[android-developers] Re: Gogle: fix the effing Lunar Lander example, unless it's an example of crappy programming.
heh heh On Oct 17, 6:56 am, orlandroid orlandro...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot believe this crap!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Gogle: fix the effing Lunar Lander example, unless it's an example of crappy programming.
sorry - I meant say are you frustrated? On Oct 17, 6:56 am, orlandroid orlandro...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot believe this crap!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Gogle: fix the effing Lunar Lander example, unless it's an example of crappy programming.
Don't think they can remove it as it is part of the Android Compatibility Definition Document that ODMs have to go through. http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/source.android.com/en/us/compatibility/android-2.2-cdd.pdf See section 4. At least if you implement OpenGL ES 2.0 you need to have Replica Island working. On Oct 24, 8:22 pm, Indicator Veritatis mej1...@yahoo.com wrote: Almost true; but even if it were true, that is not good enough. Sample code does not have to be finalize, robust, professional code, but since it IS the example the company is holding out as a good example of how to code something, it really should not be as bad as Lunar Lander is. That is, there are certain things you can leave to the implementer of the professional version, and there are certain things that even the author of the sample code must get right: Lunar lander did not get the latter right. They really should either fix it or remove it -- it really is that bad! On Oct 22, 1:00 am, Doug beafd...@gmail.com wrote: I would have to say it contains no more errors per line of code than the subject of your message. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Gogle: fix the effing Lunar Lander example, unless it's an example of crappy programming.
Almost true; but even if it were true, that is not good enough. Sample code does not have to be finalize, robust, professional code, but since it IS the example the company is holding out as a good example of how to code something, it really should not be as bad as Lunar Lander is. That is, there are certain things you can leave to the implementer of the professional version, and there are certain things that even the author of the sample code must get right: Lunar lander did not get the latter right. They really should either fix it or remove it -- it really is that bad! On Oct 22, 1:00 am, Doug beafd...@gmail.com wrote: I would have to say it contains no more errors per line of code than the subject of your message. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Gogle: fix the effing Lunar Lander example, unless it's an example of crappy programming.
I would have to say it contains no more errors per line of code than the subject of your message. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
