[amsat-bb] Re: Orbitron on Windows 7

2013-02-21 Thread Vu Trong Thu
Hakan,
I have the same problem down here and have to open Task Manager to
forcefully end Orbitron. I would like to hear if there is a better solution.

73 Thu XV9AA

-Original Message-
From: Håkan H [mailto:sm7...@telia.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:28 AM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Orbitron on Windows 7

Hello!


I run Orbitron on a XP machine with very good result.  Problem is when i try
to run it on a Win 7 laptop it rejects to close down. I remember last year
there where some writing about problem with this combination.

Any good result out there?


73 Hakan SM7WSJ 




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Orbitron on Windows 7

2013-02-21 Thread Håkan H




I have the same problem down here and have to open Task Manager to
forcefully end Orbitron. I would like to hear if there is a better solution.

73 Thu XV9AA


Hello Thu   (and all others on the list)


Now things are working here.  I post some of the advice i got off list that 
helped me get it running. (maybe help someone else)



*Don't install Orbitron to the default location. Save it somewhere like 
C:\Orbitron so that it can write changes and you can edit the files.


Also set it to run as Administrator and if you are still having problems set 
it to run in compatibility mode for windows XP


I'm running windows 7 and running it as Admin fixed the problem.



*I think you have to install it by right clicking on the installation file 
and select run as administrator, and you might have to do the same to run 
the program under win 7.  I use a shortcut on my PC that I set to run as 
administrator in the shortcuts properties




*I have fixed a similar problem by running it in XP
Compatibility mode.  Look under the Properties for the icon.

This helped me to get at really nice program running also on my new 
computer.


73 de Hakan SM7WSJ





___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Personal Best on AO7-b

2013-02-21 Thread K4FEG
Today at 18:59UTC myself, (K4FEG EM55aj) and Jari, OH2FQV (KP20mf), had 
a successful 2way CW contact on AO7-b both signals were 559 with 
approximately 1 degree (or less) of elevation on both sides of the pass.


The calculated distance on this QSO is approximately 7862Km based on a 
couple of calculation programs.


Jari has an excellent station for low elevation operations and can hear 
to LOS with ease.


THANK YOU JARI FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND PERSISTENCE!

Frank E. Griffin;
K4FEG EM55aj
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] FRETS1 Ion Motor Powered Satellite at Tampa Bay Mini Maker Faire

2013-02-21 Thread Trevor .
See http://www.amsat-uk.org/?p=12853

73 Trevor M5AKA


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Personal Best on AO7-b

2013-02-21 Thread Bob- W7LRD
Great effort Frank!! keep trying! 
73 Bob W7LRD 

- Original Message -
From: K4FEG k4...@k4feg.com 
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:22:07 AM 
Subject: [amsat-bb] Personal Best on AO7-b 

Today at 18:59UTC myself, (K4FEG EM55aj) and Jari, OH2FQV (KP20mf), had 
a successful 2way CW contact on AO7-b both signals were 559 with 
approximately 1 degree (or less) of elevation on both sides of the pass. 

The calculated distance on this QSO is approximately 7862Km based on a 
couple of calculation programs. 

Jari has an excellent station for low elevation operations and can hear 
to LOS with ease. 

THANK YOU JARI FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND PERSISTENCE! 

Frank E. Griffin; 
K4FEG EM55aj 
___ 
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Personal Best on AO7-b

2013-02-21 Thread Eric Knaps, ON4HF
Well done Frank!
Hope to hear you again soon.
73,
Eric.

Amateur Radio Station ON4HF 
Eric Knaps 
Satellite manager UBA 

http://www.on4hf.be 



- Oorspronkelijk e-mail -
Van: K4FEG k4...@k4feg.com
Aan: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Verzonden: Donderdag 21 februari 2013 20:22:07
Onderwerp: [amsat-bb] Personal Best on AO7-b

Today at 18:59UTC myself, (K4FEG EM55aj) and Jari, OH2FQV (KP20mf), had 
a successful 2way CW contact on AO7-b both signals were 559 with 
approximately 1 degree (or less) of elevation on both sides of the pass.

The calculated distance on this QSO is approximately 7862Km based on a 
couple of calculation programs.

Jari has an excellent station for low elevation operations and can hear 
to LOS with ease.

THANK YOU JARI FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND PERSISTENCE!

Frank E. Griffin;
K4FEG EM55aj
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: 2.4GHz broadband router on satellite?

2013-02-21 Thread Lee Maisel

James French wrote:

What are the possibilities of building a satellite that uses a Linksys
WRT54GL router with a modified DD-wrt or HSMM-Mesh software as a store
and forward BBS, to route a received request from one station to another
station, or even to connect to a on board networked camera to receive
images?

What kind of uplink power would be needed from the home station?

How fast could the speed(s) get theoretically?

How big would the antenna have to be on the craft and for the ground
station to even be able to do this adequately?

Would the doppler be too much to even consider this?

Would the space environment be too harsh for something like this?

This is just something I was thinking about this morning and thought I
would toss it out.

James W8ISS

___
  

THAT is an AWESOME Idea!

I don't see why it wouldn't work, I don't know if doppler is an issue 
though, it may not be if the modulation is FM.

The antenna would not have to be big, it's 2.4Ghz


Why don't you post this on the HSMM-MESH.org web forums and get ideas?

73
Lee
W5LMM


--


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: 2.4GHz broadband router on satellite?

2013-02-21 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
One of the recent 3u DOD sponsored cubes has a S dish for tracking wifi type 
tags on containers. I'm not sure how much lick they had with that.

73, Drew KO4MA

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:58 PM, Lee Maisel mai...@lobo.net wrote:

 James French wrote:
 What are the possibilities of building a satellite that uses a Linksys
 WRT54GL router with a modified DD-wrt or HSMM-Mesh software as a store
 and forward BBS, to route a received request from one station to another
 station, or even to connect to a on board networked camera to receive
 images?
 
 What kind of uplink power would be needed from the home station?
 
 How fast could the speed(s) get theoretically?
 
 How big would the antenna have to be on the craft and for the ground
 station to even be able to do this adequately?
 
 Would the doppler be too much to even consider this?
 
 Would the space environment be too harsh for something like this?
 
 This is just something I was thinking about this morning and thought I
 would toss it out.
 
 James W8ISS
 
 ___
 THAT is an AWESOME Idea!
 
 I don't see why it wouldn't work, I don't know if doppler is an issue though, 
 it may not be if the modulation is FM.
 The antenna would not have to be big, it's 2.4Ghz
 
 
 Why don't you post this on the HSMM-MESH.org web forums and get ideas?
 
 73
 Lee
 W5LMM
 
 
 -- 
 
 
 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] CO-55 UHF beacon stuck?

2013-02-21 Thread Bernard Van Haecke
Hello,

This is to report that CO-55 seems to be stuck with a 100% duty cycle
carrier
on 436.825 MHz.  The CW beacon was not operational during the 2013-02-22
02:07z
pass over Northern California, instead a constant carrier was heard during
the entire pass,
maximum signal S8.

Receiving station: FT-817ND, AD6IW 25dB 0.3NF preamp, Arrow antenna,
Arduino-controlled rotator, Orbitron tracking/doppler software

Not sure if this is a recent issue or not on this satellite.  Is anyone
from Tokyo Institute of Technology on this list?

73 de Bernard KI6TSF
ki6tsf at amsat.org
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: 2.4GHz broadband router on satellite?

2013-02-21 Thread Greg D

Lee Maisel wrote:

James French wrote:

What are the possibilities of building a satellite that uses a Linksys
WRT54GL router with a modified DD-wrt or HSMM-Mesh software as a store
and forward BBS, to route a received request from one station to another
station, or even to connect to a on board networked camera to receive
images?

What kind of uplink power would be needed from the home station?

How fast could the speed(s) get theoretically?

How big would the antenna have to be on the craft and for the ground
station to even be able to do this adequately?

Would the doppler be too much to even consider this?

Would the space environment be too harsh for something like this?

This is just something I was thinking about this morning and thought I
would toss it out.

James W8ISS

___

THAT is an AWESOME Idea!

I don't see why it wouldn't work, I don't know if doppler is an issue 
though, it may not be if the modulation is FM.

The antenna would not have to be big, it's 2.4Ghz


Why don't you post this on the HSMM-MESH.org web forums and get ideas?

73
Lee
W5LMM



Hi James, Lee,

If you are thinking of using standard Wi-Fi as the link protocol, be 
aware that the timers that drive the protocol don't well work over long 
distances (few miles).  Something about the speed of light not being 
fast enough.  Real bummer.  These would need to be adjusted, though I 
think the implications for a point-point connection may not be too severe.


Besides doppler shift, which could be a problem depending on how agile 
the ground station is, the modulation scheme (it's NOT simply FM) uses 
about 20 mhz of bandwidth, so you will need significant power to get the 
20db S/N needed to decode anything halfway reliably.  Remember, a 
typical AP runs 100mw on 2.4 ghz, and gets reliable communication over 
distances of 100's of FEET with omni antennas.  Add some gain on both 
ends (so now you need attitude control on the satellite!), and you can 
go a few miles.  But 100's of miles to orbit?  I need someone to do the 
numbers, but I bet it's not too good.


Greg  KO6TH


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb