[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-05 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:07:47 +0200
i8cvs domenico.i8...@tin.it wrote:

 Why to vaste time with the FM satellites for very small on a single channel
 to exchange only call letters and locators at most into a terrific QRM ?
 

Because everyone has the gear to work FM satellites.

Show me an all-mode HT that retails for the same sort of price and is the same 
sort of size as an FM HT and I might be interested.  Otherwise, to get UHF and 
VHF SSB I'm stuck with an inconveniently large radio which is only really 
useful for the twenty minutes a day that a satellite is overhead.

Not to mention the difficulty involved in tuning the radio and aiming the 
antenna.  Doesn't the Doppler shift mean you need to constantly retune?  How do 
you manage to do that, key the mike and point the aerial, *and* have enough 
brainpower left to make a contact?

Gordon MM0YEQ
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-05 Thread Pedro A. Perez
There is an easy way to work linear birds from mobile. All you need is a 
single band SSB mobile radio (FT-857, FT-897, etc), a portable SSB receiver 
(TH-F6, etc.) and very simple antennas for the downlink (like the CJU for 
mode J, 1/4 whip for mode B, etc):

http://eb4dka.laserenadigital.com/Amateur%20Satellite%20Articles/FO29_MOBILE.pdf

http://eb4dka.laserenadigital.com/Videos%20AMSAT/VIDEO_EB4DKA%20via%20FO29%20desde%20movil.html

I´ve made hundred of QSOs via FO-29 using this little station. It also works 
nice on FM birds.

Best 73s

Pedro EB4DKA
http://eb4dka.laserenadigital.com


 Show me an all-mode HT that retails for the same sort of price and is the 
 same sort of size as an FM HT and I might be interested.  Otherwise, to 
 get UHF and VHF SSB I'm stuck with an inconveniently large radio which is 
 only really useful for the twenty minutes a day that a satellite is 
 overhead.

 Not to mention the difficulty involved in tuning the radio and aiming the 
 antenna.  Doesn't the Doppler shift mean you need to constantly retune? 
 How do you manage to do that, key the mike and point the aerial, *and* 
 have enough brainpower left to make a contact?

 Gordon MM0YEQ

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-05 Thread i8cvs
- Original Message -
From: Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:45 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

 On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:07:47 +0200
 i8cvs domenico.i8...@tin.it wrote:

  Why to vaste time with the FM satellites for very small on a single
  channel to exchange only call letters and locators at most into a
  terrific QRM ?
 

 Because everyone has the gear to work FM satellites.

 Gordon MM0YEQ
 ___

Hi Gordon, MM0YEQ

Everyone actually has a gear to work FM satellites because AMSAT
in the last few years has built a lot of FM satellites only to encurage the
japanese industry to produce FM rigs.

Compare the early years 1970 to 1980 when OSCAR-6, OSCAR,7 and
OSCAR-8 were alive and well and you will realize that no one owned
a FM rig for satellite use but only homebrewed CW and SSB rigs and
that epoch time was a real satellite epoch time.

73 de

i8CVS Domenico

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-05 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi!

 Show me an all-mode HT that retails for the same sort of price and is the
 same sort of size as an FM HT and I might be interested.  Otherwise, to
 get UHF and VHF SSB I'm stuck with an inconveniently large radio which
 is only really useful for the twenty minutes a day that a satellite is
 overhead.

An all-mode HT doesn't exist at this time.  Probably the closest you get
in an HT would be a TH-F6/TH-F7 with its all-mode receiver, but still an FM
transmitter.  You could attempt transmitting CW by keying that transmitter,
but it's not ideal with the 5 kHz tuning steps at FM on that radio (SSB
tuning steps on a TH-F6/TH-F7 can go as small as 33 Hz) and no
provision for computer control.  Otherwise, an FT-817 gets close to the
HT size, is an all-mode transceiver at HF and 6m as well as 2m and
70cm, and would qualify as a radio that can be used more than twenty
minutes a day that a satellite is overhead.  It does cost more than an
FM HT, but FT-817s should be available on the secondhand market
as they have been in production for a decade.  Even two FT-817s as
a portable all-mode full-duplex satellite station are not what I - or
many - would consider inconveniently large.  If you prefer computer
control, the 817s have Yaesu's CAT port to allow for that.

 Not to mention the difficulty involved in tuning the radio and aiming the
 antenna.  Doesn't the Doppler shift mean you need to constantly
 retune?  How do you manage to do that, key the mike and point the
 aerial, *and* have enough brainpower left to make a contact?

You are having to make minor adjustments to your frequency - or
frequencies - when working SSB or CW via satellite.  If you follow the
so-called One True Rule, you're making the adjustments to one of
the two frequencies (usually the higher of the two frequencies).
Everyone had to work SSB/CW via satellite this way in the past,
before the advent of computer-controlled stations, and it is still an
option today even if some (many?) discourage it.

If you've worked FM satellites, you already know about the key the
mike and point the aerial part.  Then just focus on the QSO in
progress.  Don't try to remember everyone you worked - leave that
on an audio recorder, or recorder app for a mobile phone or iPod
type of device or laptop/netbook, and play it back later to update
your log.

Pedro EB4DKA has posted a lot of useful information for working
SSB via satellite.  I read the writeups and watched the videos as I
started out on the SSB birds.  I don't operate using a mobile setup
like Pedro does, but with one directional antenna (an Elk 2m/70cm
log periodic) through a diplexer to my two-radio setup.  I've
uploaded some videos working those satellites at:

http://www.youtube.com/va7ewk

I used both of my FT-817NDs on the SSB passes shown in these
videos, but on occasion swap out the 817 I use as the receiver
and put my TH-F6A in its place.

73!






Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-05 Thread John Geiger
Belcom used to make (and might still make) all mode HTs that cover a wide
variety of bands.  Santec imported one as the LS202 in the 80s, it was an
all mode 2 meter HT.  I found one at a hamfest with 2 new battery packs a
couple of years ago for $80!  AEA imported the 10 meter version (and the 6m
version but that doesn't help with the satellites) back in the 80s, calling
it the DX Handy.  Around 2000 Eagle made the Eagle 454 Spitfire which was
a 10 meter all mode HT (mainly aimed at the CB and Freeband crowd), and
another company has recently started marketing a 10 meter all mode HT
again.  Belcom also made a 70cm all mode HT.

So, there are rigs out there in HT format that will work on the linear
satellites, now the job is to find them!

I have been waiting to comment on early threads on this post as well.  While
the linear satellites do hold more possibilities, they are more expensive to
get on, and unfortunately in the States, there just isnt' that much activity
on VO52 which is unfortunate since it is a such a great satellite.  The FM
satellites are just cheaper to get started on.

For example:  my FM satellite station consists of

Kenwood TM-251A bought used for $99
Arrow Antennas dualband J Pole bought new for $40
50 foot run of 9913 knock off coax bought new for $38
So, for less than $200 I have a good FM setup.  I already had the power
supply, but if you need to buy a new one, figure $75 or so.

I can do one linear sat right now-AO7 in Mode A-using my Icom 706 original.
I bought the rig for $260, got a Mirage B108 amp for $40, and a 2M9SSB for
$40 (plus the gas and tolls to pick it up).  The light duty rotor  was
already up but it was about $80 new.  The 9913 copy coax was $38.  For the
10 meter downlink I already had a dipole up, but that would cost $30 or so
to build-including coax.  Overall, I got very good prices on this setup, it
would usually cost more.

I give both examples just to show the difference in setup costs.  With my
Icom HF/VHF setup I cannot work Mode B on the satellites, as I don't have a
UHF transmitter (as of yet).

73s John AA5JG

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) 
amsat...@wd9ewk.net wrote:

 Hi!

  Show me an all-mode HT that retails for the same sort of price and is the
  same sort of size as an FM HT and I might be interested.  Otherwise, to
  get UHF and VHF SSB I'm stuck with an inconveniently large radio which
  is only really useful for the twenty minutes a day that a satellite is
  overhead.

 An all-mode HT doesn't exist at this time.  Probably the closest you
 get
 in an HT would be a TH-F6/TH-F7 with its all-mode receiver, but still an FM
 transmitter.  You could attempt transmitting CW by keying that transmitter,
 but it's not ideal with the 5 kHz tuning steps at FM on that radio (SSB
 tuning steps on a TH-F6/TH-F7 can go as small as 33 Hz) and no
 provision for computer control.  Otherwise, an FT-817 gets close to the
 HT size, is an all-mode transceiver at HF and 6m as well as 2m and
 70cm, and would qualify as a radio that can be used more than twenty
 minutes a day that a satellite is overhead.  It does cost more than an
 FM HT, but FT-817s should be available on the secondhand market
 as they have been in production for a decade.  Even two FT-817s as
 a portable all-mode full-duplex satellite station are not what I - or
 many - would consider inconveniently large.  If you prefer computer
 control, the 817s have Yaesu's CAT port to allow for that.

  Not to mention the difficulty involved in tuning the radio and aiming the
  antenna.  Doesn't the Doppler shift mean you need to constantly
  retune?  How do you manage to do that, key the mike and point the
  aerial, *and* have enough brainpower left to make a contact?

 You are having to make minor adjustments to your frequency - or
 frequencies - when working SSB or CW via satellite.  If you follow the
 so-called One True Rule, you're making the adjustments to one of
 the two frequencies (usually the higher of the two frequencies).
 Everyone had to work SSB/CW via satellite this way in the past,
 before the advent of computer-controlled stations, and it is still an
 option today even if some (many?) discourage it.

 If you've worked FM satellites, you already know about the key the
 mike and point the aerial part.  Then just focus on the QSO in
 progress.  Don't try to remember everyone you worked - leave that
 on an audio recorder, or recorder app for a mobile phone or iPod
 type of device or laptop/netbook, and play it back later to update
 your log.

 Pedro EB4DKA has posted a lot of useful information for working
 SSB via satellite.  I read the writeups and watched the videos as I
 started out on the SSB birds.  I don't operate using a mobile setup
 like Pedro does, but with one directional antenna (an Elk 2m/70cm
 log periodic) through a diplexer to my two-radio setup.  I've
 uploaded some videos working those satellites at:

 http://www.youtube.com/va7ewk

 I used both 

[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-05 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi John!

 Belcom used to make (and might still make) all mode HTs that cover a wide
 variety of bands.  Santec imported one as the LS202 in the 80s, it was an
 all mode 2 meter HT.  I found one at a hamfest with 2 new battery packs a
 couple of years ago for $80!  AEA imported the 10 meter version (and the 6m
 version but that doesn't help with the satellites) back in the 80s, calling
 it the DX Handy.  Around 2000 Eagle made the Eagle 454 Spitfire which was
 a 10 meter all mode HT (mainly aimed at the CB and Freeband crowd), and
 another company has recently started marketing a 10 meter all mode HT
 again.  Belcom also made a 70cm all mode HT.

Other than whatever company is marketing that new 10m all-mode HT,
which would only be useful for AO-7 mode A at this time (assuming it
tunes up to 29.400-29.500 MHz and not just around the lower end of
the 10m band), you would be looking for the smallest needles in the
largest proverbial haystack to get those old all-mode HTs that are no
longer in production.  This is why I referenced radios that are currently
in production and more plentiful on the secondhand market in the
FT-817/FT-817ND and the TH-F6/TH-F7 - even if the FT-817 is
slightly larger than HT size.

 I have been waiting to comment on early threads on this post as well.  While
 the linear satellites do hold more possibilities, they are more expensive to
 get on, and unfortunately in the States, there just isnt' that much activity
 on VO52 which is unfortunate since it is a such a great satellite.  The FM
 satellites are just cheaper to get started on.

snip

 I can do one linear sat right now-AO7 in Mode A-using my Icom 706 original.
 I bought the rig for $260, got a Mirage B108 amp for $40, and a 2M9SSB for
 $40 (plus the gas and tolls to pick it up).  The light duty rotor  was
 already up but it was about $80 new.  The 9913 copy coax was $38.  For the
 10 meter downlink I already had a dipole up, but that would cost $30 or so
 to build-including coax.  Overall, I got very good prices on this setup, it
 would usually cost more.

All you need now is something that will transmit and receive in all modes
at 70cm.  Maybe an old FT-817, or IC-706Mk2/Mk2G, would be a good
fit for your station.  You're not that far away from working all the SSB/CW
birds, and you seem to have a way of finding all sorts of radios (seeing
your for-sale posts on different lists and forums over the years).  As for
the numbers of operators on VO-52 and the other SSB/CW satellites,
that number is slowly growing.  It may never match the numbers working
FM simply due to the cost and availability of FM gear, but people are
out there working those birds.  Maybe we'll hook up on VO-52 sometime,
or I will get my mode A situation worked out and join you on AO-7 that
way.  :-)

73!




Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-05 Thread Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF
Don't forget the old FT-290, 490 and 690 series from Yaesu and the IC202 and 
70cM versions from Icom.
Great portables of their time.

On 05-Jul-11 17:40, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote:

 All you need now is something that will transmit and receive in all modes
 at 70cm.  Maybe an old FT-817, or IC-706Mk2/Mk2G, would be a good
 fit for your station.  You're not that far away from working all the SSB/CW
 birds, and you seem to have a way of finding all sorts of radios (seeing
 your for-sale posts on different lists and forums over the years).  As for
 the numbers of operators on VO-52 and the other SSB/CW satellites,
 that number is slowly growing.  It may never match the numbers working
 FM simply due to the cost and availability of FM gear, but people are
 out there working those birds.  Maybe we'll hook up on VO-52 sometime,
 or I will get my mode A situation worked out and join you on AO-7 that
 way.  :-)

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-04 Thread Dave Webb KB1PVH
Welcome back!

AO-27, AO-51, SO-50 for now.

Dave - KB1PVH

Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID X
On Jul 4, 2011 3:44 PM, iamsavedbygr...@q.com wrote:
 I have been out of commission for about a year. What FM SATS are in
operation now? Anyone?


 WA7HQD
 Lee Ernstrom
 Syracuse, Utah DN31xb
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Active FM Sats

2011-07-04 Thread i8cvs
- Original Message -
From: iamsavedbygr...@q.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 11:18 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Active FM Sats

 I have been out of commission for about a year. What FM SATS are in
operation now? Anyone?


 WA7HQD
 Lee Ernstrom
 Syracuse, Utah DN31xb

Hi Lee, WA7HQD

Instead to go to a single channel FM satellites actually operating 
AO-27, AO-51, SO-50 please try on the linear transponder satellites
VO-52, FO-29 and OSCAR-7 plenty of room fom many CW and
SSB QSO's at  the same time.

VO-52 has actually the strongest down link signal between 145. 875 to
145.925 MHz using the indian linear transponder continuously operating
24/hours with no limitations due of ecliples.

FO-29 is also working very well in Mode-J and OSCAR-7 in Mode A
and Mode-B  do permit nice QSO's between USA and Europe. 

Why to vaste time with the FM satellites for very small on a single channel
to exchange only call letters and locators at most into a terrific QRM ?

73 de 

i8CVS Domenico

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb