Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Hi, On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:44:45PM -0400, John Levine wrote: > If you care about rDNS, you need to find a better ISP that meets your > needs. Then tell the old one why you left. That seems to be a problem in Italy these days - few ISPs offer IPv6 at all, so finding one that does IPv6 *and* rDNS seems hard. (In Germany, there's competition on the ISP market, but I'm not sure there are many that actually delegegate out /48s - and I'm not sure how many of those that do provide reverse DNS actually permit customers to put in records of their choice, and not just auto-generated PTRs) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
It appears that Alessandro Vesely said: >On Sat 06/Apr/2024 19:54:27 +0200 Randy Bush wrote: > Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number > assignment? Because your ISP can't be bothered. >>> Is such unbotherability legitimate? >RIPE could at least reproach those LIRs that have an inet6num but no rDNS >delegation to it. RIPE does what its members want it to do. If they don't care about rDNS, so be it. If you care about rDNS, you need to find a better ISP that meets your needs. Then tell the old one why you left. R's, John -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
On 7.04.2024 15:42, Alessandro Vesely wrote: BTW, how should one search DB objects like 2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa? I can search it in the DNS but not in https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query -T domain -d I believe you can also use the more/less specific flags with that query but I didn't try. -- Best regards, Semisol -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
On Sat 06/Apr/2024 19:54:27 +0200 Randy Bush wrote: Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number assignment? Because your ISP can't be bothered. Is such unbotherability legitimate? these years, it is one of the things when considering a provider from which one gets address space. part of the problem is that this used not to be the case. "rdns is not really useful" was the common thought. so many isps did not pay it much attention. now, more and more services are using rdns mapping to defend against crapola. so it has become useful, and quite needed in some cases. but it is notalways easy to justify to management the costs of cleaning it up, often involving your provider, sometimes your provider's provider, and on up the chain. RIPE could at least reproach those LIRs that have an inet6num but no rDNS delegation to it. BTW, how should one search DB objects like 2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa? I can search it in the DNS but not in https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query Best Ale -- -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
