Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Trevor Woerner
On 10/03/14 05:33, Koen Kooi wrote:
> 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)

In keeping with the measurement theme (as Khem has already pointed out)
I like this one better too (fwiw).

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Koen Kooi

Op 4 okt. 2014, om 10:00 heeft Khem Raj  het volgende 
geschreven:

> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Koen Kooi  wrote:
>> The current config has too many DISTRO_FEATURES, the biggest one being 
>> 'x11'. I'd love to keep systemd as init, but we might need something smaller 
>> as well.
> 
> how about uselessd :)
> http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/

I've looked at it, but udev rules and journal are very good to have and 
uselessd kicked those to the curb :(
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Koen Kooi  wrote:
> The current config has too many DISTRO_FEATURES, the biggest one being 'x11'. 
> I'd love to keep systemd as init, but we might need something smaller as well.

how about uselessd :)
http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] [meta-angstrom][daisy][PATCH] gcc-crosssdk: keep the same provider for all gcc packages

2014-10-04 Thread Koen Kooi
THanks, applied!

Op 3 okt. 2014, om 15:40 heeft Max Krummenacher  het 
volgende geschreven:

> addresses nativesdk-gcc-runtime failing in do_configure
> checking dynamic linker characteristics... configure: error: Link tests are 
> not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
> caused by a mismatch between gcc providers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher 
> ---
> conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf 
> b/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf
> index 2268826..5524db0 100644
> --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf
> +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-v2014.06.conf
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_nativesdk-linux-libc-headers= 
> "${LINUX_LIBC_HEADERS_VERSIO
> 
> #use Linaro tools for ARM
> ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_arm ?= "linaro-4.8%"
> +ANGSTROM_NATIVE_GCC_VERSION_arm  ?= "linaro-4.8%"
> ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_aarch64 ?= "linaro-4.8%"
> #ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION_arm   ?= "linaro-2.24%"
> ANGSTROM_GDB_VERSION_arm ?= "linaro-7.6%"
> -- 
> 1.8.4.5
> 
> 
> ___
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
> 


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Koen Kooi

Op 3 okt. 2014, om 18:27 heeft Philip Balister  het 
volgende geschreven:

> On 10/03/2014 02:33 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I 
>> want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom 
>> config just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those 
>> systems and is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm 
>> struggling with is coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it 
>> with a few people in person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the 
>> following 2 options remain:
>> 
>> 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT)
>> 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)
>> 
>> What are your thoughts on all this?
> 
> Why doesn't the current config work?

The current config has too many DISTRO_FEATURES, the biggest one being 'x11'. 
I'd love to keep systemd as init, but we might need something smaller as well.

regards,

Koen

> 
> Philip
> 
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> Koen
>> ___
>> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
>> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
>> 
>> 
> 
> ___
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
> 


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel