Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems
On Friday, October 3, 2014, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few > I want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom > config just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those > systems and is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm > struggling with is coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it > with a few people in person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the > following 2 options remain: > > 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT) > 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota) Iota is what I like. Its in same line as measurement unit. I view it as iot answer is angstrom > > What are your thoughts on all this? > > thanks, > > Koen > ___ > Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list > Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel > ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems
On 10/03/2014 02:33 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I > want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom config > just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those systems and > is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm struggling with is > coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it with a few people in > person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the following 2 options remain: > > 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT) > 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota) > > What are your thoughts on all this? Why doesn't the current config work? Philip > > thanks, > > Koen > ___ > Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list > Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel > > ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] [meta-angstrom][daisy][PATCH] gcc-crosssdk: keep the same provider for all gcc packages
addresses nativesdk-gcc-runtime failing in do_configure
checking dynamic linker characteristics... configure: error: Link tests are not
allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
caused by a mismatch between gcc providers.
Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher
---
conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf
b/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf
index 2268826..5524db0 100644
--- a/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf
+++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_nativesdk-linux-libc-headers=
"${LINUX_LIBC_HEADERS_VERSIO
#use Linaro tools for ARM
ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_arm ?= "linaro-4.8%"
+ANGSTROM_NATIVE_GCC_VERSION_arm ?= "linaro-4.8%"
ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_aarch64 ?= "linaro-4.8%"
#ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION_arm ?= "linaro-2.24%"
ANGSTROM_GDB_VERSION_arm ?= "linaro-7.6%"
--
1.8.4.5
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] [meta-angstrom][daisy][PATCH] gcc-crosssdk: keep the same provider for all gcc packages
Hi When building meta-toolchain, nativesdk-gcc-runtime fails in do_configure as described by Crt Gorup here: http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-toolchain/2014-August/004516.html I found that nativesdk-gcc-runtime is build from the Linaro sources, but it's configure uses tools built from the vanilla gnu gcc sources. e.g. the relevant config.log shows the use of ld from a 4.8.2 path, (vanilla gnu gcc from oe-core) sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/gcc/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/4.8.2/ld: cannot find crtbegin.o: No such file or directory sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/libexec/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/gcc/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/4.8.2/ld: cannot find -lgcc while the libs exist but are located in a 4.8.3 path (linaro-4.8 from meta-linaro) find sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-angstromsdk-linux* -name crtbegin.o sysroots/x86_64-nativesdk-angstromsdk-linux/usr/local/oecore-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/usr/lib/x86_64-angstromsdk-linux/4.8.3/crtbegin.o Using "linaro-4.8%" for all gcc providers fixes the issue. (as does using "4.8%") Max Krummenacher (1): gcc-crosssdk: keep the same provider for all gcc packages conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) -- 1.8.4.5 ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:33:04AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I > want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom config > just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those systems and > is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm struggling with is > coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it with a few people in > person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the following 2 options remain: > > 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT) This is the winner, anything that puts the Angstrom bit last is a loser! Graeme > 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota) > > What are your thoughts on all this? > > thanks, > > Koen > ___ > Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list > Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems
Hi, I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom config just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those systems and is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm struggling with is coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it with a few people in person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the following 2 options remain: 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT) 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota) What are your thoughts on all this? thanks, Koen ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
