[Angstrom-devel] GTK issues
I'm trying to build VLC manually on my Z, but it fails looking for gtk2. I have gtk+-2.0 installed, and have had the same issue with other apps, if I am remembering correctly (Linphone, I believe). Is Angstrom's GTK+ messed up somehow? Any help would be appreciated. Potentially relevant info: Zaurus SL-C3100 Angstrom 2007.12 Kernel 2.6.23 Standard libs from the feeds ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] [ADMIN] bug tracker moved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer schreef: | Dear folks, | | due to some unforseeable events, our bug tracker had to move. Unfortunately we | don't have full control over the openembedded.org DNS space (which we are | trying to fix), so we can't switch this right now. In the meantime, please | use bugs.openembedded.net as the bugtracker hostname. | | Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks to our Bugzilla admin Greg for taking | care about the issue! Thanks, I locally changed my sepukku.bbclass parameters so the angstrom autobuilders can function again. They were spewing out nasty bitbake errors because of an (seemingly) unreachable bugzilla. regards, Koen - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] will go go away in december 2007, please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHoNUHMkyGM64RGpERArlqAKCM9CFH8XtJEOXmNeS+oW+85PnWDACgkfYB WXC/71iqwWDkj7MxDMtSsqc= =rfHS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] Tracking proposed changes to linux-handhelds-2.6 kernel (PocketPCs)
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:40:53 +0100
Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
> | Hello,
> |
> | I've finally opened a ticket to track changes for the next upgrade
> of | linux-handhelds-2.6. If you have an idea what to enable, or made
> such a | proposal before, please add a comment to that bug.
>
> How did you manage to do that? The bugtracker has been down for a few
> days now, and nothing is mentioned on openembedded.org or the oe
> mailinglists about the problem or a solution
Heh. Or is it a joke? ;-) I find funny things happen to
bugtracker. It didn't work for me for few weeks, several days ago I
posted to oe-dev about that, with zero response. I wanted to contact
Greg of treke.net directly, just when I hit a
http://bugs.openembedded.net URL somewhere, and that works for me.
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
>
>
> |
> | Specific requests ("enable option CONFIG_XXX because it allows Y")
> are | preferred to vague ("make support for my card").
> |
> | http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3724
[]
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] [oe] Tracking proposed changes to linux-handhelds-2.6 kernel (PocketPCs)
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:40 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Paul Sokolovsky schreef: > | Hello, > | > | I've finally opened a ticket to track changes for the next upgrade of > | linux-handhelds-2.6. If you have an idea what to enable, or made such a > | proposal before, please add a comment to that bug. > > How did you manage to do that? The bugtracker has been down for a few > days now, and nothing is mentioned on openembedded.org or the oe > mailinglists about the problem or a solution The machine the bugzilla was hosted on lost its hosting at really short notice. Its moved to a temporary server which is available as bugs.openembedded.net, the DNS for .org should be in the process of getting fixed. Cheers, Richard ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] [ADMIN] bug tracker moved
Dear folks, due to some unforseeable events, our bug tracker had to move. Unfortunately we don't have full control over the openembedded.org DNS space (which we are trying to fix), so we can't switch this right now. In the meantime, please use bugs.openembedded.net as the bugtracker hostname. Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks to our Bugzilla admin Greg for taking care about the issue! Cheers, -- Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | IT-Freelancer | http://www.vanille-media.de ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] Tracking proposed changes to linux-handhelds-2.6 kernel (PocketPCs)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| Hello,
|
| I've finally opened a ticket to track changes for the next upgrade of
| linux-handhelds-2.6. If you have an idea what to enable, or made such a
| proposal before, please add a comment to that bug.
How did you manage to do that? The bugtracker has been down for a few
days now, and nothing is mentioned on openembedded.org or the oe
mailinglists about the problem or a solution
regards,
Koen
|
| Specific requests ("enable option CONFIG_XXX because it allows Y") are
| preferred to vague ("make support for my card").
|
| http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3724
|
|
| I also would like to ask developers/testers/users of specific devices
| to look thru
|
http://bugs.openembedded.net/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1585&hide_resolved=1
| and see if some issues are resolved now and can be closed, or some
| additional info can be provided for them.
|
| P.S. There're lots to re-review for other devices, too:
|
http://bugs.openembedded.net/showdependencytree.cgi?id=3488&hide_resolved=1
|
| P.P.S. Don't forget that all the bugs mentioned here are release bugs,
| i.e. track status of what's available for end users with 2007.12 distro
| (release images + current feeds), so if some issue is resolved, say,
| in .dev, but not available for end users, it should not be closed, but
| instead RFC should be submitted for merging the fix to the stable
| branch.
|
|
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will go go away in december 2007, please
use [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFHoKiVMkyGM64RGpERApiqAKCAquWgO99603Asn3RB6nNsjmAp+gCbBCfq
5+LCu25cx3xXUAQG+94zVdI=
=EYdK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] add kernel-module-loop to roofs for collie and tosa
Dnia Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Junqian Gordon Xu napisał: > On 01/30/2008 05:23 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > Dnia Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Junqian Gordon Xu napisał: > >> altboot-console-image needs loopback file support either in the > >> kernel or as kernel module. > > > > It is not 'altboot-console-image' which needs it but altboot. > > You are right, but practically it's not nice to have users to go find > kernel-module-loop before they can install roofs as a loopback image at > SD/CF. For tosa, the typical case is to install altboot-console-image > first then use altboot to install another image. Users does not have to go and find it. OE will take care of it and installing altboot into image will also adds kernel-module-loop package. Thats how dependencies works. > >> I would propose the following change [both dev and stable] to pack > >> kernel-module-loop into the default rootfs for collie and tosa; and > >> bump PR for task-base. > > > > As altboot needs it then it has to be added as RRECOMMENDS to altboot > > recipe rather. > > The point is to have it available with altboot at the very beginning. > Although it's not techinically RDEPENDS, should we set it as RDEPENDS > to altboot recipe? RRECOMMENDS is proper for kernel modules as it does not break if package is not available (which is a case when loop is in kernel not module). -- JID: hrw-jabber.org OpenEmbedded developer/consultant It is your destiny. -- Darth Vader ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] add kernel-module-loop to roofs for collie and tosa
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb: > Although it's not techinically RDEPENDS, should we set it as RDEPENDS to > altboot recipe? I agree with Marcin and Thomas that this is a problem that altboot should fix and not the machine config. I propose RRECOMMENDS for altboot which will give the intended behaviour. ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] Tracking proposed changes to linux-handhelds-2.6 kernel (PocketPCs)
Hello,
I've finally opened a ticket to track changes for the next upgrade of
linux-handhelds-2.6. If you have an idea what to enable, or made such a
proposal before, please add a comment to that bug.
Specific requests ("enable option CONFIG_XXX because it allows Y") are
preferred to vague ("make support for my card").
http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3724
I also would like to ask developers/testers/users of specific devices
to look thru
http://bugs.openembedded.net/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1585&hide_resolved=1
and see if some issues are resolved now and can be closed, or some
additional info can be provided for them.
P.S. There're lots to re-review for other devices, too:
http://bugs.openembedded.net/showdependencytree.cgi?id=3488&hide_resolved=1
P.P.S. Don't forget that all the bugs mentioned here are release bugs,
i.e. track status of what's available for end users with 2007.12 distro
(release images + current feeds), so if some issue is resolved, say,
in .dev, but not available for end users, it should not be closed, but
instead RFC should be submitted for merging the fix to the stable
branch.
--
Best regards,
Paul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] add kernel-module-loop to roofs for collie and tosa
On 01/30/2008 05:23 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Junqian Gordon Xu napisał: >> altboot-console-image needs loopback file support either in the kernel >> or as kernel module. > > It is not 'altboot-console-image' which needs it but altboot. You are right, but practically it's not nice to have users to go find kernel-module-loop before they can install roofs as a loopback image at SD/CF. For tosa, the typical case is to install altboot-console-image first then use altboot to install another image. >> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m were set for both collie and tosa. Other Z deviced >> has loopback file support built into the kernel. > > Probably not for long as kernel size increase with each version ;( We can set it as module for all devices, sooner or later. >> I would propose the following change [both dev and stable] to pack >> kernel-module-loop into the default rootfs for collie and tosa; and >> bump PR for task-base. > > As altboot needs it then it has to be added as RRECOMMENDS to altboot > recipe rather. The point is to have it available with altboot at the very beginning. Although it's not techinically RDEPENDS, should we set it as RDEPENDS to altboot recipe? Regards Gordon ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] [review] glibc fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
glibc 2.5, 2.6.1:
* check for updated resolv.conf before a nameserver call (see debian bug
#272265)
* remove bogus executable attribute for patch
* clean up ugly mixing of tabs and spaces
Author: mickeyl at openembedded.org
Branch: org.openembedded.dev
Revision: 013b42d9a596e92a85b2c13b49e8ce89c99c1b14
ViewMTN:
http://monotone.openembedded.org/revision/info/013b42d9a596e92a85b2c13b49e8ce89c99c1b14
Files:
1
packages/glibc/files/glibc-2.5-local-dynamic-resolvconf.patch
packages/glibc/glibc_2.5.bb
packages/glibc/glibc_2.6.1.bb
packages/glibc/files/glibc-2.5-soft-fp-separate-strong-alias.patch
mtn:execute
Diffs:
#
# mt diff -r567d05bbd75df7441d86ea1fe729b0ac87293846
- -r013b42d9a596e92a85b2c13b49e8ce89c99c1b14
#
#
#
# add_file "packages/glibc/files/glibc-2.5-local-dynamic-resolvconf.patch"
# content [632962b32cab961fcf4965eb86bd960f0213]
#
# patch "packages/glibc/glibc_2.5.bb"
# from [e6741570d998564cd9d8b305974d4969b497]
#to [53e27da951911e905482cc1827cbd661372ca6bd]
#
# patch "packages/glibc/glibc_2.6.1.bb"
# from [1753994ceec7d4c54e81239f486d92052e46c752]
#to [1f216ad18c9a31af1594aec05b31fa975613897c]
#
# clear "packages/glibc/files/glibc-2.5-soft-fp-separate-strong-alias.patch"
# attr "mtn:execute"
#
- --- packages/glibc/files/glibc-2.5-local-dynamic-resolvconf.patch
632962b32cab961fcf4965eb86bd960f0213
+++ packages/glibc/files/glibc-2.5-local-dynamic-resolvconf.patch
632962b32cab961fcf4965eb86bd960f0213
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+--- glibc-2.5.orig/debian/patches/any/local-dynamic-resolvconf.diff
glibc-2.5/debian/patches/any/local-dynamic-resolvconf.diff
+@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
++# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
++# DP: Description: allow dynamic long-running processes to
++# DP: re-read a dynamically updated resolv.conf on the fly
++# DP: Dpatch author: Adam Conrad
++# DP: Patch author: Thorsten Kukuk
++# DP: Upstream status: Ubuntu-Specific
++# DP: Date: 2006-01-13 08:14:21 UTC
++
++Index: resolv/res_libc.c
++===
++--- resolv/res_libc.c.orig
+ resolv/res_libc.c
++@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
++ #include
++ #include
++ #include
++-
+++#include
++
++ /* The following bit is copied from res_data.c (where it is #ifdef'ed
++out) since res_init() should go into libc.so but the rest of that
++@@ -94,8 +94,17 @@
++ int
++ __res_maybe_init (res_state resp, int preinit)
++ {
++- if (resp->options & RES_INIT) {
++- if (__res_initstamp != resp->_u._ext.initstamp) {
+++ static time_t last_mtime;
+++ struct stat statbuf;
+++ int ret;
+++
+++
+++ if (resp->options & RES_INIT) {
+++ ret = stat (_PATH_RESCONF, &statbuf);
+++ if (__res_initstamp != resp->_u._ext.initstamp
+++ || (ret == 0) && (last_mtime != statbuf.st_mtime))
+++ {
+++ last_mtime = statbuf.st_mtime;
++ if (resp->nscount > 0) {
++ __res_iclose (resp, true);
++ return __res_vinit (resp, 1);
- --- packages/glibc/glibc_2.5.bb e6741570d998564cd9d8b305974d4969b497
+++ packages/glibc/glibc_2.5.bb 53e27da951911e905482cc1827cbd661372ca6bd
@@ -1,17 +1,15 @@ require glibc.inc
~ require glibc.inc
+PR = "r9"
~ ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm"
~ PACKAGES_DYNAMIC = "libc6*"
~ RPROVIDES_${PN}-dev = "libc6-dev"
- -PR = "r8"
- -
~ # the -isystem in bitbake.conf screws up glibc do_stage
~ BUILD_CPPFLAGS = "-I${STAGING_INCDIR_NATIVE}"
~ TARGET_CPPFLAGS = "-I${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}${layout_includedir}"
- -
~ FILESDIR = "[EMAIL PROTECTED](bb.data.getVar('FILE',d,1))}/glibc-2.4"
~ GLIBC_ADDONS ?= "ports,nptl,libidn"
@@ -36,57 +34,52 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = "linux-libc-headers
~ RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = "linux-libc-headers-dev"
- -# file://noinfo.patch;patch=1
- -# file://ldconfig.patch;patch=1;pnum=0
- -# file://arm-machine-gmon.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \
- -# \
- -# file://arm-ioperm.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \
- -# file://ldd.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \
- -SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/glibc/glibc-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
- -ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/glibc/glibc-ports-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
- -ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/glibc/glibc-libidn-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
- - file://arm-memcpy.patch;patch=1 \
- - file://arm-longlong.patch;patch=1 \
- - file://fhs-linux-paths.patch;patch=1 \
- - file://dl-cache-libcmp.patch;patch=1 \
- - file://ldsocache-varrun.patch;patch=1 \
- - file://nptl-crosscompile.patch;patch=1 \
- -file://glibc-check_pf.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \
- -# file://glibc-2.4-compile.patch;patch=1 \
- -# file://glibc-2.4-openat-3.patch;patch=1 \
- -# file://fixup-aeabi-syscalls.patch;patch=1 \
- -
Re: [Angstrom-devel] update opie 1.2.4-pre SRCDATE
On 01/29/2008 04:45 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> conf/distro/include/preferred-opie-versions-1.2.4-pre.inc >> >> -OPIE_SRCDATE ?= "20070727" >> +OPIE_SRCDATE ?= "20080127" > > Ack. committed revision 15394705606b406c4ed24bfaa8ef220a20321b5b Regards Gordon ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] add kernel-module-loop to roofs for collie and tosa
Dnia Wednesday, 30 of January 2008, Junqian Gordon Xu napisał: > altboot-console-image needs loopback file support either in the kernel > or as kernel module. It is not 'altboot-console-image' which needs it but altboot. > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m were set for both collie and tosa. Other Z deviced > has loopback file support built into the kernel. Probably not for long as kernel size increase with each version ;( > I would propose the following change [both dev and stable] to pack > kernel-module-loop into the default rootfs for collie and tosa; and > bump PR for task-base. As altboot needs it then it has to be added as RRECOMMENDS to altboot recipe rather. -- JID: hrw-jabber.org OpenEmbedded developer/consultant We're here to give you a computer, not a religion. -- Bob Pariseau, at the introduction of the Amiga ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] [RFC] add kernel-module-loop to roofs for collie and tosa
altboot-console-image needs loopback file support either in the kernel or as kernel module. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m were set for both collie and tosa. Other Z deviced has loopback file support built into the kernel. I would propose the following change [both dev and stable] to pack kernel-module-loop into the default rootfs for collie and tosa; and bump PR for task-base. --- conf/machine/collie.confc23a85835bc13ac978f36742cfc8ccf5880e0ec8 +++ conf/machine/collie.conf062e7d70c35cf3f4db0e10e8b9f254fd47e39952 @@ -14,5 +14,7 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "jffs2 tar.gz" IMAGE_LINGUAS = "" IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "jffs2 tar.gz" +MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "kernel-module-loop" + ROOT_FLASH_SIZE = "14" # actually 14680064, see EXTRA_IMAGECMD above --- conf/machine/tosa.conf bdda7deb7ee9f2d950ee255097efcdfa1cf7a39a +++ conf/machine/tosa.conf 94e6eda28ba66d57c2ef49c6c11c78bf0c311349 @@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "jffs2" IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "jffs2" # wlan-ng Modules -MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "wlan-ng-modules-usb" +MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "wlan-ng-modules-usb kernel-module-loop" ROOT_FLASH_SIZE = "28" Regards Gordon ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] update opie 1.2.4-pre SRCDATE
> That's my experience, too. It's as stable as 1.2.3, which is expected as > there is no big changes. I haven't tested the bluez and PIM, which are > supposed to be improved in 1.2.4. I haven't tested PIM, but bluetooth isn't up. Also IRDA seems to be not working, but I' don't know if it's because of my own kernel. Michal Poplawski ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
