[amsat-bb] Re: transponder

2012-10-17 Thread i8cvs
Hi Paolo, PU2PHK

I suggest you to contact William PE1RAH at pe1...@yahoo.com

73 de

i8CVS Domenico

- Original Message -
From: Paulinho - PU2PHK pu2...@gmail.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] transponder


 Hello
 I'm doing some experiments and I wonder if anyone has some scheme of a
 Linear Transponder VHF - UHF to provide me.
 Now appreciate any help.
 Thanks.
 Paulo PU2PHK
 Brasil

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: transponder

2012-10-17 Thread Jari Koivurinne
 Hello
 I'm doing some experiments and I wonder if anyone has some scheme of a
 Linear Transponder VHF - UHF to provide me.
 Now appreciate any help.
 Thanks.
 Paulo PU2PHK
 Brasil



Hello!

This is one ready to fly analog transponder:
http://www.qsl.net/pe1rah/LE002.htm

-jari oh3uw




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: transponder

2012-10-17 Thread Mike Rupprecht
At the AMSAT-DL meeting in Bochum last weekend William presented a U/V
lineartransponder for 1U cubesats (weight only 30 gramms)

73 Mike
DK3WN

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] Im
Auftrag von Jari Koivurinne
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2012 10:26
An: Paulinho - PU2PHK
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Betreff: [amsat-bb] Re: transponder

 Hello
 I'm doing some experiments and I wonder if anyone has some scheme of a 
 Linear Transponder VHF - UHF to provide me.
 Now appreciate any help.
 Thanks.
 Paulo PU2PHK
 Brasil



Hello!

This is one ready to fly analog transponder:
http://www.qsl.net/pe1rah/LE002.htm

-jari oh3uw




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Transponder 1412Z

2011-08-07 Thread Glenn AA5PK
I wish I'd heard you calling, Ray.
Still trying to make my first contact through ARISSat,  The QSB is a killer.
73
Glenn AA5PK

- Original Message - 
From: rsoi...@aol.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:25 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Transponder 1412Z


I heard myself calling CQ for about 2 minutes, peaking 569, but  no takers 
 that I could hear.  Then, about 2 minutes later, I heard  AA5PK calling CQ, 
 about the same strength, but I could no longer hear  myself.
 
 It's a challenge!
 
 73 Ray W2RS
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Transponder 1412Z

2011-08-07 Thread Rsoifer
Hi Glenn,
 
I haven't made a QSO yet either.  The biggest problem, I think, is the  
satellite's tumbling, which results in frequent obstruction of the little 
uplink  antenna by the main body of the spacecraft.  On this pass, when I   
could 
see the uplink antenna, you couldn't, and vice versa.  The  rapid  Doppler, 
due to the low altitude, doesn't help either.
 
I'll try again tomorrow morning.
 
73 Ray
 
 
In a message dated 8/7/2011 2:42:54 P.M. GMT Standard Time,  
aa...@suddenlink.net writes:

I wish  I'd heard you calling, Ray.
Still trying to make my first contact through  ARISSat,  The QSB is a 
killer.
73
Glenn AA5PK

- Original  Message - 
From: rsoi...@aol.com
To:  amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:25  AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Transponder 1412Z


I heard myself  calling CQ for about 2 minutes, peaking 569, but  no 
takers 
 that  I could hear.  Then, about 2 minutes later, I heard  AA5PK calling  
CQ, 
 about the same strength, but I could no longer hear   myself.
 
 It's a challenge!
 
 73 Ray  W2RS
 ___
 Sent via  AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an  AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
program!
  Subscription settings:  http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Transponder 1412Z

2011-08-07 Thread K2AK - Jeff
Ray,

I could hear myself extremely well also using about 20 watts. I tried SSB
and CW no takers. I was trying around center of pass band.

Will listen for other next time instead of running my big mouth.

73,
Jeff - K2AK
DM41

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of rsoi...@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 7:26 AM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Transponder 1412Z

I heard myself calling CQ for about 2 minutes, peaking 569, but  no takers
that I could hear.  Then, about 2 minutes later, I heard  AA5PK calling CQ,
about the same strength, but I could no longer hear  myself.
 
It's a challenge!
 
73 Ray W2RS
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Transponder 1412Z

2011-08-07 Thread K5OE

Ray,
I heard you solid, 589, with some QSB, but never faint.  I didn't reply because 
I was going back and forth to 145.825 to see if the packet was operational (it 
was not).  I did not hear the reported QRM from packet bursts over that pass 
(Pacific, SoCal,  Baja).
73,
Jerry, K5OE

 original message -
I heard myself calling CQ for about 2 minutes, peaking 569, but  no takers 
that I could hear.  Then, about 2 minutes later, I heard  AA5PK calling CQ, 
about the same strength, but I could no longer hear  myself.
 
It's a challenge!
 
73 Ray W2RS





___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Transponder

2011-08-06 Thread George Henry
No joy on the 12:00Z pass (48 deg max elev) here...  could hear the CW beacon, 
BPSK, and FM transmissions with deep fades, but otherwise quite well.  No other 
stations heard in the transponder passband, nor could I hear myself on the 
downlink, from 5 to 75 watts uplink using omnis (M2 eggbeater w/preamp on the 
downlink, homebrew turnstile on the uplink).  Next pass here not until 04:30Z.

It doesn't appear that the satellite has any active or passive attitude control 
system.  I have heard that the spin should eventually settle around the same 
axis as the antenna, but is there any reasonable hope that that would happen 
during the satellite's operational lifetime?

George, KA3HSW

 
- Original Message 
 From: rsoi...@aol.com rsoi...@aol.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Sat, August 6, 2011 8:48:21 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Transponder
 
 On the ARISSat-1 pass just ended here (23 degrees max elevation), results  
 were about the same as yesterday.  I heard my CW downlink for about a  
 minute, peaking 559.  Several other CW signals were in there, but  I couldn't 
get 

 their calls due to the deep fades.
 
 Bruce appears to be right that the transponder's performance depends  
 largely on the spacecraft's orientation.
 
 73 Ray W2RS


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Transponder

2011-08-06 Thread Phil Karn
On 8/6/11 8:23 AM, George Henry wrote:

 It doesn't appear that the satellite has any active or passive attitude 
 control 
 system. 

Correct.

 I have heard that the spin should eventually settle around the same
 axis as the antenna, but is there any reasonable hope that that would happen 
 during the satellite's operational lifetime?

Good question. Theory says it will *eventually* happen, but how fast
depends on the mechanisms to dissipate mechanical energy in the
spacecraft. Because the frame and the modules inside are so rigid, I
think the flexible 2m antenna will probably do most of the work.

One way to follow this is to measure the satellite's spin period very
accurately over time. Assuming no external torque (e.g., atmospheric
drag, which will eventually become significant) then the spacecraft must
conserve its original angular momentum. But as it dissipates excess
energy and converts to a spin around the preferred axis (i.e., shifts
its angular momentum to the body axis with the greatest moment of
inertia), the spin rate will decrease.

E.g., if the moment of inertia around the axis of initial spin is, say,
1, and the moment of inertia around the preferred (antenna) axis is 3,
then after it settles down the spin rate will be 1/3 of its original value.

So if we can follow the spin rate over time we can predict how long
it'll take to reach a stable spin around the antenna axis. That does
require knowledge of the moments and products of inertia, which I assume
were measured before launch.

73, Phil
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb