Re: [Angstrom-devel] Testers needed for setup script

2010-03-29 Thread Matt Soffen (Angstrom)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 24-03-10 17:29, Matt Soffen (Angstrom) wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Internally at TI we have various scripts to make setting up an angstrom
>>> buildtree easier and I adapted the shell one (I don't do perl, sorry
>>> Niclas :)) and put it in gitorious:
>>>
>>> http://gitorious.org/angstrom/angstrom-setup-scripts
>>>
>>> It started life as a wrapper for bitbake (which I dislike), so some of
>>> its usage is clunky for people use to OE already. The end goal is to
>>> support both the wrapper usage as well as the non-wrapper usage.
>>>
>>> As opposed to http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom
>>> this will build the .dev branch (which has no bitbake included), hence
>>> the extra logic to install bitbake as well. Adding support for OE
>>> branches (e.g. stable/2009) and overlays is planned, but don't let that
>>> stop you from implementing that yourself and send patches :)
>>>
>>> Please have a look and give it a try, I'm keen on getting it working
>>> really well before adding to the angstrom build instructions.
>>>
>>> If you have patches you can send them to this list or use gitorious to
>>> make a merge request.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Koen
>>
>> Good Afternoon All,
>>
>> I've tried this on my Fedora 12 machine.   I'm trying to build things
>> for
>> my Zaurus (Poodle).
>>
>> When I attempt to do the ./oebb.sh bitbake world,  I'm getting a couple
>> of
>> errors.  I'm not sure if they are related to the script (which I doubt)
>> or
>> with the dev tree/fedora tool chain.
>>
>> This is what was displayed:
>>
>> Executing: bitbake world
>
> 'bitbake world' is not something we want to support in angstrom. Try
> something simpler, like 'console-image' :)
>

Thanks.  I've tried it but there was other isues.  I had '.' in my path
and that failed.  I also had an older bitbake installed.  Once I removed
the '.' and bitbake things moved along.

However, I got to a specific point and its failing now.

build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/kexec-tools-klibc-static-2.0.1-r4/kexec-t
ools-2.0.1/configure: line 5880: syntax error: unexpected end of file

I've been trying to explicitly build this file but things aren't quite right.

No matter what I've tried, I still get this failure.

Does anyone have an idea about how to fix this issue ?

Thanks  !

Matt




-
This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
   "Webmail for nuts!"
http://squirrelmail.org/


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Testers needed for setup script

2010-03-24 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 24-03-10 17:29, Matt Soffen (Angstrom) wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Internally at TI we have various scripts to make setting up an angstrom
>> buildtree easier and I adapted the shell one (I don't do perl, sorry
>> Niclas :)) and put it in gitorious:
>>
>> http://gitorious.org/angstrom/angstrom-setup-scripts
>>
>> It started life as a wrapper for bitbake (which I dislike), so some of
>> its usage is clunky for people use to OE already. The end goal is to
>> support both the wrapper usage as well as the non-wrapper usage.
>>
>> As opposed to http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom
>> this will build the .dev branch (which has no bitbake included), hence
>> the extra logic to install bitbake as well. Adding support for OE
>> branches (e.g. stable/2009) and overlays is planned, but don't let that
>> stop you from implementing that yourself and send patches :)
>>
>> Please have a look and give it a try, I'm keen on getting it working
>> really well before adding to the angstrom build instructions.
>>
>> If you have patches you can send them to this list or use gitorious to
>> make a merge request.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Koen
> 
> Good Afternoon All,
> 
> I've tried this on my Fedora 12 machine.   I'm trying to build things for
> my Zaurus (Poodle).
> 
> When I attempt to do the ./oebb.sh bitbake world,  I'm getting a couple of
> errors.  I'm not sure if they are related to the script (which I doubt) or
> with the dev tree/fedora tool chain.
> 
> This is what was displayed:
> 
> Executing: bitbake world

'bitbake world' is not something we want to support in angstrom. Try
something simpler, like 'console-image' :)

regards,

Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLqk3JMkyGM64RGpERAvc1AKCwD5jqtVusdWK60z+i8I0J3r63ygCgigfd
2hr8nuTY4y1eBVq7c+OsHRY=
=x+tg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Testers needed for setup script

2010-03-24 Thread Matt Soffen (Angstrom)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Internally at TI we have various scripts to make setting up an angstrom
> buildtree easier and I adapted the shell one (I don't do perl, sorry
> Niclas :)) and put it in gitorious:
>
> http://gitorious.org/angstrom/angstrom-setup-scripts
>
> It started life as a wrapper for bitbake (which I dislike), so some of
> its usage is clunky for people use to OE already. The end goal is to
> support both the wrapper usage as well as the non-wrapper usage.
>
> As opposed to http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom
> this will build the .dev branch (which has no bitbake included), hence
> the extra logic to install bitbake as well. Adding support for OE
> branches (e.g. stable/2009) and overlays is planned, but don't let that
> stop you from implementing that yourself and send patches :)
>
> Please have a look and give it a try, I'm keen on getting it working
> really well before adding to the angstrom build instructions.
>
> If you have patches you can send them to this list or use gitorious to
> make a merge request.
>
> regards,
>
> Koen

Good Afternoon All,

I've tried this on my Fedora 12 machine.   I'm trying to build things for
my Zaurus (Poodle).

When I attempt to do the ./oebb.sh bitbake world,  I'm getting a couple of
errors.  I'm not sure if they are related to the script (which I doubt) or
with the dev tree/fedora tool chain.

This is what was displayed:

Executing: bitbake world
NOTE: Handling BitBake files: \ (8092/8092) [100 %]
NOTE: Parsing finished. 7415 cached, 355 parsed, 322 skipped, 0 masked.
NOTE: preferred version 1.2.4 of opie-securityplugin-dummy not available
(for item opie-securityplugin-dummy)
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
ERROR: Required build target 'libchamplain-gtk' has no buildable providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['libchamplain-gtk',
'libchamplain', 'clutter-cairo', 'clutter']

I've installed libchamplain-devel and clutter-devel but I'm still getting
the same error (only thing changed is that changed was the Parsing
finished line:

NOTE: Parsing finished. 7461 cached, 309 parsed, 322 skipped, 0 masked.

Does anyone have any idea how to resolve the "Missing"  problem for this ?

Thanks !

Matt


-
This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
   "Webmail for nuts!"
http://squirrelmail.org/


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel