Re: [Angstrom-devel] What version of the OE metadata are the feeds built from?

2010-12-07 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07-12-10 15:37, Philip Balister wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to point people at a relatively sane checkout of
> the OE dev for people using a product based on Angstrom 2010.

short version:

cat /etc/angstrom-version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFM/lOpMkyGM64RGpERAkguAKC5ddUrgyqiEI9iRMgRqbbF+L3OPwCgu7cP
ny9Y1/rm06uju6/4yc3hbK8=
=8HZD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] What version of the OE metadata are the feeds built from?

2010-12-07 Thread Gary Thomas

On 12/07/2010 08:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07-12-10 15:37, Philip Balister wrote:

I'm looking for a way to point people at a relatively sane checkout of
the OE dev for people using a product based on Angstrom 2010.


short version:

cat /etc/angstrom-version


Does this tell you the OE branch & revision?  Those are the
most important data, not just a generic 'angstrom-2010'

--

Gary Thomas |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates  |Embedded world


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] What version of the OE metadata are the feeds built from?

2010-12-07 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07-12-10 16:39, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 12/07/2010 08:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07-12-10 15:37, Philip Balister wrote:
>>> I'm looking for a way to point people at a relatively sane checkout of
>>> the OE dev for people using a product based on Angstrom 2010.
>>
>> short version:
>>
>> cat /etc/angstrom-version
> 
> Does this tell you the OE branch & revision?  Those are the
> most important data, not just a generic 'angstrom-2010'

Why don't you just try and find out?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFM/lzwMkyGM64RGpERAjaWAKCFC2sHKFlufOBekygkqD8QOcuMzwCfZelc
WhWBQFMXj+nS8oa4vJQVRJE=
=j4J+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] What version of the OE metadata are the feeds built from?

2010-12-07 Thread Philip Balister

On 12/07/2010 11:12 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07-12-10 16:39, Gary Thomas wrote:

On 12/07/2010 08:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07-12-10 15:37, Philip Balister wrote:

I'm looking for a way to point people at a relatively sane checkout of
the OE dev for people using a product based on Angstrom 2010.


short version:

cat /etc/angstrom-version


Does this tell you the OE branch&  revision?  Those are the
most important data, not just a generic 'angstrom-2010'


Why don't you just try and find out?


The problem with the short version is you need a working and up to date 
installation ...


Philip

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] What version of the OE metadata are the feeds built from?

2010-12-07 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07-12-10 17:15, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 12/07/2010 11:12 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07-12-10 16:39, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> On 12/07/2010 08:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 07-12-10 15:37, Philip Balister wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to point people at a relatively sane checkout of
> the OE dev for people using a product based on Angstrom 2010.

 short version:

 cat /etc/angstrom-version
>>>
>>> Does this tell you the OE branch&  revision?  Those are the
>>> most important data, not just a generic 'angstrom-2010'
>>
>> Why don't you just try and find out?
> 
> The problem with the short version is you need a working and up to date
> installation ...

And narcissus is too hard to use for that how?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFM/nCDMkyGM64RGpERArm+AKCqdBj152/Pmn62ALwRi91gkIs+7QCgriL1
Dk4//8Vvl1oOyKPJoSGCmjs=
=6dBU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel