Re: [Angstrom-devel] Making angstrom-core the default in the setup scripts

2011-07-27 Thread Philip Balister

On 07/26/2011 12:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:

Paul Menzel wrote:


I am still having some concerns I raised in reply to Khem?s message [2]
but I am pasting them here again.


Will reply to your original message on OE-dev.


If someone can point me at a coherent set of instructions for building 
Angstrom with OE core, I can start to put in some spare cycles.


Philip

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Making angstrom-core the default in the setup scripts

2011-07-27 Thread Koen Kooi

Op 27 jul. 2011, om 19:24 heeft Philip Balister het volgende geschreven:

 On 07/26/2011 12:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
 Paul Menzel wrote:
 
 I am still having some concerns I raised in reply to Khem?s message [2]
 but I am pasting them here again.
 
 Will reply to your original message on OE-dev.
 
 If someone can point me at a coherent set of instructions for building 
 Angstrom with OE core, I can start to put in some spare cycles.

As mentioned before: 
http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/meta-angstrom/tree/README
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Making angstrom-core the default in the setup scripts

2011-07-27 Thread Philip Balister

On 07/27/2011 01:31 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:


Op 27 jul. 2011, om 19:24 heeft Philip Balister het volgende geschreven:


On 07/26/2011 12:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:

Paul Menzel wrote:


I am still having some concerns I raised in reply to Khem?s message [2]
but I am pasting them here again.


Will reply to your original message on OE-dev.


If someone can point me at a coherent set of instructions for building Angstrom 
with OE core, I can start to put in some spare cycles.


As mentioned before: 
http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/meta-angstrom/tree/README


OK for now  ...

But how about a wikipedia article? I hear that is your new favorite 
source for information.


(I am poking fun at Koen)

Philip

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Making angstrom-core the default in the setup scripts

2011-07-26 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Koen,


Am Freitag, den 15.07.2011, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:

 What do you think of making the oe-core branch[1] the default in the
 setup scripts? The basic needs are there and I'm using it for for all
 the new work I'm doing. It is missing a lot of recipes, but if people
 can name the ones that are missing we can port them over to meta-oe
 and/or meta-angstrom.

unfortunately I have not had time yet to try it out. I am still having
some concerns I raised in reply to Khem’s message [2] but I am pasting
them here again.

1. Compared to former oe.dev activity looking at meta-oe there are only
a handful of people doing contributions and a lot of recipes are
missing. I have the feeling that a lot of developers where left out in
the process of creating the new infrastructure and I do not know if they
just develop their private branches based on oe.dev or if they use
meta-oe and I have not noticed this.

2. Looking at the weekly changelogs sent to the lists I see a lot of
duplicated commits in each layer. Why is that needed? Is not that a
design problem of the layers?

3. I find the `recipe-*section*/` directories difficult to handle to
finding a recipe. Before I would use `recipe/` and then tab completion
and now I have to search for it. Are others uncomfortable with this?

4. What images are available in/for oe-core/meta-openembedded? I liked
for example `minimal{,-uclibc}`? `find . -name minimal*` in `oe-core` or
`meta-oe` did not give any result. Not to mention the images for
BeagleBoard or `micro-image` for the recently sent patches for payload
creation for coreboot.


Thanks,

Paul


 [1] 
 http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/setup-scripts/log/?h=oe-core
[2] 
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-July/033963.html


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Making angstrom-core the default in the setup scripts

2011-07-17 Thread Maksym Parkachov
Hi,

I wanted to make sure, that when you switch default to oe-core, the
current scripts will be moved to some maintenance branch or
something like that, and they still will be making checkout from
2011.03 oe branch. Is this the plan ?

Thanks,
Maksym

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
 Hi,

 What do you think of making the oe-core branch[1] the default in the setup 
 scripts? The basic needs are there and I'm using it for for all the new work 
 I'm doing. It is missing a lot of recipes, but if people can name the ones 
 that are missing we can port them over to meta-oe and/or meta-angstrom.

 regards,

 Koen

 [1] 
 http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/setup-scripts/log/?h=oe-core
 ___
 Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
 Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Making angstrom-core the default in the setup scripts

2011-07-15 Thread Philip Balister

On 07/15/2011 12:21 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:

Hi,

What do you think of making the oe-core branch[1] the default in the setup 
scripts? The basic needs are there and I'm using it for for all the new work 
I'm doing. It is missing a lot of recipes, but if people can name the ones that 
are missing we can port them over to meta-oe and/or meta-angstrom.


We should wait on making it the default, but we should start making sure 
people now how to try oe-core.


I'm not sure we are ready for a bunch of new people building oe-core yet.

Philip

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel