Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla

2019-03-18 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette


In message <6f358385-b1c7-0805-47f0-50e926cbe...@tana.it>, you wrote:

>On Sat 16/Mar/2019 21:15:22 +0100 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> First, I am inclined to wonder aloud why anyone is even still peering
>> with any of the several ASNs mentioned in the report.  To me, the mere
>> fact that any of these ASNs still have connectivity represents a clear
>> and self-evident failure of "self policing" in and among the networks
>> that comprise the Internet.
>
>
>RIRs cannot themselves enact block lists such as Spamhaus DROP.  However, those
>ASNs could well make their way to such lists.  Why don't they?

I only wish that I knew.


Regards,
rfg



Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla

2019-03-18 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Sat 16/Mar/2019 21:15:22 +0100 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:

> First, I am inclined to wonder aloud why anyone is even still peering
> with any of the several ASNs mentioned in the report.  To me, the mere
> fact that any of these ASNs still have connectivity represents a clear
> and self-evident failure of "self policing" in and among the networks
> that comprise the Internet.


RIRs cannot themselves enact block lists such as Spamhaus DROP.  However, those
ASNs could well make their way to such lists.  Why don't they?


Best
Ale
--