!

 Just read a posting about a possible replacement for the ill fated super
 sophisticated over-engineered ultra complex AO40 satellite.
 My perception is that any attempt to create a New Generation Molnya Orbit
 Satellite must undergo a very serious and comprehensive engineering
 research
 , in order to keep it within an area of simplicity that will make possible
 a
 much higher degree of reliability.
 No, it is not a call for an ultra simple parrot satellite, or a medium
 level
 of sophistication...
 what I am proposing is to achieve a consensus on how to keep the new
 satellite within engineering performance parameters that will help to keep
 costs down, increase the MTBF ( Mean Time Between Failures ) of its
 equipment, and also to achieve a high degree of operational control so that
 it can be kept working for a long time.
 In the meantime, until an AO40 Molnya satellite may be designed and funds
 can be found to build it and then obtain a piggy back ride on a launch...
 it
 would be nice to try to assemble one or more satellites that could follow
 the very effective and practical designs of the RS10, RS12 and RS 15...
 If such satellites are built they will certainly be most welcome at a
 worldwide scale, especially now that heliophysicists ( i.e. solar
 scientists
 ) are almost sure that the present solar cycle and the one following are
 going to bring monthly sunspot averages not seen in more than a century !!!
 Maybe this posting could start a very productive thread on the AMSAT.BB
 amigos !!!
 It would be nice to hear opinions and points of view from all around the
 world on this topic
 73 and DX
 Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich ( AKA Arnie Coro ) Emergency Coordinator IARU
 Region II Area C Host of Dxers Unlimited radio hobby program Radio Havana
 Cuba ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb