Gents,
Gpredict has simple formula based the tle for the decay date. That is
starting to appear elsewhere for visualization purposes. The negative
altitude is the result of running past where the data is valid.
Charles
On Oct 13, 2011 6:44 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi Tom.
>
> Interesting question.
>
> I wonder if running a prediction program forward from a set of 'todays'
> keps will give a vaild answer for decay date?
>
> Looking at the keps, you have a number for decay rate. I reached the
> conclusion that this could be a major source of inaccuracy as presumably the
> value for decay rate will change as the satellite reduces altitude. It maybe
> the case that decay rate follows a curve which is not replicated by the
> program. Does anyone know if this is correct as it seems unlikely that
> software available to us e.g. Nova / GPredict will include algorithms for
> auto changing decay rate or for including other variables like sunspot
> cycle. I believe these variables are accounted for in more advanced software
> like AGI Satellite tool kit (STK)
>
> Thanks
>
> David G0MRF
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Doyle
> To: amsat-bb
> Sent: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:08
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Tracking program performance post chicken little date.
> (SatPC32 and GPredict)
>
>
> All the hype over the chicken little contest caused me to wonder how
> tracking programs will handle it.
>
> I was looked into the Cal Poly CP6 and HAWKSAT1 satellites. The TLE data
> is
> published on both Amsat and Celestrack lists. SatPC32 shows neither of the
> satellites as moving. An error is generated when trying to select either of
> them. I thought that perhaps they had decayed but had not been removed from
> the TLE lists.
>
> GPredict continues to track Az-El for CP6 in real time in the text display
> but shows the elevation and altitude as negative and the up/down direction
> as D (decayed) - it does not display CP6 on the map. I am assuming that CP6
> has decayed. The elevation for CP6 goes up and down and the tracking value
> change over time. Since the elevation is always negative perhaps GPredict
> is
> tracking what would have happened if the earth was just a tiny point of
> mass
> and the satellite is able to continue its downward descent. HAWKSAT1 shows
> up as above ground and running in GPredict.
>
> Since ARISSAT1 is probably going to decay fairly quickly I took a look at
> predicting ahead using the great Preview tracking in SatPC32 to see how
> decay is handled. After a couple of really bad years the coverage map for
> ARISSAT1 looks better than ever starting just two years from now in 2014.
> Unfortunately I could not figure out how to get GPredict to predict more
> than 14 days in the future and did not want to fool around changing the
> system clock.
>
> I have wondered what the NORAD routines would do after decay and how
> tracking programs that use the NORAD model would deal with it. Does the
> NORAD model continue to track as if the earth was just a very small very
> heavy point in space. A transparent 3D earth display would be very
> interesting to use to view the post chicken little results - someone must
> have one. Anyone know for sure ? HAWKSAT1 is still a bit of a mystery.
>
> 73 W9KE tom ...
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
