[amsat-bb] NF

2009-10-04 Thread Fitri Rahmawati
hi, 
sorry I'm new
 
how exactly NF at Yaesu FT-847 transceiver for UHF 437,325 mhz ( 69 cm ) ?
 
Thank's
Fitri Rahmawati - Indonesia


  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB NF formula posting

2013-10-04 Thread i8cvs
Hi Ralph, W0RPK

I will write the formula in another arithmetical form:


NF   =  ( Vi x 10^-6 )^2 ) x 20 ) / (BW x S/N ) ) log) x 10 )  + 174  
   dB  10
  
where:

Vi = input signal in uV applied over the 50 ohm RX input
BW = Band Wide in Hz (2400 Hz for SSB)
S/N = Signal to Noise ratio in power ratio = 10 

Going to your YAESU FT-726 R the sensitivity is specified for 10 dB of (S+N)/N  
and not for 10 dB of S/N so that we must convert first (S+N)/N into S/N with 
the following formula:

S + N
S/N = --- - 1  =  10 log (10-1) = 9.54 in power ratio 
   N10 

Calculating the sensitivity for 2 meters SSB/CW  less than 0.15 uV  for 10 dB 
(S+N)/N  we have:


NF =( 0.15 x 10^-6)^2 ) x 20 ) / ( 2400 x 9.54 ) ) log) x 10 ) + 174 =  
6.9 dB 
   dB   
10
 

Calculating the sensitivity for 70 cm SSB/CW  less than 0.15 uV  for 12 dB 
(S+N)/N  we have:


S + N
S/N = --- - 1  =  10 log (15.84 -1) = 14.84 in power ratio 
   N10 


NF  =   (0.15 x 10^-6 )^2 ) x 20 ) / ( 2400 x 14.84 ) ) log   ) x 10 ) + 174 = 
5.01 dB 
   dB   
 10


CONCLUSION:

The sensitivity in 2 meters and 70 cm is the same 0.15 uV but in 70 cm 0.15 uV 
are specified for 12 dB (S+N)/N and not 10 dB (S+N)/N as in 2 meters and so it 
happen that the receiver is more sensitive in 70 cm 

The formulas where published into an old issue of the Ham Radio Magazine early 
about 1973 and I have to find it in my many papers after that I will send a 
copy to you but I remember  it very often ant this numbars are burned into my 
brain HI HI ! 

I hope this helps and if you have any question please let me know.

73" de i8CVS Domenico

  - Original Message - 
  From: Ralph Wallio, W0RPK 
  To: domenico.i8...@tin.it 
  Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:48 PM
  Subject: AMSAT-BB NF formula posting


  Domenico --

  Thanks for posting the NF formula.  Your results for the ICOM IC-R10 cause me 
to reconsider what I have been estimating
  for my much older YAESU FT-726R.  Specifications from the Yaesu Operating 
Manual:

  2m SSB/CW Less than 0.15uV for 10dB (S+N)/N

  70cm SSB/CW   Less than 0.15uV for 12dB (S+N)/N

  I would like to make this calculation myself but I am having trouble 
duplicating your results probably due to uncertainties
  resulting from how the formula is formatted by AMSAT-BB.

  Perhaps you have a document source to suggest that will resolve these 
uncertainties.

  TNX es 73 de Ralph W0RPK

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB NF formula posting

2013-10-05 Thread Nick Pugh K5QXJ
Domenico nice explanation please send the papers to the list

Thanks
nick

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of i8cvs
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:24 PM
To: AMSAT-BB; Ralph Wallio, W0RPK
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB NF formula posting

Hi Ralph, W0RPK

I will write the formula in another arithmetical form:


NF   =  ( Vi x 10^-6 )^2 ) x 20 ) / (BW x S/N ) ) log) x 10 )  + 174  
   dB
10
  
where:

Vi = input signal in uV applied over the 50 ohm RX input BW = Band Wide in
Hz (2400 Hz for SSB) S/N = Signal to Noise ratio in power ratio = 10 

Going to your YAESU FT-726 R the sensitivity is specified for 10 dB of
(S+N)/N  and not for 10 dB of S/N so that we must convert first (S+N)/N into
S/N with the following formula:

S + N
S/N = --- - 1  =  10 log (10-1) = 9.54 in power ratio 
   N10 

Calculating the sensitivity for 2 meters SSB/CW  less than 0.15 uV  for 10
dB (S+N)/N  we have:


NF =( 0.15 x 10^-6)^2 ) x 20 ) / ( 2400 x 9.54 ) ) log) x 10 ) + 174
=  6.9 dB 
   dB
10
 

Calculating the sensitivity for 70 cm SSB/CW  less than 0.15 uV  for 12 dB
(S+N)/N  we have:


S + N
S/N = --- - 1  =  10 log (15.84 -1) = 14.84 in power ratio 
   N10 


NF  =   (0.15 x 10^-6 )^2 ) x 20 ) / ( 2400 x 14.84 ) ) log   ) x 10 ) + 174
= 5.01 dB 
   dB
10


CONCLUSION:

The sensitivity in 2 meters and 70 cm is the same 0.15 uV but in 70 cm 0.15
uV are specified for 12 dB (S+N)/N and not 10 dB (S+N)/N as in 2 meters and
so it happen that the receiver is more sensitive in 70 cm 

The formulas where published into an old issue of the Ham Radio Magazine
early about 1973 and I have to find it in my many papers after that I will
send a copy to you but I remember  it very often ant this numbars are burned
into my brain HI HI ! 

I hope this helps and if you have any question please let me know.

73" de i8CVS Domenico

  - Original Message -
  From: Ralph Wallio, W0RPK
  To: domenico.i8...@tin.it
  Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:48 PM
  Subject: AMSAT-BB NF formula posting


  Domenico --

  Thanks for posting the NF formula.  Your results for the ICOM IC-R10 cause
me to reconsider what I have been estimating
  for my much older YAESU FT-726R.  Specifications from the Yaesu Operating
Manual:

  2m SSB/CW Less than 0.15uV for 10dB (S+N)/N

  70cm SSB/CW   Less than 0.15uV for 12dB (S+N)/N

  I would like to make this calculation myself but I am having trouble
duplicating your results probably due to uncertainties
  resulting from how the formula is formatted by AMSAT-BB.

  Perhaps you have a document source to suggest that will resolve these
uncertainties.

  TNX es 73 de Ralph W0RPK

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] [Re: AMSAT-BB NF formula posting (amended)

2013-10-05 Thread i8cvs

Hi Ralph, W0RPK and All on the list.

Unfortunately in my previous message i have taped few mistake but hopefully the 
following calculation are actually correct.

I have rewrite the formula in another arithmetical form wich is easier to be 
used and not is corrupted or differently formatted sending it through BB

NF   =  ( Vi x 10^-6 )^2 ) x 20 ) / (BW x S/N ) ) log) x 10 )  + 174
dB  
  10
   
where:

Vi = input signal in uV applied across the 50 ohm RX input
BW = Bandwidth in Hz (2400 Hz for SSB)
S/N = Signal to Noise ratio in power ratio 

The sensitivity for YAESU FT-726R of W0RPK in 2 meters is specified
for 10 dB of (S+N)/N  and not for 10 dB of S/N as required by the formula
so that we must convert first (S+N)/N into S/N as follow.

 S + N
S/N = --- - 1  =  (10-1)  =  9  in power ratio
N

Calculation of NF for sensitivity of 2 meters SSB/CW  less than 0.15 uV for
10 dB (S+N)/N ... we compute:


NF=  ( 0.15 x 10^-6)^2 ) x 20 ) / ( 2400 x 9 ) ) log) x 10 ) + 174 =  
7.18 dB
dB  
10

  -
 
The sensitivity for  YAESU FT-726 R of W0RPK in 70 cm is specified
for 12 dB of (S+N)/N  and not for 10 dB of S/N as required by the formula
so that we must convert first (S+N)/N into S/N as follow:

S/N =  ( S + N ) / N ) - 1  =  10^( 12/10) ) -1 = 15.84 - 1 = 14.84 in power 
ratio


Calculation of NF for sensitivity of 70 cm SSB/CW less than 0.15 uV for a
12 dB (S+N)/N  ratio.. we compute:

 NF= (0.15 x 10^-6 )^2 ) x 20 ) / ( 2400 x 14.84 ) ) log   ) x 10 ) +174 = 
5.01 dB
dB  
10

 CONCLUSION:

2 meters: Noise Figure NF = 7.18 dB

70 cm: Noise Figure NF = 5.01 dB 

The sensitivity voltage in 2 meters and 70 cm has the same value of
0.15 uV but in 70 cm 0.15 uV are specified for a 12 dB (S+N)/N ratio
and not for a ratio of 10 dB (S+N)/N as in 2 meters and so it happens
that the receiver is more sensitive in 70 cm

Please note that the above formula is valid only for Vi = input signal in uV 
applied across the 50 ohm RX input.

Unfortunately the manufacturers do not specify if Vi of the sensitivity
specifications is the voltage that we read with the RF Signal Generator
connected to the receiver input or if Vi is the voltage that we read over
the Signal Generator with open output.

This can generate ambiguity in calculating NF because measurement 
are made with a Signal Generator with 50 ohm impedance output 
connected to the receiver input wich impedance is as well 50 ohm
so that the output voltage of the Signal Generator is divided in two
equal parts across both the internal 50 ohm impedances.

BTW many commercial receiver NF calculations are demonstrating
that the value of NF match very well with the input voltage Vi so that
we can assume that the manufacturers specifications are giving Vi
as the voltage applied across the 50 ohm receiver input. 

The formulas where published into an old issue of the Ham Radio Magazine
early about 1973 and I have to find it in my many papers after that I will
send a copy to any one is interested to it.

I use this formula very often and this numbars are burned into my brain HI HI !

Please Ralph let me know if your calculations match with the actual one ?! 

 I hope this helps and if there is any question please let me know.

 73" de i8CVS Domenico

   - Original Message -
   From: Ralph Wallio, W0RPK
   To: domenico.i8...@tin.it
   Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:48 PM
   Subject: AMSAT-BB NF formula posting

Domenico --

Thanks for posting the NF formula.  Your results for the ICOM IC-R10 cause
me to reconsider what I have been estimating for my much older YAESU FT-726R.
Specifications from the Yaesu Operating Manual:

2m SSB/CW Less than 0.15uV for 10dB (S+N)/N

70cm SSB/CW   Less than 0.15uV for 12dB (S+N)/N

I would like to make this calculation myself but I am having trouble duplicating
your results probably due to uncertainties resulting from how the formula is
formatted by AMSAT-BB.

Perhaps you have a document source to suggest that will resolve these
uncertainties.

TNX es 73 de Ralph W0RPK

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb